I
nte
rna
t
io
na
l J
o
urna
l o
f
E
lect
rica
l a
nd
Co
m
p
ute
r
E
ng
in
ee
ring
(
I
J
E
CE
)
Vo
l.
7
,
No
.
3
,
J
u
n
e
201
7
,
p
p
.
1278
~
1
2
8
5
I
SS
N:
2
0
8
8
-
8708
,
DOI
: 1
0
.
1
1
5
9
1
/
i
j
ec
e
.
v7
i
3
.
p
p
1
2
7
8
-
1285
1278
J
o
ur
na
l ho
m
ep
a
g
e
:
h
ttp
:
//ia
e
s
jo
u
r
n
a
l.c
o
m/o
n
lin
e/in
d
ex
.
p
h
p
/I
JE
C
E
I
n
v
e
s
t
i
g
a
t
i
n
g
A
g
i
l
e
A
d
a
p
t
a
t
i
o
n
f
o
r
P
ro
j
e
c
t
D
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
Ra
j
esh
H
.
K
ulk
a
rn
i
1
,
P
.
P
a
dm
a
na
b
ha
m
2
,
M
a
na
s
i H
a
rsh
e
3
,
K
.
K
.
B
a
s
ee
r
4
,
P
a
lla
v
i P
a
t
il
5
1
De
p
a
rtme
n
t
o
f
Co
m
p
u
ter E
n
g
in
e
e
rin
g
,
JS
P
M
,
NT
C
S
.
P
.
P
U
n
iv
e
rsity
,
In
d
ia
2
De
p
a
rtme
n
t
o
f
Co
m
p
u
ter S
c
ien
c
e
a
n
d
E
n
g
in
e
e
rin
g
.
BIET
,
J.N.T
.
Un
iv
e
rsity
,
In
d
ia
3
De
p
a
rtme
n
t
o
f
Co
m
p
u
ter E
n
g
in
e
e
rin
g
,
BS
COER,
S
.
P
.
P
Un
iv
e
rsity
o
f
P
u
n
e
,
In
d
ia
4
De
p
a
rtme
n
t
o
f
Co
m
p
u
ter S
c
ien
c
e
,
JN
IA
S
,
JN
T
U
A
(In
d
ia)
5
De
p
a
rtme
n
t
o
f
Co
m
p
u
ter
En
g
in
e
e
e
r
in
g
JSP
M
,
NT
C
S
.
P
.
P
Un
iv
e
rsity
,
In
d
ia
Art
icle
I
nfo
AB
ST
RAC
T
A
r
ticle
his
to
r
y:
R
ec
eiv
ed
Dec
9
,
2
0
1
6
R
ev
i
s
ed
Mar
2
7
,
2
0
1
7
A
cc
ep
ted
A
p
r
11
,
2
0
1
7
Ag
il
e
m
e
th
o
d
o
l
o
g
ies
a
d
a
p
tatio
n
in
so
f
tw
a
re
c
o
m
p
a
n
ies
is
a
n
a
c
c
e
p
ted
n
o
rm
.
Ra
p
id
a
p
p
li
c
a
ti
o
n
d
e
v
e
lo
p
m
e
n
t
a
n
d
e
f
f
icie
n
t
d
e
li
v
e
ra
b
les
b
e
in
g
t
h
e
p
re
m
ise
.
T
h
e
c
h
a
n
g
in
g
b
u
sin
e
ss
n
e
e
d
s,
c
o
st
e
f
f
e
c
ti
v
e
n
e
ss
a
n
d
ti
m
e
l
y
d
e
li
v
e
r
y
a
re
c
a
tere
d
to
b
y
a
g
il
e
m
e
th
o
d
s.
Dif
f
e
re
n
t
so
f
t
w
a
re
d
e
v
e
lo
p
m
e
n
t
m
o
d
e
ls
a
re
in
t
h
e
li
tera
tu
re
a
n
d
a
ls
o
a
re
b
e
i
n
g
u
se
d
b
y
th
e
in
d
u
stry
.
F
e
w
c
o
m
p
a
n
ies
h
a
v
e
a
d
o
p
te
d
a
g
il
e
,
f
e
w
a
re
g
e
a
rin
g
u
p
f
o
r
a
n
d
f
e
w
a
re
in
tran
s
it
io
n
.
W
e
in
v
e
stig
a
ted
a
g
il
e
p
re
se
n
c
e
in
a
s
o
f
twa
re
c
o
m
p
a
n
y
.
P
r
o
jec
t
m
a
n
a
g
e
m
e
n
t
is
a
n
e
v
o
lv
in
g
a
rt
w
it
h
i
n
n
o
v
a
ti
v
e
m
e
th
o
d
s
b
e
i
n
g
a
d
d
e
d
u
p
.
T
h
e
a
im
o
f
th
is
p
a
p
e
r
i
s
to
tea
se
a
b
o
u
t
p
r
o
jec
t
m
a
n
a
g
e
m
e
n
t
c
h
a
ll
e
n
g
e
s,
a
g
il
e
,
a
g
il
e
tr
a
n
siti
o
n
in
c
o
m
p
a
n
ies
a
n
d
a
c
o
m
p
a
riso
n
o
f
c
o
n
v
e
n
ti
o
n
a
l
so
f
tw
a
r
e
e
n
g
in
e
e
rin
g
p
ra
c
ti
c
e
s
w
it
h
a
g
il
e
p
ro
c
e
ss
m
o
d
e
l.
T
h
is
p
a
p
e
r
tak
e
s
sto
c
k
o
f
th
e
c
u
rre
n
t
sta
tu
s
o
f
q
u
a
li
ty
in
so
f
tw
a
re
p
ro
jec
ts
a
n
d
t
o
a
d
d
o
n
q
u
a
li
ty
p
ro
c
e
ss
im
p
ro
v
e
m
e
n
t
stra
teg
ies
.
T
h
e
re
su
lt
s
p
re
se
n
ted
h
e
re
a
re
a
f
t
e
r
a
q
u
a
li
tativ
e
in
terv
iew
stu
d
y
w
it
h
o
n
e
c
ro
ss
f
u
n
c
ti
o
n
tea
m
u
sin
g
stre
a
m
li
n
e
d
e
v
e
lo
p
m
e
n
t
f
ra
m
e
w
o
rk
in
a
g
il
e
d
e
v
e
lo
p
m
e
n
t.
K
ey
w
o
r
d
:
Ag
ile
p
r
o
ce
s
s
m
o
d
el
P
r
o
j
ec
t m
an
a
g
e
m
e
n
t
R
ap
id
ap
p
licatio
n
d
ev
elo
p
m
en
t
So
f
t
w
ar
e
E
n
g
i
n
ee
r
in
g
Co
p
y
rig
h
t
©
2
0
1
7
In
stit
u
te o
f
A
d
v
a
n
c
e
d
E
n
g
i
n
e
e
rin
g
a
n
d
S
c
ien
c
e
.
Al
l
rig
h
ts
re
se
rv
e
d
.
C
o
r
r
e
s
p
o
nd
ing
A
uth
o
r
:
R
aj
esh
H.
Ku
lk
ar
n
i
,
D
e
p
a
r
t
m
e
n
t
o
f
C
o
m
p
u
t
e
r
E
n
g
i
n
e
e
r
i
n
g
,
JS
P
M
,
N
T
C
S
.
P
.
P
.
U
n
i
v
e
r
s
i
t
y
,
I
n
d
i
a
.
E
m
ail:
2
0
1
5
r
aj
esh
k
u
l
k
ar
n
i
@
g
m
ail.
co
m
1.
I
NT
RO
D
UCT
I
O
N
T
h
er
e
ex
is
t
s
ev
er
al
So
f
t
w
ar
e
Dev
elo
p
m
e
n
t
L
i
f
ec
y
cle
(
SDLC)
Mo
d
els,
b
u
t
th
ey
ar
e
r
ar
el
y
f
o
llo
w
ed
b
y
o
r
g
an
izat
io
n
s
f
o
r
th
e
r
ea
l
p
r
o
j
ec
t
im
p
le
m
e
n
tat
io
n
s
as
t
h
e
y
lack
s
u
itab
ilit
y
[
1
]
.
A
p
r
o
ject
is
a
s
eq
u
en
ce
o
f
u
n
iq
u
e,
co
m
p
le
x
,
a
n
d
co
n
n
ec
ted
ac
tiv
it
ies
t
h
at
h
a
v
e
o
n
e
g
o
al
o
r
p
u
r
p
o
s
e
an
d
th
at
m
u
s
t
b
e
co
m
p
leted
b
y
a
s
p
ec
if
ic
t
i
m
e,
w
i
th
in
b
u
d
g
et,
an
d
ac
co
r
d
in
g
to
s
p
ec
if
icat
i
o
n
[
2
]
,
[
3
]
.
A
p
r
o
j
ec
t
co
m
p
r
is
es
a
n
u
m
b
er
o
f
ac
tiv
itie
s
th
at
m
u
s
t
b
e
co
m
p
leted
in
s
o
m
e
s
p
ec
if
ied
o
r
d
e
r
,
o
r
s
eq
u
en
ce
.
An
ac
tiv
it
y
i
s
a
d
ef
in
ed
ch
u
n
k
o
f
w
o
r
k
[
4
]
.
T
h
e
s
eq
u
en
ce
o
f
th
e
ac
tiv
i
ties
is
b
ased
o
n
tech
n
ical
r
eq
u
ir
e
m
e
n
ts
,
n
o
t
o
n
m
an
a
g
e
m
e
n
t
p
r
er
o
g
ativ
es.
A
lt
h
o
u
g
h
th
e
p
r
o
j
ec
t
m
a
n
ag
er
tr
ea
ts
t
h
e
s
p
ec
if
i
ca
tio
n
as
f
i
x
ed
,
th
e
r
ea
lit
y
o
f
t
h
e
s
it
u
atio
n
i
s
th
a
t
an
y
n
u
m
b
er
o
f
f
ac
to
r
s
ca
n
ca
u
s
e
th
e
s
p
e
ci
f
icatio
n
to
ch
an
g
e.
Ag
ile
Ma
n
i
f
e
s
to
tr
ig
g
er
ed
Ag
ile
ap
p
r
o
ac
h
es
[
5
]
.
Ag
ile
p
r
o
ce
s
s
m
o
d
el
(
A
SP
)
[
6
-
9
]
ar
e
a
d
ap
tiv
e,
f
lex
ib
le,
co
h
e
r
en
t a
n
d
f
a
s
ter
[
1
0
]
.
Af
ter
th
e
p
u
b
licatio
n
o
f
A
g
i
le
m
an
if
e
s
to
,
ap
p
r
o
ac
h
o
f
Ag
ile
Ma
n
ag
e
m
e
n
t
h
a
s
in
cr
ea
s
ed
in
th
e
s
o
f
t
w
ar
e
d
ev
e
lo
p
m
en
t
o
r
I
T
p
r
o
j
ec
ts
.
I
t
is
n
ec
ess
ar
y
to
u
s
e
ag
ile
p
r
ac
tices
a
n
d
p
r
in
cip
les
i
n
ev
er
y
p
r
o
j
ec
t
th
at
f
ac
es
u
n
ce
r
tai
n
t
y
.
Ma
n
y
p
o
p
u
lar
ag
ile
p
r
ac
tices
d
id
ex
is
t
in
tr
ad
itio
n
al
p
r
o
j
ec
ts
ev
en
b
ef
o
r
e
th
e
A
g
ile
m
an
if
e
s
to
.
Ho
w
ev
er
,
w
e
ca
n
n
o
t
s
a
y
t
h
at
ce
r
tai
n
a
g
ile
p
r
ac
t
ices
ca
n
n
o
t
b
e
u
tili
ze
d
f
o
r
p
r
o
j
ec
ts
th
at
ar
e
s
til
l
ca
r
r
ied
o
u
t
in
t
h
e
tr
ad
itio
n
al
wa
y
.
C
er
tai
n
a
g
ile
p
r
ac
tices
ca
n
s
till
b
e
u
tili
s
ed
f
o
r
p
r
o
j
ec
ts
,
w
h
ic
h
ar
e
f
o
llo
w
i
n
g
tr
ad
itio
n
al
w
a
y
o
f
i
m
p
le
m
e
n
ta
tio
n
[
3
]
,
[
5
]
,
[
1
]
.
T
h
e
ag
ile
m
e
th
o
d
s
e
m
p
h
asi
s
e
s
th
e
co
n
cu
r
r
en
t
ex
ec
u
tio
n
o
f
th
e
tr
ad
itio
n
all
y
s
u
cc
es
s
i
v
e
task
s
o
f
a
p
r
o
j
ec
t
an
d
th
e
co
n
s
tan
t
co
o
r
d
in
atio
n
o
f
p
ar
ticip
an
ts
.
T
h
e
ess
en
ce
o
f
t
h
e
ap
p
r
o
ac
h
in
v
o
l
v
e
s
co
n
s
ta
n
t
u
p
d
ati
n
g
Evaluation Warning : The document was created with Spire.PDF for Python.
I
J
E
C
E
I
SS
N:
2
0
8
8
-
8708
I
n
ve
s
tig
a
tin
g
A
g
ile
A
d
a
p
t
a
tio
n
fo
r
P
r
o
ject
Dev
elo
p
men
t
(
R
a
j
e
s
h
H
.
K
u
l
k
a
r
n
i
)
1279
o
f
th
e
ex
ec
u
tio
n
,
an
d
d
etailed
p
lan
n
i
n
g
o
f
s
m
aller
c
y
cle
s
(
it
er
atio
n
s
)
to
i
m
p
le
m
en
t
a
p
r
o
j
e
ct
ac
co
r
d
in
g
to
th
e
cu
r
r
en
t
r
e
s
u
l
ts
,
le
s
s
o
n
s
lear
n
e
d
,
n
e
w
id
ea
s
etc.
T
h
e
f
o
cu
s
o
n
t
h
e
u
s
er
is
v
er
y
i
m
p
o
r
tan
t
an
d
t
h
e
p
r
o
j
ec
t
tea
m
th
er
ef
o
r
e
u
s
u
all
y
i
n
v
o
l
v
es
a
r
ep
r
esen
tati
v
e
o
f
en
d
u
s
er
s
w
h
o
r
eg
u
lar
l
y
c
h
ec
k
s
t
h
e
p
ar
tial
r
e
s
u
lt
s
o
f
th
e
p
r
o
j
ec
t.
T
h
e
ag
ile
s
o
f
t
w
ar
e
d
ev
elo
p
m
e
n
t
e
v
o
lv
ed
i
n
1
9
9
0
s
as
a
f
lex
i
b
le
m
ea
n
s
o
f
h
a
n
d
lin
g
c
h
a
n
g
i
n
g
r
eq
u
ir
e
m
e
n
t
s
[
6
]
.
[
1
1
-
1
3
]
s
p
ea
k
ab
o
u
t
ag
ilit
y
an
d
ag
ile
m
et
h
o
d
s
s
u
c
h
as
s
cr
u
m
an
d
XP
as
w
el
l
th
e
m
aj
o
r
s
tr
e
n
g
t
h
o
f
a
g
ile
b
ein
g
co
m
m
u
n
icatio
n
.
T
h
e
r
ep
o
r
ts
o
f
Stan
d
is
h
Gr
o
u
p
as
m
en
t
io
n
ed
in
[
1
4
]
,
[
1
5
]
h
ig
h
li
g
h
t
t
h
e
r
ea
s
o
n
o
f
h
i
g
h
s
u
cc
ess
r
ate
o
f
ag
ile
b
ein
g
e
f
f
ec
t
iv
e
co
m
m
u
n
icatio
n
an
d
r
ap
id
d
ev
elo
p
m
e
n
t
.
2.
L
I
T
E
RA
T
UR
E
R
E
VI
E
W
Her
e,
th
e
f
o
cu
s
o
f
d
is
c
u
s
s
io
n
is
ag
ile
tec
h
n
iq
u
e
s
,
ch
alle
n
g
es
in
v
o
lv
ed
,
co
m
p
ar
is
o
n
w
i
th
tr
ad
itio
n
a
l
m
et
h
o
d
s
,
p
r
o
s
an
d
co
n
s
,
ad
ap
tab
ilit
y
.
T
h
ese
ap
p
r
o
ac
h
es
g
iv
e
a
m
aj
o
r
d
escr
ip
tio
n
a
b
o
u
t
th
e
p
r
ev
io
u
s
l
y
av
ailab
le
b
est
m
et
h
o
d
s
w
it
h
r
eg
ar
d
to
th
eir
f
ea
tu
r
e
s
al
o
n
g
w
it
h
t
h
e
k
n
o
w
led
g
e
g
ain
ed
a
f
t
er
th
e
ap
p
licatio
n
o
f
th
o
s
e
ap
p
r
o
ac
h
es
i
n
t
h
e
i
n
d
u
s
tr
ial
f
ield
.
T
h
is
s
ec
tio
n
s
u
m
m
ar
izes
a
g
ile
p
r
o
ce
s
s
m
o
d
el
in
a
b
r
ie
f
m
an
n
er
.
R
esear
ch
is
n
ee
d
ed
to
p
r
o
v
id
e
n
e
w
ap
p
r
o
ac
h
es
an
d
to
h
ar
m
o
n
ize
t
h
e
ex
is
ti
n
g
m
eth
o
d
s
.
C
lear
l
y
,
ag
il
e
co
n
ce
p
ts
w
ill
co
n
ti
n
u
e
to
m
i
g
r
ate
in
to
tr
ad
itio
n
al
o
r
g
an
izatio
n
s
(
an
d
v
ice
v
er
s
a)
t
h
r
o
u
g
h
p
lan
n
ed
o
r
clan
d
esti
n
e
v
ec
to
r
s
.
I
n
2
0
0
2
,
i
n
[
1
6
]
a
tech
n
ical
r
ep
o
r
t
at
VT
T
o
n
ag
ile
s
o
f
t
w
ar
e
s
h
o
w
s
p
r
o
ce
d
u
r
es
as
w
ell
as
th
e
f
u
n
ctio
n
s
i
n
v
o
lv
ed
.
T
h
e
ad
ap
tab
ilit
y
a
n
d
ef
f
ec
t
iv
e
n
es
s
is
h
ig
h
li
g
h
ted
i
n
[
1
5
-
1
9
]
.
Y
et,
o
n
l
y
a
s
m
al
ler
r
an
g
e
o
f
e
m
p
ir
icall
y
v
alid
ated
s
t
u
d
ies
s
atis
f
y
t
h
e
s
e
f
ea
t
u
r
es.
A
co
m
p
ar
at
iv
e
s
t
u
d
y
o
n
a
g
ile
m
et
h
o
d
o
lo
g
ies
[
2
0
]
h
as
s
tated
th
at
t
h
e
e
m
p
ir
ical
s
u
p
p
o
r
t
is
n
ee
d
ed
.
R
elatio
n
s
h
ip
b
et
w
ee
n
ag
i
le
d
ev
elo
p
m
e
n
t
an
d
th
e
C
ap
ab
ilit
y
Ma
tu
r
it
y
Mo
d
el
(
C
MM
)
i
s
el
ab
o
r
ated
in
[
2
1
]
an
d
ex
p
r
ess
e
d
th
e
p
o
s
s
ib
ili
t
y
o
f
a
m
al
g
a
m
atio
n
o
f
a
g
ile
w
it
h
co
n
v
e
n
tio
n
al
m
et
h
o
d
s
.
XP
an
d
ag
ile
m
o
d
eli
n
g
w
er
e
e
x
p
lo
r
ed
in
[
2
2
-
2
4
]
.
I
n
[
2
5
]
h
u
m
a
n
a
n
d
s
o
cial
f
a
cto
r
s
af
f
ec
ti
n
g
ag
i
le
m
et
h
o
d
s
ar
e
d
is
cu
s
s
ed
.
I
n
[
2
6
]
XP
m
o
d
el
w
a
s
an
al
y
s
ed
f
o
r
b
etter
q
u
alit
y
.
I
n
[
2
7
]
Scr
u
m
in
f
l
u
e
n
ce
s
o
n
d
ev
elo
p
m
en
t
tea
m
ar
e
v
er
i
f
ie
d
.
Mig
r
atio
n
f
r
o
m
tr
ad
itio
n
al
to
ag
ile
d
ev
elo
p
m
en
t
is
ex
p
lo
r
ed
in
[
2
8
]
.
I
n
[
2
9
]
,
a
g
r
o
u
p
o
f
m
et
h
o
d
s
f
o
r
co
-
lo
ca
ted
tea
m
s
o
f
v
ar
y
i
n
g
s
iz
e
s
a
n
d
cr
iticalit
y
t
h
r
o
u
g
h
C
lear
,
Y
ello
w
,
Or
a
n
g
e,
R
ed
,
B
lu
e
w
as
u
s
ed
f
o
r
r
ep
r
esen
tatio
n
p
u
r
p
o
s
es.
T
h
e
lar
g
ely
a
g
ile
m
et
h
o
d
,
k
n
o
w
n
as
C
r
y
s
tal
C
lear
,
s
h
o
w
i
n
ter
est
o
n
co
m
m
u
n
icatio
n
in
s
m
al
l
tea
m
s
th
a
t
ar
e
in
v
o
l
v
ed
in
s
o
f
t
w
ar
e
d
ev
elo
p
m
en
t
an
d
it
is
o
f
less
s
i
g
n
i
f
i
ca
n
ce
.
C
lear
d
ev
elo
p
m
en
t
ca
n
b
e
ac
co
m
p
lis
h
ed
u
s
i
n
g
s
e
v
e
n
tr
aits
,
n
a
m
el
y
,
r
eq
u
is
i
tes
f
o
r
th
e
tech
n
ical
en
v
ir
o
n
m
e
n
t,
r
e
g
u
lar
d
eliv
er
y
,
o
s
m
o
t
ic
co
m
m
u
n
icatio
n
,
p
er
s
o
n
al
p
r
o
tectio
n
,
r
ef
lectiv
e
en
h
a
n
ce
m
en
t,
co
n
ce
n
tr
atio
n
a
n
d
tr
o
u
b
le
-
f
r
ee
ac
ce
s
s
to
ex
p
er
t u
s
er
s
.
A
-
P
r
o
-
P
D
m
o
d
el
d
ev
elo
p
m
e
n
t
w
as
c
h
ec
k
ed
i
n
[
3
0
]
,
[
3
1
]
.
A
co
m
b
i
n
atio
n
o
f
m
o
d
el
-
d
r
iv
e
n
an
d
ag
ile
d
ev
elo
p
m
en
t
w
a
s
d
ea
lt
in
[
3
2
]
an
d
it
g
i
v
es
m
o
r
e
i
m
p
o
r
ta
n
ce
to
th
e
in
itial
p
r
o
j
ec
t
m
o
d
el,
s
p
litt
in
g
o
f
t
h
e
w
o
r
k
in
ter
m
s
o
f
f
ea
t
u
r
es
an
d
o
f
f
er
i
n
g
a
n
iter
ativ
e
d
esi
g
n
f
o
r
ea
ch
an
d
ev
er
y
f
ea
tu
r
e.
A
ll
t
h
e
it
er
atio
n
s
ass
o
ciate
d
w
it
h
ea
c
h
an
d
ev
er
y
f
ea
t
u
r
e
i
n
v
o
lv
e
s
t
w
o
p
h
ases
,
n
a
m
el
y
,
t
h
e
d
esig
n
a
n
d
th
e
d
ev
e
lo
p
m
en
t.
A
VM
o
d
el
d
esig
n
is
elab
o
r
ated
in
[
33
]
.
P
r
o
j
ec
t
p
lan
n
i
n
g
s
w
it
h
f
ee
d
b
ac
k
co
n
tr
o
l
lo
o
p
s
is
elab
o
r
ated
in
[
2
4
]
.
L
ea
n
m
et
h
o
d
s
w
er
e
i
m
p
le
m
e
n
ted
i
n
T
o
y
o
ta
p
r
o
d
u
ctio
n
s
y
s
te
m
[
2
3
]
w
h
er
e
s
p
ee
d
,
ad
ap
tab
ilit
y
an
d
p
o
w
er
w
er
e
a
p
lu
s
.
Ag
i
le
co
n
ce
p
t
i
m
p
le
m
e
n
tatio
n
i
n
a
p
r
o
j
ec
t
u
s
in
g
D
C
R
g
r
ap
h
s
w
a
s
d
is
cu
s
s
ed
in
[
3
4
]
alo
n
g
w
i
th
t
h
e
ad
v
an
tag
e
s
an
d
d
is
ad
v
an
ta
g
es.
Go
o
d
p
r
o
g
r
a
m
m
in
g
p
r
ac
tices
s
u
c
h
as
p
air
p
r
o
g
r
a
m
m
in
g
,
r
ef
ac
to
r
in
g
an
d
test
in
g
w
er
e
r
ec
o
m
m
en
d
ed
in
[
3
0
]
.
E
v
alu
atio
n
o
f
ef
f
ec
ti
v
en
e
s
s
o
f
d
ev
elo
p
m
en
t
tea
m
m
e
m
b
er
s
w
a
s
cr
itiq
u
ed
i
n
[
1
1
]
,
[
3
5
]
,
[
3
6
]
u
s
in
g
s
h
ar
ed
m
e
n
t
al
m
o
d
els.
As
p
er
[
3
7
]
:
"
Ma
n
y
So
f
t
w
ar
e
Dev
elo
p
m
e
n
t
L
i
f
ec
y
cl
e
Mo
d
els
(
SD
L
C
s
)
ex
i
s
t.
E
v
o
l
u
tio
n
o
f
v
ar
io
u
s
m
o
d
el
s
w
a
s
r
es
u
lt
o
f
t
h
e
i
n
d
u
s
tr
y
n
ee
d
.
An
y
SD
L
C
p
r
o
ce
s
s
m
o
d
el
s
h
o
u
ld
b
e
b
ased
o
n
th
e
b
es
t
i
n
d
u
s
tr
ial
p
r
ac
tices.T
h
e
tr
ad
itio
n
al
SD
L
C
p
r
o
ce
s
s
m
o
d
els
ar
e
n
o
t
s
u
f
f
i
cien
t
to
ca
ter
to
c
u
r
r
en
t
n
ee
d
s
.
T
h
ese
m
o
d
els
ar
e
n
o
t su
itab
le
f
o
r
r
ea
l ti
m
e
p
r
o
j
e
cts”.
As
p
er
[
3
8
]
:
"T
o
d
ev
elo
p
q
u
alit
y
s
o
f
t
w
ar
e
o
n
a
p
r
ed
ictab
le
s
ch
ed
u
le,
th
e
r
eq
u
ir
e
m
e
n
ts
m
u
s
t
b
e
estab
lis
h
ed
an
d
m
ai
n
tai
n
ed
w
i
th
r
ea
s
o
n
ab
le
s
tab
ilit
y
th
r
o
u
g
h
o
u
t
th
e
d
ev
elo
p
m
e
n
t
c
y
c
le.
C
h
an
g
e
s
w
ill
h
a
v
e
to
b
e
m
ad
e,
b
u
t
th
e
y
m
u
s
t
b
e
m
an
a
g
ed
an
d
in
tr
o
d
u
ce
d
in
a
n
o
r
d
er
ly
w
a
y
.
Hen
ce
,
ch
a
n
g
e
m
a
n
a
g
e
m
e
n
t
is
a
cr
itical
p
ar
t
o
f
an
y
SDLC
m
o
d
el"
.
As
p
er
[
3
9
]
:
“
Ag
il
e
p
r
o
ce
s
s
es
f
o
cu
s
o
n
i
m
m
e
d
iatel
y
d
eliv
er
in
g
f
u
n
ctio
n
alit
y
,
w
h
ile
tr
ad
itio
n
al
m
eth
o
d
s
f
o
cu
s
o
n
o
p
ti
m
i
zin
g
d
ev
e
lo
p
m
en
t
o
v
er
a
lo
n
g
er
p
er
io
d
.
T
h
e
tr
ad
itio
n
al
m
et
h
o
d
s
lo
n
g
er
lif
e
cy
c
les r
eq
u
ir
e
ad
j
u
s
t
m
en
t
s
to
th
e
ag
i
le
p
r
o
ce
s
s
es”.
[
3
9
]
is
th
e
b
ase
f
o
r
A
g
ile
f
ac
t
o
r
s
,
w
eb
q
u
esti
o
n
n
air
e
m
e
th
o
d
o
lo
g
y
an
d
lik
er
t
an
a
l
y
s
is
.
T
h
e
r
esear
ch
ap
p
r
o
ac
h
an
d
m
et
h
o
d
ar
e
s
a
m
e
as [
3
9
]
in
a
d
if
f
er
en
t e
n
v
ir
o
n
m
en
t.
As
p
er
[
4
0
]
:
“
T
h
e
lack
o
f
d
ir
ec
t
co
n
tact
b
et
w
ee
n
t
h
e
d
ev
e
lo
p
m
e
n
t
tea
m
a
n
d
th
e
c
u
s
to
m
er
s
co
u
ld
en
cu
m
b
er
th
e
p
r
o
ce
s
s
o
f
s
p
ec
i
f
y
in
g
r
eq
u
ir
e
m
en
t
s
f
o
r
th
e
f
u
t
u
r
e.
I
n
tu
r
n
,
h
a
n
d
o
f
f
s
a
m
o
n
g
f
u
n
ct
io
n
s
ca
n
ca
u
s
e
d
elay
s
a
n
d
i
n
cr
ea
s
i
n
g
r
is
k
s
o
f
i
n
f
o
r
m
a
tio
n
b
ein
g
m
i
s
u
n
d
er
s
to
o
d
.
L
ev
el
o
f
d
etail
s
i
s
v
ar
y
in
g
d
ep
en
d
i
n
g
o
n
r
ep
r
esen
tativ
e
s
b
et
w
ee
n
cu
s
t
o
m
er
an
d
d
ev
elo
p
er
.
A
s
a
r
esu
lt,
th
e
d
ev
elo
p
ed
s
y
s
te
m
is
f
r
eq
u
en
tl
y
n
o
t
s
atis
f
ac
to
r
y
o
r
ev
e
n
lead
to
p
r
o
j
ec
t f
ailu
r
e”
.
As
p
er
[
4
1
]
:
“
T
h
e
p
r
o
ce
s
s
m
o
d
el
m
u
s
t
f
o
cu
s
o
n
id
en
ti
f
y
i
n
g
th
e
er
r
o
r
s
in
t
h
e
s
a
m
e
o
r
clo
s
est
p
h
ase
o
f
th
e
SD
L
C
p
r
o
ce
s
s
to
av
o
id
o
r
r
ed
u
ce
th
e
r
ed
o
-
w
o
r
k
an
d
co
s
t.
Mo
s
t
o
f
th
e
ex
is
ti
n
g
tr
ad
itio
n
al
SD
L
C
p
r
o
ce
s
s
Evaluation Warning : The document was created with Spire.PDF for Python.
I
SS
N
:
2
0
8
8
-
8708
I
J
E
C
E
Vo
l.
7
,
No
.
3
,
J
u
n
e
2
0
1
7
:
1
2
7
8
–
1
2
8
5
1280
m
o
d
el
s
d
o
n
’
t
i
n
v
o
lv
e
m
a
n
ag
e
m
en
t
tea
m
d
ir
ec
tl
y
w
i
th
t
h
e
d
ev
elo
p
m
e
n
t
tea
m
.
Hen
ce
,
t
h
e
p
r
o
j
ec
t
m
a
n
a
g
e
m
e
n
t
tea
m
d
o
es
n
o
t
h
a
v
e
d
ir
ec
t
co
m
m
u
n
icatio
n
w
it
h
t
h
e
d
ev
elo
p
m
e
n
t
a
n
d
as
s
o
ciate
d
m
e
m
b
e
r
s
.
T
h
e
m
a
n
ag
e
m
e
n
t
j
u
s
t
r
e
m
ai
n
s
a
s
a
s
ile
n
t
i
n
ter
m
ed
iate
co
m
m
u
n
icatio
n
b
o
d
y
.
T
h
u
s
,
p
r
o
p
er
m
a
n
ag
e
m
e
n
t
o
b
s
e
r
v
atio
n
a
n
d
co
n
tr
o
l
is
h
id
d
en
i
n
th
e
d
ev
elo
p
m
en
t
p
r
o
ce
s
s
.
A
s
a
r
es
u
lt,
th
e
d
ev
elo
p
m
e
n
t
p
r
o
ce
s
s
lack
s
p
r
o
p
er
m
an
a
g
e
m
en
t
s
u
p
er
v
i
s
io
n
a
n
d
co
n
tr
o
ls
.
I
n
ad
d
itio
n
,
th
e
p
r
o
j
ec
t
h
as
t
o
s
u
f
f
er
f
r
o
m
r
eso
u
r
ce
s
h
o
r
t
ag
e,
r
is
k
h
a
n
d
li
n
g
,
co
o
r
d
in
atio
n
an
d
m
a
n
y
o
t
h
er
co
n
f
lic
ts
an
d
p
r
o
b
le
m
s
”.
As
p
er
[
3
2
]
:
“
Ma
n
a
g
i
n
g
v
ar
ia
b
ilit
y
i
n
s
u
b
s
y
s
te
m
s
a
n
d
tea
m
s
h
a
s
p
r
o
v
en
d
if
f
icu
lt.
I
f
b
o
th
ag
ile
a
n
d
tr
ad
itio
n
al
tea
m
s
ar
e
d
ev
e
lo
p
in
g
s
o
f
t
w
ar
e
f
o
r
t
h
e
s
a
m
e
p
r
o
d
u
ct,
t
h
e
y
ca
n
d
e
v
elo
p
r
ad
ically
d
if
f
er
en
t
ar
ti
f
ac
t
s
th
at
m
i
g
h
t
n
o
t
in
te
g
r
ate
ea
s
il
y
.
W
ith
o
u
t
s
o
m
e
m
ea
n
s
o
f
co
o
r
d
in
atio
n
,
an
ag
ile
tea
m
’
s
d
o
m
a
in
as
s
u
m
p
tio
n
s
,
GUI
s
,
o
r
co
m
m
er
cial
o
f
f
-
th
e
-
s
h
el
f
ch
o
ices
co
u
ld
v
ar
y
s
i
g
n
i
f
ica
n
tl
y
f
r
o
m
o
th
er
d
ev
el
o
p
er
s
’
co
u
n
ter
p
ar
t
ass
u
m
p
tio
n
s
”.
3.
RE
S
E
ARCH
M
E
T
H
O
D
A
s
u
r
v
e
y
h
a
s
b
ee
n
ca
r
r
ied
o
u
t
t
h
r
o
u
g
h
p
r
i
n
ted
q
u
est
io
n
n
a
ir
e.
Her
e,
w
e
tr
ied
to
k
n
o
w
h
o
w
Ag
ile
So
f
t
w
ar
e
De
v
elo
p
m
e
n
t
p
r
ac
tices
af
f
ec
t
t
h
e
p
er
f
o
r
m
a
n
ce
o
f
s
o
f
t
w
ar
e
d
ev
elo
p
m
e
n
t
p
r
o
jects,
w
h
at
ar
e
t
h
e
i
m
p
o
r
tan
t
c
h
an
g
es
t
h
at
ar
e
r
eq
u
ir
ed
an
d
th
e
ch
a
llen
g
e
s
i
n
v
o
l
v
ed
in
ad
o
p
tin
g
t
h
ese
a
g
ile
p
r
ac
tices.
T
h
is
q
u
esti
o
n
n
air
e
w
a
s
g
iv
e
n
to
s
o
f
t
w
ar
e
p
r
ac
titi
o
n
er
s
s
u
ch
a
s
d
i
r
ec
to
r
,
s
en
io
r
m
an
a
g
er
,
m
an
a
g
er
,
ar
ch
itect,
tea
m
lead
er
,
d
ev
elo
p
er
,
test
er
,
w
h
o
h
as
e
x
p
er
ien
ce
p
r
ac
tici
n
g
s
o
f
t
w
ar
e
d
e
v
elo
p
m
e
n
t
u
s
i
n
g
b
o
th
p
la
n
-
d
r
i
v
e
n
(
tr
ad
itio
n
al)
an
d
ag
ile
ap
p
r
o
ac
h
es a
n
d
m
et
h
o
d
o
lo
g
ies.
T
h
e
in
f
o
r
m
atio
n
co
llected
f
r
o
m
t
h
e
s
u
r
v
e
y
q
u
es
tio
n
s
en
ab
le
d
u
s
to
e
n
h
an
ce
o
u
r
u
n
d
er
s
ta
n
d
in
g
o
f
t
h
e
cr
itical
ch
a
n
g
es
r
eq
u
ir
ed
an
d
th
e
c
h
alle
n
g
es/ris
k
s
i
n
v
o
l
v
ed
i
n
i
n
tr
o
d
u
cin
g
a
g
ile
s
o
f
t
w
ar
e
d
e
v
elo
p
m
e
n
t
p
r
ac
tices
in
o
r
g
a
n
izatio
n
s
p
r
ac
ticin
g
p
lan
-
d
r
iv
e
n
(
tr
ad
itio
n
al)
s
o
f
t
w
ar
e
d
ev
elo
p
m
e
n
t
m
et
h
o
d
o
lo
g
ies
.
T
h
e
lik
er
t
s
tati
s
tical
a
n
al
y
s
i
s
p
o
in
t
s
ar
e
d
ep
icted
i
T
A
B
L
E
I
.
T
h
e
q
u
esti
o
n
n
air
e
w
as
co
n
d
u
c
ted
an
d
ca
teg
o
r
is
ed
o
n
th
e
b
asis
o
f
f
o
llo
w
i
n
g
ag
ile
f
a
cto
r
s
d
er
iv
ed
f
r
o
m
[
3
9
]
:
a.
Sp
ec
if
icatio
n
b.
P
r
o
j
ec
t Sch
ed
u
le
c.
T
ea
m
W
o
r
k
d.
C
lie
n
t Co
llab
o
r
atio
n
e.
C
h
al
len
g
es/
R
i
s
k
I
n
v
o
l
v
ed
A
q
u
e
s
tio
n
n
air
e
w
as
d
is
tr
i
b
u
ted
to
t
w
o
tea
m
s
w
o
r
k
i
n
g
o
n
s
o
f
t
w
ar
e
p
r
o
j
ec
ts
u
s
in
g
ag
i
le
m
et
h
o
d
o
lo
g
ies
o
f
m
u
lti
n
atio
n
al
I
n
d
ian
s
o
f
t
w
ar
e
co
m
p
a
n
y
.
T
h
e
n
u
m
b
er
o
f
r
esp
o
n
d
en
ts
w
a
s
1
4
th
o
u
g
h
t
h
e
tar
g
et
w
as
2
5
.
T
h
e
q
u
esti
o
n
n
a
ir
e
r
esu
lts
s
h
ed
lig
h
t
o
n
th
e
a
g
ile
p
r
a
ctice
s
b
ein
g
f
o
llo
w
ed
.
T
h
e
team
m
e
m
b
er
s
w
er
e
v
er
y
m
u
ch
s
y
n
ch
r
o
n
ize
d
an
d
w
o
r
k
ed
in
u
n
is
o
n
.
T
h
e
q
u
esti
o
n
n
air
e
r
esp
o
n
s
e
s
an
d
r
esu
lt
s
r
ef
lecte
d
th
e
s
a
m
e
w
it
h
f
e
w
d
if
f
er
e
n
t
v
o
ices.W
e
u
s
ed
a
t
w
o
le
v
el
L
ik
er
t
s
ca
le
an
d
t
h
e
r
esp
o
n
s
es
w
er
e
co
llected
f
r
o
m
t
h
e
r
esp
o
n
d
en
ts
.
As in
[
3
9
]
g
r
o
u
p
w
is
e
q
u
e
s
tio
n
n
air
e
co
n
te
n
ts
a
n
d
q
u
esti
o
n
s
a
r
e
as f
o
llo
w
ed
:
a.
Sp
ec
if
icatio
n
s
o
f
P
r
o
j
ec
t &
P
r
o
d
u
ct
1.
I
s
ag
ile
p
r
o
j
ec
t m
a
n
ag
e
m
e
n
t a
p
p
licab
le
in
th
e
co
n
te
x
t o
f
p
r
o
d
u
ct
d
ev
elo
p
m
e
n
t?
2.
C
an
ce
r
tai
n
ag
i
le
p
r
ac
tices b
e
u
tili
s
ed
f
o
r
p
r
o
j
ec
ts
th
at
ar
e
s
ti
ll c
ar
r
ied
o
u
t in
tr
ad
itio
n
al
m
a
n
n
er
?
3.
Do
es p
r
o
j
ec
t sp
ec
if
icatio
n
s
in
clu
d
e
an
as
s
es
s
m
e
n
t o
f
t
h
e
f
u
n
ctio
n
s
o
f
t
h
e
p
r
o
d
u
ct?
4.
A
r
e
s
p
ec
i
f
icatio
n
s
p
r
ep
ar
ed
j
o
in
tl
y
b
y
t
h
e
clien
t a
n
d
th
e
p
r
o
ject
tea
m
?
5.
Sh
o
u
ld
m
o
r
e
e
m
p
h
asize
b
e
laid
o
n
f
ac
e
-
to
-
f
ac
e
co
m
m
u
n
icatio
n
f
o
r
co
n
v
e
y
i
n
g
in
f
o
r
m
atio
n
/s
p
ec
i
f
icatio
n
s
to
an
d
w
ith
i
n
t
h
e
d
ev
elo
p
m
e
n
t te
a
m
?
6.
A
r
e
ch
a
n
g
i
n
g
r
eq
u
ir
e
m
e
n
ts
welc
o
m
e,
ev
e
n
late
d
u
r
in
g
p
r
o
j
e
ct/p
r
o
d
u
ct
d
ev
elo
p
m
e
n
t?
7.
A
r
e
th
e
tea
m
m
e
m
b
er
s
al
w
a
y
s
w
il
lin
g
to
co
n
ti
n
u
o
u
s
l
y
lear
n
f
r
o
m
o
n
e
a
n
o
t
h
er
an
d
o
p
en
f
o
r
tr
ain
in
g
th
r
o
u
g
h
m
e
n
to
r
in
g
an
d
p
r
o
f
es
s
io
n
all
y
g
u
id
ed
d
is
cu
s
s
io
n
s
?
b.
P
r
o
j
ec
t Sch
ed
u
le
1.
W
as
th
e
p
r
o
j
ec
t
d
iv
id
ed
in
to
s
h
o
r
t
(
s
a
m
e
le
n
g
th
)
c
y
cles/
iter
atio
n
s
d
u
r
i
n
g
w
h
ic
h
th
e
tea
m
w
a
s
f
o
cu
s
ed
o
n
in
d
i
v
id
u
al
f
u
n
ctio
n
s
(
o
r
s
et
o
f
f
u
n
ctio
n
s
)
o
f
t
h
e
p
r
o
d
u
ct
2.
Do
y
o
u
tr
y
to
m
a
k
e
i
m
p
o
r
tan
t
p
r
o
j
ec
t d
ec
is
io
n
s
r
ap
id
ly
w
i
th
i
n
s
h
o
r
t ti
m
e
f
r
a
m
e
s
?
3.
Do
es
y
o
u
r
s
o
f
t
w
ar
e
d
ev
elo
p
m
en
t
tea
m
r
el
y
o
n
i
n
ter
n
aliz
ed
,
in
f
o
r
m
al,
u
n
d
o
cu
m
e
n
ted
p
lan
s
(
a
s
ag
ain
s
t
f
o
r
m
al
d
o
cu
m
en
ted
p
lan
s
)
?
4.
Do
y
o
u
b
eliev
e
i
n
s
h
o
r
t,
iter
ativ
e,
test
-
d
r
iv
e
n
,
an
d
p
eo
p
le
-
ce
n
tr
ic
d
e
v
elo
p
m
e
n
t?
5.
W
o
u
ld
y
o
u
s
h
i
f
t
f
r
o
m
li
f
ec
y
cle
-
b
ased
d
ev
elo
p
m
en
t
to
f
e
atu
r
e
-
d
r
i
v
en
ev
o
l
u
tio
n
ar
y
a
n
d
iter
ativ
e
d
ev
elo
p
m
en
t?
6.
Do
y
o
u
m
ea
s
u
r
e
a
n
d
tr
ac
k
p
r
o
g
r
ess
b
ased
o
n
w
o
r
k
i
n
g
s
o
f
t
war
e?
7.
Do
y
o
u
p
r
ac
tice
s
i
m
p
le
d
e
s
ig
n
s
,
p
r
o
ce
s
s
e
s
,
a
n
d
ap
p
r
o
ac
h
es
i
n
y
o
u
r
s
o
f
t
w
ar
e
d
e
v
elo
p
m
e
n
t
m
et
h
o
d
o
lo
g
ies?
Evaluation Warning : The document was created with Spire.PDF for Python.
I
J
E
C
E
I
SS
N:
2
0
8
8
-
8708
I
n
ve
s
tig
a
tin
g
A
g
ile
A
d
a
p
t
a
tio
n
fo
r
P
r
o
ject
Dev
elo
p
men
t
(
R
a
j
e
s
h
H
.
K
u
l
k
a
r
n
i
)
1281
8.
I
s
ag
ile
p
r
o
j
ec
t m
a
n
ag
e
m
e
n
t a
p
p
licab
le
in
th
e
co
n
te
x
t o
f
p
r
o
d
u
ct
d
ev
elo
p
m
e
n
t?
9.
C
an
ce
r
tai
n
ag
i
le
p
r
ac
tices b
e
u
tili
s
ed
f
o
r
p
r
o
j
ec
ts
th
at
ar
e
s
ti
ll c
ar
r
ied
o
u
t in
th
e
tr
ad
itio
n
al
m
an
n
er
?
c.
R
o
le
o
f
T
ea
m
w
o
r
k
1.
T
h
e
m
e
m
b
er
s
i
n
th
e
tea
m
s
h
o
u
l
d
b
e
g
eo
g
r
ap
h
icall
y
co
-
lo
ca
t
ed
.
2.
W
o
r
k
s
h
o
u
ld
b
e
in
s
m
all
tea
m
s
(
n
o
m
o
r
e
th
a
n
4
-
5
m
e
m
b
er
s
)
in
th
e
p
r
o
j
ec
ts
.
3.
T
ea
m
m
e
m
b
er
s
s
h
o
u
ld
r
eg
u
lar
l
y
d
is
c
u
s
s
t
h
eir
m
is
ta
k
es a
n
d
l
ea
r
n
f
r
o
m
t
h
e
m
4.
I
n
m
o
s
t
ca
s
e
s
,
co
m
m
u
n
icat
io
n
an
d
n
e
g
o
tiatio
n
i
n
t
h
e
p
r
o
j
ec
ts
h
ap
p
en
b
et
w
ee
n
p
eo
p
le
w
h
o
ar
e
p
h
y
s
icall
y
c
lo
s
e
to
o
n
e
an
o
th
e
r
.
5.
I
n
m
o
s
t
ca
s
es,
co
m
m
u
n
icatio
n
a
n
d
n
e
g
o
tiatio
n
i
n
th
e
p
r
o
j
e
cts
h
ap
p
en
b
et
w
ee
n
p
eo
p
le
wh
o
w
o
r
k
in
th
e
s
a
m
e
(
s
i
m
ilar
)
ti
m
e
zo
n
e.
6.
T
h
e
b
u
s
in
es
s
tea
m
a
n
d
d
ev
elo
p
er
s
s
h
o
u
ld
w
o
r
k
to
g
e
th
er
d
ail
y
(
clo
s
el
y
)
t
h
r
o
u
g
h
o
u
t th
e
p
r
o
ject.
7.
T
h
e
d
ev
elo
p
m
en
t
tea
m
s
s
h
o
u
l
d
b
e
s
elf
-
o
r
g
an
izin
g
to
m
ee
t
t
h
e
ch
a
n
g
i
n
g
r
eq
u
ir
e
m
e
n
ts
a
n
d
th
e
n
e
w
l
y
ar
is
in
g
ch
al
len
g
es o
f
th
e
b
u
s
i
n
ess
.
8.
A
t r
e
g
u
lar
i
n
ter
v
a
ls
,
th
e
tea
m
s
h
o
u
ld
r
ef
lect
o
n
h
o
w
to
b
ec
o
m
e
m
o
r
e
ef
f
ec
t
iv
e.
9.
T
h
e
team
g
e
n
er
all
y
s
h
o
u
ld
co
n
s
i
s
ts
o
f
tech
n
icall
y
co
m
p
ete
n
t a
n
d
ex
p
er
ien
ce
d
p
eo
p
le
10.
T
h
e
m
aj
o
r
it
y
o
f
m
e
m
b
er
s
o
f
t
h
e
tea
m
s
h
o
u
ld
h
av
e
s
i
m
i
lar
s
o
cial
cu
ltu
r
e,
ev
e
n
th
o
u
g
h
t
h
e
y
m
i
g
h
t
b
e
b
elo
n
g
i
n
g
to
d
if
f
er
e
n
t n
at
io
n
al
ities
an
d
p
r
o
v
in
ce
s
.
11.
T
h
e
team
m
e
m
b
er
s
s
h
o
u
ld
in
g
en
er
al
al
w
a
y
s
b
e
w
ill
in
g
to
co
n
tin
u
o
u
s
l
y
lear
n
f
r
o
m
o
n
e
an
o
th
er
.
d.
C
lie
n
t Co
llab
o
r
atio
n
1.
Sh
o
u
ld
cu
s
to
m
er
s
clo
s
el
y
co
ll
ab
o
r
ate
w
i
th
t
h
e
d
ev
elo
p
m
e
n
t
tea
m
m
e
m
b
er
s
?
2.
I
n
s
o
f
t
w
ar
e
d
ev
elo
p
m
e
n
t
p
r
o
j
ec
ts
,
cu
s
to
m
er
s
ar
e
co
m
m
itte
d
to
th
e
p
r
o
j
ec
t,
i.e
.
,
th
e
y
ar
e
m
o
tiv
a
ted
,
ac
tiv
e,
an
d
co
n
s
id
er
th
e
m
s
el
v
e
s
to
b
e
r
esp
o
n
s
ib
le
ele
m
en
ts
o
f
th
e
p
r
o
j
ec
t.
3.
I
n
th
e
p
r
o
j
ec
ts
,
a
v
er
y
h
i
g
h
p
r
i
o
r
ity
i
s
g
i
v
e
n
to
ac
h
ie
v
e
cu
s
to
m
er
s
ati
s
f
ac
t
io
n
.
4.
C
u
s
to
m
er
/cl
ien
t
s
h
o
u
ld
p
r
o
p
o
s
e
an
d
ev
alu
a
ted
(
co
s
t,
v
alu
e
ad
d
ed
)
ch
an
g
es to
g
eth
er
w
i
th
t
h
e
tea
m
.
5.
C
u
s
to
m
er
/cl
ien
t
u
s
er
s
h
o
u
ld
p
ar
ticip
ate
in
th
e
d
ev
e
lo
p
m
en
t o
f
test
p
r
o
ce
d
u
r
es.
6.
So
f
t
w
ar
e
d
ev
elo
p
m
e
n
t
p
r
o
j
ec
t
tea
m
f
o
llo
w
s
co
n
ti
n
u
o
u
s
atten
tio
n
to
tech
n
ical
ex
ce
llen
ce
an
d
g
o
o
d
d
esig
n
f
o
r
d
ev
elo
p
m
e
n
t.
7.
C
u
s
to
m
er
s
atis
f
ac
tio
n
h
a
s
g
iv
en
a
h
ig
h
p
r
io
r
it
y
t
h
r
o
u
g
h
ea
r
l
y
an
d
co
n
t
in
u
o
u
s
d
eli
v
er
y
o
f
v
a
lu
ab
l
e
s
o
f
t
w
ar
e.
e.
C
h
al
len
g
es/
R
i
s
k
s
I
n
v
o
lv
ed
1.
P
r
o
b
lem
s
ar
is
e
w
it
h
i
n
d
ev
elo
p
m
e
n
t
tea
m
s
th
at
ar
e
g
eo
g
r
ap
h
icall
y
d
is
tr
ib
u
ted
an
d
n
o
t
co
-
lo
ca
ted
i
n
ag
ile
d
ev
elo
p
m
e
n
t.
2.
Dif
f
er
en
ce
s
in
p
r
o
d
u
cti
v
it
y
b
e
t
w
ee
n
tea
m
m
e
m
b
er
s
i
n
ag
i
le
s
o
f
t
w
ar
e
d
ev
elo
p
m
e
n
t.
3.
C
h
al
le
n
g
es
o
f
th
e
a
g
ile
tea
m
s
in
i
n
teg
r
ati
n
g
t
h
e
d
ev
elo
p
m
e
n
t
p
r
o
ce
s
s
e
s
a
n
d
s
u
b
s
y
s
te
m
s
w
it
h
tea
m
s
w
it
h
i
n
t
h
e
s
a
m
e
o
r
g
an
iza
tio
n
p
r
ac
ticin
g
tr
ad
itio
n
a
l d
ev
elo
p
m
en
t
m
et
h
o
d
o
lo
g
ies.
4.
A
d
o
p
tin
g
a
g
ile
m
et
h
o
d
o
lo
g
ie
s
f
o
r
u
s
e
i
n
le
g
ac
y
s
y
s
te
m
s
,
w
h
ic
h
ar
e
m
o
r
e
r
esis
tan
t
to
c
h
an
g
es
i
n
in
ter
n
a
l so
u
r
ce
co
d
e.
5.
P
r
o
b
lem
s
w
it
h
s
elec
ti
n
g
th
e
ap
p
r
o
p
r
iate
ag
ile
m
e
th
o
d
o
lo
g
y
an
d
t
h
e
s
u
p
p
o
r
tin
g
to
o
ls
ac
co
r
d
in
g
to
o
r
g
an
izatio
n
al
n
ee
d
s
a
n
d
ch
ar
ac
ter
is
tics
.
4.
RE
SU
L
T
S AN
D
D
I
SCU
SS
I
ON
T
h
e
r
esp
o
n
s
es
r
esu
l
t
f
r
o
m
t
h
e
s
p
ec
if
icatio
n
s
o
f
th
e
p
r
o
j
ec
t
a
n
d
th
e
p
r
o
d
u
ct,
p
r
o
j
ec
t
s
ch
ed
u
le,
r
o
le
o
f
tea
m
w
o
r
k
,
clie
n
t
co
llab
o
r
tatio
n
,
ch
alle
n
g
es/
r
is
k
i
n
v
o
lv
ed
a
n
d
ag
ile
s
u
cc
e
s
s
ar
e
Fi
g
u
r
e
1
,
Fig
u
r
e
2
,
Fig
u
r
e
3
,
Fig
u
r
e
4
,
Fi
g
u
r
e
5
an
d
Fig
u
r
e
6
,
r
esp
ec
tiv
el
y
.
A
p
p
licab
il
it
y
o
f
a
g
ile
p
r
ac
tices
f
o
r
t
h
e
cu
r
r
en
t
u
n
d
er
g
o
in
g
p
r
o
j
ec
t
w
a
s
f
o
u
n
d
to
b
e
7
9
%,
s
co
p
e
f
o
r
m
i
g
r
atin
g
f
r
o
m
tr
ad
i
tio
n
al
p
r
ac
tices
to
ag
ile
p
r
ac
tices
w
a
s
f
o
u
n
d
to
b
e
4
3
%,
ass
ess
m
e
n
t
o
f
p
r
o
d
u
ct
f
u
n
ct
io
n
s
w
as
f
o
u
n
d
to
b
e
3
6
%,
2
2
%
o
f
t
h
e
p
r
o
j
ec
t
s
p
ec
if
icatio
n
s
w
er
e
j
o
in
tl
y
p
r
ep
ar
e
d
b
y
clien
t
an
d
t
h
e
p
r
o
j
ec
t
t
ea
m
,
8
6
%
r
ec
o
m
m
e
n
d
a
tio
n
f
o
r
f
ac
e
to
f
ac
e
co
m
m
u
n
icatio
n
w
as
g
i
v
e
n
,
ch
an
g
i
n
g
r
eq
u
ir
e
m
e
n
t
s
ar
e
an
t
icip
ated
an
d
w
elco
m
ed
b
y
7
9
%
o
f
r
esp
o
n
d
en
t
s
to
th
e
q
u
esti
o
n
n
air
e
a
n
d
8
6
%
o
f
th
e
r
esp
o
n
d
en
t
s
h
a
v
e
s
h
o
w
n
t
h
e
w
ill
in
g
n
ess
to
lear
n
.
1
0
0
%
r
esp
o
n
d
en
ts
a
f
f
ir
m
ed
t
h
at
th
e
m
o
d
u
le
s
w
er
e
d
iv
id
ed
in
to
s
h
o
r
t
c
y
cle
s
w
it
h
f
o
cu
s
o
n
f
u
n
ctio
n
s
,
r
ap
id
d
ec
is
io
n
m
a
k
i
n
g
w
as
r
ec
o
m
m
e
n
d
ed
b
y
9
3
%,
5
4
%
r
ely
o
n
f
o
r
m
al
d
o
cu
m
e
n
t
p
la
n
s
,
i
ter
ativ
e,
s
el
f
-
d
r
iv
e,
p
eo
p
le
ce
n
tr
ic
d
ev
elo
p
m
e
n
t
w
as
r
ec
o
m
m
e
n
d
ed
b
y
8
6
%,
m
ig
r
ati
n
g
to
iter
ativ
e
d
ev
elo
p
m
e
n
t
w
a
s
r
ec
o
m
m
e
n
d
ed
b
y
7
1
%,
p
r
o
g
r
ess
tr
ac
k
i
n
g
o
n
w
o
r
k
i
n
g
s
o
f
t
w
ar
e
is
d
o
n
e
b
y
7
1
%,
s
i
m
p
li
cit
y
is
f
o
llo
w
ed
b
y
7
8
%,
7
1
%
s
a
y
a
g
ile
is
ap
p
licab
le
in
t
h
e
co
n
te
x
t
o
f
p
r
o
d
u
ct
d
ev
e
lo
p
m
en
t
a
n
d
p
o
s
s
ib
il
it
y
o
f
m
i
g
r
atio
n
is
s
u
g
g
e
s
ted
b
y
7
9
%.
R
o
le
o
f
T
ea
m
w
o
r
k
r
es
u
lted
in
th
e
r
esp
o
n
s
es
as
i
n
Fi
g
u
r
e
3
,
9
3
%
s
u
g
g
es
ted
g
eo
g
r
ap
h
ical
c
o
lo
ca
tio
n
o
f
tea
m
m
e
m
b
er
s
i
s
n
ee
d
ed
,
s
m
aller
tea
m
s
ize
is
r
ec
o
m
m
e
n
d
ed
b
y
2
9
%,
9
3
% r
ec
o
m
m
e
n
d
p
er
io
d
ic
in
ter
ac
tio
n
a
m
o
n
g
tea
m
m
e
m
b
er
s
,
2
1
% s
u
g
g
es
t p
h
y
s
ical
p
r
o
x
i
m
it
y
lea
d
s
to
h
ig
h
er
co
m
m
u
n
icat
io
n
,
8
6
% f
ee
l si
m
ilar
ti
m
e
Evaluation Warning : The document was created with Spire.PDF for Python.
I
SS
N
:
2
0
8
8
-
8708
I
J
E
C
E
Vo
l.
7
,
No
.
3
,
J
u
n
e
2
0
1
7
:
1
2
7
8
–
1
2
8
5
1282
zo
n
e
lead
s
to
b
etter
co
m
m
u
n
i
ca
tio
n
,
1
0
0
%
s
u
g
g
e
s
t
b
u
s
i
n
ess
an
d
d
ev
elo
p
er
tea
m
s
h
o
u
ld
w
o
r
k
to
g
eth
er
a
n
d
a
s
w
ell
s
el
f
o
r
g
an
iz
in
g
tea
m
s
r
ea
d
y
to
ta
k
e
ch
alle
n
g
es.
C
lie
n
t
C
o
llab
o
r
atio
n
r
es
u
lted
in
th
e
r
esp
o
n
s
e
s
as
i
n
Fi
g
u
r
e
4
.
C
lo
s
e
co
llab
o
r
atio
n
,
tech
n
ica
l
ex
ce
lle
n
ce
,
g
o
o
d
d
esig
n
,
cu
s
to
m
er
s
ati
s
f
ac
tio
n
ar
e
h
ig
h
p
r
io
r
it
y
w
i
th
a
r
ati
n
g
o
f
1
0
0
%,
cu
s
t
o
m
er
co
m
m
it
m
en
t
an
d
cu
s
to
m
e
clie
n
t
eq
u
a
l
s
ta
k
eh
o
ld
er
s
h
ip
i
n
test
p
r
o
ce
d
u
r
es
h
as
a
r
ati
n
g
o
f
9
3
%
w
h
i
le
in
co
s
t
ev
al
u
atio
n
i
t
is
8
6
%.
C
h
al
len
g
es/
R
i
s
k
s
I
n
v
o
l
v
ed
r
esu
lted
i
n
t
h
e
r
esp
o
n
s
es
a
s
i
n
Fi
g
u
r
e
5
.
A
p
p
r
o
p
r
iate
to
o
l
s
elec
tio
n
p
r
o
b
lem
g
o
t
a
1
0
0
%
r
atin
g
,
d
i
f
f
er
en
ce
s
,
ch
al
len
g
es
o
f
i
n
teg
r
atio
n
;
ad
o
p
tio
n
g
o
t
9
3
%
r
atin
g
.
Fi
g
u
r
e
6
d
ep
icts
ag
ile
s
u
cc
es
s
r
ate
d
ep
icted
in
a
m
b
y
s
o
f
t
s
u
r
v
e
y
2
0
1
3
.
Fig
u
r
e
1
.
Sp
ec
if
icatio
n
s
o
f
P
r
o
j
ec
t a
n
d
Pro
d
u
ct
Fig
u
r
e
2
.
P
r
o
j
ec
t Sch
ed
u
le
Fig
u
r
e
3
.
R
o
le
o
f
T
ea
m
w
o
r
k
Fig
u
r
e
4
.
C
lien
t
C
o
llab
o
r
atio
n
Fig
u
r
e
5
.
C
h
alle
n
g
es/
R
is
k
s
I
n
v
o
lv
ed
Fig
u
r
e
6
.
Ag
ile
S
u
cc
es
s
C
h
ar
t (
Am
b
y
s
o
f
t)
T
h
e
s
tatis
tic
s
o
f
t
h
e
li
k
er
t
an
al
y
tics
h
a
s
b
ee
n
p
r
ese
n
ted
in
T
ab
le
1
.
T
h
e
s
tati
s
tical
r
ep
o
r
t
o
n
s
p
ec
if
icatio
n
s
o
n
p
r
o
j
ec
t
an
d
p
r
o
d
u
ct,
p
r
o
j
ec
t
s
ch
ed
u
le,
r
o
l
e
o
f
team
w
o
r
k
,
clie
n
t
co
llab
o
r
tatio
n
,
ch
allen
g
es
/
r
is
k
i
n
v
o
l
v
ed
an
d
ag
ile
s
u
cc
ess
ar
e
d
is
cu
s
s
ed
u
s
in
g
T
ab
l
e
1
.
T
h
e
s
tatis
tics
r
ev
ea
l
t
h
a
t
th
e
r
esp
o
n
s
e
r
ate
r
e
m
ain
s
co
n
s
is
te
n
t
at
5
6
%,
w
h
er
ea
s
t
h
e
s
tan
d
ar
d
d
ev
iati
o
n
is
le
s
s
er
t
h
an
5
0
%.
S
u
c
h
r
ed
u
ce
d
s
tan
d
ar
d
Evaluation Warning : The document was created with Spire.PDF for Python.
I
J
E
C
E
I
SS
N:
2
0
8
8
-
8708
I
n
ve
s
tig
a
tin
g
A
g
ile
A
d
a
p
t
a
tio
n
fo
r
P
r
o
ject
Dev
elo
p
men
t
(
R
a
j
e
s
h
H
.
K
u
l
k
a
r
n
i
)
1283
d
ev
iatio
n
en
s
u
r
es
t
h
e
co
n
s
is
ten
c
y
o
f
t
h
e
r
esu
lt
s
as
w
ell
as
th
e
r
eliab
ilit
y
o
f
th
e
s
o
f
t
w
ar
e.
T
h
e
m
ea
n
p
er
f
o
r
m
a
n
ce
is
ab
o
v
e
7
0
% t
h
a
t e
n
s
u
r
es t
h
e
f
u
l
f
ill
m
e
n
t o
f
p
r
o
j
ec
t r
eq
u
ir
em
e
n
ts
.
T
ab
le
1
.
L
ik
er
t
A
n
al
y
s
is
Sta
tis
tics
o
n
d
etails o
f
th
e
p
r
o
j
ec
t
P
r
o
g
r
a
m N
a
me
S
p
e
c
i
f
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
s
o
f
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
&
P
r
o
d
u
c
t
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
Q5
Q6
T
o
t
a
l
P
o
i
n
t
s
R
e
c
e
i
v
e
d
11
6
5
3
12
11
T
o
t
a
l
P
o
i
n
t
s
P
o
ssi
b
l
e
28
28
28
28
28
28
M
e
a
n
0
.
7
8
5
7
1
0
.
4
2
8
5
7
0
.
3
5
7
1
4
0
.
2
1
4
2
8
5
7
1
4
0
.
8
5
7
1
4
0
.
7
8
5
7
1
S
t
a
n
d
a
r
d
D
e
v
i
a
t
i
o
n
0
.
4
2
6
0
.
5
1
4
0
.
4
9
7
0
.
4
2
6
0
.
3
6
3
0
.
4
2
6
R
e
sp
o
n
se
R
a
t
e
5
6
%
P
r
o
g
r
a
m N
a
me
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
S
c
h
e
d
u
l
e
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
Q5
Q6
Q7
Q8
Q9
T
o
t
a
l
P
o
i
n
t
s
R
e
c
e
i
v
e
d
14
13
7
12
10
10
11
10
11
T
o
t
a
l
P
o
i
n
t
s
P
o
ssi
b
l
e
28
28
28
28
28
28
28
28
28
M
e
a
n
1
0
.
9
2
8
5
7
1
4
2
9
0
.
5
0
.
8
5
7
1
4
2
8
5
7
0
.
7
1
4
2
9
0
.
7
1
4
2
9
0
.
7
8
5
7
1
0
.
7
1
4
2
9
0
.
7
8
5
7
1
S
t
a
n
d
a
r
d
D
e
v
i
a
t
i
o
n
0
.
0
0
0
0
.
2
6
7
0
.
8
5
5
0
.
3
6
3
0
.
4
6
9
0
.
4
6
9
0
.
4
2
6
0
.
4
6
9
0
.
4
2
6
R
e
sp
o
n
se
R
a
t
e
5
6
%
5
6
%
5
6
%
5
6
%
5
6
%
5
6
%
5
6
%
5
6
%
5
6
%
P
r
o
g
r
a
m N
a
me
R
o
l
e
o
f
T
e
a
m
w
o
r
k
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
Q5
Q6
Q7
Q8
Q9
Q
1
0
Q
1
1
T
o
t
a
l
P
o
i
n
t
s
R
e
c
e
i
v
e
d
13
4
13
3
12
14
14
14
14
3
14
T
o
t
a
l
P
o
i
n
t
s Po
ssi
b
l
e
28
28
28
28
28
28
28
28
28
28
28
M
e
a
n
0
.
9
2
8
5
7
1
4
2
9
0
.
2
8
5
7
1
0
.
9
2
8
5
7
0
.
2
1
4
2
8
5
7
1
4
0
.
8
5
7
1
4
1
1
1
1
0
.
2
1
4
2
9
1
S
t
a
n
d
a
r
d
D
e
v
i
a
t
i
o
n
0
.
2
6
7
0
.
4
6
9
0
.
2
6
7
0
.
4
2
6
0
.
3
6
3
0
.
0
0
0
0
.
0
0
0
0
.
0
0
0
0
.
0
0
0
0
.
4
2
6
0
.
0
0
0
R
e
sp
o
n
se
R
a
t
e
5
6
%
5
6
%
5
6
%
5
6
%
5
6
%
5
6
%
5
6
%
5
6
%
5
6
%
5
6
%
5
6
%
P
r
o
g
r
a
m N
a
me
C
l
i
e
n
t
C
o
l
l
a
b
o
r
a
t
i
o
n
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
Q5
Q6
Q7
T
o
t
a
l
P
o
i
n
t
s
R
e
c
e
i
v
e
d
14
13
14
12
13
14
14
T
o
t
a
l
P
o
i
n
t
s
P
o
ssi
b
l
e
28
28
28
28
28
28
28
M
e
a
n
1
0
.
9
2
8
5
7
1
4
2
9
1
0
.
8
5
7
1
4
2
8
5
7
0
.
9
2
8
5
7
1
1
S
t
a
n
d
a
r
d
D
e
v
i
a
t
i
o
n
0
.
0
0
0
0
.
2
6
7
0
.
0
0
0
0
.
3
6
3
0
.
2
6
7
0
.
0
0
0
0
.
0
0
0
R
e
sp
o
n
se
R
a
t
e
5
6
%
5
6
%
5
6
%
5
6
%
5
6
%
5
6
%
5
6
%
P
r
o
g
r
a
m N
a
me
C
h
a
l
l
e
n
g
e
s /
R
i
s
k
s
I
n
v
o
l
v
e
d
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
Q5
T
o
t
a
l
P
o
i
n
t
s
R
e
c
e
i
v
e
d
2
13
13
13
14
T
o
t
a
l
P
o
i
n
t
s
P
o
ssi
b
l
e
28
28
28
28
28
M
e
a
n
0
.
1
4
2
8
6
0
.
9
2
8
5
7
1
4
2
9
0
.
9
2
8
5
7
0
.
9
2
8
5
7
1
4
2
9
1
S
t
a
n
d
a
r
d
D
e
v
i
a
t
i
o
n
0
.
3
6
3
0
.
2
6
7
0
.
2
6
7
0
.
2
6
7
0
.
0
0
0
R
e
sp
o
n
se
R
a
t
e
5
6
%
5
6
%
5
6
%
5
6
%
5
6
%
N
u
mb
e
r
o
f
L
i
k
e
r
t
S
c
a
l
e
O
p
t
i
o
n
s
2
Q
u
e
st
i
o
n
n
a
i
r
e
P
a
r
t
i
c
i
p
a
n
t
s
14
T
o
t
a
l
P
o
ssi
b
l
e
P
a
r
t
i
c
i
p
a
n
t
s
25
A
l
l
r
e
sp
o
n
se
s a
r
e
b
a
se
d
o
f
f
a
L
i
k
e
r
t
sc
a
l
e
(
S
t
r
o
n
g
l
y
A
g
r
e
e
t
o
S
t
r
o
n
g
l
y
D
i
sag
r
e
e
)
S
t
r
o
n
g
l
y
A
g
r
e
e
=
1
,
S
t
r
o
n
g
l
y
D
i
sag
r
e
e
=
0
5.
CO
NCLU
SI
O
N
I
n
th
is
p
a
p
e
r
a
c
r
i
t
i
c
a
l
r
ev
i
e
w
o
f
a
g
i
l
e
p
r
a
c
ti
c
es
b
e
i
n
g
a
d
o
p
t
ed
i
n
a
s
o
f
tw
a
r
e
c
o
m
p
an
y
i
s
d
o
n
e
.
Us
in
g
q
u
e
s
t
i
o
n
n
a
i
r
e
an
d
l
i
k
e
r
t
s
c
al
e
w
e
an
a
ly
s
e
d
t
h
e
im
p
a
ct
o
f
v
a
r
i
o
u
s
ag
i
l
e
f
a
c
t
o
r
s
o
n
t
e
am
m
em
b
e
r
s
.
Pr
o
je
c
t
s
p
e
c
if
i
ca
t
i
o
n
s
,
t
e
am
w
o
r
k
,
r
is
k
s
,
ch
a
l
le
n
g
es
an
d
o
th
e
r
ag
il
e
f
a
ct
o
r
s
ef
f
e
c
t
o
n
th
e
t
e
am
w
as
a
c
q
u
i
r
e
d
u
s
in
g
a
q
u
e
s
t
i
o
n
n
a
i
r
e
an
d
u
s
in
g
l
ik
e
r
t
s
c
a
l
e
i
t
w
a
s
q
u
an
tif
i
e
d
.
F
a
c
e
to
f
a
c
e
c
o
m
m
u
n
ic
a
t
i
o
n
,
d
iv
i
d
i
n
g
th
e
m
o
d
u
l
es
in
t
o
s
m
a
l
l
i
t
e
r
at
i
o
n
s
,
c
li
en
t
an
d
d
ev
e
l
o
p
e
r
c
o
l
l
a
b
o
r
a
t
i
o
n
,
a
p
p
r
o
p
r
i
at
e
t
o
o
l
s
el
e
c
ti
o
n
w
a
s
f
e
w
o
f
t
h
e
f
a
c
t
o
r
s
w
h
i
ch
r
an
k
h
ig
h
am
o
n
g
th
e
t
e
am
m
e
m
b
e
r
s
u
s
in
g
a
g
i
l
e
m
eth
o
d
o
l
o
g
i
es
f
o
r
s
o
f
tw
a
r
e
d
ev
el
o
p
m
en
t
.
ACK
NO
WL
E
D
G
M
E
NT
T
h
e
au
th
o
r
s
w
i
s
h
to
t
h
an
k
Dr
.
An
ir
u
d
h
a
J
o
s
h
i,
I
D
C
,
I
I
T
Mu
m
b
a
i
f
o
r
all
th
e
s
u
p
p
o
r
t
an
d
g
u
id
an
ce
.
T
h
e
au
th
o
r
s
w
o
u
l
d
lik
e
t
o
th
an
k
a
ll
th
e
in
d
u
s
t
r
y
an
d
a
c
a
d
em
i
c
p
a
r
t
i
c
i
p
an
t
s
o
f
th
is
an
a
ly
s
is
.
Evaluation Warning : The document was created with Spire.PDF for Python.
I
SS
N
:
2
0
8
8
-
8708
I
J
E
C
E
Vo
l.
7
,
No
.
3
,
J
u
n
e
2
0
1
7
:
1
2
7
8
–
1
2
8
5
1284
RE
F
E
R
E
NC
E
S
[1
]
S
o
n
a
li
P
a
th
a
k
,
P
a
ll
a
v
i
S
a
x
e
n
a
,
“
H
y
b
rid
M
e
th
o
d
o
lo
g
y
In
v
o
lv
in
g
S
c
ru
m
a
n
d
W
a
terfa
ll
M
o
d
e
l
to
w
a
rd
s
th
e
S
o
f
tw
a
r
e
P
r
o
jec
t
De
v
e
lo
p
m
e
n
t
in
A
c
a
d
e
m
ic
Kn
o
w
led
g
e
Ce
n
ters
”
,
In
ter
n
a
ti
o
n
a
l
J
o
u
rn
a
l
o
f
Ev
a
lu
a
ti
o
n
a
n
d
Res
e
a
r
c
h
in
Ed
u
c
a
ti
o
n
(
IJ
ER
E)
,
V
o
l
1
N
o
1
,
2
0
1
2
p
a
g
e
s 2
5
-
32
[2
]
Ro
b
e
rt
K.
wy
so
c
k
i,
“
E
f
f
e
c
ti
v
e
P
r
o
jec
t
M
a
n
a
g
e
m
e
n
t,
T
ra
d
it
io
n
a
l,
A
g
il
e
,
Ex
tre
m
e
”
,
W
il
e
y
,
S
ix
th
Ed
it
i
o
n
[3
]
A
lj
a
z
S
tare
,
“
Ag
il
e
P
ro
jec
t
M
a
n
a
g
e
m
e
n
t
–
A
F
u
tu
re
A
p
p
ro
a
c
h
to
t
h
e
M
a
n
a
g
e
m
e
n
t
o
f
P
ro
je
c
ts?
”
Dy
n
a
mic
Rela
ti
o
n
sh
i
p
s M
a
n
a
g
e
me
n
t
J
o
u
r
n
a
l
,
M
a
y
2
0
1
3
.
[4
]
P
ra
ti
y
u
sh
G
u
leria
G
u
leria
,
V
ik
a
s
S
h
a
rm
a
,
M
a
n
ish
A
ro
ra
,
“
De
v
e
lo
p
m
e
n
t
a
n
d
Us
a
g
e
o
f
S
o
f
t
w
a
re
a
s
a
S
e
rv
ice
f
o
r
a
Clo
u
d
a
n
d
N
o
n
-
Clo
u
d
Ba
se
d
En
v
iro
n
m
e
n
t
-
A
n
E
m
p
iri
c
a
l
S
tu
d
y
”
,
In
ter
n
a
ti
o
n
a
l
J
o
u
rn
a
l
o
f
Cl
o
u
d
Co
mp
u
t
in
g
a
n
d
S
e
rv
ice
s S
c
ien
c
e
(
I
J
-
CL
OS
ER
)
V
o
l
2
No
1
,
2
0
1
3
p
a
g
e
s 5
0
-
58
[5
]
ww
w
.
a
g
il
e
m
a
n
if
e
sto
.
o
r
g
[6
]
M
iX
i
o
A
o
y
a
m
a
,
“
Ag
il
e
S
o
ft
w
a
r
e
Pr
o
c
e
ss
M
o
d
e
l”
,
in
P
r
o
c
e
e
d
in
g
s
o
f
T
we
n
ty
-
F
irst
A
n
n
u
a
l
In
ter
n
a
ti
o
n
a
l
Co
n
f
e
re
n
c
e
o
n
C
o
m
p
u
ter S
o
f
tw
a
re
a
n
d
A
p
p
li
c
a
ti
o
n
s,
p
p
.
4
5
4
-
4
5
9
,
1
9
9
7
.
[7
]
R.
M
c
Ca
u
ley
,
“
Ag
il
e
De
v
e
lo
p
m
e
n
t
M
e
t
h
o
d
s
P
o
ise
d
t
o
Up
se
t
S
tat
u
s Q
u
o
”
,
S
IGCS
E
Bu
ll
,
v
o
l.
3
3
,
p
p
.
1
4
–
1
5
,
2
0
0
1
.
[8
]
O’L
e
a
r
y
P
,
A
li
Ba
b
a
r
M
,
T
h
iel
S
,
Rich
a
rd
so
n
I.
,
“
Pr
o
d
u
c
t
De
riv
a
ti
o
n
Pr
o
c
e
ss
a
n
d
A
g
il
e
A
p
p
r
o
a
c
h
e
s:
Exp
lo
ri
n
g
th
e
In
teg
ra
ti
o
n
P
o
ten
ti
a
l”
,
in
P
r
o
c
e
e
d
in
g
s
o
f
S
e
c
o
n
d
IF
I
P
Ce
n
tr
a
l
a
n
d
Eas
t
E
u
ro
p
e
a
n
Co
n
f
e
re
n
c
e
o
n
S
o
f
tw
a
re
En
g
in
e
e
rin
g
T
e
c
h
n
i
q
u
e
s.
W
y
d
a
wn
ictw
o
NA
K
OM:
P
o
z
n
n
,
P
o
la
n
d
,
2
0
0
7
.
[9
]
X
iao
d
a
n
Y
u
,
S
tac
ie
P
e
tt
e
r
,
"
Un
d
e
rsta
n
d
in
g
A
g
il
e
S
o
f
tw
a
r
e
De
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
P
ra
c
ti
c
e
s
u
sin
g
S
h
a
re
d
M
e
n
tal
M
o
d
e
ls
T
h
e
o
r
y
"
,
In
fo
rm
a
ti
o
n
a
n
d
S
o
ft
w
a
r
e
T
e
c
h
n
o
lo
g
y
,
V
o
l.
5
6
,
n
o
.
8
,
p
p
.
9
1
1
–
9
2
1
,
A
u
g
u
st 2
0
1
4
.
[1
0
]
A
d
a
m
He
n
d
ra
Bra
ta,
De
ro
n
L
ian
g
,
S
h
o
leh
Ha
d
i
P
ra
m
o
n
o
,
“
S
o
f
twa
re
De
v
e
lo
p
m
e
n
t
o
f
A
u
to
m
a
ti
c
D
a
ta
Co
ll
e
c
to
r
f
o
r
Bu
s
Ro
u
te
P
la
n
n
i
n
g
S
y
ste
m
”
,
In
t
e
rn
a
ti
o
n
a
l
J
o
u
rn
a
l
o
f
El
e
c
trica
l
a
n
d
Co
m
p
u
ter
E
n
g
in
e
e
rin
g
(
IJ
ECE
)
,
V
o
l
5
No
1
,
2
0
1
5
p
a
g
e
s 1
5
0
-
1
5
7
[1
1
]
K.
Co
n
b
o
y
,
“
Ag
il
it
y
f
ro
m
F
irst
P
ri
n
c
ip
les
:
Re
c
o
n
str
u
c
ti
n
g
th
e
Co
n
c
e
p
t
o
f
Ag
il
it
y
in
In
f
o
rm
a
ti
o
n
S
y
ste
m
s
D
e
v
e
lo
p
m
e
n
t”,
In
fo
rm
a
ti
o
n
S
y
ste
ms
Res
e
a
r
c
h
,
V
o
l.
2
0
,
p
p
.
3
2
9
–
3
5
4
,
2
0
0
9
.
[1
2
]
P
.
A
b
ra
h
a
m
ss
o
n
,
O.
S
a
lo
,
J.
Ro
n
k
a
in
e
n
,
J.
W
a
rsta
,
“
A
g
il
e
S
o
f
t
w
a
r
e
De
v
e
lo
p
m
e
n
t
M
e
th
o
d
s:
Re
v
iew
a
n
d
A
n
a
l
y
sis
”
,
V
T
T
P
u
b
li
c
a
ti
o
n
s,
2
0
0
2
.
[1
3
]
J.
Hig
h
sm
it
h
,
A
.
Co
c
k
b
u
rn
,
“
A
g
i
le
S
o
f
tw
a
re
De
v
e
lo
p
m
e
n
t:
T
h
e
B
u
sin
e
ss
o
f
In
n
o
v
a
ti
o
n
”
,
C
o
mp
u
ter
,
V
o
l.
3
4
,
p
p
.
120
–
1
2
2
,
2
0
0
1
.
[1
4
]
R.
L
.
G
la
ss
,
“
T
h
e
S
tan
d
ish
Re
p
o
r
t:
Do
e
s
it
re
a
ll
y
De
sc
rib
e
a
S
o
f
t
wa
re
Crisis?
”
,
Co
mm
u
n
ica
ti
o
n
AC
M
,
V
o
l
.
4
9
,
p
p
.
15
–
1
6
,
2
0
0
6
.
[1
5
]
S
.
G
ro
u
p
,
2
0
1
1
CHA
OS
Re
p
o
rt,
2
0
1
1
.
[1
6
]
P
.
A
b
ra
h
a
m
ss
o
n
,
O.
S
a
lo
,
J.
Ro
n
k
a
in
e
n
,
J.
W
a
rsta
,
“
Ag
il
e
S
o
ft
w
a
r
e
De
v
e
lo
p
me
n
t
M
e
th
o
d
s:
Rev
iew
a
n
d
A
n
a
lys
is
”
,
V
T
T
T
e
c
h
n
ica
l
re
p
o
rt,
2
0
0
2
.
[1
7
]
D.
Co
h
e
n
,
M
.
L
in
d
v
a
ll
,
P
.
C
o
st
a
,
“
A
n
In
tro
d
u
c
ti
o
n
t
o
A
g
il
e
M
e
th
o
d
s
”
,
i
n
:
M
.
V
.
Zelk
o
w
it
z
(Ed
.
),
Ad
v
a
n
c
e
s
in
Co
mp
u
ter
s,
Ad
v
a
n
c
e
s in
S
o
ft
wa
r
e
En
g
in
e
e
rin
g
,
V
o
l
.
6
2
,
El
se
v
ier
,
Am
ste
rd
a
m
,
2
0
0
4
.
[1
8
]
J.
Eri
c
k
so
n
,
K.
L
y
y
ti
n
e
n
,
K
.
S
iau
,
Ag
il
e
M
o
d
e
li
n
g
,
“
A
g
il
e
S
o
f
t
w
a
r
e
De
v
e
lo
p
m
e
n
t,
a
n
d
Ex
tre
m
e
P
ro
g
ra
m
m
in
g
:
T
h
e
S
tate
o
f
R
e
se
a
rc
h
”
,
J
o
u
rn
a
l
o
f
D
a
ta
b
a
se
M
a
n
a
g
e
me
n
t
, V
o
l.
1
6
,
n
o
.
4
,
p
p
.
8
8
–
1
0
0
,
2
0
0
5
.
[1
9
]
P
.
Kr
u
tch
e
n
,
“
T
h
e
Ra
ti
o
n
a
l
U
n
if
ied
P
ro
c
e
ss
:
A
n
In
tr
o
d
u
c
ti
o
n
”
,
t
h
ir
d
e
d
.
,
A
d
d
iso
n
-
W
e
sle
y
,
Bo
sto
n
,
2
0
0
3
.
[2
0
]
P
.
A
b
ra
h
a
m
ss
o
n
,
J.
W
a
rsta
,
M
.
T
.
S
ip
o
n
e
n
,
J.
Ro
n
k
a
in
e
n
,
“
Ne
w
Dire
c
ti
o
n
s
o
n
A
g
il
e
M
e
th
o
d
s:
A
Co
m
p
a
ra
ti
v
e
A
n
a
l
y
si
s
”
,
in
:
P
ro
c
e
e
d
i
n
g
s
o
f
th
e
2
5
t
h
I
n
tern
a
ti
o
n
a
l
C
o
n
f
e
re
n
c
e
o
n
S
o
f
tw
a
re
En
g
in
e
e
rin
g
(ICS
E’0
3
),
IEE
E
P
re
ss
,
2
0
0
3
.
[2
1
]
M
.
C.
P
a
u
lk
,
C.
V
.
W
e
b
e
r
,
B.
Cu
rt
is,
M
.
B.
Ch
rissis,
“
T
h
e
Ca
p
a
b
il
it
y
M
a
tu
rit
y
M
o
d
e
l:
G
u
id
e
li
n
e
s
f
o
r
Im
p
ro
v
in
g
th
e
S
o
f
tw
a
r
e
P
ro
c
e
ss
”
,
A
d
d
iso
n
-
W
e
sl
e
y
,
Bo
sto
n
,
1
9
9
5
,
IS
BN
0
-
201
-
5
4
6
6
4
-
7.
[2
2
]
J.
Eri
c
k
so
n
,
K.
L
y
y
ti
n
e
n
,
K.
S
iau
,
A
g
il
e
M
o
d
e
li
n
g
,
“
Ag
il
e
so
f
t
wa
re
d
e
v
e
lo
p
m
e
n
t,
a
n
d
e
x
tre
m
e
p
r
o
g
ra
m
m
in
g
:
th
e
sta
te o
f
re
se
a
r
c
h
”
,
J
o
u
rn
a
l
o
f
Da
tab
a
se
M
a
n
a
g
e
m
e
n
t,
V
o
l
.
1
6
,
n
o
.
4
,
p
p
.
8
8
–
1
0
0
,
2
0
0
5
.
[2
3
]
M
.
P
o
p
p
e
n
d
iec
k
,
T
.
P
o
p
p
e
n
d
iec
k
,
“
L
e
a
n
S
o
f
tw
a
r
e
De
v
e
lo
p
m
e
n
t
–
A
n
Ag
il
e
T
o
o
lk
it
f
o
r
S
o
f
twa
r
e
De
v
e
lo
p
m
e
n
t
M
a
n
a
g
e
rs
”
,
A
d
d
iso
n
-
W
e
sle
y
,
Bo
s
to
n
,
2
0
0
3
,
I
S
BN
0
-
3
2
1
-
1
5
0
7
8
-
3.
[2
4
]
K.
S
c
h
w
a
b
e
r
,
M
.
Be
e
d
le,
“
A
g
il
e
S
o
f
tw
a
r
e
De
v
e
lo
p
m
e
n
t
w
it
h
S
c
ru
m
”
,
P
re
n
ti
c
e
Ha
ll
,
Up
p
e
r
S
a
d
d
le
Riv
e
r
,
2
0
0
1
.
[2
5
]
T.
D
y
b
a
,
T
.
Din
g
so
y
r
,
“
E
m
p
iri
c
a
l
S
tu
d
ies
o
f
A
g
il
e
S
o
f
t
w
a
r
e
De
v
e
lo
p
m
e
n
t:
A
S
y
ste
m
a
ti
c
R
e
v
ie
w
”
,
In
fo
rm
a
ti
o
n
S
o
ft
w
a
r
e
T
e
c
h
n
o
lo
g
y
,
V
ol
.
5
0
,
p
p
.
8
3
3
–
8
5
9
,
2
0
0
8
.
[2
6
]
Y
.
Kh
ra
m
o
v
,
“
T
h
e
Co
st o
f
Co
d
e
Qu
a
li
ty”
,
in
P
r
o
c
e
e
d
in
g
s o
f
th
e
A
G
I
L
E
Co
n
f
e
re
n
c
e
,
p
p
.
1
1
9
–
1
2
5
,
2
0
0
6
.
[2
7
]
G
.
Be
n
e
f
ield
,
“
Ro
ll
in
g
o
u
t
A
g
il
e
in
a
l
a
r
g
e
e
n
ter
p
rise
”
,
in
:
P
r
o
c
e
e
d
in
g
s
o
f
th
e
4
1
st
A
n
n
u
a
l
Ha
w
a
i
i
In
ter
n
a
ti
o
n
a
l
Co
n
f
e
re
n
c
e
o
n
S
y
s
te
m
S
c
ien
c
e
s,
I
EE
E
Co
m
p
u
ter S
o
c
iety
,
2
0
0
8
.
[2
8
]
F
.
Ji,
T
.
S
e
d
a
n
o
,
“
Co
m
p
a
ri
n
g
Extr
e
me
P
r
o
g
ra
mm
in
g
a
n
d
W
a
ter
fa
ll
Pr
o
jec
t
R
e
su
lt
s,
S
o
ft
wa
r
e
En
g
in
e
e
rin
g
Ed
u
c
a
ti
o
n
a
n
d
T
ra
in
i
n
g
(
CS
EE
&
T
)”
,
i
n
P
r
o
c
e
e
d
in
g
s o
f
2
4
th
I
EE
E
-
CS
Co
n
f
e
re
n
c
e
,
p
p
.
4
8
2
–
4
8
6
,
M
a
y
2
0
1
1
.
[2
9
]
A
.
Co
c
k
b
u
r
n
,
“
Cry
sta
l
Clea
r:
A
Hu
m
a
n
-
P
o
w
e
re
d
M
e
th
o
d
o
lo
g
y
f
o
r
S
m
a
ll
T
e
a
m
s,
A
d
d
iso
n
-
W
e
sle
y
”
,
2
0
0
4
,
I
S
BN
0
-
201
-
6
9
9
4
7
-
8.
[3
0
]
K.
Be
c
k
,
“
Ex
tre
m
e
P
ro
g
ra
m
m
in
g
Ex
p
lain
e
d
:
Em
b
ra
c
e
Ch
a
n
g
e
”
,
Ad
d
iso
n
-
W
e
sle
y
,
2
0
0
0
,
IS
BN
0
-
2
0
1
-
6
1
6
4
1
-
6.
[3
1
]
J.
S
tap
let
o
n
,
“
DSDM
:
Bu
sin
e
s
s
F
o
c
u
se
d
De
v
e
lo
p
m
e
nt
”
,
se
c
o
n
d
e
d
.
,
P
e
a
rso
n
Ed
u
c
a
ti
o
n
,
2
0
0
3
,
I
S
BN
9
7
8
-
0
3
2
1
1
1
2
2
4
8
.
[3
2
]
A
lj
a
z
S
tare
,
“
Co
m
p
re
h
e
n
siv
e
M
a
n
a
g
e
m
e
n
t
o
f
P
ro
jec
t
C
h
a
n
g
e
s”
,
Eco
n
o
mic
a
n
d
B
u
sin
e
ss
Rev
iew
,
V
o
l.
1
2
,
No
.
3
,
2
0
1
0
,
1
9
5
–
2
1
0
.
[3
3
]
M
a
rti
n
M
c
Hu
g
h
,
Oisí
n
Ca
w
le
y
,
F
e
r
g
a
l
M
c
Ca
f
f
e
r
y
,
Ita
Rich
a
rd
so
n
,
a
n
d
X
iao
f
e
n
g
W
a
n
g
,
“
An
Ag
i
le
V
-
M
o
d
e
l
f
o
r
M
e
d
ica
l
De
v
ice
S
o
ft
wa
r
e
De
v
e
lo
p
me
n
t
to
Ov
e
r
c
o
me
th
e
Ch
a
ll
e
n
g
e
s
wit
h
Pl
a
n
Dr
ive
n
S
o
ft
w
a
r
e
De
v
e
lo
p
me
n
t
Evaluation Warning : The document was created with Spire.PDF for Python.
I
J
E
C
E
I
SS
N:
2
0
8
8
-
8708
I
n
ve
s
tig
a
tin
g
A
g
ile
A
d
a
p
t
a
tio
n
fo
r
P
r
o
ject
Dev
elo
p
men
t
(
R
a
j
e
s
h
H
.
K
u
l
k
a
r
n
i
)
1285
L
if
e
c
y
c
les
”
,
in
p
r
o
c
e
e
d
in
g
s
o
f
5
t
h
I
n
tern
a
ti
o
n
a
l
W
o
rk
sh
o
p
o
n
In
S
o
f
twa
re
En
g
in
e
e
rin
g
in
He
a
lt
h
Ca
re
(S
EHC),
P
p
.
12
-
1
9
,
2
0
1
3
.
[3
4
]
S
o
re
n
De
b
o
is,
T
h
o
m
a
s
Hi
ld
e
b
ra
n
d
t
a
n
d
M
o
r
ten
M
a
rq
u
a
rd
,
“
A
Ca
se
fo
r
De
c
la
ra
ti
v
e
Pr
o
c
e
ss
M
o
d
e
ll
i
n
g
:
Ag
il
e
De
v
e
lo
p
me
n
t
o
f
a
Gr
a
n
t
Ap
p
li
c
a
ti
o
n
S
y
ste
m”
,
in
p
ro
c
e
e
d
in
g
s
o
f
1
8
th
In
tern
a
ti
o
n
a
l
Co
n
f
e
re
n
c
e
W
o
rk
sh
o
p
s
a
n
d
De
m
o
n
stra
ti
o
n
s
o
n
En
ter
p
rise
Distrib
u
te
d
Ob
jec
t
C
o
m
p
u
ti
n
g
,
2
0
1
4
.
[3
5
]
T
.
D
y
b
a
,
E.
A
rish
o
lm
,
D.
S
jø
b
e
r
g
,
J.
Ha
n
n
a
y
,
F
.
S
h
u
ll
,
“
A
re
t
w
o
h
e
a
d
s b
e
tt
e
r
th
a
n
o
n
e
?
On
t
h
e
e
f
f
e
c
ti
v
e
n
e
ss
o
f
p
a
i
r
-
p
ro
g
ra
m
m
in
g
”
,
IEE
E
S
o
ft
w
a
r
e
,
V
o
l.
2
4
,
n
o
.
6
,
p
p
.
1
0
–
1
3
,
2
0
0
7
.
[3
6
]
H.
Erd
o
g
m
u
s,
M
.
M
o
risi
o
,
M
.
T
o
rc
h
ian
o
,
“
On
t
h
e
Ef
f
e
c
ti
v
e
n
e
ss
o
f
th
e
T
e
st
-
f
irst
A
p
p
ro
a
c
h
to
P
r
o
g
ra
m
m
in
g
”
,
IEE
E
T
ra
n
s
a
c
ti
o
n
s o
n
S
o
ft
w
a
r
e
En
g
in
e
e
rin
g
, V
o
l.
3
1
,
n
o
.
3
,
p
p
.
2
2
6
–
2
3
7
,
2
0
0
5
.
[3
7
]
A
rd
h
e
n
d
u
M
a
n
d
a
l
a
n
d
S
.
C.
P
a
l,
“
In
v
e
stig
a
ti
n
g
a
n
d
A
n
a
ly
sin
g
th
e
De
sire
d
Ch
a
ra
c
teristics
o
f
S
o
f
t
w
a
re
De
v
e
lo
p
m
e
n
t
L
i
f
e
c
y
c
le
(S
D
L
C)
M
o
d
e
ls”
,
In
ter
n
a
ti
o
n
a
l
J
o
u
rn
a
l
o
f
S
o
ft
wa
r
e
E
n
g
in
e
e
rin
g
Res
e
a
r
c
h
&
Pra
c
ti
c
e
s
,
V
o
l.
2
,
Iss
u
e
4
,
Oc
to
b
e
r
,
2
0
1
2
.
[3
8
]
M
a
rti
n
M
ich
lm
a
y
r
,
F
ra
n
c
is
Hu
n
t
,
Da
v
id
P
ro
b
e
rt,
“
Q
u
a
li
ty
Pra
c
ti
c
e
s
a
n
d
Pr
o
b
lem
s
in
Fr
e
e
S
o
ft
w
a
r
e
Pr
o
jec
ts”
,
P
r
o
c
e
e
d
in
g
s o
f
th
e
F
irst
In
ter
n
a
ti
o
n
a
l
C
o
n
f
e
re
n
c
e
o
n
Op
e
n
S
o
u
rc
e
S
y
st
e
m
s
G
e
n
o
v
a
,
1
1
th
-
1
5
t
h
Ju
ly
2
0
0
5
[3
9
]
A
lj
a
z
S
tare
“
Ag
il
e
Pr
o
jec
t
M
a
n
a
g
e
me
n
t
in
Pr
o
d
u
c
t
De
v
e
lo
p
me
n
t
Pr
o
jec
ts”
,
P
r
o
c
e
d
ia
-
S
o
c
ial
a
n
d
Be
h
a
v
io
ra
l
S
c
ien
c
e
s,
V
o
lu
m
e
1
1
9
,
1
9
M
a
rc
h
2
0
1
4
,
P
a
g
e
s 2
9
5
-
3
0
4
.
[4
0
]
A
n
d
re
i
A
n
tan
o
v
ich
,
A
n
a
sta
sia
S
h
e
y
k
o
&
Brian
Ka
tu
m
b
a
,
“
Bo
tt
len
e
c
k
s in
th
e
De
v
e
lo
p
m
e
n
t
L
i
f
e
C
y
c
l
e
o
f
a
F
e
a
tu
re
”
,
Ba
c
h
e
lo
r
o
f
S
c
ien
c
e
in
S
o
f
tw
a
r
e
En
g
in
e
e
rin
g
a
n
d
M
a
n
a
g
e
m
e
n
t,
T
h
e
sis Re
p
o
rt
No
.
2
0
1
0
:0
1
2
IS
S
N:
1
6
5
1
-
4
7
6
9
.
[4
1
]
Ba
rr
y
Bo
e
h
m
,
Rich
a
rd
T
u
rn
e
r
,
“
M
a
n
a
g
e
m
e
n
t
Ch
a
ll
e
n
g
e
s
to
Im
p
le
m
e
n
ti
n
g
A
g
il
e
P
r
o
c
e
ss
e
s
in
T
ra
d
it
io
n
a
l
De
v
e
lo
p
m
e
n
t
Or
g
a
n
iza
ti
o
n
s”
,
P
u
b
li
sh
e
d
b
y
th
e
IEE
E
C
o
m
p
u
ter S
o
c
iet
y
,
0
7
4
0
-
7
4
5
9
/0
5
/$
2
0
.
0
0
©
2
0
0
5
IE
EE
.
Evaluation Warning : The document was created with Spire.PDF for Python.