Int
ern
at
i
onal
Journ
al of Ele
ctrical
an
d
Co
mput
er
En
gin
eeri
ng
(IJ
E
C
E)
Vo
l.
9
, No
.
6
,
Decem
ber
201
9
, p
p.
5596~
5603
IS
S
N: 20
88
-
8708
,
DOI: 10
.11
591/
ijece
.
v9
i
6
.
pp5596
-
56
03
5596
Journ
al h
om
e
page
:
http:
//
ia
es
core
.c
om/
journa
ls
/i
ndex.
ph
p/IJECE
Assessin
g
C
ompl
ete
n
ess
of a WEB
s
ite f
rom
Q
ualit
y
P
erspe
ctive
J.
Sa
si B
hanu
1
, D
B
K K
ames
h
2
, JKR S
as
tr
y
3
1
CMR
Instit
ute
of
Technol
og
y
,
Kandla
ko
y
a
Village, Medc
h
al
Di
stric
t
,
H
y
der
abad,
Indi
a
,
2
Mall
a
Redd
y
E
ngine
er
ing
Col
lege
for
wom
e
n
Hy
der
aba
d
,
Ind
ia
3
Koneru
La
ksm
a
ia
h
Educ
a
ti
on
Foundati
on
,
Indi
a
Art
ic
le
In
f
o
ABSTR
A
CT
Art
ic
le
history:
Re
cei
ved
Sep
5
, 2
01
8
Re
vised
Ju
l
1
8
,
201
9
Accepte
d
J
ul
27
, 2
01
9
As
sess
ing
the
qual
ity
of
a
web
site
is
m
ost
im
porta
nt
,
espe
cial
l
y
be
ca
use
peopl
e
in
th
e
world,
nowada
y
s,
are
depe
nd
ent
o
n
the
qual
i
t
y
of
the
content
hosted
on
the
W
EB
for
var
ious
purposes.
Eve
r
y
aspe
c
t
that
det
ermines
the
qu
al
ity
of
t
he
websit
e
m
ust
be
ta
k
en
in
to
account
as
the
users
use
W
ebsit
e
s
,
for
v
a
rious
purposes.
The
con
te
nt
posted
on
th
e
W
EB
should
be
ac
c
essible
to
the
public,
and
it
m
ust
be
of
high
qual
ity
so
th
at
t
he
users
c
an
use
it
withou
t
a
n
y
doubt
.
Th
e
q
ual
ity
of
the
co
nte
nt
post
ed
on
the
W
EB
is
depe
nden
t
on
ma
n
y
fa
ct
ors.
Th
ere
are
as
m
any
as
42
fac
tors
such
as
it
s
lay
out
,
e
ase
of
navi
ga
ti
on,
stru
ct
ure
,
qu
al
i
t
y
of
content,
qua
li
t
y
of
m
ult
i
-
m
edi
a,
e
tc.
that
nee
d
to
b
e
con
sidere
d
for
asse
ss
ing
the
over
a
l
l
qual
i
t
y
of
a
website.
“
Com
ple
te
ness”
is
one
such
fac
tor
.
“
Com
ple
te
nes
s
”
is
about
the
tot
a
l
availabili
t
y
of
the
da
t
a
about
a
spec
i
fic
context
that
the
user
is
pursuing.
An
inc
om
ple
te
web
site
tha
t
is
not
la
rge
l
y
used
b
y
peopl
e
eve
ntu
al
l
y
g
et
s
out
of
the
dom
ai
n
of
sea
rch
eng
ine
s,
and
a
lso
th
e
users
lose
int
er
est
in
such
website
s.
Eve
r
y
qu
al
i
t
y
fac
tor
m
ust
be
assess
ed
inde
pend
ent
l
y
b
y
using
a
m
ode
l.
Th
e
m
odel
s
m
ust
be
combined
to
r
efl
e
ct
the
over
al
l
qu
alit
y
of
the
w
ebsi
te
.
A
set
of
sub
-
fac
tors
rep
rese
nt
a
qua
lit
y
fac
tor
.
The
qua
l
ity
of
ev
er
y
sub
-
fac
t
or
m
ust
be
indi
viduall
y
co
m
pute
d
and
combined
to
obta
in
the
qua
li
t
y
of
the
ent
ire
f
ac
tor
.
Thi
s
pap
er
primari
l
y
foc
uses
on
pre
senti
ng
a
m
odel,
using
which,
t
he
qual
i
t
y
assess
m
ent
of
a
website
c
an
be
m
ade
conside
r
in
g
the
f
ac
tor
call
ed
“
Com
ple
te
ne
ss
”
which
is
one
of
the
fac
t
ors
to
be
asses
sed
for
computing
the
qual
ity
of
website
s.
The
re
c
an
be
m
uch
dat
a
m
issing
in
the
cont
ent
po
sted
on
the
website,
such
as
m
issing
col
um
n
s
in
the
ta
ble
s
and
form
s
.
The
m
issing
infor
ma
ti
on
m
ake
s
the
websi
te i
nco
m
ple
te
and
un
-
u
sef
ul.
Ke
yw
or
d
s
:
Asse
s
si
ng
the
qu
al
it
y
of
w
eb
sit
es
Com
plete
ness
of the
WEB sit
es
Evaluati
ng
t
he
qu
al
it
y o
f WE
B
Qu
al
it
y assess
m
ent
f
act
ors
Total
quali
ty
of
WEB sit
es
Copyright
©
201
9
Instit
ut
e
o
f Ad
vanc
ed
Engi
n
ee
r
ing
and
S
cienc
e
.
Al
l
rights re
serv
ed
.
Corres
pond
in
g
Aut
h
or
:
JKR Sast
ry
,
Dep
a
rtm
ent o
f El
ect
ro
nics
and C
om
pu
te
r
E
nginee
rin
g,
Kone
ru Lak
shm
ai
ah
Ed
ucati
on
F
ound
a
ti
on
(D
eem
ed
to
be Un
i
ver
sit
y),
Vaddes
wr
am
, G
untu
r Dist
rict
, An
dhra Pra
de
sh
, I
nd
ia
.
Em
a
il
: dr
sastry
@k
l
un
i
ver
sit
y.
in
1.
INTROD
U
CTION
Websi
te
s
are
bein
g
us
e
d
e
xt
ensively
f
or
dissem
inati
ng
inf
or
m
at
ion
.
Qu
al
it
y
of
th
e
we
bs
it
es
i
s
the
m
os
t
i
m
po
rtant
an
d
si
gn
i
ficant
issue
w
hen
it
com
es
t
o
dissem
inati
n
g
high
-
qu
al
it
y
con
te
nt
to
t
he
us
er
s
.
More
ref
i
ned
and
releva
nt
i
nfor
m
at
ion
ca
n
be
m
ade
avail
able
to
the
us
ers
by
c
onsideri
ng
e
ve
ry
aspect
determ
ining
t
he
qual
it
y
of
the
we
bs
it
e.
It
is
qu
it
e
im
po
rta
nt
to
determ
ine
the
fact
or
s
that
infl
uen
ce
the
qu
al
it
y
of
t
he
web
sit
es
by
the
us
e
of
m
od
el
s
that
help
c
om
pu
te
the
qu
al
it
y
of
the
web
sit
es
quant
it
at
ively
to
determ
ine
the r
eal
ist
ic
stat
e o
f
the
we
bs
it
e.
Ther
e
are
m
or
e
tha
n
42
pa
ram
et
ers
[1
,
2]
u
se
d
for
c
om
pu
ti
ng
t
he
qual
it
y
of
th
e
we
bs
it
es.
A
f
or
m
ulate
d
m
od
el
req
ui
re
d
f
or
c
om
pu
ti
ng
t
he
qual
it
y
of
a
Sub
-
fact
or.
All
the
in
div
id
ual
m
od
e
ls
need
com
bin
ing
i
nto a la
r
ger
m
od
el
for
c
om
pu
ti
ng the
qu
al
it
y o
f
t
he
e
ntire fa
ct
or.
Evaluation Warning : The document was created with Spire.PDF for Python.
In
t J
Elec
&
C
om
p
En
g
IS
S
N: 20
88
-
8708
Assessin
g
c
om
plete
ness of
a WEB si
te
fro
m quali
ty
p
ers
pec
ti
ve (
J. S
as
i
Bh
anu)
5597
Exc
hange
of
inf
or
m
at
ion
th
r
ough
web
sit
es
has
bec
om
e
a
pa
rt
of
e
very
body’s
li
fe
.
The
c
onte
nt
po
ste
d
on
the
we
bs
it
e
is
in
dif
fer
e
nt
f
or
m
at
s
that
include
s
ound,
im
ages,
vi
deo
s
,
aud
i
os
,
grap
hi
cs,
et
c.
Diff
e
re
nt
form
at
s
are
us
ed
to
po
st
diff
e
ren
t
kinds
of
co
nte
nt.
Eve
ry
day
m
any
web
sit
es
are
bein
g
intr
oduce
d.
Qu
al
it
y
of
th
es
e
web
sit
es
is
the
real
co
nce
r
n.
Nob
od
y
ca
n
m
ake
dep
e
nde
nt
on
a
co
ntent
ho
ste
d
on
the
WEB
in
the
a
bs
ence
of
t
he
qual
it
y
of
s
uc
h
co
nte
nt
.
Assessm
ent
of
qual
it
y
is
the
m
os
t
chall
en
ging
ta
sk.
Cust
om
er
sat
isfact
ion
is
de
pe
ndent
on t
he qu
al
it
y o
f
th
e w
e
bs
it
e,
wh
i
ch
is
purs
ue
d/su
r
fed f
or w
a
nt
of info
rm
ation
.
Ther
e
is
a
nee
d
to
co
ns
ide
r
m
any
factor
s
f
or
assessi
ng
th
e
qu
al
it
y
of
the
web
sit
es
[3
]
.
The
facto
r
s
include
us
a
bili
ty
,
con
necte
dness,
str
uct
ur
e
,
na
vig
at
io
n,
safety
,
m
a
i
ntainabili
ty
,
reli
abili
ty
,
fu
nctio
nalit
y,
pr
i
vacy,
porta
bili
ty
,
et
c.
The
re
is
a
need
to
us
e
m
any
tool
s,
m
et
ho
ds
,
m
od
el
s
,
a
nd
te
c
hn
i
qu
e
s
for
as
sessin
g
t
he
qual
it
y
of
a
we
bs
it
e.
M
os
t
of
the
we
bs
it
es
de
velo
pe
d
by
orga
niz
at
ion
s
require
diff
e
re
nt
aspec
ts
that
i
nclud
e
a
lo
go,
c
olor
sc
he
m
e,
anim
a
te
d
gr
a
phic
s,
m
ou
se
-
over
e
ff
ec
ts,
grap
hic
ar
t,
co
nn
ect
ivit
y
wit
h
the d
at
a
bases,
and se
ver
al
othe
r
re
quisi
te
s.
Ther
e
is
a
need
to
us
e
sever
al
par
am
et
ers
fo
r
evaluati
ng
the
qu
al
it
y
of
a
we
bs
it
e
[4
]
,
w
hich
are
ei
the
r
directl
y
relat
ed
or
oth
e
rw
is
e.
So
m
e
of
t
he
m
e
tho
ds
use
d
f
or
com
pu
t
ing
qual
it
y
of
websi
te
s
are
purely
su
bject
ive
,
whic
h
are
ac
quir
ed
ta
ke
n
as
in
pu
t
from
ind
iv
idu
al
s.
The
qu
al
it
y
factor
s
c
an
al
so
be
m
e
asur
e
d
us
in
g
sta
ti
sti
cal
m
et
ho
ds w
hic
h
a
re
gen
e
rall
y k
now
n
as
ob
j
e
ct
ive m
easur
em
ents.
Qu
al
it
y
requi
rem
ents
diff
e
r
from
sta
keh
ol
der
t
o
sta
keholde
r.
Vari
ou
s
act
or
s
t
hat
inclu
de
T
he
desig
ners
,
us
e
rs,
m
ana
gem
ent,
dev
el
op
e
rs,
et
c.
lo
ok
at
the
qual
it
y
fr
om
diff
ere
nt
pe
rs
pec
ti
ves.
Ma
intai
nab
il
it
y,
Secu
rity
,
Functi
on
al
it
y,
e
tc
.
are
c
on
si
der
e
d
f
ro
m
the
perspecti
ve
of
t
he
pro
gr
am
m
ers,
wh
il
e
Usab
il
it
y,
Eff
i
ci
ency,
Credita
bili
ty
,
et
c.
ar
e
con
sid
ere
d
f
ro
m
the
per
spe
ct
ive
of
en
d
-
us
ers
.
The
ne
eds
of
a
web
sit
e
m
us
t
be
colle
ct
ed
first
from
the
per
cepti
ve
of
a
n
act
or
,
a
nd
the
n
the
qua
li
ty
par
am
et
ers
need
to
be
colle
ct
ed
that
be
st represe
nt th
e said
nee
ds
.
The
c
om
plexity
of
the
we
bs
i
te
s
is
increasin
g
day
by
day,
especial
ly
consi
der
in
g
t
he
E
-
C
omm
erce,
Ele
ct
ro
nics
,
M
us
e
um
s,
and
t
he
li
ke
websi
te
s.
Sele
ct
io
n
of
su
it
a
ble
qual
it
y
factor
s
a
nd
determ
ining
qual
it
y
evaluati
on
m
eth
ods
to
a
ssess
the
facto
rs
is
increasin
gly
c
om
plex
due
t
o
th
e
e
xistence
of
m
or
e
facto
r
s
an
d
the
inter
-
relat
ion
s
hi
ps
am
on
g
the
pa
ram
et
er
s.
The
re
is
a
ne
ed
to
c
onside
r
both
at
trib
ute
s
and
cha
racteri
sti
cs
and
the
relat
io
ns
hi
p
betwee
n
the
t
wo
in
th
e
we
bs
it
es.
W
ebsite
s
m
us
t
ha
v
e
both
obj
e
ct
iv
e
eval
uatio
n
a
nd
a
balance
d
a
nd
consci
ous
s
ubj
ect
ive
incl
us
io
n.
T
her
e
is
a
ne
ed
to
e
xplore
bo
t
h
ty
pes
of
m
et
ho
ds
c
onsider
i
ng
the p
a
ram
et
ers
that nee
d
t
ho
se
m
e
tho
ds f
or
unde
rtaki
ng the
evalu
at
io
n.
A
set
of
par
a
m
et
ers
that
su
it
the
char
act
erist
ic
s
and
at
trib
utes
of
a
web
sit
e
m
us
t
be
sel
ect
e
d.
Ever
y
par
am
eter
m
us
t
be
qua
li
ty
assessed
su
ch
t
hat
cha
rac
te
risti
cs
and
at
t
rib
utes
are
e
va
luate
d
hierar
c
hi
cal
ly
us
in
g
t
he
s
ub
-
c
rite
ria
an
d
sub
-
sub
c
rite
ria.
E
valuati
ng
m
od
el
s
f
or
each
of
the
c
har
act
eri
sti
cs,
su
b
-
c
har
act
eris
ti
cs,
and
s
ub
-
su
b
c
ha
racteri
sti
cs
m
us
t
be
determ
ined,
and
t
he
sam
e
us
ed
f
or
c
om
p
uting
T
he
qu
al
it
y.
T
her
e
s
houl
d
be
a
m
e
tho
d
t
ha
t
com
bin
es
the
qual
it
y
of
the
hiera
rc
hy
of
c
har
a
ct
erist
ic
s
to
determ
ine
the
ov
e
rall
qual
it
y
of
eac
h
at
tr
ibu
te
/pa
ram
et
e
r.
T
he
ov
e
rall
qu
al
it
y
of
th
e
websi
te
has
to
be
cal
culat
ed,
c
onside
rin
g
al
l
the
at
trib
utes
t
hat
are
sel
ect
e
d
based
on
th
e
nee
ds
e
xam
i
ned
f
or
t
he
w
ebsite
.
In
this
pa
per,
a
m
od
el
and
a
pr
oce
ss
are
presente
d
us
i
ng
the
qu
al
it
y
of
t
he
web
sit
e
assessed
c
on
si
de
rin
g
“C
om
plete
ness”
an
d
it
s r
el
at
e
d
s
ub
-
c
rite
r
ia
.
2.
LIT
ERATUR
E SU
RV
E
Y
Var
i
ou
s
facto
r
s,
su
c
h
as
sec
ur
it
y,
us
a
bili
ty
,
ade
quacy
,
a
nd
a
ppeara
nce
,
ha
ve
been
c
on
si
der
e
d,
by
Mi
ss.
Ka
usa
r
Fiaz
K
ha
wa
j
a1
et
al
.
,
[
1]
f
or
e
valuati
ng
t
he
qual
it
y
of
t
he
we
bs
it
e.
A
qu
al
it
y
we
bs
it
e
is
eas
y
to
us
e
,
a
nd
it
i
s
possible
t
o
le
arn
from
that
ki
nd
of
a
sit
e.
O
ne
ca
n
co
ncl
ude
that
the
m
or
e
the
we
bs
it
e
use
d,
the
m
or
e
the
qual
it
y
of
t
he
web
sit
e.
The
e
xp
e
rience
o
f
t
he
us
er
co
uld
be
c
onsidere
d
as
rich
an
d
va
luable
wh
e
n
the
us
e
r
s
le
arn
from
qu
al
it
y
web
sit
es.
The
facto
r
“Appeara
nce
”
ref
ers
to
th
e
loo
k
a
nd
fe
el
of
T
he
we
bs
it
e
wh
ic
h
inclu
de
s
app
eal
in
g,
orga
nizat
ion
of
color
s
a
nd
obj
ect
s
,
a
m
eaningfu
l
arra
nge
m
ent
of
inf
or
m
at
ion
,
et
c.
Ka
us
ar
Fiaz
Kh
a
wa
j
a1
et
al
.,
[1
]
hav
e
presente
d
a
m
e
thod
us
i
ng
w
hi
ch
the
qual
it
y
of
the w
e
bs
it
es
a
r
e
com
pu
te
d ba
sed o
n
the
obse
rv
at
io
ns
of the
us
ers
whil
e the
w
e
bs
it
e is in
use
.
Seve
ral
factors
s
uch
as
Fle
xib
il
it
y,
safety
,
and
us
a
bili
ty
hav
e
bee
n
co
ns
ide
red
by
V
ijay
Ku
m
ar
Ma
ntri
et
al
.
[
3]
f
or
com
pu
ti
ng
the
qual
it
y
of
the
we
bs
it
e.
The
fact
or
“U
sabili
ty
”
ref
ers
to
t
he
e
ff
ect
iv
eness,
sat
isfact
ion
,
a
nd
ef
fici
ent
us
e
of
th
e
we
bs
it
e.
The
facto
r
“S
afety
”
ref
ers
t
o
the
prese
nce
of
the
us
ers
w
ho
is
ei
ther
co
nnect
ed
to
the
websi
te
or
s
urfin
g
th
e
web
sit
e.
T
he
us
er'
s
co
nn
ect
ion
to
t
he
we
bsi
te
sh
ould
ne
ve
r
get
expose
d
to
the
ou
tsi
de
world
.
The
a
bili
ty
b
uilt
into
the
de
velo
pm
ent
of
a
web
sit
e
tha
t
al
lows
cha
nges
to
the
w
ebsite
,
w
hile
the
we
bs
it
e
is
in
us
e
,
is
relat
ed
to
the
factor
“Fle
xib
i
li
ty
.”
A
to
ol
P
oDQ
A
(Portal
Data
Qu
al
it
y
Asses
sm
ent
Too
l)
has
bee
n
de
ve
lop
e
d
us
in
g
wh
ic
h,
one
ca
n
asses
s
the
qu
al
it
y
of
a
web
sit
e
consi
der
i
ng f
ac
tors b
uilt
into
t
he
to
ol.
Evaluation Warning : The document was created with Spire.PDF for Python.
IS
S
N
:
2088
-
8708
In
t J
Elec
&
C
om
p
En
g,
V
ol.
9
, N
o.
6
,
Dece
m
ber
2019
:
5596
-
5603
5598
M
any
facto
rs
s
uch
a
s
na
vig
at
ion
,
c
onte
nt,
st
ru
ct
ur
e,
m
ulti
m
edia,
appeara
nce,
a
nd
uniq
ue
ness
hav
e
been
c
on
si
dered
by
Vassili
s
S.
Mou
sta
kis
et
al
.,
[4
]
fo
r
assessi
ng
the
qu
al
it
y
of
a
web
sit
e.
T
he
f
act
or
“con
te
nt”
is
relat
ed
to
the
inf
or
m
at
ion
po
ste
d
on
the
w
ebsi
te
and
c
on
veyed
to
the
end
-
us
er
th
r
ough
a
n
interface
.
T
he
qual
it
y
factor
“c
onte
nt”
ex
pr
esse
s
th
e
extent
of
gen
e
rali
zat
ion
an
d
s
pecial
iz
at
ion
,
com
plete
ness,
connecte
dness
,
an
d
co
ve
rag
e
of
a
dom
ai
n.
The
s
upport
desi
gn
e
d
a
nd
prov
i
ded
to
t
he
use
r
that
helps
to
m
ov
e
ar
ound
the
si
te
is
cal
le
d
na
vig
at
io
n.
The
qu
al
it
y
of
na
vi
gation
is
de
pe
nd
e
nt
on
the
effor
t
require
d
to
m
ov
e
ar
ound
the
sit
e,
avail
abili
t
y
of
the
co
nne
ct
ed
li
nk
s,
a
nd
si
m
ple
structure.
The
qu
al
it
y
factor
“Struct
ur
e”
de
al
s
with
sp
ee
d,
organ
iz
at
io
n
of
c
onte
nt,
qu
ic
k
acce
ss
to
th
e
con
te
nts,
et
c.
The
lo
ok
a
nd
f
eel
of
the
web
sit
e
c
an
be
relat
e
d
to
the
ap
pear
a
nce
an
d
us
e
of
dif
fer
e
nt
kinds
of
m
ulti
-
media
an
d
gr
a
phic
s.
A
we
bs
it
e
can
be
desi
gn
e
d,
consi
der
i
ng
m
any
sty
le
s.
A
web
sit
es
“
Un
i
qu
e
ness”
ref
e
r
s
to
it
sta
nd
in
g
out
a
m
on
g
sim
i
la
r
we
bs
it
es.
A
un
i
qu
e
web
sit
e
has
to
be
of
hi
gh
qual
it
y,
and
s
uch
sit
es
us
e
d
quit
e
of
te
n
by
the
us
e
rs.
Va
s
sil
is
S.
Mou
st
akis
et
al
.,
[4
]
hav
e
pr
ese
nte
d
a
m
e
tho
d
ca
ll
ed
AH
P
(An
al
yt
ic
al
Hierar
chica
l
Pr
oc
ess)
,
an
d
they
hav
e
us
e
d
the
m
e
tho
d
f
or
com
pu
ti
ng
th
e
qu
al
it
y
of
th
e
web
sit
e.
Ma
ny
oth
e
r
pa
ra
m
et
er
s
al
so
ha
ve
to
be
con
si
der
e
d
f
or
c
om
pu
ti
ng
t
he
qual
it
y
of
the
we
b
sit
e.
T
he
issue
of
“
porta
bili
ty
”
has
been
consi
der
e
d
by
Andr
i
na
Gr
a
niü
et
al
.,
[
5]
f
or
assessi
ng
the
qual
it
y
of
the
a
bi
li
t
y
to
m
ov
e
c
on
te
nt
from
one
sit
e
to the othe
r wit
hout the
n
ee
d t
o
m
ake an
y c
ha
ng
e
s at ei
the
r e
nd.
An
as
sessm
ent
syst
e
m
has
be
en
prese
nted
by
Tanya
Sin
gh
et
al
.
[6
]
co
nsi
der
in
g
diff
e
re
nt
kinds
of
factors
that
inc
lud
e
ap
pear
a
nc
e,
a
dequacy,
se
cur
it
y,
a
nd
pr
i
vac
y.
T
hey
pr
e
sented
the
li
te
ral
m
eaning
of
t
hese
factors.
T
he
ea
se
of
usi
ng
a
w
ebsite
an
d
the
extent
that
one
can
le
ar
n
by
usi
ng
t
he
websi
te
is
to
be
c
ompu
te
d
represe
nting
th
e
qu
al
it
y
of
th
e
sa
m
e
in
te
r
ms
of
the
facto
r
cal
le
d
“usab
il
it
y.”
The
facto
r
“usa
bili
ty
,
ref
ers
to
the
way
the
use
rs
c
ould
us
e
the
we
bs
it
e.
S
om
e
inform
at
io
n
disp
la
ye
d
th
r
ough
t
he
websi
te
co
uld
be
pri
vate
t
o
a u
se
r
c
on
ce
r
ne
d.
The
eli
gib
l
e
W
e
b users
prov
i
ded w
it
h t
he
infor
m
at
ion
re
la
te
d
to t
hem
.
The
qual
it
y
relat
ed
to
the
factor
“p
rivacy”
is
the
exac
tness
with
wh
ic
h
the
pr
i
vacy
of
the
us
e
r
-
m
ai
ntained.
T
he
acce
ss
to
the
con
te
nt
m
us
t
be
re
stric
te
d
to
au
thoriz
ed
a
nd
authe
ntica
te
d
us
ers
.
The
in
f
or
m
at
i
on
exc
ha
ng
e
d
betwee
n
the
use
rs
a
nd
we
bs
i
te
m
us
t
be
sec
ur
e
d
s
o
that
no
dam
age
cau
sed
in
the
tra
ns
it
.
Th
e
qual
it
y
of
the
web
sit
e
ca
n
be
assesse
d
ba
se
d
on
t
he
sec
ur
i
ty
enf
orce
d
durin
g
an
exc
ha
nge
of
inf
or
m
at
ion
.
They
hav
e
c
onsidere
d
an
oth
e
r
f
act
or
“A
de
qu
a
cy
”
that
deals
with
com
plete
ness
an
d
exact
ness
of
the
co
ntent
hos
te
d
on
the
websi
te
.
Si
m
il
ar
att
rib
u
te
s
ha
ve
be
en
co
ns
i
der
e
d
by
A
nu
s
ha
et
a
l.,
[7
]
f
or
asses
sing
the
qual
it
y
of
the
we
bs
it
es.
Am
on
g
t
he
pa
ram
et
ers
consi
der
e
d
by
the
m
,
the
m
os
t
i
m
po
rtant
at
tribu
te
is
“Port
abili
ty
.”
The
abili
ty
to
m
ov
e
the
cod
e
and
co
ntent
from
on
e
m
achi
ne
to
an
oth
er
without
m
aking
any
change
a
nd
sti
ll
m
ake
them
re
ady
f
or
t
he
ta
r
get
m
achine
is
cal
le
d
portabil
i
ty
.
Anothe
r
im
portant
thi
ng
a
bout
the
we
bs
it
es
is
the
reli
abili
ty
of
the
c
onte
nt
that
is
disp
la
ye
d
to
the
us
ers
ever
y
tim
e
the
us
er
sta
rts
s
urfin
g
the
web
sit
e.
A
web
sit
e
m
us
t
ref
le
ct
the
sam
e
con
te
nt
ev
ery
tim
e
a
us
er
cl
ic
ks
on
t
he
sam
e
li
nk
un
le
s
s
the
c
on
te
nt
on the
we
b
sit
e
is dynam
ic
al
l
y
change
d.
Th
e
re
li
abili
ty
of
a we
bs
it
e
te
rm
ed
as
the proba
bili
t
y
that
the inten
de
d pa
ge
is
not avail
a
ble.
A
web
sit
e
desi
gn
e
d
a
nd
deve
l
op
e
d
s
uc
h
tha
t
m
ai
ntenan
ce
of
the
sam
e
is
sim
ple
wh
en
changes
to
the
we
bs
it
e
a
re
nee
de
d.
T
he
qual
it
y
of
t
he
w
eb
sit
e
as
s
uch
de
pends
on
th
e
easi
ness
with
w
hich
the
we
bs
it
e
m
ai
ntained.
V
ario
us
issue
s
that
inclu
de
c
ha
ng
ea
bili
ty
,
te
sta
bili
ty
,
analy
sabili
ty
,
e
tc
.
m
us
t
be
con
si
der
e
d
wh
e
n
it
com
e
s
to
assessi
ng
the
qu
al
it
y
of
a
web
sit
e,
consi
der
i
ng
t
he
factor
“m
ai
ntainabili
ty
.”
An
ot
he
r
i
m
po
rtant
iss
ue
co
ns
ide
red
wh
e
n
it
c
om
es
to
m
ai
ntainabili
t
y
is
the
abil
it
y
to
m
ake
ch
ang
e
s
to
t
he
w
ebsite
wh
il
e it
is ru
nning
.
On
e m
or
e im
po
rta
nt f
act
or co
ns
ide
red
from
t
he
point
of
qua
li
ty
o
f
the w
e
bsi
te
is the “A
na
ly
sabili
ty”
of
t
he
websi
te
.
The
a
naly
sabi
li
ty
of
a
we
bs
it
e
inclu
des
the
abili
ty
to
read
the
co
ntent,
rel
at
e
the
co
ntent
,
an
d
interp
ret
the
sa
m
e,
and
al
so
find
an
d
det
e
rm
ine
the
nav
igati
onal
paths
that
exist
within
the
we
bs
it
e.
A
websi
te
can
be
sai
d
t
o
be
st
able
wh
e
n
no
l
oo
s
e
e
nds
e
xis
t,
the
us
e
r
i
nter
face
is
not
c
ha
ng
e
d,
or
the
la
yout
of
the
disp
la
y
is
no
t
dis
order
l
y
pr
esente
d.
T
he
sta
ble
we
bsi
te
do
es
not
un
derg
o
fr
e
qu
ent
changes.
T
he
issue
of
te
sti
ng
a
we
bs
it
e
m
us
t
be
t
aken
i
nto
c
ons
iderati
on
w
hile
desig
ning
the
web
sit
e.
It
sho
uld
be
possi
ble
to
m
ake
cha
nges
to
the
we
bs
it
es
w
hile
the
we
bsi
te
is
in
us
e.
Most
of
t
he
we
bs
it
es
bei
ng
use
d
the
se
days
do
not
su
pp
or
t t
his f
e
at
ur
e.
Fil
ipp
o
Ri
cca
et
al
.,
[8
]
ha
ve
con
si
der
e
d
m
any
oth
e
r
facto
rs
w
hich
will
help
to
com
pu
te
the
qu
al
it
y
of
the w
e
bs
it
es.
The
fact
or
s
c
on
si
der
e
d
incl
ud
e
t
he
desi
gn
o
f
the w
e
bs
it
e,
orga
nizat
ion
, user
-
fr
ie
nd
li
nes
s,
an
d
the
or
gan
iz
at
io
n
set
up o
f
the
w
ebsite
.
T
he
O
rg
a
nisati
on o
f
t
he
websi
te
incl
ud
e
s w
eb
pa
ge
s
an
d
t
he
li
nki
ng
of
the
we
b
pa
ges
.
The
way
t
he
we
b
pa
ges
ar
e
li
nk
e
d
hav
e
a
direct
bear
i
ng
on
t
he
e
ff
ec
ti
ve
acce
ssibil
it
y
o
f
the
we
b
pag
es
.
The
pr
e
fer
e
nc
es
of
t
he
us
ers
m
us
t
be
kep
t
in
m
ind
wh
il
e
de
sign
i
ng
t
he
w
ebsite
s.
T
he
co
ntent
exp
ect
e
d has t
o be
rendere
d.
Levels
to
w
hich
the
co
ntent
rendere
d
an
d
the
play
fu
lne
ss
with
w
hich
the
con
te
nt
a
ccesse
d
is
the
m
os
t
i
m
po
rtant
facto
rs
that
m
us
t
be
con
si
der
e
d
to
evaluate
the
qu
al
i
ty
of
the
w
ebsite
s
as
pr
es
ente
d
by
S
al
eh
Al
w
ahaishi
et
al
.,
[9
]
.
T
hey
have
pr
ese
nted
th
e
fr
am
ewo
r
k
bu
t
not
the
c
om
pu
ta
ti
on
al
m
et
hods
require
d
to
c
om
pu
te
the
qu
al
it
y
of
the
websi
te
s.
They
ha
ve
prese
nted
t
hat
a
ge
neral
crit
erion
is
re
quired
t
o
Evaluation Warning : The document was created with Spire.PDF for Python.
In
t J
Elec
&
C
om
p
En
g
IS
S
N: 20
88
-
8708
Assessin
g
c
om
plete
ness of
a WEB si
te
fro
m quali
ty
p
ers
pec
ti
ve (
J. S
as
i
Bh
anu)
5599
cal
culat
e
the
qual
it
y
of
any
web
sit
e
that
re
nd
e
rs
a
ny
co
ntent
an
d
ser
vic
es
supporte
d
thr
ough
the
we
bs
it
e.
They
ha
ve
e
xpla
ined
that
m
any
dim
ensi
on
s
co
ns
i
der
e
d
f
or
com
pu
t
i
ng
t
he
qu
al
it
y
of
t
he
websi
te
s.
These
dim
ension
s
m
us
t
be
con
si
der
e
d
in
c
onjun
ct
io
n
with
qual
it
y
ind
ic
at
or
s
an
d
c
hec
klist
s
by
the
WEB
desi
gner
s a
nd
dev
el
op
e
rs, as
pr
ese
nted
b
y
L
ay
la
H
asan
and
Em
ad
Abuelr
ub
[10].
Inform
at
ion
dissem
inati
on
th
rou
gh
we
bs
it
es
is
al
arm
ing
ly
increasin
g.
Ther
e
has
bee
n
the
rap
i
d
grow
t
h
of
we
b
ap
plica
ti
on
s
a
nd
we
bs
it
es.
T
he
qu
al
it
y
of
t
he
websi
te
s
m
us
t
be
high
s
o
tha
t
they
a
re
us
e
d
extensi
vely
f
or
accessi
ng in
form
ation
n
ee
de
d
f
or d
if
fer
e
nt
pur
po
ses
. A m
od
el
call
ed We
bQEM
(Web Qu
al
it
y
Evaluati
on
Me
thod)
has
been
dev
el
op
e
d
by
Kav
i
ndra
K
um
ar
Sin
gh
et
al
.,
[11]
for
c
om
pu
ti
ng
t
he
qual
it
y
of
web
sit
es
base
d
on
the
ob
j
ect
ive
asses
sm
ent.
H
ow
e
ver,
is
ha
s
bee
n
obser
ve
d
that
t
he
e
valuati
on
of
t
he
qual
ity
of
we
bs
it
es
ac
hieve
d
t
hroug
h
sub
j
ect
ive
as
s
essm
ent
is
m
os
t
unreli
able.
They
hav
e
pr
e
sented
a
quant
it
at
iv
e
assessm
ent
of
the
qual
it
y
of
th
e
web
sit
e
base
d
on
ob
j
ect
ive
evaluati
on.
T
he
m
et
ho
d
pro
pose
d
by
them
c
ov
e
rs
the att
rib
utes, c
har
act
erist
ic
s,
and s
ub
-
cha
rac
te
risti
cs.
Ma
ny
of
the
use
rs
world
wide
are
interact
in
g
with
each
ot
her
t
hro
ugh
w
ebsite
s,
es
pecial
ly
thro
ug
h
so
ci
al
we
b
sit
es.
T
he
qual
it
y
of
s
uc
h
s
ocial
web
sit
es
ha
s
bec
om
e
th
e
m
os
t
i
m
po
rtant
crit
eria
to
fa
ci
li
ta
te
pro
per
inte
racti
on
s
am
ong
us
ers.
L
ong
-
S
he
ng
C
he
n
et
al
.
[12]
ha
ve
at
te
m
pted
to
find
the
facto
rs
us
e
d
f
or
evaluati
ng
the
qu
al
it
y
of
so
ci
al
sit
es.
They
hav
e
us
e
d
featur
e
sel
ect
ion
t
echn
i
qu
e
s
to
com
pu
te
the
qual
it
y
of
s
ocial
sit
es.
Com
pu
ta
ti
on
of
the
qual
it
y
of
t
he
we
bs
it
es
re
qu
i
res
the
e
voluti
on
of
Me
tric
s.
Na
w
Lay
Wah
et
al
.,
[13]
ha
ve
pr
ese
nted
m
et
rics
us
in
g
w
hic
h
us
a
bili
ty
of
a
web
sit
e
com
pu
te
d
thr
ough
sixtee
n
fact
or
s
that
include
total
pa
ges,
w
ord
c
ount
pe
rce
ntage
of
body
te
xt,
te
xt
to
li
nk
co
un
t,
the
total
s
iz
e
of
the
web
sit
e
i
n
byte
s,
et
c. T
he
y hav
e
used
suppo
rt v
e
ct
or
s
for p
red
ic
ti
ng t
he qu
al
it
y o
f w
ebsite
s.
Sastry
JKR
et
al
.,
[
14
-
18]
ha
ve
prese
nted
t
he
way
qual
it
y
assessed
c
onsi
der
i
ng
t
he
at
tribu
te
s
w
hich,
include
co
nte
nt,
str
uctu
re,
nav
i
gatio
n,
m
ul
tim
edia,
a
nd
us
a
bili
ty
.
The
m
et
ho
d
of
c
onside
rin
g
s
ub
-
char
act
e
r
ist
ic
s
and
t
he
way
t
he
qual
it
y
assessed
relat
ing
t
o
an
at
tri
bu
te
pr
ese
nted
.
Ma
ny
oth
e
r
ap
pro
aches
pr
ese
nted
relat
ing
to
t
he
iss
ue
of
qual
it
y
of
the
web
sit
es
,
wh
ic
h
le
a
d
to
new
e
r
dim
ension
s
to
the
asse
ssm
en
t
of
the
qu
al
it
y of
the w
e
bs
it
es [
19
-
28
]
. Ho
wever,
no
ne
of
the
pap
e
rs
prese
nted
in the lit
eratur
e
hav
e
dealt
w
it
h
the
issue
of
a
ssessin
g
the
qual
it
y
of
the
web
sit
es
from
the
vie
w
of
co
m
plete
ness
of
c
onte
nt
ho
s
te
d
on
the w
e
bs
it
es.
3.
INV
E
STIG
A
TIONS
AN
D FIN
DINGS
Com
plete
ness
of
I
nfor
m
at
ion
hoste
d
on
a
w
ebsite
is
im
po
r
ta
nt
so
that
us
e
rs
ca
n
s
ee
the
m
eaning
of
the
co
ntent
ho
ste
d.
Ma
ny
as
pects
m
us
t
be
consi
der
e
d
rel
at
ing
to
the
c
om
ple
ti
on
of
t
he
co
ntent
ho
st
ed
on
the
we
bs
it
es.
Mi
ssed
URL/
web
pa
ges,
m
issi
ng
sel
f
-
refe
ren
ce
hrefs
in
the
sam
e
pag
e,
Mi
ssin
g
Tab
ula
r
colum
ns
in
t
he
ta
bles,
m
issi
ng
data
it
em
s
in
input
-
outp
ut
f
or
m
s,
Mi
ssing
m
enu
s
as
pe
r
t
he
c
on
te
xt,
m
i
ssin
g
Im
ages,
Mi
ssing
Vi
deos,
m
i
ssing
A
udios
are
s
om
e
of
t
he
c
har
act
e
risti
cs
of
the
at
tribu
te
“C
om
pleten
ess
”
consi
der
e
d
a
nd
quali
ty
assessed
to
g
et
t
he o
ver
al
l
qu
al
it
y o
f
the
w
e
bs
it
es.
3.1.
Missed
U
RL/WE
B
pages
An
URL
is
sai
d
to
be
m
issi
n
g
if
a
hr
e
f
is
present
a
nd
th
e
corres
pondin
g
WEB
pag
e
is
a
bs
e
nt
as
per
the
URL
re
pr
esented
di
rector
y
hiera
rch
y.
The
qual
it
y
of
these
c
har
ac
te
r
ist
ic
s
can
be
m
easur
ed
ba
sed
on
the
num
ber
of
hr
e
fs
m
issi
ng
’.
Mi
ssing
hr
e
fs
ide
ntifie
d
th
rou
gh
al
l
the
pag
e
s
de
velo
pe
d
f
or
im
ple
m
entin
g
the en
ti
re
w
e
bsi
te
.
Let
n
=
Num
ber
of
pa
ges
Total
Mi
ssing
hr
e
fs
=
∑
ℎ
(
)
1
Table
1
s
hows
the
detai
ls
of
m
issi
ng
href
s
i
n
the
c
od
e
,
a
nd
the
way
qual
it
y
com
pu
te
d
c
on
si
der
i
ng
the
num
ber
of
m
issi
ng
hr
e
fs.
This
ta
ble
m
od
ifie
d
as
pe
r
the
exp
e
rience
gained,
co
ns
ide
ri
ng
t
he
pe
rcep
ti
on
of
the
us
e
r.
In
te
ll
igent
syst
em
s
/
Ex
per
t
syst
em
s
can
be
buil
t
to
determ
ine
the
m
et
ric
value
for
the
num
ber
of
m
issi
ng
href
s.
Table
1
.
Asses
sm
ent o
f
qual
it
y of M
issi
ng hr
efs (Q
hr
e
fs)
Missin
g
href
s
1
2
3
4
>5
Qu
ality
f
acto
r
(Qh
refs
)
1
.00
0
.70
0
.50
0
.25
0
Evaluation Warning : The document was created with Spire.PDF for Python.
IS
S
N
:
2088
-
8708
In
t J
Elec
&
C
om
p
En
g,
V
ol.
9
, N
o.
6
,
Dece
m
ber
2019
:
5596
-
5603
5600
3.2.
Missing
self
-
r
eferenti
al hre
f
s
In
an
htm
l
page,
na
vi
gation
c
an
be
im
ple
m
e
nted
us
i
ng
href
s,
es
pecial
ly
w
hen
the
siz
e
of
the
pa
ge
is
too
high
bi
g
or
la
rg
e
.
T
he
Na
vig
at
io
n
withi
n
the
sam
e
pag
e
im
ple
m
ente
d
th
r
ough
sel
f
hr
e
fs.
Ge
ner
al
l
y,
it
is
the
case
that
sel
f
hr
e
fs
c
od
e
d
within
the
sa
m
e
p
age,
bu
t
pro
gr
am
con
tr
ol
to
tho
se
hype
rlink
s
a
re
not
cod
e
d,
resu
lt
in
g
in
the
execu
ti
on
of
s
el
f
-
re
fer
e
nce.
Mi
ssing
sel
f
hrefs
ide
ntifie
d
t
hro
ugh
al
l
the
pag
e
s
de
velo
pe
d
f
or
i
m
ple
m
enting
the e
ntire
web
si
te
,
as s
how
n
in
Table
2
.
Let
n
=
Num
ber
of
pa
ges
Total
sel
f
-
Mi
ss
ing
hrefs
Qs
hr
efs
=
∑
ℎ
(
)
1
Table
2
.
Asses
sm
ent o
f
qual
it
y of m
issi
ng
self hrefs (
Qs
hr
e
fs)
Missin
g
href
s
1
2
3
4
>5
Qu
ality
f
acto
r
(Qs
h
refs
)
1
.00
0
.70
0
.50
0
.25
0
3.3.
Missing
t
ab
ul
ar
c
olumns
Con
te
nt
so
m
eti
m
es
is
render
ed
th
r
ough
the
disp
la
y
of
ta
bl
es.
The
col
umns
c
on
ta
i
ned
in
the
ta
ble
s
m
us
t
m
at
ch
a
r
eposi
tory o
f
t
he
data
el
em
ent
s
that
we
re d
es
ign
e
d
to d
e
vel
op
the d
at
abas
e.
Com
par
in
g
the h
tm
l
base
d
ta
bles
w
it
h
the
existi
ng
data
rep
osi
tor
y
will
help
to
fin
d
wh
et
her
t
he
ta
bles
hav
e
been
c
od
e
d
pr
op
e
rly
within
t
he
HT
ML.
Wh
il
e
co
m
par
ing
the
ta
bles,
m
issi
ng
colum
ns
in
th
e
ta
b
le
if
a
ny
fou
nd,
the
det
ai
ls
of
the
com
par
iso
n
ta
bula
te
d
as
per
Ta
ble
3.
T
he
qual
it
y
of
the
Tables
in
ser
te
d
into
the
H
TML
Tables
c
om
pu
te
d
as p
e
r
Ta
ble
4.
Table
3
.
Mi
ssi
ng
col
um
n
det
ai
ls i
n
the
ta
bles
inc
orporated
into
HTML
pa
ges
Serial
n
u
m
b
e
r
HTM
L
Pag
e
Nu
m
b
e
r
o
f
T
ab
les
referred
Nu
m
b
e
r
o
f
m
iss
in
g
Co
lu
m
n
s
1
Klu
n
iv
ersity
.in/ec
m
/
rese
r
2
2
2
Klu
n
iv
ersity
.in/ec
m
/p
rog
ra
m
s
2
0
3
Klu
n
iv
ersity
.in/ec
m
/p
u
b
licatio
n
s
4
0
Total
8
2
Table
4
.
Q
ualit
y assessm
ent b
ased
on the
m
i
ssing col
um
ns
Missin
g
Co
lu
m
n
s
0
1
2
3
>4
Qu
ality
F
acto
r
(Q
m
i
sco
ls)
1
.0
0
.7
0
.5
0
.2
0
.0
3.4.
Missing
f
ie
lds
in f
orms
Con
te
nt
m
a
y
be
pr
ese
nted
s
om
et
i
m
es
based
on
in
put
f
or
m
s.
The
at
trib
ut
es
ref
le
ct
ed
as
par
t
of
f
or
m
s
m
ay
be
incomple
te
du
e
t
o
m
issi
ng
of
s
om
e
of
the
releva
nt
fiel
ds
desig
ned
i
nto
disp
l
ay
ed
form
s.
The
m
or
e
the
fiel
ds
a
re
m
issi
ng
,
the
le
ss
the
qu
al
it
y
of
t
he
we
bs
it
e.
Gen
e
rall
y,
the
data
to
be
in
putt
ed
th
rou
gh
t
he
f
or
m
s
has
to b
e
in
li
ne
with
t
he
c
orr
esp
onding d
at
a
reposit
ory
.
Co
m
par
ing
the h
t
m
l
based
ta
ble
s
with
the
e
xist
ing
d
at
a
reposit
ory
will
help
to
fin
d
w
hethe
r
the
ta
bles
hav
e
be
en
c
od
e
d
pr
op
e
rly
within
the
H
T
ML.
W
hile
co
m
par
ing
the
ta
bles,
m
is
sing
at
tri
bu
te
s
in
the
f
orm
s
if
any
f
ound,
th
e
detai
ls
of
t
he
com
par
ison
ta
bu
la
te
d
as
pe
r
Table
5.
The q
ualit
y of
the form
s insert
ed
into
the
H
T
ML pa
ges
s
ho
wn in T
able
6.
Table
5
.
Mi
ssi
ng f
ie
ld
d
et
ai
ls
in
the
for
m
s in
corp
or
at
ed
int
o HTML
p
a
ges
Serial
n
u
m
b
e
r
HTM
L
Pag
e
Nu
m
b
e
r
o
f
f
o
r
m
s
r
ef
err
ed
Nu
m
b
e
r
o
f
m
iss
in
g
f
ield
s
1
Klu
n
iv
ersity
.in/ec
m
/
rese
arch
1
0
2
Klu
n
iv
ersity
.in/ec
m
/p
rog
ra
m
s
1
0
3
Klu
n
iv
ersity
.in/ec
m
/p
u
b
licatio
n
s
2
1
Total
4
1
Table
6
.
Q
ualit
y assessm
ent b
ased
on the
m
i
ssing fiel
ds
Missin
g
f
ield
s
0
1
2
3
>4
Qu
ality
F
acto
r
(Q
m
i
sf
ield
s)
1
.0
0
.7
0
.5
0
.2
0
.0
Evaluation Warning : The document was created with Spire.PDF for Python.
In
t J
Elec
&
C
om
p
En
g
IS
S
N: 20
88
-
8708
Assessin
g
c
om
plete
ness of
a WEB si
te
fro
m quali
ty
p
ers
pec
ti
ve (
J. S
as
i
Bh
anu)
5601
3.5.
Missing
im
age
s
The
c
on
te
nt
re
nd
e
re
d
on
we
b
sit
es
is
bein
g
en
riche
d
f
rom
tim
e
to
time
by
i
m
bib
ing
m
ultim
edia
base
d
ob
j
ect
s
into
t
he
co
ntent
.
The
qual
it
y
of
the
im
ages
is
an
iss
ue.
T
he
siz
e
of
t
he
im
a
ge
a
nd
t
he
res
ol
utio
n
of
t
he
im
ages
are
s
om
e
of
th
e
m
ajo
r
fa
ct
ors
.
E
ver
y
HTML
pa
ge
will
ref
e
r
to
the
im
ages
thr
ough
it
s
U
RL
an
d
gen
e
rall
y
de
fin
es
the
siz
e
a
nd
res
olu
ti
on.
Som
et
i
m
es
the
im
ages
as
ref
e
r
red
by
a
“h
ref
”
m
a
y
no
t
be
e
xi
sti
ng
,
and
as
a
resul
t,
blan
k
im
ages
dis
play
ed.
Seco
nd
l
y,
the
cha
racteri
sti
cs
of
t
he
act
ua
l
i
m
age
m
us
t
m
at
ch
the
sp
eci
ficat
io
n
of
the
im
age
cod
e
i
nto
the
HTML
pa
ge.
E
ach
pa
ge
ca
n
be
scann
e
d
to
de
te
rm
ine
the
num
ber
of
im
ages
con
t
ai
ned
in
it
,
an
d
the
n
the
s
pecifica
ti
on
of
eac
h
of
the
im
age
s
in
te
rm
s
of
t
he
siz
e
a
nd
res
ol
utio
n
and
t
he
locat
i
on
of
each
of
the
im
age
ca
n
be
determ
ined.
An
im
age
can
be
retrie
ved
us
i
ng
t
he
hr
e
f
of
the
i
m
age,
an
d
the
siz
e
an
d
reso
luti
on
of
the
i
m
age
can
be
com
pu
te
d
and
t
hen
c
ompare
d
with
c
ode
into
the
HTML
pa
ge
.
If
the
com
par
iso
n
fail
s
or
if
the
i
m
age
do
es
no
t
exist,
the
n
it
can
be
const
ru
e
d
as
a
m
is
sing
Im
age
—
the
resu
lt
s
obta
ine
d
thr
ough
the
app
li
cat
io
n
of
the
process
e
xpla
ined
a
bove
sh
ow
n
in
Ta
ble
7.
The
qual
it
y
of
the
Im
ages
ins
erted
i
nto
t
he
HTML
pa
ges
c
om
pu
te
d
as
pe
r
Ta
ble
8.
Si
nc
e
there
is
on
e
m
issi
ng
i
m
age an
d o
ne
non
-
co
her
e
nt i
m
age,
the
qual
it
y com
pu
te
d
as
0
.
75
.
Table
7
.
Mi
ssi
ng
im
ages
Serial
n
u
m
b
er
HTM
L
Pag
e
Nu
m
b
e
r
o
f
I
m
ag
es
refer
red
Nu
m
b
e
r
o
f
m
iss
in
g
I
m
ag
es
Nu
m
b
e
r
o
f
no
n
-
co
h
erent
i
m
ag
es
Total In
-
co
m
p
l
ete
I
m
ag
es
1
Klu
n
iv
ersity
.in/ec
m
/
rese
arch
1
0
0
0
2
Klu
n
iv
ersity
.in/ec
m
/p
rog
ra
m
s
1
1
0
1
3
Klu
n
iv
ersity
.in/ec
m
/p
u
b
licatio
n
s
2
0
1
1
4
…
Total
4
1
1
2
Table
8
.
Q
ualit
y
assessm
ent b
ased
on the
m
i
ssing fiel
ds
Missin
g
I
m
ag
es
0
1
2
3
>4
Qu
ality
F
acto
r
(
Q
m
i
sI
m
ag
es
M
)
1
.0
0
.7
0
.5
0
.2
0
.0
No
n
Co
h
erent I
m
a
g
es
0
1
2
3
>4
Qu
ality
F
acto
r
(Q
m
i
sI
m
ag
es
C
)
1
.0
0
.8
0
.6
0
.4
0
.0
Co
m
b
in
ed
qu
ality
o
f
Factor (
Q
m
isI
m
ag
es)
1
.0
0
.75
0
.65
0
.45
0
.0
3.6.
Missing
vide
os
Vide
os
ar
e ye
t ano
t
her
f
or
m
o
f
the c
on
te
nt in
cl
ud
e
d
in t
he
w
ebsite
s for
pro
vid
in
g
i
nteracti
ve
c
on
te
nt.
The
us
e
rs
nor
m
al
l
y
are
qu
it
e
interest
ed
to
le
arn
thr
ough
the
Video
s
poste
d
on
the
WEB.
A
vaila
bi
li
t
y
of
vid
e
os
on
t
he
on
e
ha
nd
a
nd
t
he
qual
it
y
of
vi
deo
play
ing,
on
the
oth
e
r
ha
nd,
a
re
the
tw
o
kinds
of
s
ub
-
fa
ct
or
s
that
are
serio
usl
y
con
cer
ne
d
with
the
qual
it
y
of
the
we
bsi
te
.
The
vid
e
os
ref
e
ren
ce
d
in
an
HTML
f
il
e
or
a
script
file
t
hro
ugh
the
spe
ci
ficat
ion
of
a
URL
a
nd
t
he
play
er
that
m
us
t
be
us
e
d
local
ly
f
or
play
ing
the
vid
e
os
.
Th
e
vid
e
os
re
fer
e
nced
t
hroug
h
locat
ion,
le
ngth
,
widt
h,
a
nd
th
e
nu
m
ber
of
f
r
a
m
es
disp
la
ye
d
pe
r
seco
nd.
The
si
ze
of
the
vid
e
os
fixe
d
in
the
c
od
e
a
nd
the
ac
tual
siz
e
of
the
vid
e
os
sto
red
at
the
URL
loc
at
ion
needs
to
be
m
at
ched
,
fail
ing
w
hich
co
m
pr
ession
of
vid
e
os
is
unde
rtake
n
le
adin
g
to
a
re
duct
i
on
i
n
the
re
so
l
ution
of
t
he
vid
e
o.
A
vaila
bili
ty
of
vi
deos
at
t
he
l
ocati
on
re
fer
e
nced
in
th
e
co
de
a
nd
m
at
chin
g
the
sp
eci
fied
a
nd
sto
red
siz
e
of
t
he
vid
e
os
are
the
t
wo
m
os
t
im
po
rtant
crit
eria
f
or
as
s
essing
the
qua
li
ty
of
the v
i
deos
a
bout the iss
ue o
f
“
com
p
le
te
ness
.”
Anothe
r
Im
po
r
ta
nt
featur
e
of
vid
e
os
is
the
m
ixing
of
s
ound
into
the
vi
deos
.
The
vi
deos
w
il
l
be
po
or
qu
al
it
y
vid
e
os
if
pro
per
s
ound
m
ixing
has
no
t
ta
ke
n
place
prop
e
rly
.
A
vid
e
o
is
i
m
pr
oper
if
acc
om
pan
yi
ng
so
un
d
file
doe
s
not
e
xist.
T
hus
t
he
qu
al
i
ty
of
vi
deo
file
s
can
be
as
sesse
d
base
d
on
los
s
of
acc
om
pany
ing
so
un
d
file
s.
Th
e
res
ource
file
s
of
the
e
xam
ple
sit
e
hav
e
be
en
sca
nn
e
d
t
o
fin
d
the
num
ber
of
vid
e
os
re
ferred
cou
l
d
not
be
l
oc
at
ed,
not
co
he
ren
t
c
on
si
der
i
ng
the
m
is
m
a
tc
h
of
the r
efe
rr
e
d
vid
e
os
s
iz
es
a
nd
t
he
act
ual
si
ze
of
the V
i
deos sto
r
ed
at
the
locati
on
s
s
pecified
thro
ugh URLs.
Table
9
s
hows
the sca
nn
e
d
a
nd
processe
d res
ults.
Table
9
.
Mi
ssi
ng
vi
deos
Serial
n
u
m
b
er
HTM
L
Pag
e
Nu
m
b
e
r
o
f
Vid
eo
s
referred
Nu
m
b
e
r
o
f
m
i
ss
in
g
v
id
eo
s
Nu
m
b
e
r
o
f
Missin
g
W
AV
E
f
iles
Nu
m
b
e
r
o
f
non
-
co
h
erent
Vid
eo
s
Total In
-
co
m
p
let
e
Vid
eo
s
1
Klu
n
iv
ersity
.in/ec
m
/
rese
arch
1
0
0
0
0
2
Klu
n
iv
ersity
.in/ec
m
/p
rog
ra
m
s
1
1
1
0
1
3
Klu
n
iv
ersity
.in/ec
m
/p
u
b
licatio
n
s
2
0
0
1
1
4
…
Total
4
1
1
1
2
Evaluation Warning : The document was created with Spire.PDF for Python.
IS
S
N
:
2088
-
8708
In
t J
Elec
&
C
om
p
En
g,
V
ol.
9
, N
o.
6
,
Dece
m
ber
2019
:
5596
-
5603
5602
The
qual
it
y
of
the
Vi
de
os
in
s
erted
i
nto
t
he
HTML/
JSP
pa
ges
c
om
pu
te
d
as
pe
r
Ta
ble
10.
The
qual
it
y
of
vid
e
os
is
c
om
pu
te
d
as
0.7
66
since
th
ere
are
one
m
issi
ng
Vi
deo,
on
e
non
-
c
oh
e
ren
t
vi
deo,
a
nd
one
m
issi
ng
wav
e
f
il
e, t
he qu
al
it
y o
f vide
os
c
om
pu
te
d
a
s 0
.
766.
Table
10
.
Qu
al
it
y assess
m
ent b
ase
d on the
m
issi
ng
fiel
ds
Mi
s
s
i
n
g
Im
ag
es
0
1
2
3
>4
Q
u
al
i
t
y
Fact
o
r (Q
m
i
s
V
i
d
e
o
s
M
)
1
.0
0
.7
0
.5
0
.2
0
.0
N
o
n
C
o
h
ere
n
t
V
i
d
e
o
s
0
1
2
3
>4
Q
u
al
i
t
y
Fact
o
r (Q
m
i
s
V
i
d
e
o
s
C
)
1
.0
0
.8
0
.6
0
.4
0
.0
N
u
m
b
er of
Mi
s
s
i
n
g
W
A
V
E
fil
es
0
1
2
3
>4
Q
u
al
i
t
y
Fact
o
r (Q
m
i
s
W
av
e
W)
1
.0
0
.8
0
.6
0
.4
0
.0
Co
m
b
i
n
e
d
q
u
a
l
i
t
y
of factor Q
m
i
s
V
i
d
e
o
s
1
.0
0
.7
6
6
0
.5
6
6
0
.3
3
0
.0
3.7.
Total qu
alit
y consi
deri
n
g th
e f
actor
“com
pleteness
.
”
The
qu
al
it
y
of
a
web
sit
e
co
ns
ide
rin
g
the
f
act
or
“C
om
plete
ness”
an
d
it
s
at
tribu
te
s
c
ompu
te
d
as
a
n
aver
a
ge
of
the
qual
it
y
of
the
ind
i
vidual
c
ha
racteri
sti
cs.
T
he
le
ss,
the
qu
al
it
y
of
a
c
ha
r
act
erist
ic
,
the
m
or
e
the
i
m
pr
ovem
ent
m
ade
in
resp
ect
of
tha
t
char
act
erist
ic
.
The
total
qu
al
it
y
of
a
web
sit
e
co
ns
i
der
i
ng
the
“com
plete
ness”
facto
r
is
de
pende
nt
on
the
qu
al
it
y
of
the
r
el
at
ed
s
ub
-
facto
rs.
It
c
ou
l
d
be
po
ssi
bl
e
that
the
qual
it
y
of
one
s
ub
-
factor
is
hi
gh
w
hi
le
the
qual
it
y
of
s
om
e
oth
er
s
ub
-
fact
or
m
ay
be
quit
e
poor
.
The
s
ub
-
facto
r
s
as
s
uc
h
are
ind
e
pende
nt.
All
the
s
ub
-
fa
ct
or
s
a
re
e
qua
ll
y
i
m
po
rtant,
no
wei
gh
ts
as
su
c
h
assig
ne
d.
A
sim
ple
ind
ic
at
ion
of
t
he
qu
al
i
ty
of
the
fact
or
c
ould
be
t
h
e
a
ver
a
ge
of
the
qu
al
it
y
of
al
l
the s
ub
-
fact
or
s
.
Qu
al
it
y
of
a
WEB
sit
e
(Co
m
plete
ness)
=
(
Q
hr
e
fs
+
Qs
hr
e
f
s
+
Qmi
scols+
Qmi
sfiel
ds
+
Qm
isI
m
ages
+
Qm
isVideos)/
6
4.
E
X
PERI
MEN
TATION
AN
D RESULTS
The
m
et
ho
ds
presente
d
i
n
thi
s
pa
per
a
pp
li
e
d
to
a
n
e
xisti
ng
websi
te
,
an
d
the
qual
it
y
of
the
we
bs
it
e
com
pu
te
d.
Ta
ble
11
s
hows
the
ex
per
im
ental
resu
lt
s.
T
he
resu
lt
s
re
veal
that
the
we
bsi
te
can
be
im
pr
ove
d
furthe
r.
Table
11.
Qu
al
it
y assess
m
ent o
f
the
par
am
et
er “
c
om
plete
ness
.
”
Qu
ality
F
acto
r
Qu
ality
valu
e
Qh
refs
0
.70
0
Qsh
refs
0
.70
0
Q
m
isco
ls
1
.00
0
Q
m
isf
ield
s
1
.00
0
Q
m
isI
m
ag
es
0
.75
0
Q
m
isVid
eo
s
0
.76
6
Total
4
.91
6
Av
erage
0
.81
9
5.
CONCL
US
I
O
NS
The
we
bs
it
e
m
us
t
be
of
high
qu
al
it
y
su
c
h
t
ha
t
the
use
rs
wi
ll
be
intere
ste
d
in
the
co
nte
nt
hoste
d
on
the
we
bs
it
es.
W
e
bs
it
es
m
us
t
be
desig
ne
d
a
nd
de
vel
op
e
d,
co
ns
i
de
rin
g
42
dif
fe
ren
t
qual
it
y
factor
s.
Qu
al
it
y
assessm
ent
of
each
of
the
factors
ne
eds
to
be
do
ne
con
side
rin
g
s
ub
-
fact
or
s
a
nd
the
featur
e
s
at
t
ached
to
a
facto
r.
An
evaluati
on
a
nd
assessm
ent
m
od
el
fo
r
asse
ssing
t
he
qual
it
y
of
a
we
bs
it
e
consi
der
i
ng
e
ach
of
the f
act
ors sepa
ratel
y and
lat
er co
m
bin
ing
th
e q
ualit
y of
each
of the f
act
or
f
or
pro
j
ect
ing
the o
v
e
rall
q
ua
li
ty of
the
entire
we
bsi
te
is
need
ed.
A
sci
entifi
c
m
od
el
ha
s
to
be
determ
ined
us
i
ng
wh
ic
h,
one
will
be
able
to
assess
the quali
ty
o
f
a
w
e
bs
it
e co
ns
i
der
i
ng a s
pecif
ic
f
act
or.
The
qu
al
it
y
factor
“C
om
plete
ness”
is
ve
ry
i
m
po
rtant
as
it
rev
eal
s
the
e
xt
ent
to
w
hich
a
web
sit
e
is
disco
nnect
ed.
The
m
or
e
disc
onnected
t
he
WEB
sit
e,
the
m
or
e
it
becom
es
un
usa
ble.
User
s
gen
e
ral
ly
lose
interest
in
suc
h
kind
of
w
eb
sit
es.
The
m
od
el
s
pro
pose
d
in
t
his
pap
e
r
for
c
om
pu
ti
ng
the
qu
al
it
y
of
the
websi
te
s
consi
der
i
ng
th
e
factor
“C
om
ple
te
ness”
is
si
m
ple,
extend
a
ble,
an
d
e
asi
ly
i
m
p
lem
e
ntable.
As
has
bee
n
sai
d
in
the
in
tro
du
ct
io
n,
42
facto
rs
nee
d
consi
der
at
io
n
for
e
valuati
ng
the
t
otal
qua
li
ty
of
the
we
bs
it
e.
E
ach
fact
or
m
us
t
be
m
od
el
ed
s
epar
at
el
y,
co
nsi
der
in
g
al
l
the
relat
ed
sub
-
fac
tors.
In
t
he
li
te
ratur
e
,
12
Fact
ors
ha
ve
bee
n
m
od
el
e
d
a
nd
prese
nte
d.
Sastry
et
al
.
,
[
2]
ha
ve
pres
ented
t
he
detai
ls
of
the
rem
ain
in
g
factors
f
or
rese
arch
i
ng
a
nd
fi
ndin
g
s
uitable
m
od
el
s
wh
ic
h
help
t
o
com
pu
t
e
the
qual
it
y
of
the
le
fto
ve
r
fa
ct
or
s.
Ther
e
c
ou
l
d
be
a
fi
nal
at
te
m
pt
to
com
pu
te
the
total
qu
al
it
y
of
the
we
bs
i
te
consi
de
rin
g
the
m
od
el
s
tha
t
hav
e
been ev
olv
e
d f
or com
pu
ti
ng
qual
it
y of
i
nd
i
vid
ual
facto
rs
se
par
at
el
y.
Evaluation Warning : The document was created with Spire.PDF for Python.
In
t J
Elec
&
C
om
p
En
g
IS
S
N: 20
88
-
8708
Assessin
g
c
om
plete
ness of
a WEB si
te
fro
m quali
ty
p
ers
pec
ti
ve (
J. S
as
i
Bh
anu)
5603
REFERE
NCE
S
[1]
K
.
F
.
Khawa
ja
and
R
.
H
.
Bokh
ari
,
“
Expl
oring
t
he
Fac
tors
As
sociate
d
W
it
h
Qua
li
t
y
of
W
ebsit
e
,
”
Department
of
Technol
ogy
Man
ageme
nt, International
Islamic Unive
rs
it
y
,
Isla
mabad,
Pakistan
,
v
ol
.
10
,
pp
.
37
-
45
,
2010
.
[2]
J
.
K
.
R
.
Sastr
y
a
nd
T
.
S
.
La
litha,
“
A
f
ramework
f
or
assess
ing
the
qual
ity
of
a
W
E
B
SITE,
PO
NT
E
,”
Int
ernati
ona
l
Journal
of
Scien
ce
and
R
ese
arch
,
v
ol
.
73
,
2017
.
[3]
V
.
K
.
Mantri
,
“
An
Introspe
ct
i
on
of
W
eb
Po
rta
ls
Qualit
y
E
val
ua
ti
on,
”
Int
e
rnational
Journ
al
of
Adv
an
ce
d
Information
sci
e
nce
and
t
ec
hnol
ogy
,
v
o
l.
5,
pp.
33
-
38
,
2016
.
[4]
V
S
Mous
ta
kis,
“
W
ebsit
e
qua
l
ity
assess
m
ent
c
rit
er
ia
,
”
Proce
e
dings
of
th
e
Ni
nth
Inte
rnat
iona
l
Confe
ren
ce
on
Information
Qua
li
ty
,
2004
.
[5]
A
.
Grani
ü,
et
a
l
.
,
“
Us
abi
li
t
y
E
val
ua
ti
on
of
We
b
Portal
s,
”
Pr
oce
ed
ings
of
the
ITI
2008,
30th
Int.
Conf.
on
Information
Tec
hnology
In
te
rfac
es
,
2008
.
[6]
T
.
Singh,
et
a
l
.
,
“
E
-
Comm
erc
e
W
ebsit
e
Quali
t
y
As
sessment
base
d
on
Us
abi
li
t
y
,
”
Department
of
Computer
Sci
ence
&
E
ngine
ering,
Amit
y
Unive
rs
ity
,
Uttar
Pradesh,
Noida,
Ind
ia
,
pp.
101
-
105
.
[7]
R.
Anus
ha,
“
A
Stud
y
on
W
ebsi
te
Qualit
y
Models,
”
Departmen
t
of
Information
Syste
ms
Manage
ment,
M
.
O.P
Vai
shnav
Co
ll
eg
e
f
or Wom
en
(
Aut
onomous
)
,
Chennai
,
v
ol
.
4,
pp.
1
-
5
,
2
014
.
[8]
F
.
Ric
c
a
and
P
.
Tonella,
“
Anal
y
sis
and
Te
sti
ng
of
W
eb
Ap
pli
c
at
ions,
”
Cen
tro
per
la
Ri
c
e
rca
Sci
entifica
e
Tecno
logi
ca
,
I
-
38050
Povo (T
r
e
nto)
,
I
tal
y
,
2001.
[9]
S
.
Alwaha
ishi
and
V
.
Snášel,
“
Assessing
the
LCC
W
ebsit
es
Quali
t
y
,
”
Spri
nger
-
Ve
rlag
B
e
rlin
Heide
lb
erg
,
in
F. Zavor
al
NDT
2010,
SI, CC
IS
87
,
pp.
556
-
5
65
,
2010
.
[10]
L
.
H
asa
n
and
E
.
Abuelr
ub,
“
As
sess
ing
the
Quali
t
y
of
W
eb
Sites
,
”
Appl
i
ed
Co
mputing
and
Informatic
s
,
vol.
9
,
pp.
11
-
29
,
2011
.
[11]
Singh
KK
et
al
.
,
“
Im
ple
m
ent
at
i
on
of
a
Model
f
or
W
ebsit
es
Qu
al
ity
Evaluation
–
DU
W
ebsit
e,
”
Inte
rnatio
na
l
Journal
of
Innov
ati
ons
&
Adv
ance
ment in
Compu
te
r Sc
ie
nc
e
,
vol
.
3,
2014
.
[12]
L
.
S
.
Ch
en
and
P
.
Chung
,
“
Ide
n
ti
fying
Crucia
l
We
bsite
Qual
it
y
Fac
tors
of
V
irtu
al
Comm
unit
ie
s
,
”
Proce
edi
ngs
o
f
the
In
te
rn
at
ion
al Mult
i
-
Conf
ere
n
ce
of
Eng
ine
e
rs
and
computer
sc
ie
nti
sts,
IME
CS
,
vol.
1
,
2010
.
[13]
N
.
L
.
W
ah,
“
An
Impr
ove
d
Appr
oach
for
W
eb
P
age
Quali
ty
Assess
ment,
”
IEEE
Student
Conf
erence
on
Rese
arc
h
and
Deve
lopmen
t
,
2011
.
[14]
Sastr
y
J
.
K
.
R
et
al
.
,
“
Quanti
f
y
in
g
qual
ity
of
W
E
B
site
s
base
d
on
cont
ent,
”
Int
ernati
onal
Journal
of
Engi
ne
ering
and
Technol
og
y
,
v
ol
.
7
,
pp.
138
-
141,
2018
.
[15]
Sastr
y
J
.
K
.
R
e
t
al.
,
“
Quanti
f
y
i
ng
qual
i
t
y
of
we
b
site
s
base
d
on
usabil
i
t
y
,
”
Int
ernati
onal
Journal
of
Eng
ine
ering
and
Technol
og
y
,
v
ol
.
7
,
pp.
320
-
322,
2018
.
[16]
Sastr
y
J
.
K
.
R
.
,
e
t
al
.
,
“
Structure
-
base
d
assess
m
ent
of
the
q
ual
ity
of
W
EB
site
s
,”
Int
ernat
ional
Journal
o
f
Engi
ne
ering
and
Technol
og
y
,
v
ol
.
7
,
pp
.
980
-
983
,
2018
.
[17]
Sastr
y
J
.
K
.
R
.
,
et
al
.
,
“
Eva
lu
a
ti
ng
qualit
y
of
navi
ga
ti
on
desig
ned
for
a
W
EB
site
,
”
Inte
rnat
i
onal
Journal
of
Engi
ne
ering
and
Technol
og
y
,
v
ol
.
7
,
pp
.
1004
-
10
07,
2018
.
[18]
N
.
P
.
Kol
la,
e
t
al
.,
“
As
sess
ing
the
qua
li
t
y
of
W
EB
sit
es
base
d
on
Multi
m
edia
c
onte
nt
,
”
Inte
rnat
ional
Journal
of
Engi
ne
ering
and
Technol
og
y
,
v
ol
.
7
,
pp
.
1040
-
10
44,
2018
.
[19]
J.
S
.
Babu,
et
al
.,
“
Optimizi
ng
webpa
ge
releva
nc
y
using
page
ran
king
and
con
te
nt
-
b
ase
d
ran
ki
ng,
”
Inte
rnat
ion
al
Journal
of
Engi
n
ee
ring a
nd
Tech
nology
(
UAE)
,
v
ol.
7
,
pp
.
1025
-
1
029
,
2018
.
[20]
K.
S
.
Prasad,
e
t
al
.,
“
An
inte
gr
at
ed
appr
oa
ch
t
owards
vulne
rab
il
ity
assess
m
ent
&
penetra
t
ion
t
esti
ng
for
a
w
e
b
appl
i
ca
t
ion,
”
Int
ernati
onal
Journ
al
of
Engi
n
ee
rin
g
and
Techno
log
y
(
UAE)
,
vol.
7,
pp.
431
-
435
,
20
18.
[21]
M.
V
.
Krishna
,
et
al
.
,
“
A
fra
m
ework
for
assess
ing
the
qu
alit
y
of
a
web
site,
”
Int
ernati
onal
Journal
of
Engi
ne
erin
g
and
Technol
og
y
(
UAE)
,
vol.
7,
p
p.
82
-
85
,
2018
.
[22]
R.
B
.
Babu,
e
t
al
.,
“
Anal
y
sis
on
visual
design
pri
nci
pl
es
of
a
webpa
ge,
”
Inte
rnat
i
onal
Journal
of
Engi
ne
ering
and
Technol
ogy
(
UAE)
,
vol.
7,
pp.
48
-
50,
2018
.
[23]
S.
S.
Pa
war
and
Y.
Prasanth,
“
Multi
-
Obje
ct
iv
e
Optimiza
ti
on
Model
for
QoS
-
Ena
bl
ed
W
eb
Service
Selecti
on
in
Servic
e
-
B
ase
d
S
y
stems
,
”
New
Revie
w
of Inform
ati
on
Ne
tworki
ng
,
vol.
22
,
pp
.
34
-
5
3,
2017
.
[24]
B.
Bhav
ani
,
et
a
l
.
,
“
Revi
ew
on
t
ec
hniqu
es
and
a
ppli
c
at
ions
invo
l
ved
in
web
usag
e
m
ini
ng,
”
Int
ernati
onal
Journa
l
of
App
li
ed
Eng
in
ee
ring
Re
search
,
vol.
12,
pp.
159
94
-
15998,
2017
.
[25]
K.
K
.
Durga
a
nd
V.
R
.
Kris
hna,
“
Autom
at
i
c
de
tecti
on
of
il
l
egitimate
w
ebsit
es
wi
th
m
utua
l
cl
ust
eri
ng
,
”
Inte
rnational
Jo
urnal
of El
e
ct
ri
c
al
and
Comput
er
Engi
n
ee
ring
,
vo
l.
6
(3)
,
pp
.
995
-
1
001,
2016
.
[26]
T.
Y
.
Sat
y
a
an
d
Prade
epi
ni
G
.
,
“
Harve
sting
d
ee
p
web
ex
tra
c
t
ions
base
d
on
h
y
brid
cl
assifi
cation
proc
edu
res,
”
Asian
Journal
of
Information
Te
c
hnology
,
vol
.
15
,
pp.
3551
-
3555,
2016
.
[27]
S.
J.
S.
Bhanu,
et
al
.,
“
Im
ple
m
ent
ing
d
y
n
amicall
y
evol
vable
comm
unic
at
ion
with
embedde
d
s
y
ste
m
s
through
W
E
B
servic
es,
”
In
te
rn
ati
onal Journal of
E
le
c
tric
al
and
Computer
Eng
i
nee
ring
,
vol
.
6
(1
)
,
pp
.
381
-
398
,
2
016
.
[28]
L
.
Prasann
a,
et
al
.
,
“
Profile
-
b
ase
d
per
sona
li
z
ed
web
se
arc
h
using
Gree
d
y
Algorit
hm
s,
”
AR
PN
Journal
o
f
Engi
ne
ering
and
Applied
S
cienc
e
s
,
vol.
11,
pp.
59
21
-
5925,
2016
.
Evaluation Warning : The document was created with Spire.PDF for Python.