TELKOM
NIKA
, Vol.12, No
.2, June 20
14
, pp. 485~4
9
2
ISSN: 1693-6
930,
accredited
A
by DIKTI, De
cree No: 58/DIK
T
I/Kep/2013
DOI
:
10.12928/TELKOMNIKA.v12i2.2058
485
Re
cei
v
ed Ma
rch 1
9
, 2013;
Re
vised Ma
y 15, 2014; Accepted Ma
y 29
, 2014
Information Interchange Layer based on Classificatio
n
of Information Use (IU)
Albard
a Supangka
t
*,S.H
Kuspriy
a
nto
Sembiring, J
Schoo
l of Elect
r
ical En
gin
eeri
ng & Informatic
s
(ST
E
I), Institut
T
e
knolo
g
i B
and
un
g
Gd. Bakrie Lt. 3 Jl. Ganeca 1
0
Band
un
g, Ind
ones
ia, ph
one/
fax. 62 2
2
25
0
098
5
*Corres
p
o
ndi
n
g
author, e-ma
i
l
: albar@st
e
i.it
b.ac.id
A
b
st
r
a
ct
Information characteristics
in cla
ssific
a
tio
n
of IU d
i
rectly r
e
late
d to
asp
e
c
ts of infor
m
ati
on
usag
e
by user in
ente
r
prise to acco
mp
lish th
eir act
i
vities.
F
eature
extraction fro
m
informatio
n
us
age i
n
three l
a
yer
of enterpris
e mana
ge
me
nt us
ed as p
a
ra
met
e
r for this char
acterist
ic. Char
acteristics an
d di
me
nsio
n ap
pl
ie
d
to develop middle-ware system
(c
al
led Inf
o
rmation Inter
c
hange
Layer)
t
hat bridges
a comm
on iss
ue ie
infor
m
ati
on sil
o
, to optimi
z
e
a services
of info
rmati
on res
our
ces in enter
pris
e.
Ke
y
w
ords
: Inform
ation Characteristic,
Inf
o
rmation Use, IS, Informa
ti
on M
ana
ge
ment, Infor
m
ati
o
n
Resource
1. Introduc
tion
In last
de
cad
e
it’s so e
a
sy to a
c
cess,
store,
produ
ce, and
di
strib
u
te info
rmati
on to
o
r
from
gl
obal source of
informati
on. Mo
st
executives o
f
enterp
r
i
s
e
s
bega
n to
real
ize th
at amo
unt
of informatio
n
will not valua
b
le if it irrelev
ant
and u
nabl
e to provid
e a
dded valu
e fo
r them. In fact
,
althoug
h investment valu
e is gro
w
in
g
rapidl
y but developm
ent
of Information System and
Tech
nolo
g
y (IST) freque
ntly incapabl
e to meet t
he expected imp
a
c
t. Most of real probl
em are
flow of inform
ation stalled
or not fit to e
x
pec
tation (causi
ng Inform
ation Silo). Compatibility and
Inter-O
pe
rabil
i
ty between
system
s o
r
u
n
its i
s
o
ften
a difficult o
b
stacl
e
to a
d
d
r
esse
d. Syst
em
integratio
n, particul
a
rly to meet a requirem
ent of informatio
n exchan
ge bet
wee
n
syste
m
s,
become
a
strategi
c i
s
sue
s
to mi
nist
ry level in
In
d
one
sia. Mo
st
strate
gic im
pact
perceiv
ed i
s
ineffective to provide
a rig
h
t informatio
n, ac
curate, and timely, e
s
pe
cially for t
op man
agem
ent,
besi
de its flo
w
between int
e
rnal u
n
its in
enterp
r
i
s
e.
DeL
one
& M
c
Le
an [1]
ha
s d
e
velop
ed
D&M Info
rma
t
ion System
s (IS)
su
cce
s
s model
sin
c
e 1
991
a
nd ge
nerates 5 a
s
pe
cts
whose influe
nce it. Informati
on Qu
ality or
IQ [2] is the o
n
ly
asp
e
ct
on
D&M model
which
spe
c
ifically se
parate
s
a
stu
d
y to
eleme
n
ts
of inform
ation
as
a
prod
uct
with i
t
s inform
ation
system
s. IQ
is me
as
ure
o
f
information
cha
r
a
c
teri
stic becau
se b
e
a
dimen
s
ion
which is di
re
ct
ly repre
s
enti
ng informat
io
n, espe
cially
as a pro
d
u
c
t of informa
t
ion
system
s. Fa
ctor of p
o
o
r
i
n
formatio
n q
uality is
con
s
idere
d
a
s
th
e mo
st influe
ntial a
s
pe
ct
for
enterp
r
i
s
e. M
any of the
IQ p
r
oble
m
s
are
pe
rvas
iv
e, co
stly an
d
even
disastrous [3]. One
of a
purp
o
ses in
applying the
o
rie
s
and co
nce
p
ts of many IQ rese
arch is to condu
ct a most
approp
riate i
m
provem
ent based on thi
s
characte
ri
stics to p
r
odu
ce
high-valu
e in
formation.
In line with observations in previous descript
ion about availability of
right information,
according
to
Ga
rvin 1
9
9
3
[4], on
e of
the b
a
si
c th
ings that b
e
come
a p
r
obl
em in
qu
ality of
informatio
n
manag
eme
n
t is in
app
ro
priate form
a
t. Appro
p
riate
n
e
ss format a
r
e
subj
ective
and
more
cl
osely relate
d to it
s u
s
a
ge
pro
c
e
ss.
The
r
ef
ore,
can
be
indicated th
e
r
e i
s
info
rma
t
ion
cha
r
a
c
t
e
ri
st
ic
s whi
c
h
relat
ed indi
re
ct
ly
to a sy
st
e
m
that prod
uces i
n
formatio
n, but highly relat
e
d
to its use. Adopted from Cho
o
[5] use
d
a term
of Informatio
n Use (I
U) a
s
a
cla
ssifi
cation
of
informatio
n chara
c
te
risti
c
in usa
ge
stag
e or ba
se
d o
n
cha
r
a
c
t
e
ri
st
ics of
it
s u
s
e
r
.
Char
act
e
rist
ics
on
cla
ssifi
cati
on of
IU to
b
e
evalu
a
ted i
s
a
p
p
r
op
riate
ness fo
rmat,
whi
c
h i
s
in th
is
study
defin
ed
as fitne
s
s
be
tween
info
rm
ation avail
abl
e with
inte
re
sts of its
user. F
o
cu
s of
this
study i
s
to
analyze the
appli
c
ation
and
effect
from
cha
r
a
c
teri
stics to
man
agem
ent of info
rmation
interchan
ge within
ente
r
p
r
ise.
We devel
ope
d an appli
c
ati
on of techn
o
l
ogy bas
ed o
n
para
m
eters from a cha
r
acteri
stic
on IU, in
co
ntext of increa
sing a valu
e of
enterpr
i
s
e inf
o
rmatio
n re
so
urces. T
h
is p
aper discu
ssed
a de
sign
testing of ap
pli
c
ation
to op
timize
exi
s
tin
g
Inform
atio
n System
s,
by rep
a
cka
g
i
n
g
Evaluation Warning : The document was created with Spire.PDF for Python.
ISSN: 16
93-6
930
TELKOM
NIKA
Vol. 12, No. 2, June 20
14: 485 – 49
2
486
informatio
n in different formats
cu
sto
m
ized to cha
r
acte
ri
stics of its users. The obje
c
tive is to
evaluate th
e
useful
ne
ss of
the
cha
r
a
c
teristi
c
s on
IU as
fac
t
ors direc
t
ly relat
ed
with effort
to
provide m
o
re high value.
To en
sure that a characteristics
w
ill be
evaluated are not incl
uded in
cla
ssifi
cation
of IQ, this trial used inf
o
rmatio
n sou
r
ce
s that al
ready availabl
e to igno
re t
he
influen
ce fro
m
a system g
enerating such informatio
n.
Success of this trial is expecte
d to hav
e implication
s
that
this desig
n
can be
impleme
n
ted
to build
a
middle
-
ware
system
and
will be
ca
pa
ble a
s
an
'in
t
erch
ang
e la
yer'
betwe
en va
ri
ous of o
perational i
n
form
ation
system
s a
nd b
e
twe
en t
he oth
e
r type
s of i
n
form
ation.
Such
system
s are should
be able to int
egrate
d
wi
th
other info
rma
t
ion system
s
either exi
s
tin
g
,
whi
c
h are be
ing or will be
developed
(gene
ric p
r
op
erties) to me
et the needs and intere
st
s at
tactical a
nd st
rategi
c layer i
n
enterp
r
ise.
2.
Conc
eptual Of Resea
rch
Model
whi
c
h
describe
s
a
formation
of
informatio
n
has
grown since i
n
tro
d
u
c
tion of
Information
T
heory
by Sha
nnon i
n
19
48.
After Ma
son
in 197
8 devel
oped
a mo
re
detailed
mod
e
l,
then develo
p
ed D&M Mo
d
e
l [1] which
gene
rate
s its
5 influence asp
e
ct
s, whe
r
e informatio
n is
prod
uct recei
v
ed, used, an
d dire
ctly affects to us
er (i
n
d
ividual impa
ct). Two p
a
ra
meters of D&M
Model, used
as a main
cla
ssifi
cation fro
m
cha
r
a
c
teri
stics of inform
ation, ie.:
IQ
a
s
a
c
l
ass
i
fic
a
tion
fo
r
d
i
me
ns
io
ns
of q
u
a
lit
ative value from
co
ntent
of information that is
prod
uced by the syste
m
,
Use or Information Use (I
U), whi
c
h in t
h
is pa
per i
s
focu
se
d as a
cla
ssifi
cation
for dimen
s
ion
s
of catego
rical
value from proce
s
s of info
rmation usage
, as pro
duct o
f
a system.
Cha
r
a
c
teri
stics of info
rma
t
ion that ha
s be
en
dev
elope
d so f
a
r, re
present
ed a
s
a
dimen
s
ion
of
inform
ation
quality (IQ
)
.
Such
di
me
nsio
ns identi
f
ied by u
s
e
r
'
s
p
e
rceptio
n
of
informatio
n a
bout a qu
ality attributes th
at shoul
d exi
s
t in an info
rmation. Wa
n
g
& Strong (1
996)
identify and
d
e
fine 16
dim
ensi
on. Ge
[3
] sep
a
rate
s t
he dim
e
n
s
ion
s
were di
re
ct relate
d to va
lue
of data/information an
d indire
ct
(a
s
suppo
ring
). Cl
assificatio
n
fo
r ph
ases of
information
also
develop
ed wi
th model for
pro
c
e
ss of In
formation Ma
nagem
ent Cy
cle [5]. The cycle of pro
c
e
s
s
start
f
r
om def
ining a clea
r and detaile
d a
ne
ed of
info
rmation
from
whol
e e
n
terp
rise
(Informati
on
Nee
d
), dete
r
mining a m
e
thod to get
(Informa
tio
n
Acqui
sition) until pro
c
e
s
s for u
s
a
g
e
of
informatio
n in
tensively by use
r
s
(Inform
a
tion Us
e
)
. Subsequ
ently observed
of i
n
fluen
ce both
for
use
r
s and
th
e ente
r
pri
s
e
(Adaptive Beh
a
viour), here
a
fter will
re
-af
f
ect to process of Informati
o
n
Nee
d
(cy
c
lica
l
). Model ad
o
p
ted from Ch
oo ca
n be se
en at figure b
e
low.
Figure 1. Information Ma
na
gement Cy
cle
(m
odified fro
m
original by
Cho
o
200
2)
Seen from fig
u
re ab
ove th
at we cla
s
sify a pro
c
e
s
ses of informatio
n manag
eme
n
t from
Cho
o
into 6
stage
s, whereas
4 sta
g
e
s
are
related
t
o
the value
creation
of informatio
n. In that
Figure 4 processe
s in informati
on man
a
gement
cycle
can b
e
grou
ped into 2 p
h
a
se
s: Prod
uct
i
on
In
fo
r
m
a
tio
n
N
eed
s
In
fo
r
m
a
t
io
n
Ac
q
u
is
ito
n
In
fo
r
m
a
tio
n
P
r
o
d
u
c
t
s
/
S
er
vi
ces
In
fo
r
m
a
t
io
n
di
s
t
r
i
bu
t
i
o
n
In
f
o
r
m
a
tio
n
Us
e
A
d
a
p
t
i
ve
Be
h
a
v
i
o
r
In
f
o
r
m
a
t
i
o
n
O
r
ga
ni
z
a
t
i
on and
S
t
o
r
a
g
e
A
c
quis
i
t
i
on
Pr
o
c
e
s
s
D
i
ssem
i
n
a
t
e
Uses
Pro
d
u
c
ti
on
Deliv
e
r
y
Evaluation Warning : The document was created with Spire.PDF for Python.
TELKOM
NIKA
ISSN:
1693-6
930
Inform
ation Interch
ang
e La
yer Ba
se
d on
Classifi
catio
n
of Inform
ation …. (Albarda Supan
gka
t
)
487
and Delivery.
IS as obje
c
t of study in m
any re
sea
r
ch
es related to
D&M mod
e
l and IQ, we
re
in
Produ
ction p
hase, while I
U
ch
ara
c
te
ristics a
s
obj
ec
t of s
t
udy in this
paper, were in Delivery.
We
acquired
a b
a
si
c
ch
aracteri
stics on
cla
s
si
ficatio
n
of IU ie
Rel
e
vance, which is we
define
as a
fitness
dimen
s
i
ons bet
wee
n
available
in
fo
rmation
to th
e
users i
n
terests
.
In this
s
t
udy
we will an
alyzed a
nd appli
ed a persp
ect
i
ve on the le
vel of information use within
enterp
r
ise a
s
a
fac
t
ors
of quantific
ation for c
harac
teris
t
ic
of Relevanc
e [6],[7
]. Our Expec
tation is
to obtain
a
categ
o
ri
cal v
a
lue fo
r a q
uantitative le
vel of IU
th
at more
cle
a
r in
wei
ghti
ng for val
u
e
of
informatio
n o
n
three
layers: 1)
ope
ratio
nal, 2) ta
ctical, and 3
)
st
rategic, in te
rms of imp
a
ct
for
enterpri
s
e. A
n
y inform
ation gener
ated by
any system
will be cla
ssified based on
direct im
pact
for this
three layers
. Analys
is
fo
r a various type
of informatio
n wi
thin enterpri
s
e, related to
a
need
s of
3 l
a
yers of ma
nagem
ent, g
enerating
a f
eature
s
extra
c
tion
of information u
s
a
g
e
in
enterp
r
i
s
e (M
ustaqi
em 201
1, Harita 20
1
2
from
[5]). Extraction yield
the following
table.
Table 1 Fe
ature of Inform
ation in Mana
gement Level
[5]
Oper
ational
Tactical
Strategic
Func
tio
n
Data Entr
y
Monitoring
Decision
Source
Internal
dail
y
, each
unit
Internal + othe
r u
n
it
Business Pr
oces
s
Internal & Ext
e
rn
al
Scope
Local Enterprise
Global
Review
Routine
Periodical
Tempor
aril
y
Infor
m
ati
on Peri
ode
Short
daily
~mont
hl
y
Medium
monthl
y
~
yearl
y
Long
multi-y
ear
Com
p
lete
ness
Detail
log file
Principal
pointers
Brief /
Resume
Event-r
elate
d
Past
Present
Future
Form
Report
Summar
y
/
Reca
pitulation
%/Graphic/ Diagr
am
Re
sulting fea
t
ure list abov
e are pa
ram
e
ters u
s
ed to
obtain a characteri
stics on
IU. This
pape
r outline
d
a verifying
of concept
for info
rm
atio
n cha
r
a
c
teri
stics on
Deliv
ery pha
se a
s
con
n
e
c
ting from informati
on co
ntent which i
s
outpu
t of Producti
on pha
se wit
h
impact for
its
use
r
s.
C
har
a
c
t
e
ri
st
ic
s on cla
ssif
i
ca
tion
of IU from
Ta
ble 1.
used
a
s
a
pa
ram
e
te
r of
sp
ecifi
c
at
ion
for ap
plicatio
n de
sign
to repa
ckaging
i
n
formatio
n so it ca
n be
a ba
sic solut
i
on for
a F
o
rmat
issue.
De
sign
of ap
plications th
at will
be
a mai
n
a
ppli
c
ation
mod
u
l
e
s, aim
s
to
b
e
abl
e to
pro
d
u
ce
high qu
ality informatio
n a
s
re
so
urce
s for ente
r
pri
s
e.
In this case, information t
hat pre
s
ente
d
in
more
ap
pro
p
riate form
at with intere
sts
of its
u
s
e
r
s
will b
e
abl
e t
o
provide
a h
i
gher be
nefits or
adde
d value, that means al
so will give a
highe
r ben
efit impact for en
terpri
se.
This a
ppli
c
ati
on is al
so i
n
tende
d as
a solution to an
o
t
her issu
e wa
s commo
n in
enterp
r
i
s
e ie
as
a bridg
e
of Informatio
n Silo. Informatio
n gene
ra
ted
from variou
s of information system
s
will
rea
rra
nge
d furthe
r so it can be u
s
e
d
betwe
en d
e
p
a
rtment fro
m
enterp
r
i
s
e a
nd al
so p
r
ovi
d
e
informatio
n that is
pre
c
i
s
e, a
c
curate, and fa
st f
o
r a
top-l
a
yer m
anag
ers, esp
e
cially
top
manag
eme
n
t.
3.
Applica
t
ion Of Co
ncep
t
Gene
ric
midd
le-ware sy
ste
m
whi
c
h m
e
ntioned
earli
e
r
is still
a co
nce
p
tual syst
em
and
we nam
ed 'Informatio
n
Interch
ang
e La
yer' (IIL).
Th
ese system serve
s
a
s
co
ntainer that
can
accomm
odat
e for inte
rcha
nge of va
riou
s types
of in
formatio
n fro
m
variou
s
so
urces,
arrang
e an
d
repa
ckagi
ng
according to
need
s of information ma
n
ageme
n
t in 3 layers. O
r
in other words,
become
s
a conne
ctive
p
a
rt
for
th
ree lay
e
rs of ma
n
a
g
e
ment in enterp
r
ise. Desi
gn of IIL system
develop
ed from an
alysi
s
of se
rvice
re
quire
ment i
n
this laye
r a
n
d
characte
ri
stics
co
ntaine
d in
c
l
as
s
i
fic
a
tion of
IU.
IIL is a 'liaison'
system
(usually call
e
d
middle-wa
re) that is de
sign
ed with
servi
c
e-
oriente
d
arch
itecture
(SOA
) app
roa
c
h. System servi
c
e
s
is de
sign
ed ba
sed on
an aspe
cts that
have b
een
st
udied
in
co
ncept of
ch
ara
c
teristic o
n
IU.
The
r
efo
r
e, th
is
system
is
not only
able
to
accomm
odat
e traffic
excha
nge fo
r data a
n
d
inform
ation
between
system p
r
o
c
e
s
ses
(Intercha
nge
) but also
ha
s capa
bility to cla
ssify
a various
sou
r
ce
s of data and i
n
formatio
n that
has bee
n o
b
tained f
r
om
proce
s
se
s at th
e op
eratio
nal
layer. IIL
ca
n be
sai
d
to
be a li
nk laye
r to
informatio
n re
sou
r
ces, both
for top mana
gem
ent an
d e
v
en also for o
t
her sta
k
eh
ol
ders.
Evaluation Warning : The document was created with Spire.PDF for Python.
ISSN: 16
93-6
9
30
TELKOM
NIKA
Vol. 12, No. 2, June 20
14: 485 – 49
2
488
Figure 2. De
sign of IIL
The main parts
of IIL were:
•
Data Ware-h
ouse
: a pla
c
e to accomm
odate vari
ou
s types
of data/informatio
n
from variou
s
sources or providers (include IS), whic
h will be used as a main
source of IIL,
•
Cla
ssif
i
cat
o
r
:
subsystem
which
have
capab
ility to generate a list
of
key
w
ords from
various
document
s sources that
will be
used
as index in a retrieval
process, as
well
as index for
rest
ru
cture
p
r
ocess
of in
formation. In
this
study,
a li
st of
keywords ba
sed o
n
a
IU
cha
r
a
c
teri
stics that co
rre
sp
ond
s to mana
gement
layer in local government of Indonesi
a,
•
Inform
ation Tracer
: subsystem that have capability to se
arch and extract information from
many so
urce
s or
do
cum
e
nts in a
c
cord
ance with
specifications, then
co
mp
ose
a re
sults i
n
to
informatio
n t
hat is mo
re
conci
s
e,
rel
e
vant, and
corresp
ond
s to
li
st of
key
w
ords i
n
cl
udin
g
a
results
of Clas
s
i
fic
a
tor) ,
•
Enterpri
se
In
from
ation Ce
nter
(EIC)
:
a
s
a
site to
store
an
d o
r
gani
ze info
rmation from
extrac
tion and c
l
as
s
i
fic
a
tion result
in a new informatio
n stru
cture.
Algorithm
of appli
c
ation
s
based on ap
plying
IU
ch
ara
c
teri
stics whi
c
h obtain
ed
from
feature extra
c
tion as
a hi
nt
for parsin
g
an
d
extra
c
ting
a do
cu
ment contain
i
ng CSF
(Cri
tical
Success Fa
ctor) an
d KPI (Key
Performance Indicator) a
nd re
su
lting a li
st of keywo
r
d
s
accordan
ce
with a measu
r
eme
n
t pattern of IU
chara
c
teri
stic. Ch
a
r
acte
ri
stics and keywords
are
obtaine
d, use
d
a
s
an
ind
e
x to optimi
z
e
a
rep
a
cka
g
ing
pro
c
e
s
s of inf
o
rmatio
n to fit
for u
s
e
r
s an
d
appli
c
able i
n
gene
ral. 4 f
eature
s
from
table of
Fea
t
ure Extractio
n
(Ta
b
le 3.)
wa
s u
s
ed a
s
a
para
m
eter of
informatio
n
cl
assificatio
n
, i.e.: f
unctio
n
,
compl
e
tene
ss, event
-rel
a
ted, an
d fo
rm
of
informatio
n. Informatio
n prese
n
ted for a
layer
of operational ma
n
ageme
nt is usually co
mpl
e
te,
that mean al
l of details from the pa
st
must
prese
n
ted. At a layer of tactical mana
gem
ent,
informatio
n p
r
esented
a
s
a poi
nters at
pre
s
e
n
t (r
ecapitulation
and its
criterion). At a layer
of
strategi
c
ma
nagem
ent, in
formation
pre
s
ente
d
a
s
a
brief o
r
sum
m
ary a
nd m
easure
m
ent
s or
ben
chma
rks
of achievem
e
n
t to the future (incl
udin
g
in cha
r
t forma
t
).
Ca
se
studie
s
impleme
n
te
d by applyin
g
this d
e
si
gn
for integ
r
ati
o
n p
r
o
c
e
ss f
o
r ma
ny
document
s of
wo
rki
ng
rep
o
rt that u
s
ed
as p
e
rfo
r
ma
n
c
e rep
o
rt
o
n
govern
m
ent activities.
In
t
h
is
ca
se fo
r
one
dist
rict
gove
r
nme
n
t in
In
done
sia.
Typ
e
of do
cume
nt
ha
s used is
Pe
rform
a
n
c
e
Accountabilit
y Reports
of Govern
ment
or Laporan
Akuntabilitas
Kinerja Inst
ansi P
e
merintah
(LAKIP), because it is a docum
ent
that directly relat
ed to a deci
s
ion-m
a
ki
ng for both a tacti
c
al
and
strategic layer in
go
vernme
nt of
Indon
esi
a
.
Comm
on
co
nstrai
nts in
ca
se
a flo
w
of
informatio
n for gove
r
nm
e
n
t in Indone
sia is un
ava
ila
bility of tools or devi
c
e
s
which
can
help
to
integrate
a v
a
riou
s
LAKIP docume
n
ts
related fr
om
many di
spa
r
a
t
e sou
r
ce
s. T
hese do
cu
me
nts
sou
r
ces were
a vario
u
s ty
pe of p
e
rio
d
i
c
repo
rt
s
wh
ere
cam
e
fro
m
many impl
ementing
unit
s
a
s
informatio
n p
r
ovide
r
(ope
rational l
a
yer) for
mana
ge
ment at l
o
cal
gove
rnme
nt office
(Ro
s
l
aeni
2013
). Flow of docum
e
n
t prep
aratio
n for LAKI
P compl
e
tely and relation
to application
s
desi
gne
d, ca
n be se
en in
Figure 4. belo
w
.
Evaluation Warning : The document was created with Spire.PDF for Python.
TELKOM
NIKA
ISSN:
1693-6
930
Inform
ation Interch
ang
e La
yer Ba
se
d on
Classifi
catio
n
of Inform
ation …. (Albarda Supan
gka
t
)
489
Figure 3. Flow of Informati
on in LAKIP
We mad
e
o
b
se
rvation
s
and give re
sults
that optimizing a flo
w
and inte
rchang
e of
informatio
n most effectiv
ely carried o
u
t at a ta
ctical layer [8],
which is in
integration
and
recapitulatio
n
pro
c
e
ss to
operational
report
s
do
cu
ments. Pra
c
ti
cal issu
e wa
s re
ca
pitulati
on
pro
c
e
ss
often
unde
rtaken
manually in p
r
epa
rin
g
a re
port like this.
As a re
sult, a
declin
e o
ccu
r in
value of info
rmation
cha
r
a
c
teri
stic
espe
cially for dim
ensi
on of tim
e
, be
side
of
cou
r
se a
d
versely
affecting for
pre
s
entatio
n
formats. It al
so le
d to
flow bottlen
ecks of informati
on to a st
rat
egic
manag
eme
n
t layer. Moreo
v
er, almost al
l of report
do
cume
nts ab
o
v
e, is no long
er in stru
ctu
r
ed
informatio
n f
o
rm
so it
ca
n
be u
s
e
d
to
evaluate
that
these cha
r
a
c
teri
stic
are i
ndep
ende
nt to a
system
who
s
e gene
rate
s such info
rmati
on.
Some
sou
r
ce
s of
do
cum
e
nts from o
n
e
of lo
cal
gov
ernm
ents in
Indone
sia
(RPJMD,
RKPD,
RENSTRA, RKT
)
and i
n
form
ation o
r
do
cum
ents f
r
om
Cri
t
ical Su
cce
s
s Fa
ctors
(CS
F
),
Key Perform
ance Indi
cator (KPI),
and
other im
portant document
s us
e
as m
a
terial that will
be
repa
ckagi
ng,
usi
ng te
ch
n
o
logy of Info
rmation
Re
trieval [9] and
particular algorithm that has
been m
ade.
Rep
a
cka
g
ing
of informatio
n co
ndu
cted
by
: extraction
, reca
pitulatio
n
, cla
ssifi
cati
on,
and
stora
ge
of informatio
n by applyin
g
a parti
cula
r
t
ools su
ch as Cla
ssifi
cator and
Informati
on
Tra
c
er
whi
c
h
has b
een d
e
scrib
ed ab
ove.
Cla
ssifi
cator
gene
rating a l
i
st of keywo
r
d by designi
ng an appli
c
a
t
ion modul th
at able to
parsing
and
extract a keywords from d
o
cum
ents,
n
o
r
mali
zing a
re
sults from ke
yword
extract
i
on
with a lexico
n
-
ba
sed, an
d structu
r
ing a li
nks bet
ween
all document
s. Modul for
Cla
ssifi
cator
are:
•
Extrac
tor
Search a
nd
Parsi
ng a
word
s that
co
rre
sp
ond to
a key
w
ords
and retrieve
a wh
ole of
informatio
n
containin
g
a
word
s from d
o
c
ume
n
t
sou
r
ce. Informatio
n refe
rred i
s
descri
p
tion
o
n
corre
s
p
ondin
g
colu
mn. Especi
a
lly for ini
t
ial pro
c
e
ss,
use
d
RP
JMD as a do
cu
me
nt sou
r
ce wit
h
keyword i
s
"Misi" (mi
ssi
on
).
•
CSF-KPI
No
r
m
alizatio
n
Normali
z
ation
of informatio
n from extra
c
ted re
sult base
d
on di
ctionary (l
exico
n
-ba
s
e
d
) tha
t
has b
een
cre
a
ted su
ch tha
t
able to reco
gnize a
stru
ct
ure of senten
ce in sta
nda
rd Indone
sia
n
Lang
uage
an
d is al
so
able
to recogni
ze
the charac
te
ri
stics of "
goo
d
"
CSF
s
[10]
a
nd KPIs [1
1],
[1
2
]. T
h
is
s
t
ud
y u
s
es
thr
e
e c
h
a
r
ac
te
r
i
s
t
ic
s o
f
KPI: sp
ecific , mea
s
urabl
e , an
d ti
me-b
ased. T
he
results a
r
e st
atement that confo
r
m to
st
anda
rd sente
n
ce of CSF
-
K
P
Is.
•
CSF-KPI
Generator
Gene
rate a CSFs and KPIs statement, in
cludi
ng ne
w keywords from
a statement.
Gene
rate a l
i
nka
ge st
ru
cture of info
rm
at
ion betwee
n
docume
n
ts, includin
g
a
keywo
r
d
s
cla
ssifying a
n
d
tagging to a
ppro
p
ri
ate manag
ement la
yer.
Information T
r
acer h
a
s p
r
i
m
ary functio
n
to
execute a
repa
ckagin
g
of informatio
n. This
sub
s
ystem
consi
s
ts of three main mo
dule
s
, nam
el
y: Searching,
Extractor, and Storage.
In
addition to
u
s
e a
con
c
e
p
t o
f
Information
Retrieval
[9] for d
e
velopin
g
algo
rithm to
Searchin
g an
d
Rencana
Kerja
Rencana
Strategis
RPJMD
Rencana
Kinerja
LAKI
P
CSF
KPI
Clasif
f
i
cator &
I
n
form
a
tion
Trace
r
Kinerja
Insta
n
si
Stra
te
gic
Tac
tic
al
Operation
a
l
F
eedback
Evaluation Warning : The document was created with Spire.PDF for Python.
ISSN: 16
93-6
930
TELKOM
NIKA
Vol. 12, No. 2, June 20
14: 485 – 49
2
490
Extractor, al
so made an al
gorithm to ret
r
ieve a
stri
ng
from the mea
s
ureme
n
t values
of KPIs that
will be used t
o
present inform
ation in graphical form.
One
of a
re
su
lts obtai
ned f
r
om ap
plicatio
n of In
formati
on T
r
a
c
er is
a sto
r
ag
e
structure of
informatio
n which
contai
n an ID from
multip
le input
docum
ents
and informati
on pa
ckage t
hat
contai
ning a keyword
required.
A
new st
orage structure
as
a clas
s of
KontenTabel
whi
c
h will be
a basi
c
st
ruct
ure of Enterp
rise
Info
rmatio
n Cente
r
EIC - (from Fi
gure
2.)
Figure 4. De
sign of Informa
t
ion Structu
r
e
for EIC
Storage
structure (EI
C
) th
at alrea
d
y co
ntai
n informa
t
ion that ha
s been
cla
s
sified an
d
arrang
ed ba
sed on nee
ds
from ea
ch of manag
eme
n
t layer then will be accessi
b
le to used a
s
a
sou
r
ce for other sy
stem
s or deliv
ered
dire
ctly corre
s
po
nd
s to a ke
yword
s
an
d classificatio
n
of
use
r
s in e
a
ch
layer of m
a
n
ageme
n
t thro
ugh a
vario
u
s ways. F
o
r
example,
sele
ct
ed info
rmatio
n
can b
e
directl
y
sent as a m
e
ssag
e (via S
M
S, IM
, push
-
mail, etc.) o
r
throug
h information sy
ste
m
for Executive (EIS).
4. Applica
t
ion
Resul
t
Below i
s
impl
ementation
a
nd testin
g co
ndu
cted for
b
o
th su
bsy
s
te
m as a
main
part of IIL
system d
e
sig
n
, and also shows an eval
uat
ion for u
s
e
of characte
ri
stic on IU.
4.1 Subsiste
m Classifica
tor
Prototype
wa
s impl
ement
ed by a
pplyi
ng an
al
g
o
rit
h
m of Ex
tra
c
tor -
No
rmali
z
ation
-
Gene
rato
r for all do
cume
nts of LAKIP re
lated (sta
rt from RP
JM
D) t
o
gen
erate
a
list of key
w
o
r
ds
index and li
nks between
all docu
m
e
n
ts. Figure
5
.
and 6. followin
g
sh
ows an example
of
algorith
m
app
lied for so
me
sampl
e
of so
urce do
cum
e
nts.
Also p
r
o
c
ee
d
a de
sign
verif
i
cation, b
o
th t
o
tech
nical
sp
ecification
s
re
quire
d (with
e
x
perts
judgem
ent)
and to user requi
reme
nts i.e person
a
l wa
s dire
ctly involved
with do
cume
nt
s
manag
eme
n
t. In general, a
verification
re
sults
sho
w
th
at this prototy
pe ha
s meet a crite
r
ia
s.
4.2 Subsiste
m Informatio
n Tracer
Verificatio
n
carri
ed out by creatin
g ap
plic
atio
n sce
nario
s u
s
ing
a data source from
document
s o
f
LAKIP rela
ted, and enter a key
w
ord (from a li
st of index gene
rated b
y
Cla
ssif
i
cat
o
r
)
t
o
s
ear
ch
a
ce
rt
ain i
n
f
o
r
m
at
i
on that
contai
n a
pe
rforma
nce a
c
hievement
s
and
repa
ckagi
ng
informatio
n i
n
a
ne
w format ba
sed
o
n
a
key
w
ord
s
(incl
udin
g
cre
a
te
cha
r
ts of
perfo
rman
ce
achi
evement
). Fun
c
tional
test give
a
re
sults that
sce
nario
s exe
c
ut
ed
su
ccessfu
lly
or met to expec
tations
.
Evaluation Warning : The document was created with Spire.PDF for Python.
TELKOM
NIKA
ISSN:
1693-6
9
30
Inform
ation Interch
ang
e La
yer Ba
se
d on
Classifi
catio
n
of Inform
ation …. (Albarda Supan
gka
t
)
491
Figure 5. Implementation of
Classificator
Figure 6. Result from Clas
sific
a
tor (lis
t on the Right)
In addition, another te
st to calcul
ate a su
cces
s rate
(mea
sured in pre
c
isi
on) f
r
om thi
s
appli
c
ation to
presenting a
n
informatio
n
appro
p
ri
at
e to keywo
r
d
s
requi
re
d by user
(Tabl
e
2.).
Preci
s
io
n as
a main attrib
utes in
con
c
e
p
t of Info
rmation Ret
r
ieval.
Test
execute
d
by inse
rting
a
few keywo
r
d
s
into this
a
pplication an
d cal
c
ulate
h
o
w mu
ch i
n
formatio
n wa
s extra
c
ted
and
displ
a
yed
co
rre
ctly. This
test also indi
cated th
at e
x
traction,
cla
ssifi
cation, a
nd re
pa
ckagi
ng
pro
c
e
ss
of informatio
n ca
n
be appli
ed t
o
all types
of
document
s, not just for L
AKIP related. So
that application ca
n be u
s
ed as g
ene
ric applicati
on for vario
u
s typ
e
s of govern
m
ent docume
n
ts.
Evaluation Warning : The document was created with Spire.PDF for Python.
ISSN: 16
93-6
930
TELKOM
NIKA
Vol. 12, No. 2, June 20
14: 485 – 49
2
492
Table 2. Pre
c
ision te
sting for seve
ral
of
keyword
s
(fo
r
field of education)
No. Ke
y
w
o
r
ds
Precision
1 Sekolah
100%
2 Koperasi
100%
3 Komputer
100%
4 Seni
100%
5 Olahraga
100%
6 Ekonomi
100%
7 Pendidikan
100%
8 rata
67%
9 SD
90%
10 MI
6%
11 MOKA
100%
12 SMP
100%
13 SMA
44%
14 TNI
50%
15 GAKIN
100%
Total peroleha
n
1260
Rata-r
ata
84%
5. Conclu
sion
From
study
above de
mo
nstrate
d
that
basi
c
ap
plication of IIL is abl
e to pe
rform a
repa
ckagi
ng
and ge
ne
rate
new info
rma
t
ion more
ap
prop
riate fo
rmat to need
s and inte
re
sts of
use
r
s. In
othe
r word
s, a
pa
rameters p
r
o
p
o
se
d for
characteri
stic of I
U
c
apa
ble
of functioni
ng a
s
a
para
m
eters t
o
produ
ce
hig
her
quality inf
o
rmatio
n.
De
sign
of mod
e
l
s
an
d sy
stem
con
c
e
p
ts i
s
still
prelimi
nary
st
udy that
need
s to
be
devel
oped
furth
e
r.
But more o
r
l
e
ss
will
cha
n
ge a
pa
ra
dig
m
of
informatio
n manag
eme
n
t in context of informat
io
n re
sou
r
ces that rise its co
mplexity in
enterp
r
i
s
e.
IIL that serve
s
a
s
a mid
d
le
-wa
r
e fo
r a v
a
ri
ou
s exi
s
tin
g
inform
ation
system
s an
d
variou
s
sources of i
n
formation
will also increasing va
lue
of asset
s
from Inform
ation Resources in
enterp
r
i
s
e. By placing IIL as pa
rt of the inform
atio
n
network infrastru
c
tu
re fro
m
enterp
r
ise will
give mo
re e
ffective impa
ct for ta
ctical and
st
rat
egic interest
s. That
mea
n
are p
r
ovid
ing
informatio
n reso
urce
s whi
c
h capabl
e to produ
ce a
hi
gh value of information to deci
s
io
n sup
port
for executive
s
or man
age
rs. This will fa
cilitate
for ma
nagem
ent of investment st
rategy in cont
e
x
t
of information
governa
nce for ente
r
pri
s
e.
Referen
ces
[1]
DeL
one
W
H
,
McLea
n ER. T
he D
e
L
o
n
e
a
n
d
McLe
an
Mo
del
of Informat
i
on S
y
st
em Su
ccess: A T
en
Year Up
date.
Jo
u
r
na
l
o
f
Ma
nag
em
en
t In
fo
rma
ti
o
n
System
s.
2003; 1
9
(4): 9
–30.
[2]
Madn
ick SE,
W
ang RY,
Lee
YW
, Z
hu H. Overvie
w
an
d F
r
ame
w
ork
for D
a
ta an
d Inform
ation Qu
al
it
y
Research.
AC
M Journa
l of Data and Infor
m
ation Qua
lity.
2
009; 1(1).
[3]
Ge M, Helfert
M, Jann
ach
D.
Informatio
n
Q
uality Ass
e
ss
ment: Val
i
dati
n
g
Measur
e
m
ent
Di
mens
io
ns
and Proc
esses
. ECIS Proceedin
g
s. 201
1: 75.
[4]
Al Hakim L.
Chall
a
n
ges of Mana
gin
g
Info
rmati
on Qua
lit
y in Service
Organi
z
a
t
i
ons.
Lond
on. Idea
Group Pub
lish
i
ng. 200
7.
[5]
Choo CW, Bergeron P,
D
e
tlo
r
B, Heat
on
L.
Information
cul
t
ur
e a
nd
infor
m
ation
use: A
n
e
x
plor
ato
r
y
stud
y
of three orga
nizati
on
s.
Journal of
the Amer
ica
n
Society for
Informati
on
Scienc
e an
d
T
e
chno
logy
. 2
008; 59(
5): 792
-804.
[6] Albar
da.
C
l
as
sificatio
n
of I
n
formatio
n
Us
e (IU)
on th
e Infor
m
ati
o
n
Res
ource
S
e
rvices
. T
he
Procee
din
g
s o
f
the 6th I
n
te
rnat
io
nal
Co
nferenc
e o
n
T
e
lecommu
nicati
o
n
S
y
stem, Se
rvices, an
d
Appl
icatio
ns (TSSA 2012). Ku
ta Bali. 201
2: 1
53-1
56.
[7
]
R
o
sl
ae
ni
D
,
Al
b
a
r
da
.
Desig
n
of Keyw
ord
Extraction App
licatio
n as a
Part of Information C
enter
.
Internatio
na
l C
onfere
n
ce o
n
ICT
for
Smart Societ
y. Jakarta.
2013; 1-9.
[8]
Nasution WS, Albarda.
Imp
r
ove
m
e
n
t of
Busin
e
ss Proc
ess in order t
o
Mana
ge the
Quality of
Information
. Internati
ona
l Co
nferenc
e on ICT
for Sm
art Societ
y
.
Jakarta. 2
013; 1-7.
[9] Ko
w
a
lski
G.
Informatio
n
Retri
e
val Arch
itectu
re and Al
gorit
h
m
s.
Sprin
ger.
Ashbur
n, VA,
USA. 2011.
[10] Ho
w
e
ll
MT
.
C
r
itical Succ
ess
F
a
ctor Simp
li
fied: Imp
l
e
m
e
n
ting T
he P
o
w
e
rful Drivers
of Dramatic
Bu
si
ne
ss Im
p
r
o
v
em
en
t.
Ne
w
York. CRC Pre
ss. 2010.
[11] Permenter
D.
Key Perfor
ma
n
c
e Indic
a
tors: Devel
o
p
i
ng,
I
m
ple
m
entin
g, an
d Usin
g W
i
nn
in
g KPIs.
John
W
ile
y
& So
ns Inc. Ne
w
J
e
rse
y
. 20
10.
[12] Kerzner
H.
Pr
oject M
a
n
age
me
nt Metrics,
KPIs, an
d
D
a
shb
oards:
A
Guid
e to
Me
asuri
ng
an
d
Monitori
ng Pro
j
ect Performanc
e.
John W
ile
y
and So
ns inc.
201
1: 103.
Evaluation Warning : The document was created with Spire.PDF for Python.