Indonesi
an
Journa
l
of El
ect
ri
cal Engineer
ing
an
d
Comp
ut
er
Scie
nce
Vo
l.
9
, No
.
2
,
Febr
ua
ry
201
8
,
pp.
43
1
~
437
IS
S
N:
25
02
-
4752
,
DOI: 10
.11
591/
ijeecs
.
v9.i
2
.
pp
4
31
-
4
37
431
Journ
al h
om
e
page
:
http:
//
ia
es
core.c
om/j
ourn
als/i
ndex.
ph
p/ij
eecs
Usab
ilit
y
Ana
ly
sis
o
f Busi
ness
Int
ellig
ence
Tool
Ba
sed Tabl
e
Virtua
li
z
a
tio
n
Suh
arj
it
o
,
Mu
ha
mm
ad Z
ia ul Haq
Master
in
Com
pute
r
Sc
ie
nc
e, Binus
Gradua
te Pr
ogra
m
,
Bin
a
Nus
ant
ar
a
Univ
ersity
,
Jaka
rta,
Indon
esia
Art
ic
le
In
f
o
ABSTR
A
CT
Art
ic
le
history:
Re
cei
ved
J
un
9
, 201
6
Re
vised
N
ov
2
0
, 2
01
6
Accepte
d
Dec
11
, 201
6
The
use
of
Busi
ness
Inte
ll
ig
ence
for
Sm
al
l
-
Mid
Ent
erp
r
ise
(SM
E)
no
longe
r
impeded
b
y
the
size
of
th
e
r
e
source
s
req
uir
e
d.
Th
e
stud
y
in
thi
s
pap
er
provide
s
an
ov
er
vie
w
of
how
th
e
use
of
proposed
software
ca
n
b
e
used
as
an
eff
ective
and
ef
fic
i
ent
alter
n
at
iv
e
soluti
on
in
buil
ding
BI
Tool
s
combined
with
ta
ble
vir
tu
al
i
za
t
ion
uti
liza
t
ion
in
S
QL.
To
know
the
le
vel
of
usabil
ity
and
suita
bi
li
t
y
o
f
the
dev
el
oped
BI
Tool
,
th
e
rese
arc
her
conduc
t
e
d
eva
lu
at
io
n
and
anal
y
z
at
ion
using
2
(two)
to
ols
(Heuri
stic
s
E
val
ua
ti
on
and
UM
UX
-
Li
te
)
.
The
result
foun
d
the
compari
son
bet
wee
n
th
e
output
(Business
Inte
lli
gen
c
e
Tool
)
produc
ed
b
y
PH
P
Report
Make
r
has
a
b
et
t
er
l
eve
l
of
usabil
i
t
y
an
d
suita
bilit
y
tha
n
i
ts
competi
tors.
Although
both
are
in
a
dec
en
t
m
edi
an,
th
e
output
nee
ds
pre
fer
en
ce
s
an
d
customiza
ti
o
ns
to
ac
hie
ve
m
axi
m
u
m
func
ti
on
al
i
t
y
l
ik
e
wel
l
-
known ot
her
dev
e
lopment
software
Ke
yw
or
d
s
:
Adh
oc qu
e
ry
Business
intel
li
gen
ce
Perceive
d usa
bi
li
t
y
Table
virtu
al
iz
at
ion
Copyright
©
201
8
Instit
ut
e
o
f Ad
vanc
ed
Engi
n
ee
r
ing
and
S
cienc
e
.
Al
l
rights re
serv
ed
.
Corres
pond
in
g
Aut
h
or
:
Suhar
j
it
o
,
Ma
ste
r
in C
ompu
te
r
Scie
nce, B
inu
s
Grad
uat
e Pro
gr
am
, Bina Nusa
ntara
U
niv
e
rsity
Jakar
ta
,
In
done
sia
Em
a
il
:
su
harjit
o@bin
us
.e
du
1.
INTROD
U
CTION
The
Util
iz
at
ion
of
BI
has
be
en
ag
reed
tha
t
it
increases
the
pro
duct
ivit
y
of
an
orga
ni
zat
ion
from
var
i
ou
s
si
des
[1
]
.
The
prob
le
m
is
that
the
reso
urc
es
need
e
d
f
or
proc
ur
em
ent,
dev
el
op
m
en
t
and
i
m
ple
m
entat
io
n
in
a
norm
at
i
ve
co
ntext
are
qu
it
e
sig
nifica
nt.
For
exam
ple,
in
ph
ysi
cal
proc
ur
em
ent
a
nd
Data
War
e
hous
e
im
plem
entat
ion
proces
s,
these
ki
nd
s
of
proces
s
are
re
qu
i
red
in
B
I
de
velo
pm
ent
[2
]
,
[
3].
In
fact,
this
was
di
ff
ic
ult
to
reali
ze
by
so
m
e
or
ga
ni
zat
ion
s/c
om
pan
ie
s
pr
im
aril
y
at
the
sm
al
l
-
m
i
d
le
vel
c
om
pan
y.
A
n
al
te
rn
at
ive
so
l
ution
offer
e
d
by
m
any
cl
ou
d
-
base
d
BI
To
ol
dev
el
op
e
rs
is
the
nex
t
ch
oice.
The
pres
ence
of
pro
du
ct
s
t
ha
t
offer
the
e
ff
e
ct
iveness
an
d
eff
ic
ie
ncy
of
BI
de
velo
pme
nt
pr
ocess
is
sti
ll
diff
ic
ult
to
be
i
m
ple
m
ented
entirel
y for se
ve
ral reas
ons.
Ba
sed
on
the
ab
ov
e
ideas
,
w
rite
r
pr
opose
d
al
te
r
native
so
l
ution
s
of
de
velo
pm
ent
of
BI
to
ol,
especial
ly
fo
r
a
sm
a
ll
-
m
id
lev
e
l
orga
nizat
io
n.
T
his
s
olu
ti
on
is
to
us
e
an
a
pp
li
cat
io
n
w
hi
ch
is
relat
ively
cheap
and
easy
to
use
.
The
m
et
ho
d
of
ap
plica
ti
on
sel
ect
ed
in
t
his
stu
dy
was
t
he
n
c
om
bin
ed
with
the
util
iz
at
ion
of
data
ta
ble
virt
ua
li
zat
ion
.
Disc
us
sio
n
on
t
his
stud
y
is
dir
ect
ed
t
o
a
ns
w
er
t
he
pro
blem
of
how
t
he
de
velop
m
ent
of
B
I
T
oo
l
is
done
an
d
how
f
ar
the
pe
rfor
m
ance
of
t
he
re
s
ults
(
ou
t
pu
t)
is
rev
ie
wed
ba
se
d
on
us
e
r
per
c
eption
on as
pects of
usa
bili
ty
.
The
st
ud
y
wa
s
co
nducted
on
one
c
om
pany
at
S
m
al
l
-
Mid
E
nter
pr
ise
(
SME)
le
vel
t
o
ob
t
ai
n
an
i
m
po
rtant in
dicat
or
that can
be
us
e
d
as p
a
ra
m
et
ers
in b
uild
ing
an
a
da
ptive
BI To
ol for
re
la
te
d
com
pan
ie
s.
The
ob
ta
ine
d
i
nd
ic
at
or
s
a
re
inte
nded
as
m
at
eria
ls
to
de
fine
use
r
an
d
syst
e
m
requirem
ents
that
are
t
he
n
int
egr
at
e
d
into the
sta
nd
a
rd
s a
nd proc
ed
ur
es
for devel
opin
g
the BI
To
ol.
De
velo
pm
e
nt is i
m
ple
m
ented
an
d
lim
it
ed
to the
su
m
m
ary
and
detai
l
repo
rt
of
t
he
c
om
pan
y'
s
CR
M
database
with
out
goin
g
th
r
ough
t
he
physi
cal
data
war
e
hous
e
pro
cess.
The
res
ul
ts
of
dev
el
oped
BI
To
ol
then
discu
ssed
,
evaluate
d
and
analy
zed
to
ob
ta
i
n
con
cl
us
io
ns
i
n t
his stu
dy.
Evaluation Warning : The document was created with Spire.PDF for Python.
IS
S
N
:
2502
-
4752
Ind
on
esi
a
n
J
E
le
c Eng &
Co
m
p
Sci,
Vol
.
9
,
No.
2
,
Fe
br
uary
201
8
:
4
3
1
–
4
3
7
432
2.
LIT
ERATUR
E & REL
ATED W
ORK
2.1. Ad
Ho
c
Q
uery as
BI To
ols
Si
m
on
(
1997)
cat
egorizes
BI
To
ols
int
o
4
(four)
f
or
m
s,
nam
el
y
Ba
sic
Re
portin
g
to
ols,
On
li
ne
An
al
yt
ic
al
Pr
oc
essing,
Data M
ining,
an
d
E
xecu
ti
ve
I
nform
at
ion
Syst
e
m
.
Thes
e
to
ols
pro
vid
e
i
nfor
m
at
ion
th
a
t
fo
c
us
es
on
e
xecu
ti
ve
-
le
vel
-
insig
ht
(inform
at
ion
pr
ese
nt
ed
for
exec
ut
ive
need
s
)
wh
ic
h
operate
d
with
das
hboards
and
oth
e
r
f
orm
s o
f display
[4].
The
relat
ed
te
rm
s;
ad
-
hoc
query
[5
]
a
nd
analy
sis
too
l
a
re
a
naly
ti
cal
t
oo
ls
inclu
de
d
in
BI
To
ols
desig
ne
d
to
e
nab
le
us
e
rs
t
o
fin
d
wh
at
-
i
f
bu
si
ness
i
nfor
m
at
ion
with
ou
t
te
c
hnic
al
assist
ance
f
r
om
IT
orga
nizat
ion
s
[
6].
T
oo
ls
li
ke
t
his
ar
e
us
ually
in
the
f
or
m
of
a
vie
w
with
na
vig
at
io
n
t
hat
al
lows
us
e
rs
to
s
el
ect
the
d
at
a
releva
nt
to
the
c
ondi
ti
on
of
the
des
ired
bu
si
ness
r
eport.
T
his
BI
too
l
is
al
so
refe
rr
e
d
to
as
Bu
sines
s
In
te
ll
igence
F
r
on
t
-
en
d [7
]
.
2.2.
Data and T
abl
e v
ir
tuali
z
at
ion
as
SQL
Vie
w
BI
To
ols
us
e
s
data
as
m
at
eri
al
to
be
dis
pla
ye
d
in
the
f
or
m
of
inf
or
m
at
i
on.
S
he
rm
an
[
5]
cal
ls
ou
t
form
s
of
data
that
co
uld
be
source
s
of
repor
ts
an
d
a
naly
sis
are;
O
LAP
data
base
s,
m
assivel
y
par
al
le
l
processi
ng
(M
PP)
database
s,
data
virt
ualiz
at
ion
,
In
-
data
ba
se
analy
ti
cs,
In
-
m
e
m
or
y
analy
ti
cs,
cl
ou
d
-
ba
sed
BI
and
N
oSQL
da
ta
bases.
For
s
our
ces
proces
s
ing
,
J
ohnson
r
ejects
the
noti
on
that
physi
cal
Data
War
e
house
is
the
on
ly
ente
rprise
so
luti
on
in
this
issue
[8
]
.
Virtuali
zat
ion
i
s
on
e
of
al
te
r
na
ti
ve
so
luti
on.
It
furthe
r
ex
plained
that t
he Virtual
D
at
a
War
e
house
is ide
ntica
l t
o
the
f
e
der
at
e
d m
od
el
i
m
ple
m
entat
ion
proce
s
s.
Stren
gth
e
ning
the
opinio
n
ab
ov
e
,
in
acco
r
da
nce
with
the
w
hite
pap
e
r
rele
ased
by
Pe
ntah
o
sta
te
s
that
My
SQ
L
(Mari
aDB)
has
co
nvincin
g
evi
dence
that
it
can
be
us
e
d
direct
ly
fo
r
da
ta
an
al
ysi
s
(BI)
pri
m
aril
y
thr
ough
the
View
functi
on
(Vi
rtual
Table)
w
hich
featu
res
in
My
SQ
L
ve
rs
ion
5
[
9].
Th
us,
My
SQ
L
with
view
functi
on
can
be
us
e
d
f
or
B
I
To
ols
data
s
ource
beca
us
e
it
adm
i
ts
as
data
virtu
al
iz
at
ion
a
nd
bec
om
es
one
form
of
V
D
W
im
ple
m
entat
ion
[
10
]
.
Data
virt
ualiz
at
ion
us
i
ng
vie
w
on
My
SQ
L/M
ar
ia
DB
al
so
becom
es
a
te
chnolo
gy
so
l
ution
for
sm
all
and
m
ediu
m
-
siz
ed
enter
pr
is
e
(S
MEs)
,
a
so
luti
on
to
be
ne
fit
in
an
ente
rprise
con
te
xt [1
1].
2.3.
BI Too
ls
D
e
ve
lopmen
t
b
y P
RM
PH
P
Re
po
rt
Ma
ker
(
PRM
)
is
a
so
ftwa
re
that
can
produce
P
HP
-
base
d
W
e
b
Scripts
to
displ
ay
rep
or
ts
from
var
io
us
da
ta
base
s
ource
s
su
c
h
as
Ma
ri
aDB,
Po
st
gr
e
S
QL,
Mi
cro
s
oft
Access,
Mi
crosof
t
SQL
Se
r
ve
r
a
nd
Or
acl
e
data
bas
e.
It
is
a
cl
ass
of
s
of
t
war
e
tha
t
is
ver
y
easy
t
o
us
e b
ut h
as
ri
ch
featu
res
that
can
be
eq
uiva
le
nt
to
so
ft
war
e
that
i
s
widely
know
n
by
BI
T
ool
de
velo
per
s
.
S
om
e
par
ti
es
have
us
ed
it
as;
da
sh
boa
rd
de
velo
pm
ent
to
m
on
it
or
ac
adem
ic
info
rm
at
ion
at
the
unive
rsity
[12],
buil
d
s
upport
syst
e
m
s
with
fu
zzy
m
et
ho
ds
[
13
]
.
Re
porting
i
nv
e
ntory
too
ls
[
14
]
.
Wh
il
e
Script
case
is
a
so
ftw
are
that
sp
eci
fi
cal
ly
has
the
sam
e
fu
nctio
n
as
PRM
in buil
ding B
I To
ols as pr
omoted
on it
s
offici
al
p
ort
al
.
3.
METHO
DOL
OGY
3.1.
Dev
el
op
me
nt
Framew
or
k
To
facil
it
at
e
t
he
un
der
sta
nd
i
ng
a
nd
the
fl
ow
of
a
naly
sis
in
this
pa
pe
r,
we
dr
a
w
th
e
order
of
fr
am
ewo
r
k
as
foll
ows:
Figure
1.
Fr
am
ewor
k
Ra
ti
on
a
l
iz
ed
the B
I
T
ool
De
velo
pm
ent
with S
QL
V
ie
w usin
g
PRM
Evaluation Warning : The document was created with Spire.PDF for Python.
Ind
on
esi
a
n
J
E
le
c Eng &
Co
m
p
Sci
IS
S
N:
25
02
-
4752
Usabili
ty
Anal
ysi
s o
f B
us
ine
s
s Intel
li
gen
ce
Tool B
as
ed
T
able
Virt
uali
za
ti
on
(
Suharji
to
)
433
The
pictu
re
a
bove
sho
ws
th
e
desi
gn
co
nc
ept
of
B
I
T
oo
l
that
will
be
bu
il
t
a
nd
anal
yz
ed
in
this
researc
h.
T
his
fr
am
ewo
r
k
al
so
ex
plains
the
m
et
ho
dolo
gica
l
ste
ps
in
the
stud
y.
T
o
obta
in
data
fo
r
a
naly
sis,
the
stud
y
was
c
onduct
ed
in
se
ver
al
sta
ges
.
Starti
ng
f
r
o
m
the
init
ia
l
da
ta
colle
ct
ion
sta
ge,
the
desi
gn
a
nd
dev
el
op
m
ent
s
ta
ge,
the
pu
blica
ti
on
sta
ge
a
nd
e
nd
i
ng
with
acce
ss
by
t
he
us
er
.
T
he
data
ob
ta
ine
d
t
hro
ugh
the
process
of
BI
To
ol
dev
el
op
m
ent,
the
res
ul
ts
of
ge
ner
at
e
d
outp
ut
com
par
es
with
t
he
resu
lt
s
de
rive
d
from
com
petit
or
s
ou
tpu
t.
T
he
resea
rch
e
r
use
s
Sc
riptcase
[15]
as
com
par
ison
software
i
n
this
s
tud
y.
In
t
he
la
s
t,
the
su
r
vey a
nd pos
t
-
te
st wil
l be
he
ld to o
btain
use
r perce
ptio
n d
at
a o
ve
r
B
I
T
ool i
nter
face
ge
ner
at
e
d.
3.2.
Usabil
ity
Anal
ys
is
The
BI
To
ol
perform
ance
con
ce
r
ning
the
us
e
of
c
onf
orm
i
ty
with
use
r
re
quirem
ents
an
d
use
r
-
us
a
bili
ty
aspects
will
be
te
ste
d
ba
sed
on
the
2
(t
wo)
I
SO
/
IE
C
25010
qual
it
y
sta
nd
a
rd,
bot
h
are
Functi
on
al
and
Usab
il
it
y [16]
The
resea
rc
her
con
cl
ud
es
t
ha
t
ta
k
ing
tw
o
qu
al
it
y
sta
nd
a
r
ds
has
represe
nted
re
quire
d
aspects
of
per
cei
ved
a
naly
sis
fo
r
the
in
it
ia
l
dev
el
opm
ent
of
an
a
pp
l
ic
at
ion
.
Acc
ordin
g
to
[17]
it
on
ly
ta
kes
usa
bili
ty
var
ia
bles
to
know
the
qu
al
it
y
and
pe
rfo
rm
ance
of
softw
are
that
is
te
m
po
rar
il
y
devel
op
e
d
base
d
on
us
e
r
exp
e
rience
. T
o m
easur
e both,
the r
e
quired
m
easur
i
ng to
ols t
hat h
a
ve bee
n
t
est
ed
as
f
ollows:
An
al
ysi
s
base
d
on
Dev
el
op
e
r
Evaluati
on/R
es
earche
r,
pe
rform
ed
by
heurist
ic
s
evaluati
on/
rev
ie
w
m
et
ho
d
to
eval
uate
the
us
a
bili
ty
of
an
app
'
s
dis
play
by
an
e
xpert
purs
ua
nt
to
r
ule
s
or
poli
ci
es
enacte
d
[18],
with
the foll
owin
g
f
or
m
ula:
Pr
oble
m
sFo
un
d (
i
)=
N(1
-
(1
-
l
)
i
)
[19
]
A
cal
culat
io
n
patte
rn
desi
gned
by
Da
vid
T
rav
is
was
us
e
d
to
s
umm
arize
the
sc
or
es
the
analy
sis
[
20
]
to
assist
the r
e
sea
rch
e
r
in
co
m
pleti
ng
the
calc
ul
at
ion
s
of this e
valuati
on.
An
al
ysi
s
based
User
Expe
rie
nce
data,
perform
ed
us
in
g
Us
ab
il
it
y
Met
ric
for
U
ser
Ex
pe
rie
nce
(
UM
U
X
)
Lit
e.
UMU
X
-
Lit
e
is
a
to
ol
pro
vid
e
d
to
m
easur
e
us
e
r
per
ce
ptio
ns
ab
ou
t
the
use
fu
l
ne
ss
of
an
app
li
cat
io
n/sof
tware
base
d
on
us
e
r
exp
e
rie
nce
acco
rd
i
ng
to
two
ra
w
va
riables.
T
he
form
ula
app
li
es
to
UMU
X
-
Lit
e as
foll
ow
:
UMU
XLITE=
0.65(it
em
1+it
e
m
2
-
2)
(10
0/12)
+22.9 [
21]
4.
RESU
LT
A
N
D ANALY
SIS
4.1. Req
uire
m
ents
The
fo
ll
owi
ng
ta
ble
is
the
sta
nd
a
r
d
descr
i
ption
use
d
f
or
synch
r
on
iz
at
io
n
requirem
ent
w
hich
is
the
n
init
ia
li
zed w
it
h t
he
c
od
e
for e
asy
subseque
nt
classi
ficat
ion
:
Table
1.
T
he
Devel
oped
BI T
oo
l R
e
quirem
e
nts Cla
ssific
at
ion ba
sed
I
S
O 2
5010
ISO S
ta
n
d
a
rds
Co
d
e
Requ
iremen
ts
Usab
ility
US0
1
Users
can
recog
n
ize that th
e BI
T
o
o
l
u
sed
is r
eally
pu
rpo
sed
f
o
r
th
eir
wo
rk n
eeds
.
US0
2
Can
be lear
n
ed
,
e
a
sy
to
us
e
US0
3
Protect ag
ain
st u
sa
g
e er
rors
US0
4
Aesth
etic and
acc
e
ss
ib
le interf
ace
Fu
n
ctio
n
al
Su
itab
ility
FS0
1
Exis
tin
g
f
u
n
cti
o
n
al
ity
inclu
d
es
u
ser
-
d
ef
in
ed
task
s an
d
g
o
als
FS0
2
The f
u
n
ctio
n
ality
presen
ted
pro
v
id
es co
rr
ect
resu
lts with
the so
lid
ou
tp
u
t pr
ecisio
n
level
FS0
3
Exis
tin
g
f
u
n
cti
o
n
al
ity
f
acilitates
cer
t
ai
n
work
to b
e do
n
e by
th
e us
er.
The
cl
assifi
cat
ion
ta
ble
ab
ove
us
e
d
as
th
e
basis
for
th
e
pr
ep
arati
on
of
the
use
r
a
nd
syst
e
m
requirem
ents
listi
ng
.
B
oth
requirem
ents
act
as
the
guideli
ne
s
in
the
dev
el
op
m
ent
proces
s.
Als
o,
resu
lt
ing
li
s
t
of p
a
ram
et
ers
us
e
d
f
or the
ana
ly
sis. Th
e
det
ai
le
d
us
e
r
a
nd
syst
e
m
r
equ
ire
m
ents table are
li
ste
d
in att
ach
m
ents.
4.2.
BI D
ata M
od
e
ll
ing (
St
ar
Sc
h
eme)
The
stu
dy
us
e
s
sta
r
schem
e
as
data
m
od
el
li
ng
to
pro
duce
fact
ta
bles.
M
eanwhil
e,
vie
w
(as
virt
ual
ta
ble)
is
a
fact
ta
ble
ob
ta
in
ed
from
the
relation
of
se
ve
ral
dim
ension
ta
bl
es
co
ntained
i
n
the
database
.
Data
m
od
el
ad
apte
d t
o
the
syst
e
m
r
equ
i
rem
ent, a
s
i
m
ple ex
am
ple
can be
desc
rib
ed belo
w:
Evaluation Warning : The document was created with Spire.PDF for Python.
IS
S
N
:
2502
-
4752
Ind
on
esi
a
n
J
E
le
c Eng &
Co
m
p
Sci,
Vol
.
9
,
No.
2
,
Fe
br
uary
201
8
:
4
3
1
–
4
3
7
434
Figure
2. The
Si
m
ple
Exam
ple
How
View
F
or
m
ed
as
Fact
Table
The
fact
ta
ble
in
the
e
xam
ple
fig
ur
e
a
bove
is
co
ns
tr
ucted
f
ro
m
sever
al
dim
ension
al
ta
bl
es
in
vi
ew
form
.
Du
e
to
i
ts
virtu
al
nat
ure,
the
fact
ta
bl
e
that
is
log
ic
al
ly
stored
in
t
he
data
base
w
it
h
the
nam
e
of
the
"viewT
ransac
ti
onSer
vices".
T
hu
s
,
t
he
ta
ble
do
e
s
no
t
disp
la
y
it
s
ph
ysi
cal
f
or
m
.
H
ow
e
ver,
if
it
is
c
om
par
ed
t
o
BI d
at
a m
od
el
l
ing
by in
volvin
g
lo
gic
al
table
then
t
his f
act
table wil
l be
tan
gib
le
as
in Fi
gure
3 f
ollows:
Figure
3.
The
Ph
ysi
cal
BI Da
ta
Mod
el
li
ng
f
or
Fact
Ta
ble
“
viewT
ransaksi
Lay
anan
”
(
Sim
ulate
d
us
in
g
C
us
tom
View
Feat
ure
i
n
PRM
)
Ba
sed
on
our
e
xp
e
rim
ent p
erfor
m
ed
us
in
g
P
RM
'
s cu
sto
m
view
facil
it
y with
the
data m
od
el
as sho
w
n
in
Fig
ur
e
3
f
ou
nd
t
hat
the
dat
a
ou
t
pu
t
is
10
0%
li
ke
the
ta
bl
e
wh
ic
h
pro
du
ced
the
m
od
el
in
the
lo
gical
m
od
el
(F
ig
ur
e
2).
F
urt
her
m
or
e,
the
res
ults
of
t
he
ta
ble
virtu
al
iz
at
ion
c
reated
f
ollow
i
ng
the
r
equ
i
rem
ents
use
d
i
n
PRM
and SC
f
or the
furthe
r p
ro
ces
s
of
t
he
B
I
T
oo
l
de
velo
pm
ent.
Evaluation Warning : The document was created with Spire.PDF for Python.
Ind
on
esi
a
n
J
E
le
c Eng &
Co
m
p
Sci
IS
S
N:
25
02
-
4752
Usabili
ty
Anal
ysi
s o
f B
us
ine
s
s Intel
li
gen
ce
Tool B
as
ed
T
able
Virt
uali
za
ti
on
(
Suharji
to
)
435
4.3.
Process
of BI
Too
l
De
velopm
ent
BI
To
ol
de
vel
op
m
ent
proces
s
us
in
g
PRM
and
SC
is
rel
at
ively
easy
t
o
do.
This
is
because
al
l
act
ivit
ie
s
can
be
done
by
util
iz
ing
t
he
feat
ures
that
are
a
va
il
abl
e
and
a
re
directed
sp
eci
f
ic
al
ly
to
pr
od
uc
e
the
repor
t
disp
la
y
in
the
f
or
m
of
ta
bles
an
d
gra
ph
s
.
T
he
s
umm
ary
of
the
process
ca
n
be
s
een
in
the
com
par
at
ive
process
table a
s foll
ow
s:
Table
2.
T
he
BI T
oo
l
De
velo
pm
ent Process
usi
ng PRM
Co
m
par
ed
to it
s
C
om
petit
or
Proces
s
PRM
SC
San
d
b
o
x
i
n
g
Manu
al
Manu
al
DB Co
n
n
ectio
n
Su
p
p
o
rted 6
Su
p
p
o
rted 9
DB Cu
sto
m
i
zatio
n
View Bu
ild
er
SQL
ed
ito
r
UI
P
referen
ce
Si
m
p
le
Co
m
p
lex
Rep
o
rt
Pag
e Dev
Integ
rated
Stan
d
Alon
e
Ch
art
Pag
e D
ev
Integ
rated
Se
m
i
Integ
rated
Dash
b
o
ard Pag
e
D
ev
Fu
ll I
n
teg
rated
Se
m
i
Integ
rated
Pag
e Blo
ck
1
-
4
Co
lu
m
n
s (
au
to
)
1
Co
lu
m
n
(
m
an
u
al
ly
f
o
r
m
o
re
th
an
1
co
lu
m
n
)
Manu
al cod
in
g
and
add
itio
n
al
lo
g
ic and
f
eatu
res
Third
party
libra
rie
s
ex
ten
sio
n
)
an
d
Fra
m
e
wo
rk (fu
lly
su
p
p
o
rted)
Third
party
libra
ry
Secu
rity
Pag
e
Integ
rated
Stan
d
Alon
e
Menu
and
L
an
g
u
ag
e Pr
ef
erence
Integ
rated
Stan
d
Alon
e
Script Prod
u
ctio
n
Ver
y
f
ast
Ver
y
slo
w
Pu
b
licatio
n
and
r
elease
Si
m
p
le
Lay
e
red P
rocess
The
ta
ble
ab
ov
e
sho
ws
the
s
um
m
ary
of
ov
e
r
al
l
process
of
BI
T
oo
l
de
velo
pm
ents
us
in
g
t
wo
s
of
twa
re
wh
ic
h
propose
d
in
this
stu
dy
(P
RM
a
nd
S
C).
I
n
ge
ner
al
,
both
ha
ve
the
sam
e
pr
ocess
.
H
ow
e
ver,
the
facts
sh
ow
that
the
PRM
process
in
so
m
e
facets
i
s
easi
er
to
do
with
relat
ively
bette
r
res
ults.
Fo
r
e
xam
ple,
i
n
PRM
it
was
found
that
the
integ
rity
of
on
e
proc
ess
and
oth
e
r
processes
was
ver
y
stron
g.
The
integ
rity
of
this
process
al
lows
de
velo
pm
ent
is
r
unning
m
or
e
syst
em
a
ti
call
y.
Wh
ere
syst
em
at
ic
pr
ocess
will
gr
eat
ly
s
uppo
rt
the r
eal
iz
at
ion
of a
good S
DL
C as well
.
4.4.
Out
p
ut PR
M
an
d
S
C
The
res
ult
is
a
co
ll
ect
ion
of
P
HP
scri
pts
and
oth
er
file
s
ge
ne
rated
thr
ough
the
pr
oc
ess
of
gen
e
rati
ng
and
com
pili
ng
.
The
file
ge
ne
rates
seve
ral
web
pa
ges
t
ha
t
hav
e
certai
n
functi
ons
a
nd
featur
e
s
de
scri
bed
as
fo
ll
ows:
Table
3.
T
he
D
escr
ipti
on
of
O
utput
Feat
ures
Gen
e
rated
by
PRM
and SC
Featu
res
PRM
SC
Gen
eral (Su
p
p
o
rt
all r
eq
u
ire
m
en
ts
)
Yes
Yes
Table Featur
es
Su
m
m
a
ry, grid
,
piv
o
t,
d
etail,
Cro
ss
ta
b
an
d
qu
arter
ly
t
ab
le
,
p
o
p
u
p
detail
Su
m
m
a
ry, grid
,
piv
o
t,
cros
stab
,
d
etail.
Ch
art
Featu
res
2
9
Ch
art
m
o
d
els,
Gan
tt Ch
art,
Serial
,
click
ab
le chart
2
0
Ch
art
m
o
d
els,
Gan
tt,
click
ab
le
ch
art,
detailed
ch
ar
t per grid
v
alu
e
Search and
Filte
r
F
eatu
res
Bas
ic,
ex
ten
d
ed
,
ti
m
e
and
date b
ased
,
cu
sto
m
f
ilte
r,
so
rt
,
d
rilldo
wn
Bas
ic,
y
ear
,
d
y
n
a
m
ic
f
ilter
(dr
ag
&
dro
p
),
so
rt
Secu
rity
AUTH
sy
ste
m
an
d
anti x
ss
and
sq
l
in
jectio
n
AUTH
sy
ste
m
An
o
th
er
Pag
e
Dash
b
o
ard, data detail
m
o
d
al pag
e
UI
b
u
ilt in
Bo
o
tstrap
f
ra
m
ew
o
rk, jqu
ery
,
f
lash
chart
jQu
ery, ht
m
l5
,
f
lash
chart
File size
S
m
all
Ver
y
Big
In
ge
ner
al
,
t
he
ou
t
put
has
been
able
to
m
eet
the
needs
of
the
requi
rem
ent
li
ste
d
i
n
this
st
ud
y.
Sp
eci
fical
ly
, s
e
ver
al
featu
res
a
nd for
m
s d
ist
in
gu
is
h betwee
n t
he
res
ults
ob
ta
ined b
oth
a
s
de
scribe
d
in
Ta
ble 3
.
4.5.
Eva
lu
at
i
on
and A
na
l
ys
is
a.
Heuristic
s
Eva
lu
at
i
on
Her
e
is
a
gr
a
ph
sho
wing
the
diff
e
re
nce
an
d
the
dev
ia
ti
on
bet
ween
t
he
scor
e
s
cam
e
by
the
BI
too
l
dev
el
op
e
d usi
ng PRM a
nd Sc
r
iptca
se. T
he
sc
or
es
take
n
f
r
om
d
evelop
e
r
pe
rcep
ti
on
us
in
g he
ur
ist
ic
s ev
al
uation
m
et
ho
d.
Evaluation Warning : The document was created with Spire.PDF for Python.
IS
S
N
:
2502
-
4752
Ind
on
esi
a
n
J
E
le
c Eng &
Co
m
p
Sci,
Vol
.
9
,
No.
2
,
Fe
br
uary
201
8
:
4
3
1
–
4
3
7
436
Figure
4. G
raph
of
Dif
fer
e
nce
Score
B
I
T
oo
l
Buil
t
with
PRM
and
Sc
riptca
se
The
fig
ur
e
s
hows
t
hat
the
PR
M
outp
ut
is
hig
he
r
i
n
m
ajo
rit
y
aspects.
T
he
re
is
five
outp
ut
usa
bili
ty
hav
e
higher
ad
van
ta
ges
com
par
ed
to
SC.
Wh
il
e
SC
on
ly
excels
on
on
e
a
sp
ect
that
is
th
e
aspect
with
code
US
R0
2.
The
e
valuati
o
n
res
ul
ts
al
so
sta
te
that
there
is
a
sim
il
arity
of
us
a
bili
ty
scor
e
in
bo
t
h
outp
uts,
i
.e.
on
aspects
with c
ode
US04SR
.
b.
Percei
ve
d U
sa
bili
ty
anal
ysi
s (
U
M
U
X
-
Li
t
e)
The
m
at
rix
ap
pl
ic
able
to
UMUX
-
Lit
e
is between
22.
9
-
87
.9
w
her
e
the
l
owest
sc
or
e
is
the b
est
re
su
lt
with
a
m
edian
of
55.4.
Ba
se
d
on
t
his
sta
ndar
d
we
can d
esc
r
ibe
the
c
om
par
ison
o
f
outp
ut (
outp
ut)
of
PR
M
and
Scriptcase a
cc
ordin
g
t
o
the
user
per
ce
ptio
n as f
ollows:
Figure
5. Perce
ive
U
sabili
ty
Com
par
ison
to
P
RM
an
d SC
O
utput
ba
sed
on
UX f
ro
m
Users
The
fig
ure
ab
ov
e
e
xp
la
ine
d
that
al
l
us
ers
giv
e
their
per
c
eption
for
outpu
t
(BI
T
ool)
pro
du
ce
d
by
PRM
bette
r
than
outp
ut
by
Scriptcase.
H
ow
ever,
with
the
fact
that
al
l
op
inions
unde
r
the
m
edian,
it
c
an
be
sta
te
d
that
both
of
this
s
oft
w
are
has
bee
n
st
at
ed
to
hav
e
a
good
usa
bili
ty
le
vel
to
be
us
e
d
in
bu
il
ding
the
B
I
To
ol.
I
n
oth
e
r
w
ords,
t
he
re
su
lt
s
of
the
BI
To
ol
both
bu
il
t
us
ing
PRM
an
d
Sc
riptcas
e
ha
ve
m
et
the
us
e
r
us
a
bili
ty
p
erce
ptions a
nd d
es
erv
e
to be
us
e
d f
or
B
I
c
us
tom
er s
e
rv
ic
e
nee
ds i
n
t
his co
m
pan
y.
5.
CONCL
US
I
O
N
Subj
ect
ive
co
nsi
der
at
io
ns
i
nc
lud
in
g
t
he
li
m
it
at
ion
s
of
in
frast
ru
ct
ure
a
nd
res
ources
owned
by
th
e
com
pan
y
becom
e
a
reaso
n
f
or
bu
il
di
ng
al
t
ern
at
ive
BI
T
oo
l
dev
el
op
m
ent
in
this
stu
dy
.
The
de
velo
pm
ent
m
akes
us
e
of
r
el
at
ively
easy
-
to
-
op
e
rate
an
d
afforda
ble
sof
t
war
e
c
om
bin
ed
with
ta
ble
vi
rtuali
zat
ion
for
ETL
util
iz
at
ion
.
T
he
process
is
do
ne
c
om
par
able
with
t
he
use
of
sim
il
ar
so
ft
war
e
f
or
buil
din
g
A
dhoc
Re
port,
a
s
well
as
the
out
pu
t
it
pro
du
ces
.
Th
e
out
pu
t
c
on
sist
in
g
of
s
um
m
ary
and
detai
l
repor
t
in
bo
th
ta
ble
a
nd
gr
aph
ic
form
(cr
os
sta
b
repor
t
an
d
se
rial
char
t)
that
prov
i
de
visu
a
li
zat
ion
of
dat
a
no
t
ye
t
fo
un
d
on
com
pan
y
CR
M
syst
e
m
.
Ba
sed
on
t
he
evaluati
on
a
nd
analy
sis
of
use
r
pe
rce
ptions,
f
ound
that
PRM
ou
t
pu
t
ha
s
a
highe
r
us
a
bili
ty
le
vel
than
Sc
riptcase
.
Also,
al
l
the
us
er
sta
te
that
the
outp
ut
PRM
is
m
or
e
declared
m
or
e
su
it
able
f
or
Evaluation Warning : The document was created with Spire.PDF for Python.
Ind
on
esi
a
n
J
E
le
c Eng &
Co
m
p
Sci
IS
S
N:
25
02
-
4752
Usabili
ty
Anal
ysi
s o
f B
us
ine
s
s Intel
li
gen
ce
Tool B
as
ed
T
able
Virt
uali
za
ti
on
(
Suharji
to
)
437
the
com
pan
y.
Nev
e
rtheless
,
t
he
ou
t
pu
ts
fro
m
bo
th;
PRM
an
d
it
s
com
pe
ti
tors
are
sti
ll
within
a
r
eas
on
a
ble
m
edian
use
d f
or the
BI p
urpos
es of the
SME.
REFERE
NCE
S
[1]
B.
Hee
s
en
,
Effecti
v
e
Strat
egy Improving
P
erformance
w
it
h
Busin
ess
,
Second
Edit
ion,
New
York:
Springer
Heide
lb
er,
2016.
[2]
R.
Kim
bal
l
and
M.
Ross
,
The
Da
ta
Warehouse
Toolki
t
,
se
cond ed
it
ion
The
Compl
et
e
Guide
to
Di
mensional
Mode
ll
ing
,
N
ew Y
ork:
W
il
ley
Co
m
pute
r,
2002
.
[3]
R.
J.
Thiera
uf
,
E
ff
e
ct
i
ve B
usiness
Intelli
g
ence
Sys
te
ms
,
London
:
Quorum
Books,
2001
.
[4]
A.
Sim
on,
Mode
rn E
nte
rpr
ise Bu
siness Int
ellige
n
ce
and
Data
Ma
nageme
nt
,
W
al
t
ham:
New York, 2014.
[5]
R.
Sherm
an
,
Bus
ine
ss
Intelli
g
ence
Guideboo
k from
Data
Integr
ation to Anal
y
tics
,
W
al
tha
m
:
E
lsevier
Inc
.
,
2015.
[6]
J.
R.
R.
G.
Rob
e
rt
Sta
ckowia
k
,
O
racle
Data
Ware
housing
and
Bus
ine
ss
Intelli
g
ence
Solu
ti
ons
,
Indi
ana
pol
is:
W
il
e
y
Publishing,
2006
.
[7]
C.
How
son,
Suc
ce
ss
ful
Busine
ss
Inte
lligen
ce,
Se
c
ret
to
M
ak
ing
BI
a
Ki
ll
er
App
,
N
ew
York:
McGr
aw
-
Hill
,
2008.
[8]
B.
D.
T
.
a
.
Prac
t
ic
e
,
Bi
t
emporal D
ata
Theory
an
d
Practice,
W
a
ltham
:
Morgan
K
auf
m
ann,
2014
.
[9]
Seth
Grim
es,
Al
t
a
Plan
a
Corpor
ation,
"
M
ySQL V
5
Re
ad
y for P
rim
e
Time
Busine
ss
Inte
lligen
ce,
"
Pe
nta
ho,
2006.
[10]
W
.
Abram
owicz,
F
il
t
ering the
W
eb
to
F
ee
d
Da
ta War
ehouse
s
,
Lo
ndon:
Springer
,
2002.
[11]
S.
Schultea
,
C
.
J
ani
esc
hb
,
S.
Ven
ugopal
c
,
I
.
W
eb
erd
and
P.
Ho
enis
cha
,
"
El
ast
ic Bu
siness Proce
ss
Mana
gement
St
a
te
of
the a
r
t and
op
en
ch
al
l
enge
s
fo
r
BP
M i
n
th
e cl
o
ud,
"
Fut
ur
e
Gen
erati
on
Comput
e
r Sy
stems V
olum
e
46,
pp.
36
-
50
,
2015.
[12]
Sulastri
,
Hari
Murti, Yunus Anis, ,
"
P
eranc
angan
Das
hboard Untuk
Me
moni
tor I
n
formas
i
Ak
ademi
k
Mahasiswa Di
Unive
rs
it
as St
ikubank
(
UNISBANK)
Semarang,
"
UN
ISBA
N
K,
S
emara
ng,
2015.
[13]
E.
Pangg
abean,
"S
iste
m
Pendukung
Keputusa
n
Eva
lu
asi
Kine
rja Dosen
Menggu
naka
n
Me
tode Fuzzy
Sim
ple
Additi
ve
W
ei
ght
ing
(Fs
aw),
"
Jur
nal
Mant
ik
Pe
nu
sa,
pp.
1
-
10,
201
6.
[14]
B.
H.
Prakoso,
"Pe
mbuatan
Apl
i
kasi
untu
k
M
eng
el
ola
Pe
rs
edi
aan
Barang
Farmas
i
pada
RumahSaki
t
AB
C
dengan
Fi
tur
Al
ert
dan
Re
porting
,
"
I
TS,
Suraba
y
a
,
2016
.
[15]
Script
c
ase
,
"H
om
e,
" 15
06
2017
.
[Onlin
e]
.
Avai
l
abl
e
:
ht
tp:
/
/www
.
scriptca
se
.
net/.
[16]
ISO
25000,
"IS
O/IEC
25010,
"
1
6
07
2017
.
[Onli
ne]
.
Available:
h
tt
p://iso25000.
co
m
/i
ndex.
php/
en/
i
so
-
25000
-
standa
rds/iso
-
25
010.
[17]
C.
Pribe
anu, "Co
m
m
ent
s on
the
r
el
i
abi
lit
y
and
v
alidity
o
f
UM
UX
and
UM
UX
-
LIT
E
short
sc
ales,"
i
n
Nati
onal
Instit
ute f
or
Re
s
earc
h
and
D
ev
e
l
opment
in
Infor
matic
s
-
ICI
Bu
c
hares
,
Buch
are
st
,
2016
.
[18]
E.
Hvannb
erg
,
G
.
Cock
ton and E.
L.
-
C
.
Law
,
Mat
uring Usabili
t
y: Qualit
y
in
So
ft
w
are,
Int
erac
t
ion and V
alu
e
,
Zuri
ch
:
Springer
,
2008
.
[19]
J.
Niel
sen
,
"H
ow
to
Condu
ct a
H
e
uristi
c
Evaluatio
n,
" 01
01
1990.
[
Online
]
.
Avai
la
b
le
:
htt
p://ec
ho
.
i
at.sfu.c
a
/l
ibr
ar
y
/h
eur
isti
ce
v
al
u
at
ion_
Niel
son.pdf.
[20]
E.
Ga
rcía, A.
G
a
rcí
a
,
L. de
-
Mar
c
os,
S.
Otón
and
J.
-
R.
Hile
r
a, "
Sem
iaut
omatic E
valuation
of
We
bsi
t
es
Us
abil
ity
,
"
in
The
Fif
th
Int
ern
at
ion
al
Conf
ere
n
ce
on
Advanc
es
in
Com
pute
r
-
Hu
m
an
Inte
r
ac
t
ions
,
Alc
alá
d
e
Hen
a
res,
2012
.
[21]
J.
Sauro and J. R
.
L
ewis,
UMU
X
-
LIT
E
Quantif
y
in
g
the Us
er
Ex
p
erie
nc
e: Pract
i
cal
Stat
isti
cs
for Us
er
Re
search
2nd
Edi
ti
on
,
C
ambridge:
Morgan
Ka
uffm
an,
2016.
Evaluation Warning : The document was created with Spire.PDF for Python.