Int
ern
at
i
onal
Journ
al of
P
ower E
le
ctr
on
i
cs a
n
d
Drive
S
ystem
s
(
IJ
PEDS
)
Vo
l.
12
,
No.
1
,
M
a
r 202
1
, p
p.
45
3
~
46
2
IS
S
N:
20
88
-
8694
,
DOI: 10
.11
591/
ij
peds
.
v12.i
1
.
pp
45
3
-
46
2
453
Journ
al h
om
e
page
:
http:
//
ij
pe
ds
.i
aescore.c
om
Fuzzy
l
ogic
co
ntro
l
of
acti
ve
and
reacti
ve
power
f
or
a
grid
-
connect
ed
photo
voltai
c
system
using
a
t
hree
-
lev
el
neutr
al
-
point
-
clamped
invert
er
Ghrissi
Ta
hri
1
,
Zou
bir
Ah
m
ed
F
oitih
2
,
Ali
Tahri
3
1,2
LE
PES
A
La
bo
rat
ory
,
E
le
c
tronics
depa
r
tment,
E
le
c
tri
c
al
Engi
n
eering
Facu
lt
y,
De
par
tment
of
E
lec
troni
cs
Engi
ne
er
ing
of
the
Univer
si
ty
of
Sci
ence
and
Te
chno
logy
of
Oran,
Moha
me
d
Boudia
f
US
TO
-
MB,
Oran,
Alge
ria
3
El
e
ct
ri
ca
l
Eng
in
ee
ring
L
abor
at
or
y,
E
lectr
i
ca
l
Eng
ine
er
ing
Facu
lt
y
of
the
Univer
si
ty
of
Sci
ence
and
Te
chno
logy
of
Oran,
Mohame
d
Boud
i
af
US
TO
-
MB,
O
ran
,
Alg
eria
Art
ic
le
In
f
o
ABSTR
A
CT
Art
ic
le
hist
or
y:
Re
cei
ved
M
a
y
3
,
20
20
Re
vised
Jan
19
,
20
21
Accepte
d
Fe
b
3,
2021
Thi
s
pape
r
aims
to
pre
sent
a
fu
zzy
logi
c
cont
ro
l
(
FLC)
of
active
a
nd
react
iv
e
power
for
a
grid
-
conne
c
te
d
phot
ovolt
aic
sys
tem.
The
PV
sys
tem
is
connect
ed
to
th
e
gr
id
ut
il
i
ty
using
a
thr
ee
-
level
n
eut
r
al
po
int
cl
a
mpe
d
inve
r
te
r
(3L
-
NP
C)
and
LC
L
f
il
t
er.
Two
cont
ro
l
str
a
te
gi
es,
fu
zz
y
log
ic
cont
rol
,
and
c
onvent
ion
al
PI
cont
ro
l
ar
e
a
ppli
ed
.
The
d
esi
gn
of
th
e
two
c
ontrol
strategi
es
is
base
d
on
ca
l
cul
a
ti
ng
th
e
i
nstant
an
eous
ac
t
ive
and
re
active
power
from
th
e
measured
grid
vol
ta
g
es
an
d
cur
r
ent
s
to
al
l
ow
the
sys
te
m
to
hav
e
a
dyn
am
i
c
robustn
ess
per
forma
n
ce
ag
ai
nst
a
sudden
cha
nge
in
r
eact
ive
power
and
sati
sfac
tory
ac
t
ive
power
tr
ac
king
under
r
api
d
sol
ar
rad
i
at
ion
ch
ange
s.
The
cont
ro
l
strat
eg
ie
s
can
trans
fer
the
to
ta
l
active
power
g
ene
r
at
ed
by
the
PV
a
rra
y
to
th
e
grid
u
ti
lity
with
high
power
qu
ality
and
a
uni
ty
p
ower
fa
ct
or
.
The
simul
at
io
n
result
s
using
th
e
Mat
la
b
-
Simu
li
n
k
env
ironm
en
t
show
that
the
FL
C
stra
te
gy
has
a
b
et
t
er
dy
nam
i
c
per
f
ormance
wi
th
l
ess
sett
l
ing
ti
m
e,
an
d
over
shoo
t
com
par
ed
to
th
e
conve
nt
iona
l
PI
cont
rol
.
Ke
yw
or
d
s
:
Acti
ve
a
nd
rea
ct
ive
powe
r
Fu
zz
y
lo
gic
c
ontr
ol
NP
C
in
ve
rter
Pertu
rb
an
d
ob
serv
PV
a
rr
a
y
This
is
an
open
acc
ess
arti
cl
e
un
der
the
CC
BY
-
SA
l
ic
ense
.
Corres
pond
in
g
Aut
h
or
:
Ghrissi
Ta
hr
i
LEPES
A
La
bo
ratory,
Ele
ct
r
onic
s
Dep
a
rtme
nt,
Ele
ct
rical
E
ng
i
neer
i
ng
Fac
ulty
Un
i
ver
sit
y
of
S
ci
ence
a
nd
Tec
hnolog
y
of
O
ra
n,
Moha
me
d
B
oudiaf
,
US
T
O
-
MB
BP
1505
El
M
’
naoue
r,
Or
a
n,
31000,
Alge
ria
Emai
l:
ghrissi.t
ahr
i@
univ
-
us
t
o.dz
1.
INTROD
U
CTION
Photo
vo
lt
ai
c
e
nerg
y
is
now
r
ecognize
d
as
one
of
t
he
prom
isi
ng
ren
e
wa
ble
energ
y
s
ourc
es
that
can
ens
ur
e
e
nergy
transiti
on
in
t
he
f
uture.
P
hoto
vo
lt
ai
c
e
ne
rgy
is
kn
own
to
be
saf
e,
poll
utio
n
-
fr
ee
a
nd
doe
s
not
require
e
xpen
sive
mai
ntena
nc
e,
s
uch
as
fo
s
sil
fu
el
s
[
1]
.
Larg
e
ph
otov
ol
ta
ic
sy
ste
ms
are
now
c
onne
ct
ed
to
the
ut
il
i
ty
gri
d
a
nd
co
ntribute
to
the
gr
ow
i
ng
dema
nd
f
or
el
ect
rical
energy
[2].
T
o
ens
ure
maxim
um
tr
ansmissi
on
of
el
ect
rical
energy,
the
phot
ov
oltai
c
(P
V
)
s
ys
te
m
m
us
t
mai
ntain
the
PV
ar
ray
to
operate
at
its
ma
ximum
powe
r
po
i
nt
(
M
P
P).
M
ore
ov
e
r,
the
gri
d
-
co
nnect
ed
PV
sy
ste
m
mu
st
be
hi
gh
l
y
c
on
t
ro
ll
ed
to
guara
ntee
t
he
secu
rity
a
nd
reli
abili
ty
of
the
powe
r
s
ys
te
m
[
3].
Acti
ve
a
nd
reacti
ve
co
nt
ro
l
is
a
c
r
ucial
ta
sk
to
mai
ntain
the
sta
bili
ty
of
t
he
powe
r
s
ys
te
m
netw
ork.
T
herefo
re,
the
re
ne
wab
le
ene
r
gy
so
urces
c
onne
ct
ed
to
the
el
e
ct
rical
util
it
y
mu
st
be
well
co
ntr
olled
to
a
void
an
y
instabil
it
y
of
t
he
powe
r
flo
w
[
4]
.
Durin
g
t
he
la
st
deca
des,
ma
ny
stu
dies
hav
e
been
ca
rr
ie
d
out
to
im
pro
ve
act
ive
an
d
re
act
ive
power
con
t
ro
l
of
gri
d
-
c
onnecte
d
PV
sy
ste
m
s.
Re
centl
y,
Laag
oubi
et
.
al
.
[
5]
propose
d
act
ive
an
d
reac
ti
ve
pow
er
c
on
trol
strat
e
gy
of
PV
gri
d
-
c
onne
ct
ed
s
ys
te
m
ba
sed
on
two
fu
zz
y
l
og
ic
co
ntr
oller
s.
T
he
first
one
f
or
MPPT
an
d
the
sec
ond
one
for
act
ive
a
nd
reacti
ve
c
urren
ts.
Evaluation Warning : The document was created with Spire.PDF for Python.
IS
S
N
:
2088
-
8
694
In
t J
P
ow
Ele
c
&
D
ri
S
ys
t,
V
ol
.
12
, N
o.
1
,
Ma
rch
20
21
:
45
3
–
46
2
454
The
main
wea
kn
e
ss
of
t
he
pro
posed
strat
e
gy
is
that
t
he
sy
ste
m
is
not
sensiti
ve
to
ch
ang
e
in
a
loca
l
load
connecte
d
to
t
he
AC
si
de.
Nag
a
raja
Ra
o
et
.
al
.
[
6]
de
velo
ped
a
c
on
trol
strat
e
gy
a
pp
li
ed
to
a
PV
gr
i
d
-
connecte
d
sy
st
em
us
i
ng
a
mul
ti
le
vel
inv
erter.
In
the
pro
po
sed
strat
e
gy
t
he
act
ive
an
d
re
act
ive
curre
nts
of
t
he
AC
side
are
not
meas
ur
e
d.
T
her
e
fore,
th
e
st
abili
ty
an
d
r
el
ia
bili
ty
of
the
powe
r
s
ys
te
m
c
annot
be
gu
a
ra
nteed
especial
ly
wh
e
n
c
hanges
occ
urre
d
in
the
wea
ther
par
a
mete
r
s.
A
meer
ul
et
.
al
.
[
7]
pro
pose
d
a
nonlinea
r
c
on
t
rol
of
a
PV
gri
d
-
c
onnected
s
ys
te
m
that
us
es
in
sta
ntane
ou
s
ac
ti
ve
an
d
reacti
ve
powe
r
c
ompone
nts
as
dy
namic
var
ia
bles.
T
he
method
has
some
ad
va
ntages
to
the
af
oreme
ntion
e
d
meth
ods
but
in
a
pres
ence
of
a
th
ree
-
phas
e
fau
lt
,
t
he
s
ys
te
m
ex
hib
it
s
a
hi
gh
volt
age
pea
k
at
the
AC
sid
e.
H
oweve
r,
ac
ti
ve
an
d
reacti
ve
powe
r
c
on
tr
ol
is
a
crit
ic
al
ta
sk
in
po
wer
ma
na
ge
ment
f
or
the
powe
r
s
ys
te
m
.
Us
ually
,
el
ect
rical
co
mp
a
nie
s
gua
ran
te
e
an
act
ive
powe
r
fl
ow
for
in
dustria
l
us
e
rs
wit
h
ma
ndat
ory
that
us
e
rs
mu
st
c
on
t
ro
l
r
eact
ive
powe
r
in
the
AC
side
.
Any
def
ic
it
in
reacti
ve
powe
r
will
hav
e
a
gr
eat
im
pact
on
t
he
volt
age
pr
of
il
e
a
nd
powe
r
s
ys
te
m
reli
abili
ty
[8]
-
[12].
In
t
his
pa
pe
r,
f
uzzy
lo
gic
co
nt
ro
ll
ers
(F
LCs
)
for
act
ive
a
nd
reacti
ve
power
are
pro
po
se
d.
The
go
al
of
the
pro
po
se
d
c
on
t
ro
l
strat
eg
y
is
to
t
ransfe
r
t
he
act
ive
powe
r
ge
ne
rated
by
a
PV
a
rr
a
y
to
the
gri
d
util
it
y
with
a
un
it
y
po
wer
fa
ct
or
.
The
c
on
tr
ol
strat
eg
y
des
ign
is
base
d
on
cal
culat
in
g
t
he
in
sta
ntane
ous
act
ive
an
d
r
eact
ive
powe
r
f
rom
t
he
meas
ur
e
d
gr
i
d
vo
lt
age
s
a
nd
curre
nts;
there
fore,
t
he
c
on
t
r
ol
syst
em
giv
e
s
dyna
mic
r
ob
us
tness
performa
nce
a
gainst
a
s
udde
n
cha
nge
in
re
act
ive
powe
r
a
nd
sat
is
factory
act
ive
powe
r
trackin
g
under
rap
i
d
so
la
r
ra
diati
on
changes
.
U
nd
e
r
a
sim
ulati
on
study
with
M
at
la
b
Sim
ulin
k
S
impowe
rsyste
ms
t
oo
l
box,
it
can
be
no
ti
ced
that
the
pro
posed
f
uzzy
lo
gic
c
ontr
ol
(
FLC)
strat
eg
y
has
a
f
ast
dyna
mic
pe
rformance
re
sp
onse
com
par
e
d
to
c
onve
ntion
al
PI
con
t
ro
l.
2.
RESEA
R
CH
METHO
D
2.1.
Ma
in
str
uct
ur
e
of
grid
-
c
on
n
ected
PV
syste
m
The
gr
id
-
c
onne
ct
ed
PV
sy
ste
m
is
show
n
in
Figure
1.
It
con
sist
s
of
a
PV
ar
ray
rated
to
80
kW
an
d
com
posed
of
40
par
al
le
l
an
d
10
series
-
co
nn
ect
ed
K
yocera
so
la
r
KC
200GT
mod
ules.
The
par
a
mete
r
s
of
the
Kyoce
ra
so
la
r
KC200GT
modu
le
a
re
ta
ke
n
as
giv
e
n
by
the
man
uf
act
ur
e
r
[13].
Pe
rtu
rb
and
obse
rv
e
d
(
P&O
)
base
d
M
P
PT
c
on
t
ro
l
strat
eg
y
is
im
pleme
nted
us
in
g
a
boos
t
DC
-
DC
c
onve
rter
to
mainta
in
the
PV
ar
ra
y
to
op
e
rate
at
its
maxim
um
power
po
i
nt.
T
he
(P
&
O)
method
us
ed
in
this
w
ork
is
as
stud
ie
d
in
previ
ou
s
work
[14
]
-
[
16]
.
A
t
hr
ee
-
le
vel
neu
t
ral
point
cl
ampe
d
in
ve
rter
(3L
-
NP
C)
is
c
onnected
to
t
he
gr
i
d
util
it
y
thr
ough
an
LCL
filt
er
to
e
nha
nce
t
he
AC
powe
r
flo
w
qual
it
y.
A
lo
cal
reacti
ve
loa
d
is
c
onnecte
d
to
t
he
gr
i
d
w
hi
ch
can
be
c
hange
d
fro
m
10
kVAR
in
du
ct
ive
m
ode
to
10
kV
AR
ca
pacit
ive
m
ode
and
vice
ve
rsa.
The
local
reac
ti
ve
load
is
us
ed
to
check
t
he
reac
ti
ve
con
t
ro
l
ca
pab
il
it
y
of
the
sy
ste
m
to
pro
vi
de
a
unit
y
po
wer
facto
r
at
the
AC
bus
ba
r.
PV
I
PV
V
D
C
-
D
C
B
O
O
S
T
C
O
N
V
E
R
T
E
R
G
r
o
u
p
o
f
P
V
M
o
d
u
l
e
s
out
I
P
&
O
M
P
P
T
C
o
n
t
r
o
l
P
W
M
n
dc
V
p
dc
V
1
C
2
C
p
c
o
3
-
l
e
v
e
l
n
e
u
t
r
a
l
p
o
i
n
t
c
l
a
m
p
e
d
(
N
P
C
)
f
R
f
L
s
R
s
L
f
C
C
R
G
r
i
d
a
e
b
e
c
e
+
-
+
-
+
-
a
i
b
i
c
i
P
L
L
gd
v
gq
v
d
q
a
b
c
gd
i
gq
i
I
n
s
o
l
a
t
i
o
n
(
)
2
W
m
T
e
m
p
e
r
a
t
u
r
e
(
)
0
C
G
a
t
e
s
i
g
n
a
l
s
P
W
M
g
e
n
e
r
a
t
o
r
-
3
l
e
v
e
l
s
d
q
a
b
c
*
d
i
*
q
i
B
l
o
c
k
o
f
c
u
r
r
e
n
t
c
o
n
t
r
o
l
id
v
iq
v
B
l
o
c
k
o
f
a
c
t
i
v
e
a
n
d
r
e
a
c
t
i
v
e
p
o
w
e
r
c
o
n
t
r
o
l
Q
P
d
q
P
Q
gd
v
gd
i
gq
v
gq
i
*
P
*
0
Q
=
-
+
-
+
i
a
b
c
v
A
B
C
a
b
c
A
B
C
A
B
C
a
b
c
A
B
C
I
n
d
u
c
t
i
v
e
l
o
a
d
C
a
p
a
c
i
t
i
v
e
l
o
a
d
G
r
i
d
B
u
s
b
a
r
Figure
1.
G
rid
-
connecte
d
PV
sy
ste
m
Evaluation Warning : The document was created with Spire.PDF for Python.
In
t J
P
ow Elec
& Dri S
ys
t
IS
S
N: 20
88
-
8
694
Fuzz
y
lo
gic control
of
activ
e a
nd r
eacti
ve
powe
r fo
r
a grid
-
co
nnect
ed p
hotovoltaic
…
(
G
hr
issi
T
ahri
)
455
The
i
ns
ta
nta
ne
ou
s
act
ive
a
nd
reacti
ve
powe
r
fl
ow
i
ng
to
the
AC
gr
i
d
a
re
cal
culat
ed
as
gi
ven
by
(1)
and
(
2)
:
=
3
2
(
+
)
(1)
=
3
2
(
−
)
(2)
Wh
e
re:
v
gd
,
v
gq
:
AC
gr
i
d
util
it
y
side
volt
age
in
dq
f
ra
me.
i
gd
,
i
gq
:
act
ive
and
reacti
ve
cu
r
ren
t
in
dq
f
ram
e.
Takin
g
int
o
ac
count
that
the
d
a
xis
is
de
finite
ly
al
ign
e
d
with
the
gri
d
vo
lt
age
w
hich
means
t
ha
t
v
gq
=
0,
the
c
ur
ren
ts
in
the
dq
fr
ame
are
cal
culat
ed
as
(
3)
an
d
(4)
[17],
[18]
:
=
(
2
3
)
(
)
(3)
=
−
(
2
3
)
(
)
(4)
As
sho
wn
in
Figure
2,
the
act
ive
an
d
rea
ct
ive
po
wer
c
on
t
ro
l
pro
vid
e
s
as
outp
ut
t
he
act
ive
a
nd
reacti
ve
c
urrent
s
set
po
i
nts
us
e
d
in
the
dec
ou
pled
c
urre
nt
c
ontr
ol.
T
he
outp
ut
po
wer
ge
nerat
ed
by
t
he
PV
arr
a
y
is
ta
ken
as
the
act
ive
powe
r
r
efere
nce
w
hile
the
ref
e
re
nce
reacti
ve
po
wer
is
set
to
zero
.
Ther
e
f
or
e,
t
he
act
ive
powe
r
gen
e
rated
by
the
PV
ar
r
ay
is
c
omplet
el
y
tra
nsfer
red
to
the
AC
gr
id
P
I
C
u
r
r
e
n
t
c
o
n
t
r
o
l
l
e
r
P
I
C
u
r
r
e
n
t
c
o
n
t
r
o
l
l
e
r
d
q
a
b
c
+
+
+
-
+
+
W
*
L
W
*
L
gd
i
gq
i
-
+
-
+
gq
i
gd
i
gd
v
gq
v
abc
v
P
I
c
o
n
t
r
o
l
l
e
r
*
P
*
0
Q
=
Q
P
P
I
c
o
n
t
r
o
l
l
e
r
gd
v
(
)
(
)
(
)
2
12
3
uu
(
)
(
)
(
)
2
21
3
uu
−
*
d
i
*
q
i
d
q
P
Q
gd
v
gd
i
gq
v
gq
i
-
+
-
+
A
c
t
i
v
e
a
n
d
r
e
a
c
t
i
v
e
p
o
w
e
r
c
o
n
t
r
o
l
D
e
c
o
u
p
l
e
d
c
u
r
r
e
n
t
c
o
n
t
r
o
l
Figure
2.
Bl
oc
k
diag
ram
of
a
ct
ive
an
d
reacti
ve
powe
r
a
nd
de
coupled
cu
rre
nt
co
ntr
ol
The
mathemat
i
cal
model
of
t
he
cu
rr
e
nts
fl
owing
from
the
i
nverter
to
t
he
gri
d
util
it
y
is
give
n
by
(
5)
.
[
]
=
[
−
−
−
]
[
]
+
1
[
−
−
]
(5)
wh
e
re
:
=
+
and
=
+
R
s
,
L
s
:
gr
id
sid
e
resist
or
a
nd
inducto
r.
R
f
,
L
f
:
3L
-
NP
C
side
resist
or
a
nd
in
du
ct
or.
:
gri
d
an
gula
r
velocit
y.
The
matri
x
m
odel
as
sho
wn
in
e
quat
ion
(
5)
exh
i
bits
cr
os
s
-
couplin
g
te
r
ms
an
d
,
a
nd
have
feed
-
f
orwa
rd
te
rms
an
d
.
F
or
eff
ic
ie
nt
co
ntr
ol,
the
two
c
urr
ent
co
mpo
ne
nts
m
us
t
be
dec
ouple
d.
Evaluation Warning : The document was created with Spire.PDF for Python.
IS
S
N
:
2088
-
8
694
In
t J
P
ow
Ele
c
&
D
ri
S
ys
t,
V
ol
.
12
, N
o.
1
,
Ma
rch
20
21
:
45
3
–
46
2
456
2.2.
Dec
ou
pled
PI
contr
ol
desig
n
In
the
la
st
dec
ades,
LCL
filt
ers
were
e
xten
sively
us
e
d
in
a
gri
d
-
co
nnect
ed
PV
s
ys
te
m
due
to
thei
r
capab
il
it
y
to
a
tt
enu
at
e
harmo
nics
a
nd
prov
i
de
high
powe
r
qual
it
y
[19],
[
20]
.
T
he
LCL
filt
er
is
an
ess
entia
l
dev
ic
e
to
el
imi
nate
ha
rm
on
ic
s
co
ntents
pr
ese
nt
in
in
ve
rter
outp
ut
cu
rr
e
nts.
It
is
cal
culat
ed
ta
kin
g
into
a
cc
ount
the
power
rati
ng
of
the
in
vert
er,
t
he
s
witc
hi
ng
f
re
qu
e
nc
y,
and
the
gr
id
frequ
e
nc
y.
T
he
eff
ect
of
dam
pi
ng
can
ob
st
ru
ct
r
eso
na
nce
pro
blems
passivel
y
or
ac
ti
vely.
T
he
po
wer
rati
ng
of
t
he
in
ver
te
r
,
the
switc
hing
f
requen
c
y,
and
the
gri
d
fr
e
qu
e
nc
y
a
re
ess
entia
l
as
in
pu
ts
f
or
s
el
ect
ing
t
he
LCL
filt
er
pa
rameters
.
Since
the
eq
uat
ion
s
ab
ove,
t
he
trans
fer
f
unct
ion
of
t
he
op
e
n
-
loop
c
urren
t
c
ontr
ol
f
or
the
s
yst
em
can
be
giv
e
n
as
(
6)
:
(
)
=
⋅
+
(
)
⋅
1
1
+
⋅
1
+
(
)
(6)
Wh
e
re:
Kp
an
d
Ki
are
the
PI
c
on
t
ro
ll
er
pa
ra
mete
rs.
is
the
ti
me
de
la
y
due
to
t
he
PWM
cal
c
ulati
on
an
d
c
omp
utati
on
needed
in
dig
it
al
c
on
tr
ol.
Tu
ning
of
PI
ga
in
pa
ramete
rs
is
justi
fied
by
(
7)
:
=
(7)
Th
us
,
t
he
tra
nsfer
f
un
ct
io
n
of
the
cl
os
e
d
-
l
oop
cu
rr
e
nt
co
ntr
ol
for
the
s
ys
te
m
can
be
s
how
n
as
(
8)
:
(
)
=
2
+
(
1
)
⋅
+
(8)
The
cl
os
ed
-
loop
c
urren
t
c
ontr
ol
tra
ns
fe
r
func
ti
on
in
a
sec
on
d
-
orde
r
gen
e
ral
f
or
m
s
ys
te
m
is
(
9)
:
(
)
=
2
2
+
2
+
2
(9)
By
ide
ntify
i
ng
equ
at
io
n
(
8)
to
equ
at
io
n
(
9)
,
the
PI
co
ntr
oller
par
a
mete
rs
a
re
fou
nd
to
be:
=
2
(10)
=
2
(
)
(11)
The
pro
portio
nal
an
d
i
nteg
r
al
gains
of
the
PI
c
ontrolle
r
are
cal
culat
ed
from
t
he
e
qu
at
ion
s
a
bove
.
The
dam
ping
c
oeffici
ent
was
pro
po
se
d
to
be
0.707
1
a
nd
w
as
ap
pro
ximate
d
to
be
0.0
01
s
:
{
=
2
.
07
=
50
(12)
2.3.
M
od
el
of
PQ
FLC
c
ontrolle
r
The
FLC
c
omp
ared
to
ot
her
c
onve
ntion
al
co
ntr
ol
te
ch
nique
s
does
not
requ
ire
pri
or
knowl
edg
e
of
t
he
mathemat
ic
al
model
of
t
he
s
ys
te
m.
On
t
he
oth
e
r
hand,
thi
s
arti
fici
al
inte
ll
igence
c
on
tr
ol
strat
eg
y
needs
a
set
of
ru
le
s
base
d
essenti
al
ly
on
t
he
kn
ow
le
dge
of
t
he
ope
rator
mani
pu
la
ti
ng
the
sy
ste
m
[
21]
.
T
he
desc
ription
of
the
f
uzzy
c
ontr
oller
sho
ws
th
at
the
sign
ific
a
nt
quantit
ie
s
for
the
c
on
tr
ol
ar
e
the
erro
r
an
d
the
cha
ng
e
of
error
of
the
act
ive
a
nd
reacti
ve
po
wer.
The
act
iv
e
power
ref
e
re
nce
P
*
is
s
uppl
ie
d
by
t
he
PV
arr
a
y
an
d
the
r
eact
ive
powe
r
ref
e
re
nc
e
Q
*
is
set
to
zer
o.
F
or
the
inputs
of
the
fu
zz
y
lo
gic
con
t
ro
ll
er,
we
will
adopt
the
two
char
act
e
risti
cs
par
a
mete
rs
no
t
ed
as
E
and
E
.
The
basic
te
ch
niqu
e
of
F
LC
is
an
associat
ion
of
the
f
ollo
win
g
three
processe
s
:
fu
zzi
ficat
io
n,
fu
zz
y
i
nf
e
ren
c
e,
an
d
de
fu
zzi
f
ic
at
ion
[
22]
.
The
f
uzz
y
lo
gi
c
con
t
ro
l
diag
r
am
is
pr
e
sente
d
in
Fi
gure
3.
It
is
com
posed
of
fou
r
bl
ock
s
wh
ic
h
are
exp
la
ine
d
as
f
ol
low:
-
The
nor
mali
zat
ion
facto
rs
ar
e
ass
ociat
ed
with
the
er
r
or
E
,
i
ts
va
riat
ion
E
,
a
nd
the
var
ia
ti
on
of
t
he
var
ia
ble
co
ntr
ol
.
-
The
blo
c
k
of
F
uzzifica
ti
on
of
the
er
ror
a
nd
its
va
riat
ion
.
Evaluation Warning : The document was created with Spire.PDF for Python.
In
t J
P
ow Elec
& Dri S
ys
t
IS
S
N: 20
88
-
8
694
Fuzz
y
lo
gic control
of
activ
e a
nd r
eacti
ve
powe
r fo
r
a grid
-
co
nnect
ed p
hotovoltaic
…
(
G
hr
issi
T
ahri
)
457
-
The
ru
le
s
of
the
f
uzzy
lo
gic
c
on
t
ro
ll
er.
-
The
defuzzifi
c
at
ion
blo
c
k
is
use
d
to
c
onver
t
t
he
fu
zz
y
c
ontr
ol
va
riat
ion
to
a
nume
rical
va
lue
[
23]
.
F
u
z
z
f
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
1
Z
−
E
E
1
Z
−
U
U
E
K
+
-
(
)
**
PQ
(
)
PQ
I
n
f
e
r
e
n
c
e
m
e
c
h
a
n
i
s
m
D
e
f
u
z
z
i
f
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
E
K
U
K
G
r
i
d
p
a
r
a
m
e
t
e
r
s
d
e
t
e
c
t
i
o
n
+
-
+
+
Figure
3.
The
s
cheme
of
a
fuz
zy
c
on
t
ro
ll
er
.
2.4.
Desi
gn
of
PQ
Fuzzy
co
nt
r
ol
The
PQ
f
uzzy
log
ic
c
ontr
ol
di
agr
a
m
is
dep
ic
t
ed
in
Fig
ure
4.
1
z
1
z
1
z
1
z
P
F
u
z
z
y
C
o
n
t
r
o
l
l
e
r
*
P
*
Q
Q
P
Q
F
u
z
z
y
C
o
n
t
r
o
l
l
e
r
gd
v
(
)
(
)
(
)
2
12
3
uu
(
)
(
)
(
)
2
21
3
uu
−
*
d
i
*
q
i
d
q
P
Q
gd
v
gd
i
gq
v
gq
i
-
+
5
2
.
1
0
−
4
2
.
1
0
−
80
+
+
-
+
3
2
.
1
0
−
2
2
.
1
0
−
3
5
.
1
0
−
+
+
-
+
-
+
P
E
P
E
Q
E
Q
E
Figure
4.
PQ
f
uzzy
lo
gic
c
on
t
ro
l
diag
ram.
Fuzzi
fica
tion:
This
ste
p
em
pl
oy
s
the
mem
ber
s
hip
functi
on
s
(
M
Fs
)
to
conve
rt
real
quantit
ie
s
to
f
uz
zy
va
riables.
These
(
M
Fs
)
ha
ve
dif
fer
e
nt
s
hap
e
s
but
tria
ngle
a
nd
tra
pez
oid
sh
a
pes
are
the
c
om
m
only
us
e
d
ty
pes
.
T
he
in
pu
t
and
outp
ut
var
i
ables
are
re
pr
e
sented
by
se
ve
n
li
nguisti
c
va
r
ia
bles,
na
mely:
NB
(
Ne
gative
Bi
g)
,
NM
(
Ne
ga
ti
ve
M
e
diu
m
),
NS
(N
e
gative
S
ma
ll
),
ZE
(
Zer
o),
PS
(
Posi
ti
ve
Small
),
PM
(Posit
ive
M
edi
um),
a
nd
PB
(Posit
ive
Bi
g)
.
The
mem
ber
s
hip
f
unct
io
ns
of
the
i
nput
and
outp
ut
var
i
ables
are
s
how
n
in
Fig
ure
5.
Fuzzy
inferen
ce:
The
M
Fs
are
c
ombine
d
with
t
he
c
on
t
ro
l
ru
le
s
to
get
the
c
ontr
ol
outp
ut.
T
he
f
unda
me
ntal
par
t
of
this
ste
p
is
the
f
uzz
y
co
ntr
ol
r
ules,
wh
ic
h
are
rela
te
d
directl
y
to
a
human
bei
ng’s
ex
pe
rtise
.
H
ow
e
ve
r,
in
Tab
le
1,
49
f
uzz
y
r
ules
for
e
rror
an
d
c
hange
of
er
r
or
are
sel
ect
ed
ac
cordin
g
to
the
M
am
da
ni
meth
od
[24
]
,
[
25]
.
Def
u
zzi
fica
tio
n:
The
de
f
uzzific
at
ion
ope
rati
on
al
lows
us
to
c
al
culat
e
fr
om
the
f
uzz
y
infe
r
ence
the
real
va
lue
of
the
ou
t
pu
t
va
riable
.
Af
te
r
that,
this
outp
ut
value
is
c
onve
rted
into
nume
rical
value
to
be
a
ppli
ed
to
t
he
pr
ocess.
Four
defuzzifi
c
at
ion
strat
egies
are
com
monly
us
ed:
the
maxi
mu
m
meth
od,
the
ave
rage
ma
ximum
meth
od
,
the
center
of
gra
vity
(cen
tr
oid)
m
et
hod,
a
nd
the
weig
hted
hei
ght
method.
The
cente
r
of
gr
a
vity
al
so
kn
own
as
a
ce
ntr
oid
meth
od
is
the
m
os
t
co
m
monly
use
d
m
et
hod
in
t
he
fiel
ds
of
fu
zz
y
con
t
ro
ll
ers
.
Th
is
meth
od
cal
c
ulate
s
the
ce
nter
of
gr
a
vity
of
the
res
ulti
ng
membe
rs
hip
f
unct
ion
µ(x)
.
T
he
a
bs
ci
ssa
of
t
he
ce
nter
of
gravit
y
ΔU
is
deter
mine
d
us
in
g
(3)
.
=
∫
(
)
∫
(
)
(13)
wh
e
re:
s
:
the
domain
of
the
membe
rs
hip
f
unct
ion.
x:
the
de
gr
ee
of
me
mb
e
rs
hip
f
un
ct
io
ns.
The
inte
gr
al
of
the
de
nominat
or
giv
es
the
surface,
w
hile
the
integral
of
the
numerat
or
c
orres
ponds
to
the
m
om
e
nt
of
the
s
urface.
Evaluation Warning : The document was created with Spire.PDF for Python.
IS
S
N
:
2088
-
8
694
In
t J
P
ow
Ele
c
&
D
ri
S
ys
t,
V
ol
.
12
, N
o.
1
,
Ma
rch
20
21
:
45
3
–
46
2
458
0
0
.
2
0
.
4
0
.
6
0
.
8
1
-
0
.
2
-
0
.
4
-
0
.
6
-
0
.
8
-
1
E
r
r
o
r
E
V
a
r
i
a
t
i
o
n
o
f
e
r
r
o
r
∆
E
O
u
t
p
u
t
∆
U
N
B
N
M
N
S
Z
E
P
S
P
M
P
B
1
-
0
.
2
-
0
.
4
N
B
N
M
N
S
Z
E
P
S
P
M
P
B
-
0
.
6
-
0
.
8
-
1
0
0
.
2
0
.
4
0
.
6
0
.
8
0
0
.
2
0
.
4
0
.
6
0
.
8
1
-
0
.
2
-
0
.
4
-
0
.
6
-
0
.
8
-
1
N
B
N
M
N
S
Z
E
P
S
P
M
P
B
Figure
5.
M
e
m
ber
s
hip
f
unct
io
n
of
the
e
rror,
t
he
var
ia
ti
on
of
the
er
ror
a
nd
the
outp
ut
of
t
he
FLCs.
Table
1.
PQ
f
uz
zy
ru
le
base
t
able.
Variation
of
e
rr
o
r
NB
NM
NS
ZE
PS
PM
PB
Er
ror
NB
NM
NS
ZE
PS
PM
PB
NB
NB
NB
NB
NM
NS
ZE
NB
NM
NM
NM
NS
ZE
PS
NB
NM
NS
NS
ZE
PS
PS
NM
NM
NS
ZE
PS
PM
PM
NB
NS
ZE
PS
PS
PM
PB
NS
ZE
PS
PM
PM
PM
PB
ZE
PS
PM
PB
PB
PB
PB
3.
SIMULATI
O
N
RESU
LT
S
To
co
m
par
e
the
performa
nce
of
the
FLC
str
at
egy
to
t
he
co
nv
e
ntio
nal
PI
con
t
ro
l,
a
set
of
simulat
io
n
te
st
cases
has
been
done
us
i
ng
M
AT
LAB
\
Simuli
nk
e
nvir
onment.
T
he
s
imulat
ion
pa
ra
mete
rs
of
the
sy
ste
m
are
giv
e
n
in
t
he
simulat
ion
pa
rameters
i
x.
F
igure
6
s
hows
the
outp
ut
curr
ent,
volt
age,
a
nd
powe
r
of
PV
ar
ray
us
in
g
pe
rtu
rb
a
nd
ob
s
er
ve
M
P
PT
te
c
hn
i
qu
e
.
A
rap
i
d
ste
p
ch
ang
e
s
a
re
a
ppli
ed
to
i
rr
a
dianc
e
sta
rtin
g
with
100
0
(W
\
m
2
)
f
r
om
0
to
0.3
s,
500
(W
\
m
2
)
from
0.
3
to
0.6
s
a
nd
e
nd
i
ng
to
1000
(W
\
m
2
)
from
0.
6
to
0.9
s.
The
PQ
FLC
a
nd
PI
c
on
t
ro
l
a
re
de
picte
d
in
Figure
7.
It
ca
n
be
see
n
that
the
act
ive
pow
er
res
pons
e
con
t
ro
ll
ed
by
t
he
f
uzzy
lo
gic
con
t
ro
ll
er
f
ollo
ws
the
act
ive
powe
r
ref
e
re
nc
e
ge
ne
rated
by
the
PV
ar
ray
bette
r
than
the
one
c
on
t
ro
ll
ed
by
the
PI
c
on
t
ro
ll
er.
It
ca
n
be
al
so
noti
ced
that
t
he
reacti
ve
po
wer
co
ntr
olled
by
t
he
fu
zz
y
l
ogic
c
ontr
oller
trac
ks
the
r
efe
ren
ce
s
et
ed
to
ze
ro
with
a
fast
tra
nsi
ent
res
ponse
com
par
e
d
to
the
one
con
t
ro
ll
ed
by
t
he
PI
c
on
t
ro
ll
e
r.
The
refo
re,
the
t
otal
act
ive
powe
r
s
upplie
d
by
t
he
PV
a
rr
a
y
is
tra
nsfer
red
to
AC
gr
i
d
with
un
it
y
powe
r
fa
ct
or
.
Fi
gure
8
sh
ows
the
respon
s
es
of
act
ive
cu
rr
e
nt
an
d
its
re
fer
e
nce
us
ing
the
two
c
ontr
ol
str
at
egies.
It
is
c
le
ar
that
the
PQ
F
LC
te
ch
ni
qu
e
ha
s
a
bette
r
dynamic
pe
rformance
an
d
more
sensiti
ve
to
a
s
udde
n
c
hange
in
ir
rad
ia
nce
c
ompa
red
to
t
he
PQ
PI
c
ontr
ol
s
trat
egy.
The
reacti
ve
c
urren
t
an
d
its
re
fer
e
nce
res
pons
es
a
re
de
picte
d
in
Fig
ure
9.
T
he
reac
ti
ve
cu
rr
e
nt
con
t
ro
ll
ed
by
fu
zz
y
l
og
ic
co
ntr
oller
has
a
faster
res
pons
e
an
d
it
is
m
ore
sen
sit
ive
to
a
sud
den
c
hange
in
irrad
ia
nce
c
ompare
d
to
t
he
one
con
t
ro
ll
ed
by
PI
c
on
tr
oller.
It
can
be
noti
ced
that
the
rea
ct
ive
curre
nt
al
way
s
after
a
s
hort
tr
ansient
sta
te
re
tur
ns
to
ze
r
o.
Figures
10
an
d
11
sho
w
loa
d
curre
nt
an
d
volt
age
wav
e
for
ms
on
the
top
a
nd
t
he
gri
d
cu
rr
e
nt
an
d
volt
age
wav
e
f
or
m
s
on
the
bo
tt
om
c
on
t
ro
ll
ed
by
PQ
PI
a
nd
PQ
FLC
con
t
ro
ll
ers
res
pecti
vely
.
The
se
wav
e
f
or
m
s
are
obta
ine
d
with
a
change
of
local
load
f
rom
inducti
ve
m
od
e
to
capaci
ti
ve
m
ode
at
0.15
s.
It
can
be
see
n
that
the
gr
i
d
c
urren
t
is
al
wa
ys
in
phase
with
the
gr
i
d
volt
age.
Howe
ver,
t
he
powe
r
facto
r
is
imp
r
ov
e
d
an
d
al
way
s
e
qu
al
to
unit
y.
T
he
propose
d
f
uzzy
l
og
ic
co
ntr
ol
a
ppr
oac
h
Evaluation Warning : The document was created with Spire.PDF for Python.
In
t J
P
ow Elec
& Dri S
ys
t
IS
S
N: 20
88
-
8
694
Fuzz
y
lo
gic control
of
activ
e a
nd r
eacti
ve
powe
r fo
r
a grid
-
co
nnect
ed p
hotovoltaic
…
(
G
hr
issi
T
ahri
)
459
al
lows
the
PV
gr
id
-
c
onnecte
d
sy
ste
m
to
tr
ansf
e
r
the
tota
l
act
ive
power
gen
e
rated
by
the
PV
ar
ra
y
with
com
pensat
ing
the
reacti
ve
power.
Figure
6.
O
utput
cu
rr
e
nt,
volt
age,
a
nd
powe
r
of
PV
a
rr
a
y
with
a
cha
nge
in
irrad
ia
nce
fro
m
1000
to
500
(
W/m2)
Figure
7.
Acti
ve
,
reacti
ve
po
w
er
a
nd
their
re
f
eren
ces
,
us
in
g
PI
c
ontrolle
rs
a
nd
f
uzz
y
lo
gic
con
t
ro
ll
ers
Evaluation Warning : The document was created with Spire.PDF for Python.
IS
S
N
:
2088
-
8
694
In
t J
P
ow
Ele
c
&
D
ri
S
ys
t,
V
ol
.
12
, N
o.
1
,
Ma
rch
20
21
:
45
3
–
46
2
460
Figure
8.
Re
spon
s
es
of
Acti
ve
cu
rr
e
nt
an
d
it
s
ref
e
ren
ce
ve
rs
us
ti
me,
us
in
g
PQ
PI
c
on
t
ro
ll
er
s
an
d
PQ
Fu
zz
y
l
og
i
c
co
ntr
ollers
(
F
LCs)
Figure
9.
Re
spon
s
es
of
reacti
ve
c
urren
t
a
nd
its
ref
e
ren
ce
ve
rs
us
ti
me,
us
in
g
PQ
PI
c
on
t
ro
ll
er
s
an
d
PQ
Fu
zz
y
l
og
i
c
co
ntr
ollers
(
F
LCs)
Figure
10.
Wa
veforms
of
loa
d
c
urren
t
a
nd
volt
age
on
the
t
op
an
d
the
gri
d
cu
rr
e
nt
and
volt
age
on
the
bo
tt
om
c
on
t
ro
l
le
d
by
PQ
PI
f
r
om
i
nductive
mode
to
capaci
ti
ve
m
od
e.
Figure
11.
Wa
veforms
of
loa
d
c
urren
t
a
nd
volt
age
on
the
t
op
an
d
the
gri
d
cu
rr
e
nt
and
volt
age
on
the
bo
tt
om
c
on
t
ro
l
le
d
by
PQ
FLC
s
fro
m
in
duct
iv
e
mode
to
capaci
ti
ve
m
od
e
.
4.
CONCL
US
I
O
N
In
t
his
pap
e
r,
fu
zz
y
l
og
ic
c
ontr
ol
of
act
ive
an
d
reacti
ve
powe
r
f
or
a
gri
d
-
c
onnecte
d
photov
oltai
c
sy
ste
m
us
in
g
a
three
-
le
vel
ne
utral
-
po
i
nt
-
cl
ampe
d
in
ve
rter
(
3L
-
N
PC)
is
pr
e
sente
d.
T
he
three
-
le
vel
ne
utral
po
i
nt
cl
ampe
d
inv
e
rter
has
be
en
use
d
with
an
LCL
filt
er
to
minimi
ze
ha
rm
on
ic
s
c
onte
nts
and
i
mpro
ve
c
urren
t
and
volt
age
wa
ves
hap
i
ng.
T
he
goal
of
the
pro
posed
co
ntr
ol
strat
egy
is
to
trans
fer
t
he
act
ive
po
wer
ge
ne
rated
Evaluation Warning : The document was created with Spire.PDF for Python.
In
t J
P
ow Elec
& Dri S
ys
t
IS
S
N: 20
88
-
8
694
Fuzz
y
lo
gic control
of
activ
e a
nd r
eacti
ve
powe
r fo
r
a grid
-
co
nnect
ed p
hotovoltaic
…
(
G
hr
issi
T
ahri
)
461
by
a
PV
ar
ray
to
t
he
gri
d
util
it
y
with
a
unit
y
powe
r
facto
r.
The
co
ntr
ol
st
r
at
egy
de
sig
n
is
ba
sed
on
cal
c
ulati
ng
the
i
ns
ta
ntane
ou
s
act
ive
a
nd
reacti
ve
pow
er
from
the
m
easur
e
d
gri
d
volt
ages
an
d
cu
rr
e
nts;
the
refo
r
e,
the
con
t
ro
l
strat
eg
y
giv
es
dynam
ic
rob
us
tnes
s
performa
nce
to
t
he
gr
i
d
-
c
on
nected
PV
s
yst
em
agai
ns
t
a
su
dde
n
change
in
reacti
ve
po
wer
an
d
sat
isfact
ory
act
ive
po
wer
trac
king
unde
r
ra
pi
d
s
olar
ra
diati
on
c
hanges
.
The
sim
ulati
on
res
ults
of
the
gr
i
d
-
c
onnecte
d
PV
sy
ste
m
us
ing
M
at
la
b
-
Si
mu
li
nk
e
nv
i
ronme
nt
s
how
cl
early
t
hat
t
he
FLC
strat
e
gy
has
a
bette
r
dy
namic
pe
rformance
with
le
ss
set
tl
ing
ti
me,
a
nd
ov
e
rsho
ot
com
par
e
d
to
the
co
nv
e
ntio
nal
PI
c
ontrol.
APPE
ND
I
X
Simulat
io
n
paramet
ers
Para
m
eters
Variables
Valu
es
The
g
rou
p
of
(
PV
)
m
o
d
u
les
wh
ich
co
m
p
o
rts
40
p
arallel
an
d
10
series
co
n
n
ected
Kyo
cera
so
lar
KC
2
0
0
GT
m
o
d
u
les
Maximu
m
Po
we
r
P
ma
x
80
kW
Maximu
m
v
o
ltag
e
V
ma
x
263
V
Cu
rr
en
t
at
m
ax
im
u
m
p
o
wer
I
ma
x
304
A
Op
en
-
circuit
v
o
lta
g
e
V
oc
330
V
Sh
o
rt
-
circuit
cu
r
re
n
t
I
sc
328
A
DC
-
DC
Bo
o
st
co
n
v
erter
p
ar
am
e
ters
Inp
u
t
v
o
ltag
e
V
i
300
V
Du
ty
cy
cle
D
0
.6
Ou
tp
u
t
v
o
ltag
e
V
0
825
V
Load
cu
rr
en
t
I
0
8
A
Ind
u
cto
r
L
0
.00
1
1
H
Ou
tp
u
t
capacito
r
C
0
5
.28
9
3
µF
Inp
u
t
capacito
r
C
in
100
µF
Switch
in
g
fr
eq
u
en
cy
F
s
55
kh
z
Load
resisto
r
R
0
1
0
3
.1250
Ω
3L
-
NPC
Inv
erter
,
LCL
filter
an
d
Loa
d
s
Grid
sid
e
in
d
u
cto
r
L
s
1
.84
mH
3L
-
NPC
sid
e
in
d
u
cto
r
L
f
2
.3
mH
Filter
c
ap
acito
r
C
f
1
1
.02
µF
Res
isto
r
in
series
with
th
e
capacito
r
R
C
3
.12
Ω
Res
o
n
an
ce
fr
eq
u
en
cy
f
r
es
1
5
4
0
.6
hz
Total
in
d
u
cto
r
resi
stan
ce
R
0
.1
Ω
Ph
ase
to
p
h
ase
RMS
v
o
ltag
e
V
ph
p
h
/RMS
3
8
1
.05
V
DC
-
Link
C
1
=
C
2
550
µF
Grid
f
requ
en
cy
f
g
50
hz
Switch
in
g
fr
eq
u
en
cy
f
s
30
Kh
z
Inv
erter
co
n
figu
rat
io
n
3
p
h
a
ses
3L
-
NPC
Ind
u
ctiv
e
lo
ad
reac
tiv
e
p
o
wer
Q
L
10
kVA
R
Cap
acitiv
e
lo
ad
re
activ
e
p
o
wer
Q
C
10
kVA
R
REFERE
NCE
S
[1]
Umaka
nt
a
Saho
o,
Ed.,
"Cold
st
ora
ge
with
bac
k
up
the
r
mal
ene
r
gy
storag
e
sys
tem,
"
Progress
in
Solar
Ene
rgy
Technol
ogi
es
an
d
Applications
:
Wi
l
ey,
2019.
[2]
K.
N.
Nw
ai
gwe
,
P.
Mutabilwa,
and
E.
Dintwa
,
“An
over
v
ie
w
of
sol
ar
power
(PV
sys
te
ms)
int
egr
at
ion
int
o
el
e
ct
ri
ci
ty
grids
,
”
Mate
ria
ls
S
ci
en
ce
for
Ener
gy
Technol
og
i
es
,
vo
l.
2,
no.
3,
pp.
629
-
6
33,
2019
,
do
i:
10.
1016/j.mse
t
.
2
019.
07.
002
.
[3]
H.
S.
Kam
il,
D.
M.
Said
,
M.
W.
Mus
ta
f
a,
M.
R.
Miv
eh,
an
d
N.
Ahmad
,
“L
ow
-
volt
ag
e
r
ide
-
thro
ugh
m
et
hods
for
grid
-
connect
ed
p
hotovol
taic
sys
tems
in
m
ic
rogrid
s:
A
rev
ie
w
and
future
prospe
ct,”
Inte
rnationa
l
Jo
urnal
of
Pow
er
El
e
ct
ronics
and
Dr
iv
e
Syst
ems
(I
JP
EDS)
,
vol
.
9,
no.
4,
pp
.
1834
-
1841,
2018
.
[4]
B.
Kropos
ki
e
t.
al.
.,
“Ac
h
ie
ving
a
100%
ren
ewa
ble
grid:
Oper
ating
el
e
ct
ri
c
power
sys
tems
with
ex
tre
m
el
y
high
le
ve
ls
of
var
i
ab
le
ren
ewa
bl
e
en
erg
y,
”
IEEE
Po
wer
and
Ene
rg
y
Mag.
,
vol
.
15
,
no.
2,
pp
.
61
-
73,
2017,
do
i:
10.
1109/MP
E.
2
016.
2637122.
[5]
T.
L
aa
goub
i,
M.
Bouzi
,
and
M.
Benc
hagr
a,
“MPP
T
and
power
f
ac
tor
cont
ro
l
for
grid
conn
ec
t
ed
PV
sys
te
ms
with
fuz
zy
logic
con
tr
oll
ers,”
Inte
rnat
i
onal
Journal
of
Powe
r
El
e
ct
roni
cs
and
Dr
iv
e
Sy
stems
(IJ
PE
DS)
,
vol.
9,
no
.
1,
pp.
105
-
113,
2018
.
[6]
S.
N.
Rao,
D.
V.
As
hok
Kumar
,
and
C.
B
abu,
“Gri
d
Connecte
d
D
istri
bute
d
Gene
r
at
ion
Sys
tem
wit
h
High
Volta
ge
Gain
Cas
ca
ded
DC
-
DC
Conve
rte
r
Fed
As
ym
me
tric
Multi
l
ev
el
Inv
erter
Top
ology,
”
Int
ernat
ional
Journal
of
El
e
ct
rica
l
&
Co
mputer
Engi
n
ee
r
ing
(
IJ
ECE
)
,
vol
.
8,
no
.
6,
pp
.
40
47
-
4059
,
2018
.
[7]
A.
A.
J.
Je
ma
n
,
N.
M.
S.
Hanno
on,
N.
Hidayat,
and
M.
M.
H.
Adam,
“Ac
ti
v
e
an
d
re
active
power
m
ana
g
em
en
t
of
grid
conne
c
te
d
photovolta
ic
sys
te
m,”
Indone
sian
Journal
of
E
le
c
tric
al
Eng
ine
ering
and
C
omputer
Sc
ie
n
c
e
(IJ
EE
CS)
,
vo
l.
1
3,
no
.
3,
pp
.
132
4
-
1331,
2019
.
Evaluation Warning : The document was created with Spire.PDF for Python.
IS
S
N
:
2088
-
8
694
In
t J
P
ow
Ele
c
&
D
ri
S
ys
t,
V
ol
.
12
, N
o.
1
,
Ma
rch
20
21
:
45
3
–
46
2
462
[8]
K.
b
en
oualid
Meda
ni,
S.
Say
ah,
and
A.
B
ekr
ar,
“
Whale
opt
i
mi
z
at
ion
al
gori
t
hm
b
ase
d
optim
al
re
ac
t
ive
pow
er
dispat
ch:
A
ca
se
study
of
the
Al
ger
ia
n
powe
r
sys
te
m,”
Elec
tric
Powe
r
Syste
ms
Re
search
,
vol.
1
63,
pp.
696
-
705
,
2018.
[9]
M.
Sh.
Az
iz
and
A.
G.
Abdull
ah,
“Hybri
d
cont
ro
l
strategie
s
of
SV
C
for
r
ea
c
ti
v
e
p
ower
com
p
ensa
t
ion,
”
Indone
sian
Journal
of
El
e
c
tric
al
Engi
ne
eri
ng
and
Comput
er
Sci
e
nce
(IJ
E
ECS)
,
vol
.
19
,
no.
2,
pp.
563
-
571,
2020,
doi:
10.
11591/ijeecs.
v19.
i2.
pp563
-
57
1.
[10]
M.
N.
I.
Sark
ar,
L.
G.
Me
ega
h
ap
ola
,
and
M.
Da
tta,
“R
eact
iv
e
po
wer
ma
nag
emen
t
in
ren
ewa
bl
e
ri
ch
power
grids:
A
rev
ie
w
of
g
rid
-
c
odes,
ren
ewa
bl
e
gene
ra
tors,
supp
ort
device
s,
control
strategi
es
an
d
opti
m
iz
a
ti
on
algorithm
s,
”
IE
EE
Ac
c
ess
,
vol
.
6,
p
p.
41458
-
41489
,
2018.
[11]
D.
Infi
el
d
and
L.
Freris,
Re
n
ewab
le
ene
rgy
in
p
ower
systems
:
John
Wi
l
ey
&
Sons
,
2
020.
[12]
N.
T.
Mooniarsi
h,
S.
Masri
,
M.
Hafe
ez,
and
A.
Hiendr
o,
“A
Gri
d
-
Connec
t
ed
Ph
otovol
taic
Int
erf
ac
e
Sys
te
m
for
Deli
ver
ing
Acti
v
e
and
R
ea
c
ti
ve
Pow
ers,
”
Int
ernat
ional
Journal
of
Powe
r
Elec
troni
cs
and
Dr
iv
e
Sys
te
ms
(IJ
PE
DS)
,
vol.
9,
no
.
3,
pp
.
1140
-
1146,
201
8.
[13]
htt
ps://www.
sola
rele
c
tric
supply
.
c
om/ky
oc
era
-
kc
2
00gt
-
solar
-
panel
-
565
.
[14]
M.
A.
E
lge
ndy
,
B.
Za
h
awi,
a
nd
D.
J.
Atk
in
son,
“Ass
essment
of
Perturb
a
nd
Obs
erv
e
MPPT
Algorit
hm
Impl
ement
at
ion
Te
chn
ique
s
for
PV
Pumping
Ap
pli
c
at
ions,
”
IEEE
Tr
ans.
Sustain
.
Ene
rgy
,
vol
.
3,
no.
1,
pp.
21
-
33
,
2012,
doi
:
10
.
11
09/T
STE
.
2011.
2
168245.
[15]
S.
Alsadi
and
B.
Alsayid,
“Ma
xi
mum
power
po
i
nt
tracki
ng
simu
la
ti
on
for
pho
to
volt
aic
sys
tems
using
per
turb
an
d
observe
a
lgorith
m,
”
IJ
EIT
,
vo
l.
2,
no
.
6,
pp
.
80
-
8
5,
De
c.
20
12.
[16]
M.
Alqar
n
i
and
M.
K.
D
arwish,
“Ma
xim
um
pow
er
poin
t
tracki
ng
for
pho
tovol
t
aic
sys
te
m
:
Modif
ie
d
Per
turb
and
Obs
erv
e
a
lgori
th
m,
”
in
2012
47th
Int
ernati
onal
U
niv
ersities
Power
Engi
ne
ering
C
onfe
renc
e
,
Uxbri
dge,
Middle
sex
,
Unite
d
Kingdo
m
,
pp
.
1
-
4,
2012
.
[17]
J.
W
ang
and
P.
W
ang,
“Power
Dec
oup
li
ng
Co
ntrol
for
Modul
ar
Mul
ti
l
eve
l
C
onver
te
r
,
”
IE
EE
Tr
ansacti
ons
on
Powe
r
E
le
c
troni
cs
,
vol
.
33
,
no
.
1
1,
pp
.
9296
-
930
9,
2018
,
doi
:
10
.
1109/T
PEL
.
201
8.
2799321.
[18]
H.
Rahb
ari
m
agh
am
,
E.
M.
Am
ir
i,
B.
Vahidi,
G.
B.
Ghar
ehpe
t
ia
n
,
and
M.
Abedi
,
“Super
io
r
d
ec
o
uple
d
cont
ro
l
of
ac
t
ive
and
r
eact
i
ve
power
for
thr
ee
-
phase
vo
ltage
source
converte
rs,”
Tur
ki
sh
Jou
rnal
of
El
e
ct
ri
ca
l
Engi
ne
ering
&
Computer
Scien
ce
s
,
vo
l.
23,
no.
4,
pp
.
1025
-
103
9,
2015
.
[19]
Seung
-
Jin
Yoon,
Tha
nh
Van
Ngu
yen,
Kyeong
-
H
wa
Kim,
“Curr
e
nt
cont
ro
l
of
grid
-
conne
c
te
d
inve
r
te
r
using
in
te
gr
al
slidi
ng
mod
e
co
ntrol
and
resona
nt
com
p
ensa
t
ion
,
”
In
te
rnationa
l
Journal
of
Power
El
e
ct
ronics
an
d
Dr
iv
e
S
yste
m
(IJ
PE
DS)
,
vol
.
1
0,
no
.
2,
pp
.
102
2
-
1033,
Jun.
201
9.
[20]
D.
Sattiana
d
an,
Soumen
Gorai
,
G.R.
Prudhvi
K
uma
r,
S.
Vidy
a
saga
r,
V.
Shan
muga
sundara
m,
“Pote
ncy
of
PR
cont
roller
for
m
ult
iple
har
moni
c
com
pensa
ti
on
f
or
a
single
-
ph
ase
gridc
onn
ecte
d
sys
te
m,
”
In
te
rna
ti
onal
Journal
of
Powe
r
E
le
c
troni
cs
and
Dr
ive
Sys
te
m
(IJ
PE
DS)
,
v
ol.
11
,
no
.
3,
pp
.
1491
-
1498,
Sep
.
2020.
[21]
G.
M.
Rao
and
R.
R.
Sankar
,
“
Fuzzy
-
PI
Contr
ol
of
Grid
Inte
r
ac
t
Three
-
Phase
Volta
g
e
Source
Inve
rt
er,”
Int
.
J.
El
e
ct
r.
Eng.
,
vo
l
.
10
,
no
.
1,
pp
.
57
-
70,
2017
.
[22]
V.
Kouloumpi
s
and
A.
Aza
p
agic,
“In
t
egr
ated
li
f
e
cy
cle
sus
ta
in
a
bil
it
y
assess
me
n
t
using
fu
zz
y
in
fer
ence:
A
nove
l
FELICIT
A
mod
el
,
”
Sustainab
le
Product
ion
and
Consum
pti
on
,
v
ol.
15
,
pp
.
25
-
34
,
2018
.
[23]
H.
A.
Mos
al
a
m,
R.
A.
Amer
,
a
nd
G.
A.
Mors
y
,
“Fuzz
y
logic
c
ontrol
fo
r
a
gr
id
-
conne
c
te
d
PV
arr
ay
through
Z
-
source
-
inve
r
te
r
using
ma
xi
mum
consta
nt
boost
c
ontrol
m
et
hod
,
”
Ain
Shams
Enginee
ring
Journal
,
vol.
9,
no
.
4,
pp
.
2931
-
2941,
201
8.
[Onlin
e].
Ava
il
able:
htt
ps:
//
w
ww
.
scie
nc
edi
re
c
t.
co
m/
sci
ence/
ar
t
ic
l
e/
pii/S
2090447918300479
[24]
E.
H.
Mamd
ani
and
S.
As
sili
an,
“An
expe
r
im
en
t
in
li
ngu
isti
c
synt
hesis
with
a
fuz
z
y
logi
c
con
trol
l
e
r,
”
In
te
rnationa
l
journal
of
human
-
compute
r
studi
es
,
vol
.
7,
no
.
1,
pp.
1
-
13
,
1975
.
[25]
R.
S.
Sank
ar,
S.
V.
Kumar
,
and
G.
M.
R
ao,
“A
dapt
iv
e
Fuzzy
PI
Curre
nt
Contr
ol
of
Grid
Inte
r
ac
t
PV
Inve
rter,
”
Inte
rnational
Jo
urnal
of
El
e
ct
ri
c
al
&
Computer
Engi
ne
ering
(
I
J
ECE
)
,
vol
.
8,
no
.
1,
pp
.
472
-
482
,
2018.
Evaluation Warning : The document was created with Spire.PDF for Python.