Int
ern
at
i
onal
Journ
al of
P
ower E
le
ctr
on
i
cs a
n
d
Drive
S
ystem
s
(
IJ
PEDS
)
Vo
l.
12
,
No.
1
,
M
a
r 202
1
, p
p.
53
2
~
54
1
IS
S
N:
20
88
-
8694
,
DOI: 10
.11
591/
ij
peds
.
v12.i
1
.
pp53
2
-
54
1
532
Journ
al h
om
e
page
:
http:
//
ij
pe
ds
.i
aescore.c
om
Perform
ance ana
lysis of
30
M
W wind
power
pla
nt
in an
operatio
n mode i
n Nou
akchott, M
aurita
nia
Bamb
a
Heib
a
1
, A
h
med
Med
Yahya
2
,
Mo
h
ammed
Q
as
i
m Tah
a
3
,
Nad
hira K
heza
m
4
,
Ab
del
Kader
Mahm
ou
d
5
1,2,5
Applie
d
R
ese
arc
h
Uni
ts
f
or
R
ene
wabl
e Ene
rgi
es
in
Wate
r
a
nd
The
Envi
ronm
en
t
(
URA
3E
),
Uni
ver
sity
of
Nouak
chot
t
Al
Aasriya
,
Nou
akc
hot
t
,
Maurita
nia
1,4
Advensed
Sys
te
m La
bor
at
ory
(
LSA
)
,
U
nive
rsit
y
of
Car
tha
g
e
,
T
unis
,
Tun
esia
3
Depa
rtment of
Biophysic
s
,
Co
llege
of
Appli
ed
S
ci
en
ce
s
,
Univer
s
it
y
of
Anbar
,
Ra
ma
di
,
Ir
aq
Art
ic
le
In
f
o
ABSTR
A
CT
Art
ic
le
history:
Re
cei
ved
Oct
1
0
, 20
20
Re
vised
Jan
15
, 2021
Accepte
d
Fe
b
5
, 2
0
21
In
thi
s
pap
er,
th
e
p
erf
orm
anc
e
a
nal
ysis
of
a
30
MW
wind
power
p
la
nt
is
per
forme
d
.
Th
e
fa
rm
consists
of
fif
teen
(T1
-
T
15)
G9
7/2000/G
AM
ESA
2
MW
grid
-
connect
ed
turb
ine
s.
T
he
f
arm
is
in
op
era
t
ion
mode
ins
ta
lled
28
km
south
of
Nouak
chot
t
c
it
y
in
M
aur
itania.
Th
e
a
nal
yz
ed
data
ar
e
moni
tor
ed
from
July
1st
,
2
015
(th
e
first
op
era
t
ion
d
ay
of
th
e
pow
er
pla
n
t)
t
o
De
ce
mb
er
31st,
2019.
The
par
amete
rs
of
pe
rform
ance
eva
lu
at
ion
are
power
gene
ra
ti
on,
ca
pa
ci
ty
fa
ct
or
,
m
ac
h
ine
av
ai
l
abi
lity,
grid
avail
abi
l
it
y,
and
sys
te
m
ava
i
la
bi
li
ty
.
It
is
observe
d
from
dat
a
ana
lysis,
th
e
wind
f
arm
sup
pli
es
a
to
t
al
ene
rgy
of
507.
3
9
GWh
to
th
e
p
ower
grid
and
h
a
ve
a
high
ave
r
a
ge
ca
p
ac
i
ty
fac
tor
of
42
.
55%
.
T1
produc
es
th
e
high
est
am
oun
t
of
elec
tr
ical
en
erg
y
a
mong
the
other
turbi
n
es
with
a
total
ene
rgy
outpu
t
o
f
35
.
46
G
Wh,
an
ave
r
age
ca
pa
ci
ty
fa
ct
or
of
44.
97%
,
and
ope
rating
hours
of
33,
814
hours
.
While
T12
produc
ed
th
e
m
ini
mum
am
ount
of
en
erg
y
in
th
is
per
iod,
th
e
di
ffe
ren
c
e
in
ene
rgy
com
p
ared
to
T1
is
4.
563
GWh.
I
t
is
obs
erv
ed
that
the
a
vai
l
abi
lity
of
the
n
et
work
is
u
nstabl
e
and
n
ee
d
s
im
prove
m
ent,
var
ying
b
et
wee
n
90.
86
%
i
n
2016
and
93.
16
%
in
2018.
In
the
first
y
ea
r
of
oper
ation,
97
.
0
6%
of
the
turbi
nes
wer
e
av
ai
l
abl
e
.
How
ever,
th
e
av
era
g
e
a
vai
l
abi
lity
of
the
wind
far
m
is a
pproxi
ma
t
el
y
94%
during
th
e tot
al study
p
eri
o
d.
Ke
yw
or
d
s
:
Ca
pacit
y
f
act
or
M
ac
hin
e
P
ower
g
rid
Power
s
ys
te
m
a
vaila
bili
ty
Win
d
p
owe
r
p
la
nt
This
is an
open
acc
ess arti
cl
e
un
der
the
CC
BY
-
SA
l
ic
ense
.
Corres
pond
in
g
Aut
h
or
:
M
oha
mme
d Q
asi
m Tah
a
Dep
a
rtme
nt of
Bi
ophy
sic
s
,
Co
ll
ege of
Applie
d
Scie
nces
-
Hit
Un
i
ver
sit
y o
f Anba
r,
Ra
ma
di
,
I
raq
Emai
l:
as.m
ohammad
_ta
ha@uo
a
nbar
.edu.i
q
1.
INTROD
U
CTION
Like
mo
st
co
untrie
s
i
n
t
he
Mi
dd
le
East
a
nd
N
or
t
h
Africa
,
M
a
ur
it
ania
has
ab
unda
nt
s
ola
r
resou
rces
and
co
ns
i
der
a
bl
e
wind
re
sour
ces
[
1]
.
I
nter
na
ti
on
al
Re
ne
w
able
E
nergy
A
gen
c
y
c
onside
r
ed
M
au
rita
nia'
s
wind
po
te
ntial
is
m
ore
l
ocali
zed
a
r
ound
t
he
c
oast
al
zo
ne
betw
ee
n
N'
Diag
o
a
nd
N
ouad
hibo
u,
and
the
wind
s
peeds
ov
e
r
7
m/s
[
2]
.
Th
us
,
t
o
stu
dy
t
he
real
pote
ntial
of
wi
nd
ene
r
gy
i
n
Ma
ur
it
ania,
it
w
o
ul
d
be
im
por
ta
nt
t
o
est
imat
e
the
pote
ntial
of
wind
po
wer
ge
nerat
ion
to
unde
rs
ta
nd
the
reli
ab
il
it
y
of
these
pa
rk
s
unde
r
the
local
cl
imat
e.
By
ex
te
ns
io
n,
f
or
re
gions
wit
h
a
cl
os
e
cl
imat
e
suc
h
as
th
os
e
des
cribe
d
by
the
a
uthors
[
2
]
-
[
4].
Othe
r
auth
or
s
ha
ve
a
nal
yze
d
the
pe
r
forma
nce o
f
wi
nd
po
wer
p
la
nt
s
[
5
]
,
[
6].
T
hes
e
auth
ors d
escr
ibed
t
he
a
vaila
bili
ty
of
the
mac
hin
e
s,
the
a
vaila
bili
ty
of
t
he
gr
i
d
with
t
he
a
vaila
bili
ty
of
t
he
w
ind
tur
bin
e
s
yst
em.
Simi
la
rl
y,
the
auth
or
s
in
[7
]
-
[
9]
stu
died
the
va
riat
ion
of
va
rio
us
pe
rform
ance
pa
ramete
rs
s
uc
h
as
t
otal
an
nu
al
produ
ct
ion
,
total
gr
id
a
vail
abili
ty,
an
d
tot
al
machine
a
va
il
abili
ty
fo
r
a
wind
fa
rm
l
oc
at
ed
on
the
J
m
godrani
a
nd
N
agad
a
Hill
s
nea
r
t
he
ci
ty
of
De
was
in
M
ad
hya
Pr
a
des
h,
I
nd
ia
.
Also
,
in
this
sen
s
e,
Chicc
o
an
d
it
s
c
ollab
or
at
ors
ha
ve
Evaluation Warning : The document was created with Spire.PDF for Python.
In
t J
P
ow Elec
& Dri
S
ys
t
IS
S
N: 20
88
-
8
694
Perf
orma
nce
analysis
of
30M
W wi
nd power
plant i
n a
n op
e
ra
ti
o
n mode i
n N
ouakc
ho
tt
.
...
(Bam
ba H
ei
ba)
533
analyze
d
t
he
pe
rformance
of
a
27.
5
MW
wind
po
wer
pla
nt
locat
ed
in
t
he
so
ut
h
of
Ital
y,
on
hill
y
te
rr
ai
n
[
1
0
].
No
t
f
orgett
in
g
Gh
aj
ur,
w
ho
st
ud
ie
d
matc
hi
ng
meth
ods
bas
ed
on
the
performa
nce
of
wi
nd
tur
bin
e
s,
w
hi
ch
can
be
est
imat
ed
by
t
he
an
nu
al
e
nerg
y
pro
duct
ion
a
nd
t
he
av
erag
e
a
nnual
powe
r,
wh
ic
h
va
ry
acc
ordin
g
to
t
he
wind
sp
ee
d
a
nd
it
s
distrib
utio
n
[
11]
.
Win
d
s
peed
is
c
on
si
de
red
a
var
ia
ble
in
ti
me
and
s
pa
ce
and
has
se
aso
nal
char
act
e
risti
cs
and
wi
nd
direc
ti
on
[12
]
-
[
14]
.
The
first
t
urbin
e
co
ns
um
es
th
e
wi
nd
ene
r
gy
at
the
fron
t
poi
nt
(a
)
resu
lt
in
g
in
les
s en
e
rgy f
or
t
he
r
ear
tu
rb
i
ne/s
(b)
a
s s
how
n
i
n (1).
=
0
.
5
(
2
−
2
)
(1)
w
he
re E
is the
energ
y
at
the
re
ar
po
i
nt,
m
is
the mass
of t
he
air,
a
nd
V
is t
he
s
pee
d.
The
res
ults
c
onside
red
i
n
t
his
work
s
how
t
hat
a
s
mall
va
r
ia
ti
on
i
n
wind
sp
ee
d
a
nd
co
nfi
gurati
on
ha
s
an
impact
on
t
he
overall
en
er
gy
pro
du
ct
i
on
of
the
wind
power
plant
[
1
5]
.
M
an
y
a
uthors
sh
ow
that
wind
fa
r
m
performa
nce
is
in
flue
nced
by
ma
ny
pa
rame
te
rs
s
uc
h
as
m
achine
up
ti
me,
gri
d
up
ti
me
,
and
l
ow
wind
hours
[16].
T
hus,
se
ver
al
st
ud
ie
s
t
hat
ha
ve
bee
n
ci
te
d
ha
ve
f
oc
us
e
d
on
a
nalyz
ing
t
he
pe
rfo
r
mance
of
wi
nd
powe
r
plants,
but
t
o
da
te
,
none
ha
ve
fo
c
us
e
d
on
a
c
omparati
ve
stu
dy
of
this
perf
ormance
.
It
is
i
n
this
se
ns
e
t
ha
t
the
pr
ese
nt
w
ork
ai
ms
to
fill
the
ga
ps
i
den
t
ifie
d
in
the
s
ci
entifi
c
li
te
ratur
e
by
ca
rryi
ng
out
an
i
n
-
dep
t
h
performa
nce
a
nalysis
of
t
his
te
chnolo
gy
on
a
real
pilo
t
unit
[17
]
-
[
20]
.
T
hi
s
stu
dy
asses
se
s
the
pe
rforma
nce
of
the
30MW
wi
nd
powe
r
plant
w
hich
is
locat
ed
at
pk
28
km
on
t
he
N
ou
a
kchott
-
Ro
sso
r
oad,
c
onne
ct
ed
to
the
SOMELEC
(N
at
ion
al
Elec
tric
it
y
Com
pa
ny) gr
i
d
a
nd which
is co
mmissi
on
ed
in
20
15 [2
1].
The
obje
ct
iv
es
of
this
pa
per
are
relat
ed
to
the
sim
plifie
d
evaluati
on
of
the
performa
nc
es
thr
oug
h
diff
e
re
nt
pa
ra
mete
rs
of
a
wind
po
wer
pla
nt
implante
d
on
a
sit
e
in
Noua
kc
ho
tt
in
ope
rati
ng
m
od
e
co
nne
ct
ed
to
the
nati
on
al
el
ect
rici
ty
gri
d.
The
sec
ond
or
iginali
ty
is
relat
ed
to
t
he
a
na
lysis
of
mete
orolo
gical
dat
a
to
est
ablish
the
c
onditi
ons
an
d
par
a
mete
rs
for
wh
ic
h
it
is
pos
sible
to
gi
ve
a scor
e on
the
e
va
luati
on
o
f
t
he
energ
y
avail
able
on
th
e
sit
e.
Fi
nally,
the
t
hir
d
or
i
gin
al
it
y
is
relat
ed
t
o
the
pr
ese
ntati
on
of
t
he
pro
du
c
ti
on
model
t
o
com
par
e
the
pr
oductio
n balan
ces o
f
eac
h wind tu
rb
i
ne of
t
he par
k for se
ve
ral y
ea
rs.
2.
THE
WI
ND
P
OWER
PLA
N
T
This
wind
po
wer
pla
nt
with
a
nominal
ca
pacit
y
of
30
MW
was
t
he
first
instal
la
ti
on
of
this
t
yp
e
connecte
d
to
the
gr
i
d
in
M
au
rita
nia.
It
is
c
omp
os
e
d
of
15
wind
tu
r
bin
es
of
2
MW
each
of
G
A
M
ESS
A
bran
ds
distrib
uted
on
three
medi
um
volt
age
li
ne
s
of
33
KV.
I
t
al
so
inclu
de
s
co
ntr
ol
an
d
comma
nd
dev
i
ces
f
or
the
el
ect
rical
e
qu
i
pm
e
nt
nee
de
d
t
o
operate
t
he
facil
it
y
a
nd
is
c
onnecte
d
to
t
he
N
ouakc
hott
ser
vice
sta
ti
on
s
[22
]
-
[
24]
. For t
his r
ea
son,
th
e
wind
powe
r plant i
s s
how
n
in
F
ig
ur
e
1.
(a)
(b)
Figure
1. The
wind
far
m
sit
e,
(
a)
T
he
fa
rm
locati
on sce
ne,
(b)
T
he far
m m
ap of
w
i
nd turb
ines
In
this
sect
io
n,
the
co
nf
ig
urat
ion
of
the
wind
tur
bine
posit
ion
s
for
the
propose
d
pla
nt
is
com
pr
isi
n
g
fifteen
G
97
/
20
00
/
Game
sa
2
MW
wind
t
urbines
with
a
hub
hei
gh
t
of
90
m
ha
s
been
pro
vid
e
d
[
25]
.
Th
e
sp
eci
ficat
io
ns
of
the
wi
nd
tu
r
bin
es
ha
ve
bee
n
pro
vid
e
d
i
n
Table
1.
T
hey
hav
e
been
a
nalyzed
in
co
nj
unct
ion
with
the
res
ults
of
the
wind
r
eso
ur
ce
a
naly
s
is
to
hi
gh
li
ght
t
he
ov
e
rall
pe
rformance
of
the
30
M
W
N
oua
kchott
Evaluation Warning : The document was created with Spire.PDF for Python.
IS
S
N
:
2088
-
8
694
In
t J
P
ow
Ele
c
&
D
ri
S
ys
t,
V
ol
.
12
, N
o.
1
,
Ma
rch
20
21
:
53
2
–
54
1
534
powe
r
plant.
I
t
s
hould
be
not
ed,
the
wind
powe
r
pla
nt
has
a
data
acq
uisi
ti
on
sy
ste
m
t
ha
t
rec
ords
da
ta
in
10
-
minu
te
i
ncr
em
ents
[
26
]
-
[
29
].
Each
wind
tur
bin
e
is
e
qu
i
pped
with
a
set
of
intel
li
gen
t
se
ns
ors
th
at
record
dat
a
in
real
-
ti
me
for
t
he
monit
ori
ng
sta
ti
on.
T
he
recorde
d
data
has
bee
n
proce
ssed
be
f
or
e
an
al
ys
is.
The
data
use
d
in this
researc
h w
ork
is
monit
or
e
d
c
onti
nuou
sly fr
om
J
uly 2
015
t
o Decem
be
r 201
9.
Table
1.
T
he
dat
asheet o
f
t
he i
ns
ta
ll
ed
tu
rb
i
ne
s
Turb
in
es Mod
el
G9
7
/2
0
0
0
/ Gam
es
a
No
m
in
al r
a
tin
g
2
0
0
0
KW
Cu
t
–
in
Win
d
s
p
eed
2
,5 m
/s
Rated
wind
sp
eed
1
4
m
/s
Cu
t
-
o
u
t Win
d
sp
ee
d
2
5
m
/s
Diam
et
er
o
f
r
o
to
r
9
7
m
Tower
Steel tub
u
lar
Heig
h
t
9
0
m
3.
PERFO
R
MANC
E E
V
ALU
ATIO
N
P
ARAM
ET
E
RS
The
I
nter
natio
nal
Ele
ct
r
otech
nical
Co
mmiss
ion
(
IEC
-
6140
0)
has
desc
ribe
d
t
he
set
of
m
easur
e
s
t
hat
are
pro
posed
f
or
the
perf
orm
ance
eval
uatio
n
of
wi
nd
far
m
instal
la
ti
on
s.
I
t
is
al
so
importa
nt
to
unde
rlin
e
that
these
meas
ur
es
are
ca
rr
ie
d
ou
t
in
this
w
ork
us
in
g
the
e
qu
a
ti
on
s
(
2)
-
(
6)
[
30].
T
he
pe
rfo
rma
nce
model
s
of
a
wind
farm
i
n
operati
ng
m
od
e
are
Ca
pacit
y
F
act
or
(CF
),
A
nnual
Ru
n
Time
(
AF),
M
ac
hine
A
vaila
bili
ty
(
M
A
),
Gr
i
d
A
vaila
bili
ty
(D
R
),
S
ys
t
em
A
vaila
bili
ty
(
DS),
a
nd
Eq
uiv
al
ent
R
un
Time
(
N
Q).
These
qu
a
ntit
ie
s
of
factors are
also
u
se
d
t
o descri
be
the
p
e
rfo
rm
ance
of the
wind
[31].
3.1.
C
apacity
fa
c
to
r
It is d
e
fine
d
as
the r
at
io
of the
energ
y
pr
oduc
ed
to t
he
e
nerg
y ou
t
pu
t t
hat
w
ou
l
d
re
su
lt
from o
per
at
in
g
at
f
ull rate
d p
ower
for ea
ch
hour
of the
yea
r.
=
(
ℎ
ℎ
)
(
)
×
(2)
3.2.
A
va
il
abi
li
ty of
th
e m
achi
ne
The
rati
o
betw
een
the
act
ual
hour
s
of
oper
at
ion
an
d
the
numb
e
r
of
ho
ur
s
t
hat
wind
sp
ee
ds
we
re
within t
he ope
r
at
ing
range.
=
ℎ
(
ℎ
)
(
ℎ
)
(3)
3.3.
Ne
twork
availabil
ity
Gr
i
d
avail
abili
ty
means
t
hat
the
gr
i
d
is
capab
le
of
a
bsor
bing
ene
r
gy
from
a
wi
nd
turb
i
ne.
It
i
s
def
i
ned as the
gr
i
d
a
vaila
ble in hou
rs
to
r
ece
ive en
e
r
g
y f
rom the
wind
farm at
the t
otal h
our
i
n
a
per
i
od.
=
(
ℎ
)
ℎ
(
ℎ
)
(4)
3.4.
System
av
ailabil
ity
Sy
ste
m
av
ai
la
bi
li
ty is the pr
oduct of
machi
ne
av
ai
la
bili
ty a
nd
netw
ork
a
va
i
la
bili
ty.
=
ℎ
×
(5)
3.5.
Eq
uiv
alen
t
D
urati
on
of
Use
It
is
al
s
o
na
m
ed
Eq
uiv
al
e
nt
Numbe
r
of
H
ours
(
NQ)
w
hi
ch
is
de
fine
d
as
the
rati
o
of
the
ene
r
gy
pro
du
ce
d b
y
th
e w
in
d
t
urbine
to the rat
ed
out
pu
t
powe
r.
=
(
ℎ
)
(
)
(6)
Evaluation Warning : The document was created with Spire.PDF for Python.
In
t J
P
ow Elec
& Dri
S
ys
t
IS
S
N: 20
88
-
8
694
Perf
orma
nce
analysis
of
30M
W wi
nd power
plant i
n a
n op
e
ra
ti
o
n mode i
n N
ouakc
ho
tt
.
...
(Bam
ba H
ei
ba)
535
4.
RESU
LT
S
ANA
L
YS
I
S
AND DIS
CUSSI
ONS
Var
ia
ti
ons
i
n
wind
s
pee
d
ov
er
the
year
set
high
i
nf
lue
nce
performa
nce
pa
rameters
.
F
or
this
reas
on,
to
stu
dy
these
infl
uen
ces
,
it
w
as
pro
pose
d
to
iden
ti
f
y
m
onth
ly
an
d
a
nnual
p
er
forma
nce
i
ndic
at
or
s
.
T
he
30MW
wind
farm
is
evaluate
d
by
cal
culat
ing
a
set
of
mon
thl
y
a
nd
a
nnual
performa
nce
ind
ic
at
ors
du
ring
the
monit
or
i
ng p
e
r
iod
[
32].
T1
has
bee
n
chosen
to
anal
yze
t
he
perf
ormance
pa
rame
te
rs
f
or
on
e
t
urbine
of
t
his
wi
nd
fa
rm.
Table
2
s
hows
the
cal
culat
io
n
of
gri
d
avail
a
bili
ty,
mac
hin
e
avail
abili
ty,
s
ys
te
m
a
vaila
b
il
it
y,
eq
uiv
al
e
nt
hours,
and
wind
tu
rb
i
ne
capaci
ty
fac
tor
us
i
ng
t
he
prece
di
ng
e
qu
at
ion
s
f
or
e
ach
month
of
the
ye
ar
2017.
duri
ng
t
he
year
2017
for
the
m
onthly
a
nalysis
an
d
f
r
om
20
16
to
2019
f
or
the
a
nnual
anal
ys
is
of
the
fi
fteen
tur
bin
es
accor
ding
to
th
e
f
o
ll
owin
g
pa
rameters:
ene
r
gy
producti
on
(kW
h)
f
or
eac
h
t
urbine
,
pro
duct
ion
ti
me
(
h),
ti
me
avail
able
on
t
he
gri
d
(
h),
ti
me
avail
a
ble
on
t
he
machi
ne
(
h),
a
nd
th
e
num
be
r
of
hours
dur
ing
w
hich
t
he
wind
sp
ee
ds
wer
e i
n t
he
operati
ng
r
ang
e
(h), et
c. T
he per
forma
nc
e
ind
ic
at
ors
wi
ll
b
e anal
yzed
f
or
eac
h
t
urbine
. Th
e
ov
e
rall
perf
ormance
of
eac
h
wind
tur
bin
e
i
s
evaluate
d
us
i
ng
t
hese
dif
fe
r
ent
par
a
mete
rs
[20].
Table
2
sh
ows
the
m
onthl
y
pe
rformance
in
di
cat
or
s
s
uch
as
wind
sp
ee
d
(m
/s),
e
ne
rgy
(
kWh
),
op
e
rati
ng
ho
ur
s
(h),
gr
id
ho
ur
s
ok (h),
wind s
pe
ed hou
rs ok (
h), fo
r
T
1 for t
he peri
od 20
17.
The
cal
c
ulati
on
of
pe
rforma
nce
par
a
mete
r
s
prese
nted
i
n
Table
3
c
onta
ins
the
cal
cula
ti
on
s
of
gri
d
avail
abili
ty,
m
achine
a
vaila
bi
li
ty
,
syst
em
a
vaila
bili
ty,
a
nd
e
quivale
nt
hours
a
nd
cap
aci
t
y
fact
or
for
T
1.
Figure
2 de
picts t
he mo
nth
l
y
e
nerg
y produce
d by T
1
a
nd it
s pow
e
r fact
ors
for
the
m
on
t
hs
of 20
17.
Tab
le
2
.
Cal
c
u
la
tio
n
s of
p
er
f
or
man
ce
p
arameter
s f
or
T1
Mon
th
W
in
d
Speed
(m
/s)
Energy
(
k
W
h
)
Turb
in
e Operating
Ho
u
rs
Ho
u
rs of Gr
id
Ho
u
rs of op
eration
Sp
eed (h)
Jan
u
ary
9
.04
7
8
3
332
575
687
6
8
7
,00
Feb
ruary
9
.28
9
0
6
410
656
669
6
7
0
,00
Mar
ch
8
,8
9
0
8
160
731
744
7
4
4
,00
Ap
ril
9
.39
8
5
8
894
631
705
7
0
5
,00
May
9
.15
7
4
4
044
602
606
6
0
2
,00
Ju
n
e
8
.10
6
7
8
908
615
616
6
1
6
,00
Ju
ly
7
.47
5
7
3
920
684
707
7
0
6
,00
Au
g
u
st
6
,88
5
0
7
586
673
724
7
2
3
,00
Sep
tem
b
er
6
,86
4
2
5
498
557
623
6
1
9
,00
Octo
b
er
7
.56
3
0
6
558
358
648
5
2
5
,00
No
v
em
b
er
7
.35
5
8
4
136
687
716
7
0
5
,00
Dece
m
b
er
9
.15
9
3
1
176
675
706
7
0
6
,00
An
n
u
ally
8
,25
8
20
8
6
2
2
7444
8151
8008
Tab
le
3
.
Cal
c
u
la
tio
n
of
en
er
g
y
p
arameter
s
Mon
th
DM
(
%
)
DR (
%
)
DS (
%
)
CF (
%
)
NQ (
h
)
Jan
u
ary
8
3
,70
9
2
.33
7
7
.28
5
2
,64
3
9
1
,67
Feb
ruary
9
7
,91
9
9
.55
9
7
.47
6
7
,44
4
5
3
,21
Mar
ch
9
8
,25
100
9
8
.25
6
1
,03
4
5
4
,08
Ap
ril
8
9
,50
9
7
.91
8
7
.63
5
9
,65
4
2
9
,45
May
100
8
1
.45
8
1
.45
5
0
,00
3
7
2
,02
Ju
n
e
9
9
,84
8
5
.55
8
5
.41
4
7
,15
3
3
9
,45
Ju
ly
9
6
,88
9
5
.02
9
2
.05
3
8
,57
2
8
6
,96
Au
g
u
st
9
3
,08
9
7
.31
9
0
.57
3
4
,11
2
5
3
,79
Sep
tem
b
er
8
9
,98
8
6
.52
7
7
.85
2
9
,55
2
1
2
,75
Octo
b
er
6
8
,19
8
7
.09
5
9
.38
2
1
,28
1
5
3
,27
No
v
em
b
er
9
7
,45
9
9
.44
9
6
.9
4
0
,57
2
9
2
,07
Dece
m
b
er
9
5
,61
9
4
.89
9
0
.72
6
2
,58
4
6
5
,59
Av
erage
9
1
,69
9
3
,08
8
6
,24
4
6
,85
4
1
0
4
,3
It
show
s
that
the
ene
rgy
pro
du
ce
d
by
T
1
r
eached
93
1,176
W
h
for
Dec
embe
r
an
d
t
he
minim
um
energ
y
was
produce
d
f
or
Oc
tob
e
r
with
306,5
58
kWh
.
T
he
total
acc
umu
la
te
d
e
nergy
pro
duct
ion
for
the
12
months
of
ope
rati
on
is
8,2
08,622
kWh,
acc
ordin
g
to
Tabl
e
2.
The
ca
pa
ci
ty
fact
or
vari
es
f
rom
21.
28%
in
Octo
ber
t
o
67
.44%
in
F
e
br
uary
th
rou
ghout
the
yea
r,
mar
king
an
a
nnual
ave
ra
ge
of
46.85%
.
Figure
3
represe
nts
th
e
machine
a
vaila
bili
ty
(
D
M
)
,
ne
twork
a
vaila
bi
li
ty
(D
R
),
an
d
s
ys
te
m
avail
a
bili
ty
(
DS)
ge
ne
rated
by T
1 durin
g
t
he
m
onths
of t
he year
20
17.
Figure
4
pro
ve
s
that
the
mac
hin
e
a
vaila
bili
ty
of
T
1
is
100%
in
M
a
y
but
68.19%
i
n
Octob
e
r
with
a
n
annual
a
verag
e
val
ue
of
91.
69%,
w
hich
m
eans
t
hat
T
1
i
s
in
go
od
reli
abili
ty
f
or
the
yea
r
2017
e
xc
ept
in
Octo
ber.
T
he
avail
abili
ty
of
the
distri
bu
ti
on
netw
ork
var
i
es
betw
een
10
0%
in
M
arc
h
and
8
1.4
5%
in
M
a
y,
giv
in
g
a
n
a
nnua
l
aver
a
ge
of
93.08%
.
T
hese
res
ults
gi
ve
th
at
the
mac
hin
e
sy
ste
m
-
netw
ork
va
ried
betw
een
a
Evaluation Warning : The document was created with Spire.PDF for Python.
IS
S
N
:
2088
-
8
694
In
t J
P
ow
Ele
c
&
D
ri
S
ys
t,
V
ol
.
12
, N
o.
1
,
Ma
rch
20
21
:
53
2
–
54
1
536
minimu
m
of
56.
38%
in
Febr
uary
a
nd
98.
25
%
in
M
arc
h
gi
ving
a
n
a
nnual
avera
ge
of
86.24%
wh
ic
h
i
mp
li
es
that
the
mac
hin
e
syst
em
T
1
is
work
i
ng
o
n
it
s
plan
ne
d
pro
du
ct
io
n.
T
he
eq
uiv
al
e
nt
numb
e
r
of
hour
s
of
op
e
rati
on
at
f
ul
l
power
for
T
1
is
mi
nimum
in
Oct
ob
e
r
of
153.2
7
hours
a
nd
ma
ximum
i
n
D
ecem
ber
of
465.5
9
hours
w
hich
i
mp
li
es
that
T1
giv
es
a
good
pro
du
ct
io
n
in
Decem
ber
as
s
how
n
in
T
a
ble
2
.
T
he
tota
l
nu
mb
e
r
of
op
e
rati
ng
ho
urs
for
T
1
is
7444
ho
ur
s
,
the
m
inimum
num
be
r
of
hours
of
pro
duct
ion
was
recorde
d
i
n
Oc
tob
e
r
of
358
ho
ur
s
wh
ic
h
is
due
t
o
mainte
nan
ce
of
the
mac
hine
durin
g
that
month
a
nd
the
ma
xim
um
nu
mb
e
r
o
f
hours
of
pro
du
ct
ion
is
731 h
ours
in
J
an
u
ar
y and 7
06
hours
in
M
arc
h
as
shown i
n
T
a
ble
3.
Figure
2.
Ene
r
gy capacit
y
fac
tor for T
1
Figure
3.
Tu
r
bin
e T
1 o
per
at
io
n
a
nalysis
Tab
le
4
.
Th
e a
n
nual e
n
erg
y
p
ro
ducti
o
n
fo
r 2
016
Energy
(
k
W
h
)
CF (%)
DM
(%)
DR (%)
DS (
%
)
T1
7
85
3
816
4
4
,71
9
2
,76
9
0
.84
8
3
.57
T2
8
22
6
029
4
6
,82
9
8
,34
9
1
.41
8
9
.89
T3
8
23
1
949
4
6
,86
9
9
,06
9
1
.24
9
0
.38
T4
7
95
7
330
4
5
,29
9
8
,54
9
1
.29
8
9
.95
T5
7
95
4
115
4
5
,28
9
8
,53
9
0
.78
8
9
.44
T6
7
80
5
439
4
4
,43
9
8
,88
9
0
.60
8
9
.58
T7
7
82
2
298
4
4
,53
9
9
,15
9
1
.26
9
0
.48
T8
7
6
2
8
456
4
3
,42
9
7
,56
9
1
.02
8
8
.80
T9
7
69
6
883
4
3
,81
9
9
,03
9
0
.28
8
9
.40
T10
7
68
7
646
4
3
,76
9
7
,70
9
1
.28
8
9
.80
T11
7
57
0
310
4
3
,09
9
5
,92
9
0
.95
8
7
.24
T12
6
71
8
986
3
8
,25
8
9
,59
8
8
.32
7
9
.12
T13
7
33
5
601
4
1
,76
9
7
,15
9
1
.24
8
8
.63
T14
7
88
3
897
4
4
,88
9
9
,14
9
1
.29
9
0
.50
T15
7
53
1
775
4
2
,87
9
4
,60
9
0
.58
8
5
.68
Evaluation Warning : The document was created with Spire.PDF for Python.
In
t J
P
ow Elec
& Dri
S
ys
t
IS
S
N: 20
88
-
8
694
Perf
orma
nce
analysis
of
30M
W wi
nd power
plant i
n a
n op
e
ra
ti
o
n mode i
n N
ouakc
ho
tt
.
...
(Bam
ba H
ei
ba)
537
Tab
le
5
.
Th
e a
n
nual e
n
erg
y
p
ro
ducti
o
n
fo
r 2
017
Energy
(
k
W
h
)
CF (%)
DM
(%)
DR (%)
DS (
%
)
T1
8
2
0
8
6
2
2
4
6
.85
9
1
.69
9
4
.33
8
6
.49
T2
8
6
5
8
3
1
4
4
9
.37
9
4
.93
9
4
.20
8
9
.42
T3
8
4
3
8
0
5
2
4
8
.16
9
7
.03
9
3
.17
9
0
.40
T4
8
0
2
0
1
1
6
4
5
.78
9
3
.02
9
4
.86
8
8
.23
T5
6
6
0
6
6
4
0
3
7
.71
8
4
.46
8
8
.97
7
5
.14
T6
7
9
6
7
6
9
8
4
5
.48
9
4
.67
9
3
.97
8
8
.96
T7
7
3
3
0
3
3
0
4
1
.84
8
8
.82
9
3
.10
8
3
.06
T8
7
6
6
5
2
1
6
4
3
.75
9
3
.38
9
4
.81
8
8
.54
T9
8
2
6
5
8
8
4
4
7
.18
9
7
.83
9
4
.55
9
2
.50
T10
8
0
6
5
9
4
8
4
6
.04
9
5
.47
9
6
.00
9
1
.65
T11
6
9
8
2
0
5
2
3
9
.85
8
5
.71
9
1
.75
7
8
.64
T12
5
7
0
9
4
7
4
3
2
.59
8
6
.25
8
1
.88
7
0
.62
T13
7
9
9
7
0
2
6
4
5
.65
9
5
.81
9
5
.78
9
1
.77
T14
8
2
3
1
9
1
6
4
6
.99
9
6
.12
9
5
.61
9
1
.90
T15
8
4
0
2
5
2
8
4
7
.96
9
7
.29
9
4
.37
9
1
.81
Tab
le
6
.
Th
e
a
n
nual
e
n
erg
y
p
ro
ducti
o
n
f
o
r 2
018
Energy
(
k
W
h
)
CF (%)
DM
(%)
DR (%)
DS (
%
)
T1
8
18
9
136
4
6
,74
9
1
,49
9
6
.
3
4
8
8
.14
T2
8
09
6
318
4
6
,21
9
5
,66
9
4
.34
9
0
.24
T3
7
54
9
970
4
3
,09
9
4
,38
8
7
.84
8
2
.90
T4
7
09
3
032
4
0
,49
9
3
,70
8
9
.57
8
3
.92
T5
7
96
5
232
4
5
,46
9
6
,12
9
4
.35
9
0
.96
T6
8
09
7
544
4
6
,22
9
6
,68
9
6
.64
9
3
.43
T7
7
69
7
500
4
3
,94
9
2
,91
9
4
.38
8
7
.68
T8
7
72
4
140
4
4
,09
9
3
,26
9
4
.65
8
8
.27
T9
8
15
4
664
4
6
,54
9
5
,67
9
6
.84
9
2
.64
T10
8
09
3
718
4
6
,20
9
5
,41
9
6
.57
9
2
.13
T11
6
35
7
166
3
6
,29
9
0
,28
7
5
.60
6
8
.25
T12
7
93
6
130
4
5
,30
9
4
,32
9
6
.96
9
1
.45
T13
8
1
5
6
392
4
6
,55
9
6
,43
9
6
.10
9
2
.67
T14
7
74
3
220
4
4
,20
9
2
,16
9
6
.07
8
8
.54
T15
7
91
3
770
4
5
,17
9
4
,86
9
4
.41
8
9
.55
Tab
le
7
.
Th
e
annu
al
en
erg
y
p
ro
ducti
o
n
fo
r 2
019
Energy
(
k
W
h
)
CF (%)
DM
(%)
DR (%)
DS (
%
)
T1
8
26
0
342
4
7
,15
9
7
,65
9
2
.07
8
9
.91
T2
7
34
1
5
9
0
4
1
,90
9
5
,82
8
8
.58
8
4
.88
T3
7
20
5
664
4
1
,13
9
5
,17
8
3
.60
7
9
.56
T4
7
59
5
552
4
3
,35
9
3
,08
9
0
.76
8
4
.48
T5
7
27
4
572
4
1
,52
9
6
,78
8
8
.20
8
5
.35
T6
7
64
8
800
4
3
,66
9
6
,27
9
0
.35
8
6
.98
T7
7
85
4
030
4
4
,83
9
6
,24
9
2
.59
8
9
.09
T8
7
85
4
872
4
4
,83
9
5
,77
9
2
.57
8
8
.65
T9
7
89
2
098
4
5
,05
9
6
,89
9
2
.62
8
9
.74
T10
7
82
3
134
4
4
,65
9
6
,75
9
2
.13
8
9
.13
T11
7
20
0
380
4
1
,10
9
3
,29
9
0
.61
8
4
.53
T12
7
61
3
600
4
3
,46
9
7
,62
9
0
.02
8
7
.88
T13
7
95
7
832
4
5
,42
9
8
,24
9
2
.13
9
0
.51
T14
7
55
5
606
4
3
,13
9
5
,90
9
0
.38
8
6
.67
T15
8
21
6
672
4
6
,90
9
7
,96
9
1
.45
8
9
.58
Figure
4.
M
ac
hi
ne
avail
a
bili
t
y
Evaluation Warning : The document was created with Spire.PDF for Python.
IS
S
N
:
2088
-
8
694
In
t J
P
ow
Ele
c
&
D
ri
S
ys
t,
V
ol
.
12
, N
o.
1
,
Ma
rch
20
21
:
53
2
–
54
1
538
The
best
pro
duct
ion
yea
r
is
2018
with
a
n
energ
y
of
a
ppr
ox
imat
el
y
116.76
G
W
h.
The
best
a
nnual
pro
du
ct
io
n
rec
orde
d
is
8658314
K
Wh
ma
r
ke
d
by
the
T
2
in
20
17.
T1
pro
du
ce
s
the
ma
ximu
m
t
otal
amo
un
t
of
el
ect
rical
energy
a
mon
g
the
fifteen
tu
r
bine
s
in
this
pa
r
k
duri
ng
these
year
s
.
Fig
ure
5
sho
ws
the
energ
y
pro
du
ce
d b
y
th
e machi
nes o
ve
r
the
four
years 2
016
t
o 2
019.
Figure
5.
A
nnua
l ener
gy
produced b
y
t
he
t
urbine f
or
t
he per
iod
2016
-
20
19
The
a
vaila
bili
ty
of
the
syst
em
(mac
hin
e
-
ne
twork
)
is
unsta
ble
an
d
needs
imp
roveme
nt.
I
t
pr
ese
nts
a
n
annual
ave
ra
ge
of
88.16%
i
n
2016,
86.6
%
i
n
20
17,
88.
05
%
in
2018
a
nd
87.12%
in
20
19.
Fig
ure
6
s
hows
t
he
fleet
(
mac
hin
e
-
gr
i
d)
sy
ste
m
a
vaila
ble fo
r
the
four
year
s
20
16 to
20
19.
Figure
6.
S
ys
te
m av
ai
la
bili
ty 2
01
6
-
2019
The
ca
pacit
y
f
act
or
durin
g
th
ese four
yea
rs
is 43.98% i
n
20
16,
44.
35% in
2017, 44.4
3%
i
n
20
18,
an
d
2019 the
av
e
ra
ge
ca
pa
ci
ty
fac
tor of 4
3.8
7%.
Figure
7
s
hows
the
flee
t fact
or
s for
t
he fo
ur
ye
ars 201
6
to
20
19.
Figure
7.
C
apa
ci
ty f
act
or
2016
-
2019
Evaluation Warning : The document was created with Spire.PDF for Python.
In
t J
P
ow Elec
& Dri
S
ys
t
IS
S
N: 20
88
-
8
694
Perf
orma
nce
analysis
of
30M
W wi
nd power
plant i
n a
n op
e
ra
ti
o
n mode i
n N
ouakc
ho
tt
.
...
(Bam
ba H
ei
ba)
539
Com
par
in
g
al
l
tur
bin
es
i
n
th
e
30MW
fleet
in
operati
ng
mode,
from
1
Ju
ly
2015
to
31
Dece
mbe
r
2019,
F
ig
ur
e
8
represe
nts
the
energ
y
-
ca
paci
ty
fact
or
c
urve
for
eac
h
m
ac
hin
e,
w
hile
F
i
gure
9
il
lustrat
es
the
energ
y versus
machine
ope
rati
ng
ti
me
cu
rv
e
durin
g
t
his p
e
ri
od.
Figure
8.
Total
en
e
rgy
a
nd ca
pacit
y fact
or
15 J
uly 2
015
-
31
Decem
ber 2
019
Figure
9.
Total
en
e
rgy
a
nd
numb
e
r of
hours
of operati
on
15
Ju
l
y 201
5
-
31
Decem
ber 2
01
9
The
a
bove
cur
ves
s
how
that:
a.
T1
pr
oduces
t
he
maxim
um
a
moun
t
of
el
ect
rical
energy
a
mong
t
he
fifte
en
wi
nd
t
urbin
es
in
this
wi
nd
far
m
with
a
total
en
ergy
outp
ut
of
35.
46
G
W
h,
mar
king
a
n
a
ve
rag
e
capaci
ty
facto
r
of
44.
97%
base
d
on
t
he
numb
e
r of o
pe
rati
ng ho
ur
s
of
33,81
4 hou
rs d
ur
i
ng the
per
i
od
from Jul
y 2015 to
Decem
be
r 20
19.
b.
T1
2
pr
oduces
t
he
mi
nimum
e
nerg
y
in
t
his
pe
rio
d
wit
h
a
va
lue
of
30
G
W
h,
mar
ki
ng
a
di
f
fer
e
nce
in
ene
r
gy
for
T1
of
4.5
63G
W
h,
wh
ic
h
is
well
exp
la
in
ed
by
the
l
ow
numb
e
r
of
hours
of
ope
rati
on
durin
g
this
pe
rio
d
(32,1
89h),
in
t
his
res
pect,
w
e
can
al
so
vis
uali
ze
in
fi
gur
es
(8,
9)
a
si
mil
ar
be
hav
i
or
of
T1
1
(e
ne
r
gy
pro
du
ce
d
31.09
G
W
h)
a
nd
a
capaci
ty
fact
or
of
39.
44%
and
operati
on
hours
31,
412h
com
par
e
d
to
t
he
oth
e
r
T
urbine
s,
i.e.
mo
st
of
th
e
ti
me
the
Tu
r
bin
es
we
re
a
va
il
able,
exce
pt
f
or
T1
1
an
d
T1
2
wh
ic
h
a
re
m
or
e
ti
me o
ut
of se
r
vice.
c.
The
total
el
ect
r
ic
it
y
su
ppli
ed
by
t
he
wi
nd
fa
rm
to
t
he
po
w
er
gri
d
from
1
Ju
ly
2015
to
31
Dece
mb
e
r
2019
is 5
07.39 G
Wh.
d.
The
a
ver
a
ge
ca
pacit
y fact
or is
42.55%
fr
om
1
J
uly 2
015 t
o 31 Dece
mb
e
r 2
019.
Evaluation Warning : The document was created with Spire.PDF for Python.
IS
S
N
:
2088
-
8
694
In
t J
P
ow
Ele
c
&
D
ri
S
ys
t,
V
ol
.
12
, N
o.
1
,
Ma
rch
20
21
:
53
2
–
54
1
540
5.
CONCL
US
I
O
N
The
ob
je
ct
ives
of
this
pa
per
are
relat
ed
to
the
simpli
fie
d
evaluati
on
of
t
he
pe
rfo
rma
nc
es
thr
ough
diff
e
re
nt
pa
ra
mete
rs
of
a
wind
po
wer
pla
nt
implante
d
on
a
sit
e
in
Noua
kc
ho
tt
in
ope
rati
ng
m
od
e
co
nne
ct
ed
to
the
nati
on
al
el
ect
rici
ty
gri
d.
The
sec
ond
or
iginali
ty
is
relat
ed
to
t
he
a
na
lysis
of
mete
orolo
gical
dat
a
to
est
ablish
the
c
onditi
ons
an
d
par
a
mete
rs
for
wh
ic
h
it
is
pos
sible
to
gi
ve
a scor
e on
the
e
va
luati
on
o
f
t
he
energ
y
avail
able
on
t
he
sit
e.
Fi
nally,
the
thir
d
ori
gin
al
it
y
is
r
el
at
ed
to
the
pr
es
entat
ion
of
the
ge
ne
rati
on
m
od
e
t
o
com
par
e
the
pro
duct
ion
bala
nces
of
each
wind
tu
rb
i
ne
of
the
pa
rk
f
or
sever
al
yea
rs.
This
pap
e
r
pr
e
sents
a
performa
nce
a
nalysis
of
a
30MW
wi
nd
fa
r
m
instal
le
d
i
n
the
Sa
helia
n
a
rea
in
N
ou
a
kc
ho
tt
,
M
a
ur
it
ani
a.
Th
e
resu
lt
s
le
ad
t
o
the
co
nclu
sio
n
that
most
of
t
he
wind
tur
bin
e
s ar
e
operati
ng opti
mall
y
with
s
li
gh
t
va
riat
ion
s
du
e
to
the
seas
on
a
l
wind
va
riat
ion
of
sp
ee
d
a
nd
directi
on.
The
ca
pacit
y
f
act
or
of
th
e
N
ou
a
kc
ho
tt
wi
nd
fa
r
m
represe
nts
a
hig
h
value
of
42.
58%
s
hows
t
ha
t
our
power
pl
ant
is
am
ong
the
most
e
ff
ic
i
ent
in
t
he
w
or
ld
.
T
hi
s
can
be
e
xpla
in
ed
by
ge
ogra
phic
al
posit
ion
and
cl
imat
ic
conditi
ons
(
high
wind
pote
ntial
)
in
the
farm
si
te
.
It
is
recorde
d
that
T1
pro
duces
t
he
highest
a
m
ount
of
el
ect
ri
ci
ty
du
rin
g
t
he
se
yea
rs
an
d
ha
s
the
hi
ghest
aver
a
ge
capaci
ty
fact
o
r
becau
se
of
it
s
po
sit
io
n
in
f
ront
of
oth
e
r
t
urbines
.
O
n
th
e
oth
er
ha
nd,
gr
i
d
avail
abili
ty
is
un
sta
ble
a
nd
ne
eds
to
be
im
pro
ve
d,
va
ry
i
ng
betwee
n
90.
86%
in
20
16
a
nd
93.16%
in
2018.
I
n
pe
rspect
ive,
the
fu
t
ur
e
w
ork
will
be
m
on
it
ori
ng
t
he
pe
rforma
nce
of
oth
e
r
w
ind
sit
es
i
n
M
a
ur
it
ania
s
uch
a
s
the
100M
W
win
d
far
m
in
Bo
ulao
ir,
4.4
M
W
wind
farm
i
n
Nou
dh
i
bou,
small
wind
farms
of
210KW
in
M
a
mghar
a
nd
27
0KW
in
Chami
f
or
the
opti
miza
ti
on
of
instanta
ne
ous
pro
du
ct
io
n
and
co
ns
e
rv
at
i
on
pe
rfo
rma
nc
e
over
ti
me.
A
lso,
a
n
analys
is
of
performa
nce
degr
adati
on ove
r
ti
me and
de
velo
pm
e
nt w
il
l f
ollow.
ACKN
OWLE
DGE
MENTS
The
aut
hors
th
ank
t
he
M
i
nistry
of
Pet
ro
le
um,
Ene
r
gy,
an
d
M
i
nes
(
M
P
E
M
)
of
M
a
ur
it
a
nia
for
acce
ss
to their
d
at
a.
REFERE
NCE
S
[1]
E
.
R
ebe
l
lo,
D
.
Wa
tson,
and
M
.
Rodgers,
“Per
f
orma
nc
e
an
al
ysi
s
of
a
10
MW
wind
far
m
in
pr
ovidi
ng
se
condary
fre
quenc
y
reg
u
lation:
Expe
r
im
en
t
al
aspe
ct
s
,
”
IEEE
Tr
ansacti
ons
on
Powe
r
S
ystem
s
,
v
o
l.
34,
no.
4,
pp
.
3090
–
309
7
,
Jul.
2019
.
[2]
IRENA
(Inte
rna
ti
onal
Rene
wab
l
e
Ene
rgy
Ag
ency),
“Ma
ur
it
an
i
a:
Rene
wabl
es,
”
2013
.
Availabl
e
:
ww
w.i
ren
a
.
org
/IRE
NA
_RRA_M
aur
it
an
ia
_EN_
2015.
pdf
.
[3]
C
.
Diyoke
,
“A
n
ew
appr
oxi
ma
t
e
ca
pa
ci
ty
fa
ct
or
me
thod
for
m
at
c
hing
wind
tu
rb
in
es
to
a
site:
c
ase
study
of
Humber
reg
ion, UK
,
”
Int
ernati
onal
Journ
al
of
Ene
rg
y
and
Environm
ent
al
Engi
ne
ering
,
v
ol
.
10
,
no
.
4
,
pp
.
4
51
–
462,
2019
.
[4]
A
.
T
.
Sae
ed,
M
.
Q
.
T
aha,
and
A
.
K
.
Ahm
ed,
“
Tra
ck
ing
t
ec
hn
i
que
for
the
sudden
ch
ange
of
PV
inve
rte
r
load
,
”
Inte
rnational
Jo
urnal
of Powe
r
El
e
ct
ronics
and
Dr
iv
e
Syst
em
(I
J
PE
DS)
,
v
o
l. 10,
n
o.
4
,
pp
.
2076
–
2083
,
De
c
.
2019
.
[5]
S
.
K
uma
r
a
and
P
.
Pandeyb
,
“
Survey
and
Perfor
ma
nc
e
Eva
lu
at
io
n
of
Ja
mgodra
n
i
Hill
s
and
Nagd
a
Hil
l
Wi
nd
Far
m
in
Madhya
Prad
esh,
Indi
a
-
A Ca
s
e
Study,
”
Ene
rg
y
Proc
edi
a
,
vol
.
54
,
p
p
.
97
–
104
,
2014.
[6]
B.
K.
Saxen
a
a
nd
K.
V
.
S.
Ra
o,
“Per
forma
n
ce
Analysis
of
W
ind
Pow
er
Pl
ant
at
Devga
r
h
in
Raj
asth
an
,
”
Int
.
Proce
ed
ings
of
2013
Int.
C
on
f.
on
Gr
ee
n
Computing,
Comm
uni
cat
ion
and
Cons
erv
ati
on
o
f
En
ergy
,
pp
.
544
–
547
,
2013
.
[7]
M
.
Q
.
T
aha,
“
Advanta
ges
and
recent
adva
nc
e
s
of
smart
ene
r
gy
grid,
”
Bu
ll
e
t
in
of
El
e
ct
rica
l
Engi
ne
ering
a
nd
Informatic
s
(B
E
EI)
,
v
o
l. 9,
n
o.
5,
pp.
1739
–
1746
,
Oct
.
2020
.
[8]
G
.
Chicco
,
P
.
D
.
Le
o
,
I
.
S
.
Il
ie
,
and
F
.
Sper
t
in
,
“Ope
ra
ti
ona
l
cha
r
acte
rist
ic
s
of
a
27
-
MW
wind
far
m
fro
m
expe
ri
me
nt
al da
t
a
,
”
MELECON
2
008
-
The
14th
I
EE
E
Me
di
te
rr
anean
E
le
c
trotechn
ic
al
Confe
ren
ce
,
Franc
e
,
2008
.
[9]
R.
Ghajur
,
R.
C
hie
did
,
and
M.
Bada
wich
,
“
Wind
Turbi
ne
op
timal
m
atching
b
ase
d
on
ca
p
acit
y
and
availa
b
il
i
t
y
fac
tors,
”
2015
In
te
rnational
Conf
ere
nce on
C
le
an
El
e
ct
rica
l
Pow
er
(ICCEP
)
,
I
ta
ly
,
2008
.
[10]
Y
.
S.
Alwan
,
M
.
S
.
Zi
d
an,
and
M
.
Q
.
Ta
h
a,
“
E
val
ua
ti
on
of
mo
bil
e
microwave
el
e
ct
ri
c
f
ie
ld
se
ver
it
y
at
Al
-
doo
r
reside
nt
ia
l
com
p
le
x
in
Ira
q
,
”
Ind
onesian
Journal
of
E
lectric
a
l
E
ngine
ering
and
Computer
Scien
ce
(I
JE
ECS)
,
v
o
l.
14,
n
o
.
3
,
pp
.
12
81
–
1285
,
June
2
019
.
[11]
V
.
P
.
Khamb
al
k
ar,
D
.
S
.
Ka
rale
,
and
S
.
R
.
Gad
ge,
“Per
for
ma
nc
e
eva
lu
at
ion
of
a
2
MW
wind
power
proj
ec
t
,
”
Journal
of
En
ergy
in
South
ern
A
fric
a
,
v
ol
.
17
,
n
o
.
4,
Nov
.
2006.
[12]
E.
El
a
,
M
.
Mil
ligan
,
and
B
.
Kirb
y,
“
Ope
rating
r
e
serve
s
and
v
aria
ble
g
ene
r
at
ion
,
”
Contract
,
vol.
3
03,
pp.
275
–
300
,
2011.
[13]
M
.
Q
.
T
aha,
Z
.
Hus
ai
n,
and
A
.
K
.
Ahmed
,
“Tw
o
-
le
vel
sche
du
li
ng
sch
em
e
for
int
eg
rated
4G
-
WL
AN
net
work
,
”
Inte
rnational
Jo
urnal
of El
e
ct
ri
c
al
and
Comput
er
Engi
n
ee
ring
,
v
o
l.
10
,
n
o
.
3
,
pp
.
2
633
–
2643
,
Jun
.
2020
.
[14]
J.
Aho
et
al
.
,
“
A
tut
ori
al
of
wind
turbi
ne
cont
rol
f
or
supporting
gri
d
fre
quen
cy
thro
ugh
ac
t
ive
powe
r
cont
rol
,
”
Proc.
Ame
r.
Control
C
onf
,
2012
,
pp
.
31
20
–
3
131
.
[15]
M.
Lore
n
zo
e
t
al.
,
“
Th
e
proof
is
in
the
putting
:
La
rg
e
-
sca
le
d
e
monstra
ti
ons
of
ren
ewa
bl
es
inte
gra
ti
o
n
show
c
ase
rea
l
-
world
soluti
ons
,
”
IE
EE P
ow
er
Ene
rgy
Mag
,
vol.
13
,
no
.
1
,
pp
.
75
–
83
,
2015
.
[16]
Wu
J
.
et
al
.,
“
B
ig
data
me
e
t
gr
e
en
ch
al
l
enge
s:
Big
data
towar
d
gre
en
applic
at
i
ons
,
”
IE
EE
Syst
J
,
vol
.
10
,
no.
3,
pp
.
888
–
900
,
Se
p.
2016
.
Evaluation Warning : The document was created with Spire.PDF for Python.
In
t J
P
ow Elec
& Dri
S
ys
t
IS
S
N: 20
88
-
8
694
Perf
orma
nce
analysis
of
30M
W wi
nd power
plant i
n a
n op
e
ra
ti
o
n mode i
n N
ouakc
ho
tt
.
...
(Bam
ba H
ei
ba)
541
[17]
J
.
Wu
,
S
.
Guo
,
H
.
Huang,
W
.
L
iu
,
and
Y
.
Xiang
,
“In
fo
rmation
a
nd
Comm
uni
cati
ons
Te
chno
logi
e
s
for
Sus
ta
ina
b
le
Deve
lopment
G
oal
s:
St
at
e
-
of
-
th
e
-
Art,
Nee
ds
an
d
Perspec
t
ive
s
,
”
IEE
E
Comm
unications
Surve
ys
a
nd
Tutor
ial
s
,
vo
l
.
20,
no
.
3
,
pp
.
23
89
–
2406,
2018
.
[18]
J.
Ole
a,
E
.
Lo
b
a
to,
I
.
Egi
do
,
and
F.
F
.
Bern
al,
“
I
mpa
c
t
of
wind
o
n
sec
onda
ry
r
eg
ula
ti
ng
power
a
nd
ene
rgy
in
th
e
Spanish
sys
te
m
,
”
Wind
En
ergy
,
vol.
19
,
no
.
12
,
p
p.
2337
–
2348
,
2
016.
[19]
M.
Jansen
,
M
.
Speckm
ann
,
and
R.
Schwinn
,
“
I
mpa
c
t
of
cont
ro
l
r
ese
rve
provisi
on
of
wind
far
m
s
on
reg
ul
at
in
g
power
costs
and bal
an
ci
ng
ene
rg
y
prices,
”
EW
EA E
v
ent
,
2012
,
pp
.
427
–
4
32
.
[20]
C.
R.
Shapiro
,
J.
Meye
rs,
C.
Me
neve
au
,
and
D
.
F.
Gayme,
“
W
in
d
far
ms
providi
n
g
sec
ondar
y
fr
eq
uenc
y
reg
u
la
t
ion
:
Eva
lu
at
ing
the
p
erf
orma
n
ce
of
m
odel
-
base
d
re
ce
d
ing
hori
z
on
control,
”
Journal
of
Phy
sics
Con
fe
re
nce
S
erie
s
,
vol
.
753,
no
.
5
,
2016
.
[21]
W.
Gao
,
Z.
Wu
,
J.
W
ang
,
and
S.
Gu,
“
A
r
evi
ew
of
in
ert
i
a
and
f
req
uenc
y
con
tro
l
t
ec
hnolog
ie
s
f
or
var
i
abl
e
spee
d
wind
turbi
n
es
,
”
Proc.
25
th
Ch
in. IE
E
E
Control
D
ec
is.
Conf
,
2013
,
pp.
2527
–
2
533
.
[22]
M
.
Q
.
Ta
ha
and
A
.
Lpiza
,
“
Desig
n
a
New
PWM
Sw
it
chi
ng
Tec
hni
que
in
Multi
le
ve
l
Conver
te
rs
,
”
IE
EE
Conn
ec
t
ic
ut
Confe
renc
e
on
I
ndustrial
El
e
ct
r
onic
s
Technol
og
y
&
Au
tomati
on
2016
,
Univer
sity
of
Bridge
port
,
CT,
Unit
ed
State
s
of
Amer
i
ca,
Oc
t
.
2016.
[23]
D.
L
ew
e
t
a
l
.
,
“
Wi
nd
and
sol
ar
cur
tailment
,
”
Proc.
Int.
Worksh
op
Lar
ge
Sca
le
Inte
ger.
Wind
P
ower
Into
Power
Syste
ms
,
2013
,
p
p.
577
–
5
86
.
[24]
R
.
J.
Cam
pb
ell
,
“
Th
e
Smar
t
Grid:
Stat
us
an
d
Outlook,
”
Co
ngre
ss
iona
l
Res
ea
rch
Serv
ice,
2018
.
Availabl
e
:
ww
w.c
rs.gov
.
[25]
K.
Kops
ida
s
and
M.
M.
Ga
le
e
la,
“Uti
lizing
d
ema
nd
response
to
i
mprove
n
et
work
rel
i
abilit
y
and
a
gei
ng
r
esil
i
enc
e
,
”
IEE
E
Tr
ansacti
o
ns on
Powe
r
Sys
te
ms
,
vol
.
34
,
no
.
3
,
pp
.
2216
–
22
27,
2018
.
[26]
A
.
K
.
Ahmed
,
M
.
Q
.
Ta
h
a,
an
d
A
.
S
.
Mus
ta
f
a,
“
On
-
ro
ad
Automobi
l
e
L
ic
ens
e
Plate
Re
cogni
ti
on
Us
ing
Co
-
Occ
urre
nc
e
Ma
t
rix
,
”
Journal
of
Adv
anc
ed
Re
sea
rch
in
D
ynamic
a
l
&
Control
S
yst
ems
,
v
ol
.
10
,
n
o
.
7,
pp.
387
–
393,
Jun.
2018.
[27]
Z.
Bi
e,
Y.
Li
n,
G.
Li,
and
F.
Li
,
“Ba
ttling
the
extrem
e
:
A
study
o
n
the
pow
er
sys
te
m
r
esil
i
enc
e
,
”
Proce
ed
ings
of
t
he
IEE
E
,
vo
l. 105,
no.
7
,
pp
.
1253
–
1266,
2017
.
[28]
M.
Pant
el
i
and
P.
Manc
are
l
la,
“In
flue
n
ce
of
e
xtre
m
e
we
at
he
r
and
clim
at
e
ch
ange
on
th
e
res
il
ie
n
ce
of
powe
r
sys
te
ms:
Impact
s
and
poss
ibl
e
mi
ti
g
at
ion
strate
gie
s,”
Elec
tri
c
Powe
r
Syste
ms
Re
search
,
vol
.
127,
pp.
259
-
27
0,
2015.
[29]
M
.
H
.
Al
-
Jum
ai
l
i
and
A
.
S
.
Abda
lka
for,
M
.
Q
.
T
a
ha,
“
Analysis
of
the
h
ard
and
soft
shading
im
pa
ct
on
photovol
t
aic
modul
e
per
form
anc
e
using
solar
modu
le
t
este
r
,
”
Int
ernati
onal
J
ournal
of
Pow
e
r
Elec
troni
cs
an
d
Dr
iv
e
S
yste
m
(IJ
PE
DS)
,
v
ol
.
1
0,
n
o
.
2
,
pp
.
101
4
–
1021
,
Jun
.
20
19
.
[30]
R.
Roofega
r
inej
ad
and
W.
Sun, “Chance
-
constr
a
ine
d
servi
ce
r
est
ora
ti
on
for
d
istribution
ne
tworks wit
h
ren
ewa
b
le
s,
”
in
IE
EE Int
ernat
ional
Conf
ere
nc
e
on
Probabil
ist
i
c
Me
thods A
pp
lied
to
Pow
er
Syst
ems
,
2018.
[31]
C.
Ahn
and
H.
Peng,
“De
ce
ntr
a
li
z
ed
and
r
ea
l
-
time
power
dispa
t
ch
cont
ro
l
f
or
a
n
isla
nded
mi
cro
grid
supported
b
y
distri
bute
d
powe
r
source
s
,
”
Ene
r
gie
s
,
v
o
l
.
6,
no.
12,
pp
.
6439
–
64
54
,
De
c. 2013
.
[32]
N.
Daha
l
,
O.
Abuomar
,
R.
King
,
and
V.
Mada
ni
,
“E
v
ent
str
ea
m
proc
essing
for
i
mprove
d
situ
at
i
onal
aw
are
ness
i
n
the
sm
art gri
d
,
”
Ex
pert
Syste
ms
Appl
ic
a
ti
ons
,
vo
l.
42
,
pp
.
6853
–
6
863
,
2015
.
[33]
M
.
Q
.
T
aha
,
M
.
H
.
A
l
-
Jum
ai
l
i
,
and
A
.
K
.
Ahmed
,
“Mode
l
i
ng
the
Di
elec
tr
ic
Mediu
ms
Im
pac
t
on
Coax
ial
Tra
nsmiss
ion
L
i
ne
Perform
anc
e
,
”
Journal
of
En
gine
ering
and
A
ppli
ed
S
ci
en
ce
s
,
v
ol
.
13
,
no.
20,
pp
.
8419
–
8425
,
2018
.
Evaluation Warning : The document was created with Spire.PDF for Python.