I
nte
rna
t
io
na
l J
o
urna
l o
f
E
lect
rica
l a
nd
Co
m
p
ute
r
E
ng
in
ee
ring
(
I
J
E
CE
)
Vo
l.
9
,
No
.
3
,
J
u
n
e
201
9
,
p
p
.
2006
~
2
0
1
7
I
SS
N:
2
0
8
8
-
8708
,
DOI
: 1
0
.
1
1
5
9
1
/
i
j
ec
e
.
v9
i
3
.
p
p
2
0
0
6
-
2017
2006
J
o
ur
na
l ho
m
ep
a
g
e
:
h
ttp
:
//ia
e
s
co
r
e
.
co
m/
jo
u
r
n
a
ls
/in
d
ex
.
p
h
p
/
I
JE
C
E
H
o
w
so
ft
w
a
re size
influ
ence
pro
du
ctivity
and pro
jec
t
dura
tion
M
ridul
B
ha
rdwa
j
1
,
Aj
a
y
Ra
na
2
,
Nee
ra
j
K
u
m
a
r
Sh
a
r
m
a
3
1,
2
Am
it
y
S
c
h
o
o
l
o
f
En
g
i
n
e
e
rin
g
a
n
d
T
e
c
h
n
o
l
o
g
y
,
Am
it
y
Un
iv
e
rsit
y
,
No
id
a
U
p
,
I
n
d
ia
3
HIMT
,
G
r
e
a
ter NOID
A
,
UP
,
In
d
ia
Art
icle
I
nfo
AB
ST
RAC
T
A
r
ticle
his
to
r
y:
R
ec
eiv
ed
J
an
1
4
,
2
0
1
8
R
ev
i
s
ed
Oct
2
5
,
2
0
1
8
A
cc
ep
ted
No
v
20
,
2
0
1
8
T
o
m
a
k
e
a
p
e
r
f
e
c
t
p
ro
jec
t
p
lan
,
th
e
so
f
t
w
a
re
siz
e
o
f
th
e
o
rd
e
r
f
ro
m
th
e
c
u
sto
m
e
r
is
th
e
m
o
st
i
m
p
o
rtan
t
fa
c
to
r.
T
h
e
b
ig
g
e
st
c
h
a
ll
e
n
g
e
f
o
r
th
e
p
ro
jec
t
m
a
n
a
g
e
r
is
to
e
sti
m
a
te
th
e
p
ro
jec
t
e
n
d
d
a
te
i
n
t
h
e
b
e
g
in
n
i
n
g
o
f
th
e
p
ro
jec
t
i.
e
.
in
p
r
o
jec
t
p
lan
n
in
g
p
h
a
se
w
it
h
re
a
li
stic
a
c
c
u
ra
c
y
.
A
p
a
rt
f
ro
m
o
t
h
e
r
m
a
jo
r
in
p
u
ts
to
e
stim
a
t
e
th
e
p
ro
jec
t
e
n
d
d
a
te,
e
x
p
e
c
t
e
d
tea
m
c
a
p
a
b
il
it
y
(p
ro
d
u
c
ti
v
it
y
)
a
n
d
e
sti
m
a
ted
so
ftw
a
r
e
siz
e
a
re
th
e
m
a
jo
r
in
p
u
ts
th
a
t
m
a
y
in
f
lu
e
n
c
e
th
e
p
ro
jec
t
e
n
d
d
a
te.
S
o
f
twa
re
si
z
e
is
o
n
e
o
f
th
e
m
o
st
sig
n
if
ica
n
t
in
d
e
p
e
n
d
e
n
t
m
e
tri
c
a
v
a
il
a
b
le
in
t
h
e
p
la
n
n
i
n
g
p
h
a
se
a
n
d
p
r
o
jec
t
m
a
n
a
g
e
r
h
a
s
to
e
stim
a
te
th
e
o
th
e
r
m
e
tri
c
s
b
a
se
d
o
n
t
h
e
in
it
ial
e
stim
a
ted
so
f
t
w
a
r
e
siz
e
.
T
h
e
re
is
n
o
d
irec
t
re
lati
o
n
s
h
ip
a
v
a
il
a
b
le
b
e
tw
e
e
n
so
f
t
w
a
r
e
siz
e
a
n
d
p
ro
jec
t
d
u
ra
ti
o
n
o
r
s
o
f
twa
re
siz
e
a
n
d
tea
m
p
ro
d
u
c
ti
v
it
y
,
h
o
w
e
v
e
r,
th
e
re
a
re
in
d
u
stry
d
a
ta
p
u
b
li
sh
e
d
b
y
Qu
a
n
ti
tativ
e
S
o
f
twa
re
M
a
n
a
g
e
m
e
n
t
a
n
d
IS
B
S
G
th
a
t
sh
o
w
s
h
o
w
th
e
se
m
e
tri
c
s
in
f
lu
e
n
c
e
e
a
c
h
o
th
e
r.
In
t
h
is
p
a
p
e
r,
u
sin
g
th
e
d
a
ta
p
u
b
li
sh
e
d
b
y
IS
BS
G
a
n
d
Qu
a
n
ti
tativ
e
S
o
f
t
w
a
re
M
a
n
a
g
e
m
e
n
t,
w
e
tr
y
to
sta
ti
stica
ll
y
e
sta
b
li
sh
h
o
w
p
ro
d
u
c
t
iv
it
y
a
n
d
p
ro
jec
t
d
u
ra
ti
o
n
a
re
in
f
lu
e
n
c
e
d
b
y
so
f
t
w
a
re
siz
e
.
W
e
h
a
v
e
d
o
n
e
li
n
e
a
r
re
g
re
ss
io
n
a
n
a
ly
sis
b
y
g
e
n
e
ra
ti
n
g
th
e
se
c
o
n
d
a
ry
d
a
ta
b
a
s
e
d
o
n
th
e
d
a
ta
p
u
b
li
sh
e
d
b
y
IS
BS
G
a
n
d
Qu
a
n
ti
tativ
e
S
o
f
tw
a
r
e
M
a
n
a
g
e
m
e
n
t.
L
in
e
a
r
r
e
g
re
ss
io
n
e
q
u
a
ti
o
n
v
a
li
d
a
ted
w
it
h
th
e
a
c
tu
a
l
p
ro
jec
t
d
a
ta
a
n
d
e
x
p
e
ri
m
e
n
tal
re
su
lt
s
su
g
g
e
st
th
a
t
th
a
t
p
ro
d
u
c
ti
v
it
y
i
s
sig
n
if
ica
n
tl
y
d
e
p
e
n
d
e
n
t
o
n
s
o
f
twa
re
siz
e
,
h
o
w
e
v
e
r,
p
ro
jec
t
d
u
ra
ti
o
n
d
o
e
s
n
o
t
sig
n
if
ica
n
tl
y
d
e
p
e
n
d
o
n
so
f
tw
a
r
e
siz
e
b
u
t
m
a
y
a
lso
b
e
d
e
p
e
n
d
e
n
t
o
n
o
th
e
r
m
e
tri
c
s li
k
e
tea
m
si
z
e
,
a
p
a
rt
f
ro
m
so
f
t
w
a
re
siz
e
.
K
ey
w
o
r
d
s
:
E
f
f
o
r
t
P
r
o
d
u
ctiv
it
y
P
r
o
j
ec
t d
u
r
atio
n
So
f
t
w
ar
e
s
ize
Co
p
y
rig
h
t
©
2
0
1
9
In
stit
u
te o
f
A
d
v
a
n
c
e
d
E
n
g
i
n
e
e
rin
g
a
n
d
S
c
ien
c
e
.
Al
l
rig
h
ts
re
se
rv
e
d
.
C
o
r
r
e
s
p
o
nd
ing
A
uth
o
r
:
Mr
id
u
l B
h
ar
d
w
aj
,
Am
it
y
Sc
h
o
o
l o
f
E
n
g
in
ee
r
i
n
g
an
d
T
ec
h
n
o
lo
g
y
,
Am
it
y
U
n
i
v
er
s
it
y
,
No
id
a
Up
,
I
n
d
ia.
E
m
ail:
m
r
id
u
l2
7
0
7
@
g
m
ail.
co
m
1.
I
NT
RO
D
UCT
I
O
N
A
ll
So
f
t
w
ar
e
an
d
I
n
f
o
r
m
at
io
n
T
ec
h
n
o
lo
g
y
Or
g
a
n
izat
io
n
s
ar
e
P
r
o
j
ec
t
B
ased
o
r
g
a
n
izatio
n
s
.
T
h
e
Or
g
an
izat
io
n
is
a
n
i
n
te
g
r
atio
n
o
f
P
r
o
j
ec
t
T
ea
m
s
w
o
r
k
i
n
g
i
n
ta
n
d
e
m
.
E
ac
h
Ma
n
a
g
er
w
h
et
h
er
v
er
tica
ll
y
o
r
h
o
r
izo
n
tall
y
al
ig
n
ed
h
as
to
w
o
r
k
an
d
d
eliv
er
p
r
o
j
ec
ts
w
it
h
v
ar
ied
s
co
p
e
an
d
s
ize.
E
s
tim
a
tio
n
o
n
th
e
p
r
o
j
ec
t
en
d
d
ate
at
t
h
e
b
e
g
i
n
n
i
n
g
o
f
t
h
e
p
r
o
j
ec
t,
n
o
t
o
n
l
y
e
n
s
u
r
es
a
s
m
o
o
th
ex
ec
u
tio
n
b
u
t
also
h
el
p
s
th
e
o
r
g
an
izatio
n
o
n
o
p
tim
u
m
u
t
ilizatio
n
o
f
av
a
ilab
le
r
eso
u
r
ce
s
an
d
an
en
h
an
ce
d
d
o
llar
v
alu
e
f
o
r
f
u
t
u
r
e
p
r
o
j
ec
ts
.
So
f
t
w
ar
e
s
iz
e
is
o
n
e
o
f
t
h
e
m
o
s
t si
g
n
if
ican
t
m
etr
ic
av
a
ilab
le
in
p
la
n
n
i
n
g
p
h
ase
a
n
d
p
r
o
j
ec
t
m
a
n
a
g
er
h
as
to
esti
m
ate
t
h
e
o
th
e
r
m
etr
ics
b
ased
o
n
th
e
i
n
itia
l
esti
m
ated
s
o
f
t
w
ar
e
s
ize.
T
h
e
i
m
p
o
r
tan
ce
o
f
s
o
f
t
w
ar
e
s
ize
is
ex
p
lain
ed
i
n
“
E
s
t
i
m
a
te
So
f
t
w
ar
e
Fu
n
ctio
n
al
Size
b
ef
o
r
e
R
eq
u
ir
e
m
en
t
p
h
ase
o
f
Dev
elo
p
m
e
n
t
L
i
f
e
C
y
cle”
[
1
]
.
“
I
m
a
g
i
n
e
y
o
u
ar
e
d
r
iv
in
g
o
n
an
i
m
p
o
r
t
an
t
tr
ip
to
a
d
i
s
tan
t
p
lace
w
h
er
e
y
o
u
h
a
v
e
n
o
t
b
ee
n
b
e
f
o
r
e.
Yo
u
w
ill
n
o
t
f
ee
l
co
m
f
o
r
tab
le
to
s
tar
t
s
u
ch
a
j
o
u
r
n
e
y
w
i
th
o
u
t
k
n
o
w
i
n
g
at
l
ea
s
t
th
e
g
en
er
al
d
ir
ec
tio
n
o
f
th
e
d
esti
n
atio
n
,
e.
g
.
d
is
tan
ce
,
t
h
e
av
ailab
le
r
o
u
te
s
,
r
o
ad
co
n
d
itio
n
s
etc.
A
r
m
ed
w
i
th
t
h
is
i
n
f
o
r
m
atio
n
an
d
a
g
o
o
d
m
ap
o
n
e
ca
n
f
ee
l
m
o
r
e
co
m
f
o
r
tab
le
ab
o
u
t
tak
i
n
g
th
e
tr
ip
.
T
h
ese
ar
e
ess
e
n
tial;
h
o
w
e
v
er
y
o
u
r
co
m
f
o
r
t
m
a
y
b
e
s
er
io
u
s
l
y
co
m
p
r
o
m
is
ed
d
u
r
in
g
th
e
j
o
u
r
n
e
y
.
R
o
ad
w
o
r
k
s
o
r
d
iv
er
s
io
n
s
ca
n
also
h
it
y
o
u
r
j
o
u
r
n
e
y
p
l
an
,
b
u
t
at
least
y
o
u
h
av
e
a
g
o
o
d
ch
an
ce
o
f
h
av
i
n
g
an
ea
r
l
y
w
ar
n
in
g
,
i
f
y
o
u
ch
ec
k
it
b
e
f
o
r
e
s
tar
ti
n
g
t
h
e
j
o
u
r
n
e
y
.
C
ar
b
r
ea
k
d
o
w
n
s
o
r
w
h
ee
l
p
u
n
ct
u
r
es
ca
n
b
e
les
s
p
r
ed
ictab
le,
b
u
t
th
e
y
ca
n
h
ap
p
en
.
Ma
n
ag
i
n
g
a
s
o
f
t
w
ar
e
p
r
o
j
ec
t
is
m
u
ch
h
ar
d
er
Evaluation Warning : The document was created with Spire.PDF for Python.
I
n
t J
E
lec
&
C
o
m
p
E
n
g
I
SS
N:
2
0
8
8
-
8708
Ho
w
s
o
ftw
a
r
e
s
iz
e
in
flu
en
ce
p
r
o
d
u
ctivity
a
n
d
p
r
o
ject
d
u
r
a
ti
o
n
(
Mr
id
u
l B
h
a
r
d
w
a
j
)
2007
th
an
p
la
n
n
i
n
g
a
tr
ip
.
T
h
e
b
ig
g
est
d
i
f
f
er
e
n
ce
is
th
a
t
n
o
m
at
ter
h
o
w
h
ar
d
y
o
u
tr
y
,
th
e
s
p
e
cif
icatio
n
s
ar
e
n
o
t
s
tatic
an
d
t
h
er
e
ar
e
ch
allen
g
e
s
in
p
r
ed
ictin
g
tea
m
p
r
o
d
u
cti
v
it
y
an
d
p
r
o
j
ec
t d
u
r
atio
n
.
”
E
ac
h
s
o
f
t
w
ar
e
d
ev
elo
p
m
e
n
t
p
r
o
j
ec
t
is
u
n
iq
u
e
an
d
p
o
s
s
e
s
s
d
i
f
f
er
en
t
ch
a
llen
g
es
to
c
o
n
tr
o
l
an
d
m
o
n
ito
r
p
r
o
j
ec
t
ex
ec
u
tio
n
.
T
h
e
p
r
o
j
ec
t
m
a
n
a
g
er
f
ac
es
m
aj
o
r
ch
allen
g
e
to
id
en
ti
f
y
th
e
i
m
p
o
r
ta
n
t
m
e
tr
ics
to
co
n
tr
o
l
an
d
m
o
n
ito
r
th
e
p
r
o
ject
ex
ec
u
tio
n
.
As
p
er
P
u
tn
am
,
L
a
w
r
e
n
ce
H.
,
an
d
W
ar
e
[
2
]
,
th
ese
m
etr
ics
ar
e
s
o
f
t
w
ar
e
s
ize,
e
f
f
o
r
t,
p
r
o
j
ec
t
d
u
r
atio
n
an
d
p
r
o
d
u
ctiv
it
y
.
T
h
ese
m
etr
ic
s
tell
s
p
r
o
j
ec
t
m
an
ag
er
ab
o
u
t
w
h
a
t
to
d
eliv
er
(
s
ize)
,
h
o
w
it
w
a
s
d
el
iv
er
ed
in
p
ast
(
p
r
o
d
u
ctiv
it
y
)
an
d
h
o
w
lo
n
g
w
ill
it
ta
k
e
to
d
eliv
er
w
it
h
c
u
r
r
en
t
tea
m
ca
p
ab
ilit
y
(
p
r
o
j
ec
t
d
u
r
atio
n
)
.
I
t
is
al
w
a
y
s
a
ch
a
llen
g
e
b
ef
o
r
e
th
e
p
r
o
j
ec
t
m
a
n
a
g
er
to
esti
m
a
te
th
e
s
e
m
etr
ics
b
ec
au
s
e
th
er
e
is
n
o
d
ir
ec
t
r
elatio
n
s
h
ip
a
m
o
n
g
t
h
ese
m
etr
ics,
h
o
w
e
v
er
,
th
er
e
ar
e
in
d
u
s
tr
y
d
ata
p
u
b
lis
h
ed
b
y
Q
u
a
n
titati
v
e
So
f
t
w
ar
e
Ma
n
a
g
e
m
e
n
t
a
n
d
I
SB
SG
t
h
at
s
h
o
w
s
h
o
w
th
e
s
e
m
e
tr
ics
i
n
f
lu
e
n
ce
ea
c
h
o
th
er
.
I
n
t
h
is
p
ap
er
,
u
s
i
n
g
t
h
e
d
ata
p
u
b
lis
h
e
d
b
y
I
SB
SG
a
n
d
Qu
an
t
itati
v
e
So
f
t
w
ar
e
Ma
n
ag
e
m
e
n
t,
w
e
tr
y
to
s
tatis
t
icall
y
e
s
tab
lis
h
h
o
w
p
r
o
d
u
ctiv
i
t
y
a
n
d
p
r
o
j
ec
t
d
u
r
atio
n
is
in
f
l
u
en
ce
d
b
y
s
o
f
t
w
ar
e
s
ize.
W
e
p
er
f
o
r
m
ed
th
e
s
tatis
tical
a
n
al
y
s
i
s
to
ac
h
iev
e
t
h
e
f
o
llo
w
in
g
a.
L
i
n
er
r
eg
r
ess
io
n
an
al
y
s
is
f
o
r
s
o
f
t
w
ar
e
s
ize
(
in
d
ep
en
d
e
n
t v
ar
i
ab
le)
an
d
p
r
o
d
u
ctiv
it
y
(
d
ep
en
d
en
t v
ar
iab
le)
b.
L
i
n
er
r
eg
r
es
s
io
n
a
n
al
y
s
i
s
f
o
r
s
o
f
t
w
ar
e
s
ize
(
in
d
ep
en
d
e
n
t
v
ar
iab
le)
an
d
p
r
o
j
ec
t
d
u
r
atio
n
(
d
ep
en
d
en
t
v
ar
iab
le)
c.
Ver
if
icatio
n
o
f
li
n
er
r
eg
r
ess
io
n
eq
u
atio
n
s
w
it
h
ac
t
u
al
d
ata
p
o
in
ts
2.
P
RO
B
L
E
M
ST
A
T
E
M
E
NT
Mo
s
t
o
f
t
h
e
So
f
t
w
ar
e
d
e
v
el
o
p
m
e
n
t
p
r
o
j
ec
ts
ar
e
co
n
ce
p
tu
alize
d
to
i
m
p
le
m
en
t
th
e
r
eq
u
ir
e
m
e
n
t
s
p
r
o
v
id
ed
b
y
t
h
e
b
u
s
i
n
es
s
u
s
er
s
.
User
s
co
u
ld
b
e
an
en
d
u
s
er
,
a
g
r
o
u
p
o
f
u
s
er
s
o
r
a
co
m
p
a
n
y
.
Usu
al
l
y
in
t
h
e
ag
e
o
f
B
2
B
C
o
m
m
er
ce
t
h
e
s
o
f
t
w
ar
e
d
e
v
elo
p
m
e
n
t
p
r
o
j
ec
t
s
ar
e
ess
e
n
tiall
y
tak
e
n
u
p
b
y
s
o
f
t
w
ar
e
i
n
d
u
s
tr
y
co
m
p
a
n
ies
a
n
d
th
er
e
ar
e
m
a
n
y
lo
ca
l
a
n
d
ex
ter
n
al
s
ta
k
e
h
o
l
d
er
s
to
th
e
p
r
o
j
ec
t.
T
h
e
s
tak
e
h
o
ld
er
s
ar
e
v
ar
ied
b
et
w
ee
n
tech
n
ical
a
n
d
n
o
n
-
te
ch
n
ica
l
p
eo
p
le.
Gen
er
all
y
,
th
e
m
ar
k
eti
n
g
tea
m
a
n
d
cu
s
to
m
e
r
in
ter
f
ac
i
n
g
tea
m
s
o
f
th
e
clien
t
o
r
d
er
s
o
f
t
w
ar
e.
T
h
e
s
co
p
e
o
f
a
s
o
f
t
w
ar
e
d
ev
elo
p
m
e
n
t
p
r
o
j
ec
t
m
a
y
b
e
b
y
th
e
v
ir
t
u
e
o
f
a
n
e
w
d
ev
elo
p
m
en
t
o
f
s
o
f
t
w
ar
e
o
r
en
h
a
n
ce
m
en
t
o
f
ex
i
s
ti
n
g
s
o
f
t
w
ar
e
d
ep
en
d
in
g
u
p
o
n
t
h
e
u
s
er
b
ase
an
d
th
eir
r
eq
u
ir
e
m
en
ts
.
T
h
e
b
u
s
i
n
es
s
u
s
er
w
a
n
t
s
th
e
s
e
r
eq
u
ir
e
m
en
t
s
(
m
o
s
t
o
f
t
h
e
s
e
ar
e
f
u
n
ct
io
n
al
in
n
atu
r
e)
to
b
e
i
m
p
le
m
en
ted
a
s
s
o
o
n
a
s
p
o
s
s
i
b
le,
h
o
w
ev
er
,
t
h
e
y
m
a
y
o
r
m
a
y
n
o
t
b
e
a
w
ar
e
ab
o
u
t
t
h
e
tec
h
n
ical
c
h
alle
n
g
es
th
at
w
o
u
ld
r
eq
u
ir
e
to
o
v
er
co
m
e
b
ef
o
r
e
it
ca
n
ac
t
u
all
y
b
e
d
eliv
er
ed
.
T
h
e
P
r
o
j
ec
t
Ma
n
ag
er
,
w
h
o
is
ac
co
u
n
tab
le
f
o
r
s
u
cc
e
s
s
f
u
l
co
m
p
letio
n
o
f
p
r
o
ject,
n
ee
d
s
to
esti
m
ate
th
e
p
r
o
ject
d
u
r
atio
n
an
d
th
e
to
tal
ef
f
o
r
ts
.
I
n
th
e
p
lan
n
i
n
g
p
h
ase,
p
r
o
j
ec
t
m
a
n
ag
er
f
ac
es
th
e
c
h
alle
n
g
e
to
esti
m
ate
t
h
e
p
r
o
j
ec
t
d
u
r
atio
n
to
co
m
p
let
e
th
e
p
r
o
j
ec
t.
On
l
y
m
etr
ics
av
a
ilab
le
is
th
e
f
u
n
cti
o
n
al
s
ize
th
at
ca
n
b
e
ca
lcu
late
d
b
ased
o
n
th
e
r
eq
u
ir
em
e
n
t
s
p
r
o
v
id
ed
b
y
th
e
u
s
er
,
h
o
w
ev
er
,
t
h
ese
r
eq
u
ir
e
m
e
n
t
s
ar
e
also
ex
p
ec
ted
to
b
e
c
h
a
n
g
ed
.
T
o
esti
m
a
te
t
h
e
p
r
o
j
ec
t
d
u
r
atio
n
,
P
r
o
j
ec
t
m
an
a
g
er
m
u
s
t
u
n
d
er
s
ta
n
d
h
is
tea
m
ca
p
ab
ilit
y
a
n
d
co
m
p
o
s
itio
n
.
T
ea
m
co
m
p
o
s
itio
n
a
n
d
ca
p
ab
ilit
y
ca
n
b
e
m
ea
s
u
r
ed
in
ter
m
s
o
f
p
r
o
d
u
ctiv
it
y
i.e
.
n
u
m
b
er
o
f
f
u
n
c
tio
n
p
o
in
ts
d
eli
v
er
ed
in
1
m
o
n
th
,
th
er
ef
o
r
e,
th
e
p
r
o
j
ec
t
m
an
a
g
er
n
ee
d
s
to
u
n
d
er
s
ta
n
d
h
o
w
h
e
ca
n
esti
m
ate
p
r
o
d
u
ctiv
it
y
a
n
d
p
r
o
j
ec
t
d
u
r
atio
n
u
s
in
g
th
e
s
o
f
t
w
ar
e
s
ize.
Un
f
o
r
tu
n
atel
y
,
m
o
s
t
o
f
th
e
ti
m
e
t
h
e
p
r
o
j
ec
t
m
a
n
a
g
er
d
o
es
n
o
t
h
a
v
e
a
n
y
m
eth
o
d
o
r
m
e
tr
ics
th
a
t
h
e
lp
h
i
m
i
n
esti
m
ati
n
g
t
h
e
p
r
o
j
ec
t
d
u
r
atio
n
an
d
p
r
o
d
u
ctiv
i
t
y
w
i
th
t
h
e
h
elp
o
f
s
o
f
t
w
ar
e
s
ize.
A
p
r
o
j
ec
t
m
a
n
ag
er
p
o
n
d
er
s
w
h
et
h
er
th
er
e
is
an
y
m
ea
s
u
r
ab
le
r
elatio
n
w
h
ich
e
x
is
ts
b
etw
ee
n
s
o
f
t
w
ar
e
s
ize
an
d
d
u
r
at
io
n
o
r
s
o
f
t
w
ar
e
s
ize
an
d
p
r
o
d
u
ctiv
it
y
.
3.
ST
UDY
O
B
J
E
C
T
I
V
E
Du
r
in
g
p
r
o
j
ec
t
ex
ec
u
tio
n
,
th
e
p
r
o
j
ec
t
m
a
n
ag
er
h
a
s
to
m
o
n
i
to
r
an
d
co
n
tr
o
l
t
h
e
f
o
llo
w
i
n
g
m
etr
ics
to
an
al
y
ze
t
h
e
i
m
p
ac
t o
n
esti
m
at
ed
p
r
o
j
ec
t
d
u
r
atio
n
an
d
th
e
tea
m
p
r
o
d
u
ctiv
it
y
.
T
h
e
y
ar
e:
a.
So
f
t
w
ar
e
s
ize
(
I
t is e
x
p
ec
ted
to
in
cr
ea
s
e
as th
e
p
r
o
j
ec
t p
r
o
g
r
ess
es)
b.
T
ea
m
Size
(
s
tab
le
tea
m
w
ill i
m
p
r
o
v
e
th
e
o
v
er
all
tea
m
p
r
o
d
u
cti
v
it
y
)
So
f
t
w
ar
e
Size
is
t
h
e
m
o
s
t
cr
it
ical
in
p
u
t
f
o
r
p
lan
n
i
n
g
a
n
d
r
o
llo
u
t
o
f
a
p
r
o
j
ec
t.
T
h
e
s
o
f
t
w
a
r
e
s
ize
is
m
ea
s
u
r
ab
le
an
d
it
is
co
n
s
id
er
ed
as
an
in
p
u
t
to
f
o
r
m
t
h
e
d
ev
el
o
p
m
e
n
t
tea
m
i.e
.
tea
m
s
ize
w
h
ich
in
t
u
r
n
d
ec
id
es
th
e
p
r
o
j
ec
t
d
u
r
atio
n
a
n
d
t
h
e
d
eliv
er
y
d
ate.
A
m
at
h
e
m
atica
l
m
o
d
el
w
ill
n
o
t
o
n
l
y
h
elp
t
h
e
p
r
o
j
ec
t
m
an
a
g
er
to
estab
lis
h
a
co
r
r
elatio
n
b
et
w
ee
n
s
o
f
t
w
ar
e
s
ize
a
n
d
t
h
e
p
r
o
j
ec
t
d
u
r
atio
n
b
u
t
also
w
i
ll
h
e
lp
p
r
o
j
ec
t
m
an
a
g
er
s
to
d
eliv
er
th
e
p
r
o
j
ec
t
o
n
tim
e.
A
cc
u
r
ac
y
o
f
t
h
e
ca
lc
u
latio
n
w
il
l
tr
i
m
d
o
w
n
p
r
o
j
ec
t
lo
s
s
es
an
d
w
ill
e
n
ab
le
o
r
g
an
izatio
n
s
to
d
eli
v
er
s
o
f
t
w
ar
e
w
i
th
i
n
a
g
r
ee
d
ti
m
e
lin
e
s
.
I
s
th
er
e
a
m
at
h
e
m
atica
l
c
o
r
r
elatio
n
b
et
w
ee
n
s
o
f
t
w
ar
e
s
ize
an
d
p
r
o
d
u
ctiv
it
y
a
n
d
th
e
p
r
o
j
ec
t
d
u
r
atio
n
?
I
f
y
es,
h
o
w
it
ca
n
b
e
ca
lcu
l
ated
an
d
m
ea
s
u
r
ed
ac
cu
r
atel
y
?
T
h
is
is
p
r
o
b
lem
wh
ich
t
h
e
au
t
h
o
r
s
ad
d
r
ess
in
th
i
s
p
ar
ticu
lar
s
tu
d
y
.
T
h
e
o
b
j
ec
tiv
e
o
f
th
e
s
t
u
d
y
is
to
p
er
f
o
r
m
d
ata
an
al
y
s
i
s
to
d
ev
elo
p
in
-
d
ep
th
u
n
d
er
s
tan
d
i
n
g
o
f
s
o
f
t
w
ar
e
s
ize
in
f
l
u
e
n
ce
o
n
p
r
o
d
u
ctiv
it
y
a
n
d
p
r
o
j
ec
t d
u
r
atio
n
.
Evaluation Warning : The document was created with Spire.PDF for Python.
I
SS
N
:
2
0
8
8
-
8708
I
n
t J
E
lec
&
C
o
m
p
E
n
g
,
Vo
l.
9
,
No
.
3
,
J
u
n
e
2
0
1
9
:
2
0
0
6
-
2
0
1
7
2008
a.
I
s
th
er
e
an
y
co
-
r
elatio
n
b
et
w
e
en
p
r
o
d
u
ctiv
it
y
an
d
s
o
f
t
w
ar
e
s
ize?
b.
C
an
w
e
a
s
s
u
m
e
h
i
g
h
er
tea
m
p
r
o
d
u
ctiv
it
y
f
o
r
b
ig
p
r
o
j
ec
ts
?
c.
I
s
th
er
e
an
y
co
-
r
elati
o
n
b
et
w
e
en
p
r
o
j
ec
t
d
u
r
atio
n
an
d
s
o
f
t
w
a
r
e
s
ize?
Ke
y
So
f
t
w
ar
e
d
e
v
elo
p
m
e
n
t
m
etr
ics
li
k
e
e
f
f
o
r
ts
,
p
r
o
j
ec
t
d
u
r
atio
n
,
p
r
o
j
ec
t
co
s
t
etc.
ar
e
d
ep
en
d
en
t
o
n
s
o
f
t
w
ar
e
s
ize
a
n
d
p
r
o
d
u
ctiv
it
y
.
Ou
r
s
t
u
d
y
i
s
an
atte
m
p
t
to
f
i
n
d
th
e
an
s
w
er
o
f
ab
o
v
e
m
e
n
tio
n
q
u
est
io
n
s
.
W
e
ai
m
to
a
n
al
y
ze
d
ata
p
u
b
li
s
h
ed
b
y
in
d
u
s
tr
y
o
f
v
ar
io
u
s
p
r
o
j
ec
t
s
an
d
ar
r
iv
e
at
m
at
h
e
m
a
tical
s
o
lu
tio
n
to
e
s
tab
lis
h
th
e
i
n
f
lu
e
n
ce
o
f
s
o
f
t
w
ar
e
s
ize
o
n
th
e
p
r
o
d
u
cti
v
it
y
o
f
t
h
e
p
r
o
ject
as
w
ell
a
s
h
o
w
i
t
i
m
p
ac
t
th
e
p
r
o
j
ec
t
d
u
r
atio
n
.
T
h
is
s
t
u
d
y
w
i
ll
h
elp
th
e
s
o
f
t
w
ar
e
p
r
o
f
es
s
io
n
al
s
a
n
d
I
T
Pr
o
j
ec
t
Ma
n
ag
er
s
w
o
r
ld
w
id
e
in
p
r
o
ac
tiv
it
y
p
la
n
n
in
g
an
d
m
iti
g
ate
t
h
e
r
is
k
if
a
n
y
.
T
ec
h
n
ica
l C
h
alle
n
g
e
s
Ma
j
o
r
ch
allen
g
e
to
ac
h
ie
v
e
t
h
e
r
esear
ch
o
b
j
ec
tiv
e
w
as
t
h
e
a
v
ailab
ilit
y
o
f
ac
t
u
al
p
r
i
m
ar
y
d
ataset
f
o
r
s
tatis
t
ical
a
n
al
y
s
i
s
.
W
e
h
av
e
u
s
ed
s
ec
o
n
d
ar
y
d
ata
t
h
at
w
a
s
g
en
er
ated
u
s
in
g
th
e
s
tat
is
tic
s
(
m
ea
n
an
d
s
ta
n
d
ar
d
d
ev
iatio
n
)
p
u
b
li
s
h
ed
b
y
I
SB
SG.
Data
w
a
s
g
en
er
ated
u
s
i
n
g
th
e
Mi
n
i
tab
to
o
l
a
n
d
d
ata
w
as
a
s
s
u
m
ed
as
n
o
r
m
all
y
d
is
tr
ib
u
ted
.
4.
DE
F
I
N
I
T
I
O
N
4
.
1
.
So
f
t
w
a
re
s
ize
So
f
t
w
ar
e
Size
i
s
t
h
e
m
e
as
u
r
e
o
f
f
u
n
ct
io
n
alit
y
th
at
w
ill
b
e
d
eliv
er
ed
b
y
s
o
f
t
w
ar
e
an
d
t
h
at
ca
n
b
e
v
alid
ated
b
y
en
d
u
s
er
o
f
t
h
e
s
o
f
t
w
ar
e.
I
t
is
a
n
u
m
er
i
ca
l
m
ea
s
u
r
e
o
f
f
u
n
ctio
n
a
l
an
d
n
o
n
-
f
u
n
ctio
n
al
r
eq
u
ir
e
m
en
ts
.
So
f
t
w
ar
e
s
ize
i
s
an
i
n
d
ep
en
d
en
t
m
etr
ic
a
n
d
al
l
o
th
er
m
etr
ics
ca
n
b
e
v
i
e
w
ed
as
f
u
n
ctio
n
o
f
t
h
e
s
o
f
t
w
ar
e
s
ize.
So
f
t
w
ar
e
Size
o
n
l
y
d
ep
en
d
s
o
n
w
h
at
to
d
eliv
e
r
r
ath
er
o
n
h
o
w
to
d
eliv
er
.
I
f
s
o
f
t
w
ar
e
s
ize
o
f
t
w
o
p
r
o
j
ec
ts
ar
e
s
am
e
t
h
en
it
d
o
es
n
o
t
i
m
p
l
y
t
h
at
b
o
th
t
h
e
p
r
o
j
ec
ts
ar
e
s
a
m
e
o
r
th
e
y
d
eli
v
er
th
e
s
a
m
e
r
eq
u
ir
e
m
e
n
t
b
u
t
it
o
n
l
y
in
d
icate
s
t
h
at
b
o
th
s
o
f
t
w
ar
e
ar
e
o
f
s
a
m
e
s
ize.
S
o
f
t
w
ar
e
Size
i
s
t
h
e
i
m
p
o
r
tan
t
m
etr
ic
to
e
s
ti
m
ate
o
th
er
m
etr
ic
s
e.
g
.
to
tal
e
f
f
o
r
t
an
d
p
r
o
j
ec
t
d
u
r
atio
n
.
I
t
al
w
a
y
s
r
e
m
ain
s
a
c
h
alle
n
g
e
to
es
ti
m
a
t
e
th
e
s
o
f
t
w
ar
e
s
ize
in
t
h
e
b
eg
i
n
n
i
n
g
o
f
t
h
e
p
r
o
j
ec
t
b
ec
au
s
e
o
n
l
y
h
i
g
h
le
v
el
r
eq
u
i
r
e
m
en
t
s
ar
e
av
ailab
le
d
u
r
i
n
g
t
h
e
p
r
e
-
r
eq
u
ir
e
m
en
t
p
h
ase
o
f
t
h
e
p
r
o
j
ec
t,
h
o
w
e
v
er
,
in
s
ize
-
b
ased
p
r
o
j
ec
t
esti
m
atio
n
,
d
etail
s
o
f
s
o
f
t
w
ar
e
r
eq
u
ir
e
m
e
n
t
ar
e
n
o
t
i
m
p
o
r
tan
t
b
u
t
r
elati
v
e
s
ize
o
f
t
h
e
p
r
o
j
ec
t
is
s
u
f
f
icien
t
f
o
r
i
n
it
ial
esti
m
ate
o
f
t
h
e
m
e
tr
ics.
Fo
r
ex
a
m
p
le
w
e
m
a
y
n
o
t b
e
ab
le
to
esti
m
ate
t
h
e
s
o
f
t
w
ar
e
s
ize
o
f
p
r
o
p
o
s
ed
p
r
o
j
ec
t a
s
d
etail
s
o
f
t
w
ar
e
r
eq
u
ir
e
m
en
t
s
ar
e
n
o
t a
v
ailab
le,
b
u
t
w
e
ca
n
co
m
p
ar
e
t
h
e
co
m
p
l
ex
it
y
o
f
th
e
p
r
o
p
o
s
ed
p
r
o
j
ec
t w
it
h
t
h
e
alr
ea
d
y
d
eliv
er
ed
p
r
o
j
ec
ts
.
T
h
is
w
i
ll
h
elp
th
e
p
r
o
j
ec
t
m
a
n
ag
er
to
estab
li
s
h
in
itial
b
a
s
eli
n
e
o
f
k
e
y
m
e
tr
ics
b
ased
o
n
t
h
e
p
as
t
p
er
f
o
r
m
an
ce
o
f
t
h
e
s
i
m
ila
r
p
r
o
j
ec
ts
.
T
h
er
e
ar
e
m
a
n
y
s
o
f
t
w
ar
e
s
iz
in
g
m
eth
o
d
s
v
iz.
f
u
n
c
tio
n
p
o
in
ts
,
u
s
e
ca
s
e
p
o
in
ts
,
s
t
o
r
y
p
o
in
t
s
(
f
o
r
ag
il
e
p
r
o
j
ec
ts
)
,
o
b
j
ec
t
b
ased
c
o
u
n
t
[
3
]
-
[
6
]
e
tc.
b
u
t
I
FP
UG
f
u
n
c
ti
o
n
p
o
in
t
is
t
h
e
m
o
s
t
w
id
el
y
u
s
ed
an
d
ac
ce
p
tab
le
s
o
f
t
w
ar
e
s
izi
n
g
m
e
th
o
d
.
4
.
2
.
P
r
o
du
ct
iv
it
y
o
r
ra
t
e
o
f
deliv
er
y
E
f
f
o
r
t
r
eq
u
ir
ed
to
d
eliv
er
u
n
it
s
o
f
t
w
ar
e
s
ize
i
s
d
ef
i
n
ed
as
P
r
o
d
u
ctiv
it
y
o
r
R
ate
o
f
d
eliv
er
y
.
P
r
o
d
u
ctiv
it
y
is
r
eq
u
ir
e
to
esti
m
ate
th
e
o
v
er
all
p
r
o
j
ec
t
ef
f
o
r
t
to
d
eliv
er
th
e
p
r
o
j
ec
t.
P
r
o
d
u
ctiv
it
y
d
ep
en
d
s
o
n
t
h
e
v
ar
io
u
s
f
ac
to
r
li
k
e
tea
m
e
x
p
er
ien
ce
o
r
ca
p
ab
ilit
y
to
w
o
r
k
in
s
i
m
ilar
tec
h
n
o
lo
g
y
o
r
d
o
m
ai
n
,
th
e
tea
m
w
ill
b
e
m
o
r
e
p
r
o
d
u
ctiv
e
i
f
th
e
y
h
a
v
e
ea
r
lier
w
o
r
k
ed
o
n
s
i
m
ilar
t
ec
h
n
o
lo
g
y
o
r
d
o
m
a
in
.
I
t
also
d
ep
en
d
s
o
n
th
e
b
u
s
i
n
ess
p
r
o
ce
s
s
u
n
d
er
s
ta
n
d
in
g
a
s
it
will
h
elp
to
tr
an
s
late
t
h
e
b
u
s
i
n
e
s
s
r
eq
u
ir
e
m
en
ts
to
tec
h
n
ical
r
eq
u
ir
e
m
e
n
ts
.
I
f
t
h
e
s
a
m
e
tea
m
h
ad
ea
r
lier
w
o
r
k
e
d
to
g
eth
er
th
e
n
it
w
il
l
h
elp
i
n
i
m
p
r
o
v
in
g
t
h
e
p
r
o
d
u
ctiv
it
y
a
s
it
w
ill
r
ed
u
ce
t
h
e
ti
m
e
r
eq
u
ir
ed
to
r
eso
l
v
e
t
h
e
co
llab
o
r
atio
n
is
s
u
es.
I
t
is
c
h
a
llen
g
in
g
to
d
ef
i
n
e
tea
m
p
r
o
d
u
cti
v
it
y
a
n
d
to
g
i
v
e
p
r
o
d
u
ctiv
it
y
a
n
u
m
b
er
b
u
t
it
a
n
ess
e
n
tial
m
etr
ic
t
h
at
n
o
t
o
n
l
y
n
ee
d
to
b
e
esti
m
a
ted
in
t
h
e
b
eg
in
n
i
n
g
b
u
t
also
n
ee
d
to
b
e
co
n
s
is
ten
t
l
y
m
o
n
it
o
r
ed
d
u
r
in
g
t
h
e
p
r
o
j
ec
t
lif
e
c
y
cle.
T
h
e
p
r
o
j
ec
t
m
an
a
g
er
ca
n
u
s
e
t
h
e
h
is
to
r
ica
l
d
ata
o
f
s
i
m
ilar
p
r
o
j
ec
ts
to
esti
m
atio
n
th
e
p
r
o
d
u
ctiv
it
y
o
f
th
e
tea
m
.
As
m
o
s
t
o
f
th
e
p
r
o
d
u
c
tiv
it
y
n
u
m
b
er
s
ar
e
p
u
b
lis
h
ed
in
r
a
n
g
e
s
o
p
r
o
j
ec
t
m
a
n
ag
er
s
h
o
u
ld
ca
r
ef
u
ll
y
c
h
o
s
e
th
e
p
r
o
d
u
cti
v
it
y
n
u
m
b
er
w
it
h
i
n
t
h
at
r
an
g
e.
Fig
u
r
e
1
[
7
]
ex
p
lain
h
o
w
p
r
o
d
u
cti
v
it
y
ca
n
b
e
u
s
ed
to
d
r
iv
e
th
e
o
v
er
all
p
r
o
j
ec
t e
f
f
o
r
ts
.
I
f
t
h
er
e
is
u
n
ce
r
tain
t
y
to
esta
b
lis
h
t
h
e
tea
m
p
r
o
d
u
cti
v
it
y
t
h
en
I
ter
ati
v
e
d
ev
elo
p
m
e
n
t
m
o
d
el
is
m
o
r
e
p
r
ef
er
ab
le
to
w
ater
f
a
ll
m
o
d
el.
I
n
w
ater
f
all
m
o
d
el
ac
tu
al
p
r
o
d
u
cti
v
it
y
o
f
th
e
tea
m
w
il
l
o
n
l
y
b
e
k
n
o
w
n
af
ter
t
h
e
co
n
s
tr
u
ct
io
n
p
h
ase
s
o
p
r
o
j
ec
t
m
an
a
g
e
w
ill
n
o
t
f
i
n
d
a
n
y
o
p
p
o
r
tu
n
it
y
to
r
e
-
d
ef
in
e
t
h
e
p
r
o
d
u
ctiv
it
y
n
u
m
b
er
a
n
d
h
en
ce
t
h
e
o
th
er
k
e
y
m
etr
ic
s
(
ef
f
o
r
t
an
d
ti
m
e)
,
h
o
w
e
v
er
,
iter
a
tiv
e
d
ev
elo
p
m
en
t
m
o
d
el
p
r
o
v
id
e
p
r
o
j
ec
t
m
an
a
g
er
th
e
o
p
p
o
r
tu
n
it
y
to
r
e
-
d
ef
i
n
e
t
h
ese
k
e
y
m
etr
ics.
Mr
id
u
l
B
h
ar
d
w
aj
an
d
A
j
a
y
R
an
a
[
8]
-
[
1
1
]
ex
p
lain
s
h
o
w
ef
f
o
r
t,
s
ch
ed
u
le
an
d
p
r
o
j
ec
t
d
u
r
atio
n
s
h
o
u
ld
b
e
r
e
-
d
ef
in
e
u
s
i
n
g
iter
a
tiv
e
m
o
d
el
as
s
h
o
w
n
in
Fi
g
u
r
e
2
.
Evaluation Warning : The document was created with Spire.PDF for Python.
I
n
t J
E
lec
&
C
o
m
p
E
n
g
I
SS
N:
2
0
8
8
-
8708
Ho
w
s
o
ftw
a
r
e
s
iz
e
in
flu
en
ce
p
r
o
d
u
ctivity
a
n
d
p
r
o
ject
d
u
r
a
ti
o
n
(
Mr
id
u
l B
h
a
r
d
w
a
j
)
2009
F
ig
u
r
e
1
.
Dr
iv
in
g
e
f
f
o
r
ts
u
s
i
n
g
s
ize
an
d
p
r
o
d
u
ctiv
it
y
Fig
u
r
e
2
.
I
ter
ativ
e
m
o
d
el
to
r
e
-
d
ef
i
n
e
e
f
f
o
r
t a
n
d
ti
m
e
d
u
r
i
n
g
p
r
o
j
ec
t lif
e
c
y
cle
4
.
3
.
P
r
o
j
ec
t
du
ra
t
io
n
P
r
o
j
ec
t
ca
len
d
ar
d
u
r
atio
n
r
ep
r
esen
ts
ti
m
e
r
eq
u
ir
ed
to
co
m
p
lete
th
e
p
r
o
j
ec
t.
P
r
o
j
ec
t
d
u
r
atio
n
i
s
t
h
e
esti
m
atio
n
o
f
p
r
o
j
ec
t
en
d
d
at
e
f
o
r
g
iv
e
n
p
r
o
j
ec
t
s
tar
t
d
ate
an
d
esti
m
ate
th
e
d
ate
w
h
e
n
w
e
ca
n
d
eli
v
er
y
t
h
e
p
r
o
j
ec
t.
I
t
m
u
s
t
b
e
u
n
d
er
s
to
o
d
th
at
p
r
o
j
ec
t
d
u
r
at
io
n
an
d
to
tal
p
r
o
j
ec
t
ef
f
o
r
t
ar
e
n
o
t
in
ter
ch
an
g
ea
b
le
m
etr
ic.
T
h
er
e
is
n
o
d
ir
ec
t
r
elatio
n
s
h
i
p
w
h
ic
h
ex
i
s
ts
b
et
w
ee
n
ti
m
e
an
d
ef
f
o
r
t.
I
t
m
u
s
t
b
e
u
n
d
er
s
t
o
o
d
th
at
b
y
ad
d
in
g
m
o
r
e
tea
m
m
e
m
b
er
s
w
e
ca
n
o
n
l
y
r
ed
u
ce
th
e
o
v
er
all
p
r
o
ject
d
u
r
atio
n
to
a
ce
r
tain
le
v
el
b
u
t
ad
d
in
g
m
o
r
e
r
eso
u
r
ce
s
m
a
y
r
es
u
lt
in
lo
n
g
e
r
p
r
o
j
ec
t
d
u
r
atio
n
an
d
in
cr
ea
s
e
co
s
t.
e.
g
if
to
tal
esti
m
ated
p
r
o
j
ec
t
ef
f
o
r
t
is
1
2
p
er
s
o
n
m
o
n
t
h
s
an
d
th
er
e
is
a
p
r
o
j
ec
t
team
o
f
4
p
eo
p
le.
I
n
th
i
s
ca
s
e
esti
m
ated
p
r
o
j
ec
t
d
u
r
atio
n
w
ill
b
e
3
m
o
n
t
h
s
p
r
o
v
id
ed
th
er
e
is
n
o
p
lan
n
ed
id
le
ti
m
e.
W
e
ca
n
’
t
d
eliv
er
t
h
is
p
r
o
j
ec
t
in
o
n
e
m
o
n
th
w
it
h
1
2
m
e
m
b
er
tea
m
b
ec
au
s
e
ad
d
in
g
m
o
r
e
m
e
m
b
er
w
ill
n
o
t
o
n
l
y
ad
d
n
e
w
co
m
m
u
n
icatio
n
ch
a
n
n
els
b
u
t
also
in
cr
ea
s
e
th
e
in
te
g
r
atio
n
e
f
f
o
r
t.
T
h
is
r
elat
i
o
n
s
h
ip
m
u
s
t
b
e
u
n
d
er
s
to
o
d
an
d
it
is
b
etter
to
h
a
v
e
an
o
p
tim
a
l
tea
m
s
ize.
Fig
u
r
e
3
[
7
]
d
escr
ib
e
th
e
r
elati
o
n
s
h
ip
b
et
w
ee
n
T
ea
m
s
ize
a
n
d
P
r
o
j
ec
t
d
u
r
atio
n
,
in
cr
ea
s
e
i
n
tea
m
s
ize
w
i
ll
h
elp
in
r
ed
u
cin
g
t
h
e
o
v
er
all
p
r
o
j
ec
t
d
u
r
atio
n
o
n
l
y
til
l
p
o
in
t
o
f
r
ef
l
ec
tio
n
b
u
t
in
cr
ea
s
e
i
n
tea
m
s
iz
e
b
ey
o
n
d
t
h
e
p
o
in
t
o
f
r
ef
lectio
n
w
il
l
in
cr
ea
s
e
t
h
e
p
r
o
j
ec
t
d
u
r
atio
n
.
Pro
j
ec
t
m
an
a
g
er
s
m
u
s
t
u
n
d
er
s
tan
d
th
e
p
o
in
t
o
f
r
ef
lectio
n
as
i
t
w
il
l
h
e
lp
h
i
m
to
co
m
m
i
t
ti
m
e
lin
es
w
it
h
p
r
o
j
ec
t
s
tak
eh
o
ld
er
s
.
I
t
is
n
o
t
ea
s
y
to
id
en
tify
t
h
e
p
o
in
t
o
f
r
e
f
lectio
n
b
u
t
w
o
r
k
b
r
ea
k
d
o
w
n
s
tr
u
ct
u
r
e
o
r
Delp
h
i
tech
n
iq
u
es
ca
n
h
elp
p
r
o
j
ec
t
m
a
n
ag
er
i
n
id
en
tify
i
n
g
t
h
e
o
p
ti
m
al
tea
m
s
ize.
Fig
u
r
e
3
.
Ho
w
in
cr
ea
s
e
in
tea
m
s
ize
w
i
ll i
m
p
ac
t p
r
o
j
ec
t d
u
r
atio
n
?
5.
RE
L
AT
E
D
WO
RK
As
p
er
P
u
tn
a
m
,
L
a
w
r
e
n
ce
H.
,
an
d
W
ar
e
[
2
]
,
s
o
f
t
w
ar
e
s
ize,
ef
f
o
r
t,
p
r
o
j
ec
t
d
u
r
atio
n
an
d
p
r
o
d
u
ctiv
it
y
ar
e
th
e
k
e
y
m
etr
ic
s
f
o
r
m
o
n
ito
r
in
g
a
n
d
co
n
tr
o
l
o
f
s
o
f
t
w
ar
e
d
ev
e
lo
p
m
en
t
p
r
o
j
ec
t.
T
h
er
e
is
n
o
d
ir
ec
t
Evaluation Warning : The document was created with Spire.PDF for Python.
I
SS
N
:
2
0
8
8
-
8708
I
n
t J
E
lec
&
C
o
m
p
E
n
g
,
Vo
l.
9
,
No
.
3
,
J
u
n
e
2
0
1
9
:
2
0
0
6
-
2
0
1
7
2010
r
elatio
n
s
h
ip
a
m
o
n
g
th
e
s
e
m
et
r
ics,
h
o
w
ev
er
,
t
h
er
e
ar
e
i
n
d
u
s
tr
y
d
ata
av
ai
lab
le
th
a
t
s
h
o
w
s
h
o
w
th
e
s
e
m
etr
ic
s
in
f
lu
e
n
ce
ea
c
h
o
th
er
.
5
.
1
.
Da
t
a
pu
bli
s
hed by
q
ua
n
t
it
a
t
iv
e
s
o
f
t
wa
re
m
a
na
g
e
m
e
nt
Qu
a
n
titati
v
e
So
f
t
w
ar
e
Ma
n
ag
e
m
en
t
(
QSM)
[
1
2
]
h
as
p
u
b
li
s
h
ed
th
e
d
ata
b
ased
o
n
th
e
s
tu
d
y
o
f
2
,
2
3
1
clo
s
ed
p
r
o
j
ec
ts
.
P
r
o
j
ec
ts
ar
e
cl
ass
i
f
ied
as
n
e
w
d
ev
e
lo
p
m
en
t,
Ma
j
o
r
/Min
o
r
en
h
an
ce
m
e
n
t,
C
o
n
v
er
s
io
n
o
r
Ma
in
te
n
an
ce
p
r
o
j
ec
t
b
ased
o
n
th
e
r
atio
o
f
n
e
w
f
u
n
c
tio
n
ali
t
y
to
b
e
ad
d
ed
v
er
s
u
s
to
tal
f
u
n
ctio
n
al
it
y
(
ad
d
ed
,
m
o
d
i
f
ied
an
d
d
elete
d
)
.
T
a
b
le
1
s
h
o
w
s
t
h
e
m
ed
ia
n
p
r
o
j
ec
t m
etr
ics f
o
r
v
ar
io
u
s
p
r
o
j
ec
t ty
p
e.
a.
Ne
w
De
v
elo
p
m
e
n
t (
m
o
r
e
t
h
an
7
5
% n
e
w
f
u
n
ct
io
n
alit
y
)
b.
Ma
j
o
r
E
n
h
an
ce
m
e
n
t (
n
e
w
f
u
n
ctio
n
alit
y
b
et
w
ee
n
2
5
%
-
7
5
%)
c.
Min
o
r
E
n
h
a
n
ce
m
e
n
t (
n
e
w
f
u
n
ctio
n
alit
y
b
et
w
ee
n
5
%
-
2
5
%)
d.
C
o
n
v
er
s
io
n
(
les
s
t
h
an
5
%
f
u
n
c
tio
n
alit
y
)
s
e.
Ma
in
te
n
an
ce
(
No
n
e
w
f
u
n
c
tio
n
alit
y
)
T
ab
le
1
.
Me
d
ian
Pro
j
ec
t M
etr
i
cs f
o
r
Var
io
u
s
P
r
o
j
ec
t
T
y
p
e
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
Ty
p
e
M
e
d
i
a
n
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
M
e
t
r
i
c
s
N
e
w
D
e
v
e
l
o
p
me
n
t
M
a
j
o
r
En
h
a
n
c
e
me
n
t
M
i
n
o
r
En
h
a
n
c
e
me
n
t
C
o
n
v
e
r
si
o
n
M
a
i
n
t
e
n
a
n
c
e
%
o
f
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
1
6
%
6
1
%
1
4
%
7%
2%
M
e
d
i
a
n
S
i
z
e
(
F
P
)
2
9
1
.
0
0
1
1
9
.
0
0
1
5
3
.
0
0
1
0
9
.
0
0
6
8
.
0
0
M
e
d
i
a
n
Ef
f
o
r
t
M
o
n
t
h
s
2
9
.
7
0
1
9
.
3
0
2
8
.
1
0
2
3
.
4
0
1
8
.
6
0
M
e
d
i
a
n
%
F
u
n
c
t
i
o
n
a
l
Ef
f
o
r
t
s
1
2
%
1
1
%
1
2
%
1
0
%
1
9
%
M
e
d
i
a
n
P
r
o
d
u
c
t
i
v
i
t
y
F
P
/
P
M
9
.
1
6
5
.
7
9
5
.
1
9
5
.
0
6
2
.
7
M
e
d
i
a
n
D
u
r
a
t
i
o
n
7
.
5
7
7
.
2
3
6
.
4
2
6
.
4
3
4
.
7
3
M
e
d
i
a
n
D
e
f
e
c
t
s
37
16
3
8
.
5
35
16
Data
s
h
o
w
s
,
R
ate
o
f
d
eliv
er
y
(
p
r
o
d
u
ctiv
it
y
)
is
h
i
g
h
er
f
o
r
n
e
w
d
ev
elo
p
m
e
n
t
p
r
o
j
ec
ts
co
m
p
ar
ed
to
m
ai
n
ten
a
n
ce
a
n
d
e
n
h
a
n
ce
m
e
n
t
p
r
o
j
ec
ts
.
P
r
o
d
u
ctiv
it
y
(
r
ate
o
f
d
eli
v
er
y
)
f
o
r
n
e
w
d
ev
e
lo
p
m
e
n
t
p
r
o
j
ec
ts
is
3
ti
m
e
s
to
th
e
p
r
o
d
u
ctiv
it
y
(
r
at
e
o
f
d
eliv
er
y
)
o
f
m
ai
n
te
n
a
n
c
e
p
r
o
j
ec
ts
an
d
5
0
%
m
o
r
e
th
an
p
r
o
d
u
ctiv
it
y
o
f
en
h
a
n
ce
m
en
t
p
r
o
j
ec
ts
,
h
o
w
e
v
er
,
th
er
e
ar
e
m
o
r
e
d
ef
ec
ts
in
j
ec
ted
in
d
ev
elo
p
m
e
n
t
p
r
o
j
ec
ts
co
m
p
ar
e
to
m
ai
n
ten
a
n
ce
p
r
o
j
ec
ts
.
Data
s
h
o
w
s
Fi
g
u
r
e
4
,
Fig
u
r
e
5
an
d
Fig
u
r
e
6
th
at
m
ed
ia
n
n
u
m
b
er
o
f
d
ef
ec
ts
f
o
r
n
e
w
d
ev
elo
p
m
e
n
t p
r
o
j
ec
ts
ar
e
m
o
r
e
th
an
d
o
u
b
le
f
o
r
n
u
m
b
er
o
f
d
ef
ec
ts
f
o
r
m
ai
n
te
n
an
ce
p
r
o
j
ec
t
s
.
Fig
u
r
e
7
s
h
o
w
s
h
o
w
p
r
o
d
u
ct
iv
it
y
(
r
ate
o
f
d
eliv
er
y
)
c
h
an
g
es
ag
a
in
s
t
s
o
f
t
w
ar
e
s
ize.
I
t
s
h
o
w
s
t
h
at
p
r
o
d
u
ctiv
it
y
i
m
p
r
o
v
e
s
s
i
g
n
if
ic
an
tl
y
as
p
r
o
j
ec
t
s
ize
i
m
p
r
o
v
e.
Data
in
T
ab
le
1
s
h
o
w
s
t
h
at
m
ed
ian
p
r
o
j
ec
t
s
ize
f
o
r
n
e
w
d
ev
elo
p
m
en
t
p
r
o
j
ec
t
is
2
9
1
f
u
n
ctio
n
p
o
in
ts
an
d
m
ed
ian
p
r
o
j
ec
t
s
ize
f
o
r
m
ai
n
te
n
an
ce
p
r
o
j
ec
t
is
6
8
f
u
n
ctio
n
p
o
in
ts
.
Ne
w
d
e
v
elo
p
m
en
t
p
r
o
j
ec
ts
ar
e
b
ig
g
er
in
s
iz
e
an
d
r
ate
o
f
d
eliv
er
y
i
s
s
i
g
n
i
f
ican
tl
y
h
ig
h
er
th
a
n
m
ai
n
ten
a
n
ce
p
r
o
j
ec
ts
.
Fig
u
r
e
4
.
Me
d
ian
p
r
o
d
u
ctiv
it
y
f
o
r
v
ar
io
u
s
p
r
o
j
ec
t
t
y
p
e
Fig
u
r
e
5
.
Me
d
ian
d
ef
ec
ts
f
o
r
v
ar
io
u
s
p
r
o
j
ec
t ty
p
e
Evaluation Warning : The document was created with Spire.PDF for Python.
I
n
t J
E
lec
&
C
o
m
p
E
n
g
I
SS
N:
2
0
8
8
-
8708
Ho
w
s
o
ftw
a
r
e
s
iz
e
in
flu
en
ce
p
r
o
d
u
ctivity
a
n
d
p
r
o
ject
d
u
r
a
ti
o
n
(
Mr
id
u
l B
h
a
r
d
w
a
j
)
2011
Fig
u
r
e
6
.
Me
d
ian
p
r
o
d
u
ctiv
it
y
ag
ain
s
t p
r
o
j
ec
t size
Fig
u
r
e
7
.
T
o
tal
ef
f
o
r
ts
an
d
p
r
o
d
u
ctiv
i
t
y
Fig
u
r
e
8
s
h
o
w
s
t
h
at
r
ate
o
f
d
eliv
er
y
d
ec
r
ea
s
es
s
h
ar
p
l
y
a
s
w
e
s
p
en
d
m
o
r
e
e
f
f
o
r
ts
.
I
t
s
h
o
w
s
th
at
i
f
we
in
cr
ea
s
e
t
h
e
tea
m
s
ize
it
m
a
y
i
m
p
ac
t
n
e
g
ati
v
el
y
o
n
o
v
er
all
te
a
m
p
r
o
d
u
ctiv
it
y
.
W
h
e
n
w
e
d
is
tr
ib
u
te
th
e
o
v
er
all
ef
f
o
r
t
s
to
t
h
e
v
ar
io
u
s
p
r
o
j
ec
t
p
h
ases
,
i
t
is
i
m
p
o
r
tan
t
to
k
n
o
w
h
o
w
e
f
f
o
r
t
d
is
tr
ib
u
tio
n
to
v
ar
io
u
s
p
h
a
s
es
w
o
u
ld
i
m
p
ac
t
th
e
k
e
y
m
etr
ics
li
k
e
s
ch
ed
u
le,
p
r
o
d
u
ctiv
it
y
a
n
d
d
ef
ec
ts
etc.
Stu
d
y
o
f
Q
u
an
titati
v
e
So
f
t
w
ar
e
Ma
n
ag
e
m
e
n
t
(
QSM)
[
1
2
]
s
h
o
w
s
th
a
t
o
v
er
all
p
r
o
d
u
ctiv
i
t
y
i
m
p
r
o
v
es
to
2
8
%
if
m
o
r
e
th
a
n
2
0
%
ef
f
o
r
ts
s
p
en
d
s
d
u
r
in
g
an
al
y
s
is
an
d
d
esi
g
n
.
T
a
b
le
2
s
h
o
w
s
h
o
w
p
r
o
d
u
ctiv
i
t
y
,
s
ch
ed
u
le
a
n
d
d
ef
ec
ts
i
m
p
r
o
v
e
s
if
w
e
s
p
en
d
m
o
r
e
th
an
2
0
%
e
f
f
o
r
ts
d
u
r
in
g
an
a
l
y
s
is
a
n
d
d
esig
n
p
h
ase
s
.
Ov
er
al
l
d
u
r
atio
n
o
f
t
h
e
p
r
o
j
ec
t
ca
n
b
e
r
ed
u
ce
d
b
y
1
4
%
an
d
also
o
v
er
all
p
r
o
j
ec
t
ef
f
o
r
t
ca
n
b
e
r
ed
u
ce
d
b
y
1
0
%
if
m
o
r
e
th
a
n
2
0
%
ef
f
o
r
ts
s
p
en
d
d
u
r
i
n
g
t
h
e
a
n
al
y
s
i
s
a
n
d
d
esig
n
p
h
ase.
T
ab
le
2
.
I
m
p
ac
t o
f
E
f
f
o
r
t Sp
en
d
in
An
al
y
s
i
s
an
d
Des
ig
n
o
n
K
e
y
Me
tr
ics
I
mp
a
c
t
o
f
Ef
f
o
r
t
S
p
e
n
d
i
n
A
n
a
l
y
si
s a
n
d
D
e
si
g
n
Ef
f
o
r
t
S
p
e
n
d
>
2
0
%
Ef
f
o
r
t
S
p
e
n
d
<
2
0
%
I
mp
a
c
t
P
r
o
d
u
c
t
i
v
i
t
y
F
P
/
P
M
7
.
9
3
6
.
2
2
8
%
M
e
d
i
a
n
D
u
r
a
t
i
o
n
(
M
o
n
t
h
s)
6
.
2
7
.
2
3
-
1
4
%
M
e
d
i
a
n
Ef
f
o
r
t
s (P
M
)
2
0
.
2
9
2
2
.
5
9
-
1
0
%
M
e
d
i
a
n
D
e
f
e
c
t
s
1
9
.
5
20
-
3%
Fig
u
r
e
8
.
I
m
p
ac
t o
f
e
f
f
o
r
t sp
en
d
in
an
al
y
s
i
s
an
d
d
esi
g
n
5
.
2
.
Da
t
a
pu
bli
s
hed by
inte
r
na
t
io
na
l so
f
t
w
a
re
bench
m
a
r
kin
g
s
t
a
nd
a
rd
g
ro
up
(
I
SB
S
G
)
I
n
ter
n
atio
n
al
So
f
t
w
ar
e
B
en
c
h
m
ar
k
i
n
g
Sta
n
d
ar
d
Gr
o
u
p
(
I
SB
SG)
in
it
s
B
en
c
h
m
ar
k
i
n
g
r
elea
s
e
p
u
b
lis
h
ed
t
h
e
r
elatio
n
s
h
ip
f
o
r
s
o
f
t
w
ar
e
s
ize,
e
f
f
o
r
ts
,
p
r
o
j
ec
t
d
u
r
atio
n
,
p
r
o
d
u
ctiv
it
y
a
n
d
m
ax
i
m
u
m
tea
m
s
ize
.
T
h
ese
r
elatio
n
s
h
ip
is
b
ased
o
n
4
,
1
0
6
s
o
f
t
w
ar
e
p
r
o
j
ec
ts
f
r
o
m
ar
o
u
n
d
th
e
w
o
r
ld
,
an
d
m
ad
e
av
ailab
le
o
n
R
elea
s
e
1
0
o
f
E
s
tim
a
tin
g
,
B
en
ch
m
ar
k
in
g
&
R
e
s
ea
r
ch
S
u
ite
C
D
[
1
3
]
.
T
h
is
r
elatio
n
s
h
ip
h
a
v
e
b
ee
n
d
er
iv
ed
af
ter
th
e
7.93
6.2
20.29
19.5
6.2
7.23
22.59
20
28%
-
14%
-
10%
-
3%
-
2
0%
-
1
0%
0%
10
%
20
%
30
%
40
%
0
5
10
15
20
25
Pr
od
u
ct
i
vit
y
FP
/
PM
M
e
d
i
a
n
Dur
a
tion
(Mo
nt
h
s)
M
e
d
i
a
n
Ef
f
or
t
s
(P
M
)
M
e
d
i
a
n
De
f
e
ct
s
Impa
c
t
of
E
ff
ort
spe
nd i
n Anal
y
sis
and
Desi
gn
Eff
or
t s
p
e
n
d
>
2
0
%
Eff
or
t s
p
e
n
d
<
2
0
%
I
m
p
ac
t
Evaluation Warning : The document was created with Spire.PDF for Python.
I
SS
N
:
2
0
8
8
-
8708
I
n
t J
E
lec
&
C
o
m
p
E
n
g
,
Vo
l.
9
,
No
.
3
,
J
u
n
e
2
0
1
9
:
2
0
0
6
-
2
0
1
7
2012
s
tatis
t
ical
a
n
al
y
s
is
o
f
p
r
o
j
ec
ts
in
t
h
e
I
SB
SG
r
ep
o
s
ito
r
y
.
I
S
B
SG
s
tu
d
y
[
1
4
]
s
h
o
w
ed
th
a
t
s
o
f
t
w
ar
e
s
ize
a
n
d
m
ax
i
m
u
m
tea
m
s
ize
ar
e
th
e
k
e
y
m
etr
ic
s
f
o
r
esti
m
at
in
g
p
r
o
j
ec
t d
u
r
atio
n
an
d
ef
f
o
r
ts
.
5
.
2
.
1
.
P
ro
du
ct
iv
it
y
a
s
f
un
ct
io
n o
f
s
o
f
t
w
a
re
s
ize
a
nd
m
a
x
i
m
u
m
t
ea
m
s
ize
Dep
en
d
en
t V
ar
iab
le=
P
r
o
d
u
ctiv
it
y
(
P
r
o
j
ec
t D
eliv
er
y
R
ate
i
n
Ho
u
r
s
p
er
Fu
n
c
tio
n
P
o
in
t)
I
n
d
ep
en
d
en
t V
a
r
iab
le
1
=Size
(
So
f
t
w
ar
e
Size
i
n
F
u
n
ct
io
n
P
o
in
ts
)
I
n
d
ep
en
d
en
t V
ar
iab
le
2
=M
ax
T
ea
m
Size
(
F
u
ll T
i
m
e
E
q
u
i
v
al
en
t o
f
Ma
x
i
m
u
m
T
ea
m
Size)
P
r
o
d
u
ctiv
it
y
=
3
7
.
4
8
*
Size
(
-
0.
496)
*
Ma
x
T
ea
m
S
ize
(0.
759)
A
b
o
v
e
eq
u
atio
n
is
d
er
i
v
ed
b
as
ed
o
n
2
0
3
n
e
w
d
ev
elo
p
m
e
n
t
p
r
o
j
ec
ts
in
I
SB
SG
p
r
o
j
ec
t
r
ep
o
s
ito
r
y
a
n
d
h
av
i
n
g
R
2
(
ad
j
)
v
alu
e
as
0
.
3
2
w
h
ic
h
m
ea
n
s
3
2
%
v
ar
iab
ilit
y
is
ex
p
lai
n
ed
b
y
th
e
ab
o
v
e
eq
u
atio
n
.
Me
d
ian
M
R
E
v
alu
e
i
s
0
.
3
7
w
h
ich
i
m
p
lies
t
h
at
th
er
e
co
u
ld
b
e
3
7
%
v
ar
i
an
ce
in
ac
tu
a
l
v
al
u
e
an
d
v
al
u
e
o
b
tain
u
s
in
g
t
h
e
d
er
iv
ed
eq
u
atio
n
.
5
.
2
.
2
.
T
o
t
a
l pro
j
ec
t
ef
f
o
rt
s
a
s
f
un
ct
io
n o
f
s
o
f
t
wa
re
s
ize
a
nd
m
a
x
i
m
u
m
t
ea
m
s
ize
Dep
en
d
en
t V
ar
iab
le=
E
f
f
o
r
ts
(
P
r
o
j
ec
t E
f
f
o
r
ts
in
P
er
s
o
n
Ho
u
r
s
)
I
n
d
ep
en
d
en
t V
ar
iab
le
1
=Size
(
So
f
t
w
ar
e
Size
i
n
F
u
n
ct
io
n
P
o
in
ts
)
I
n
d
ep
en
d
en
t V
ar
iab
le
2
=M
ax
i
m
u
m
T
ea
m
Size
(
F
u
ll T
i
m
e
E
q
u
iv
ale
n
t o
f
Ma
x
i
m
u
m
T
ea
m
Size)
E
f
f
o
r
ts
=
3
7
.
4
8
*
Size
(.
504)
*
Ma
x
i
m
u
m
T
ea
m
Size
(0.
759)
A
b
o
v
e
eq
u
atio
n
is
d
er
i
v
ed
b
as
ed
o
n
2
0
3
n
e
w
d
ev
elo
p
m
e
n
t
p
r
o
j
ec
ts
in
I
SB
SG
p
r
o
j
ec
t
r
ep
o
s
ito
r
y
a
n
d
h
av
i
n
g
R
2
(
ad
j
)
v
alu
e
as
0
.
6
1
w
h
ic
h
m
ea
n
s
6
1
%
v
ar
iab
ilit
y
is
ex
p
lai
n
ed
b
y
th
e
ab
o
v
e
eq
u
atio
n
.
Me
d
ian
M
R
E
v
alu
e
i
s
0
.
3
7
w
h
ich
i
m
p
lies
t
h
at
th
er
e
co
u
ld
b
e
3
7
%
v
ar
ian
ce
in
ac
tu
a
l
v
al
u
e
an
d
v
al
u
e
o
b
tain
u
s
in
g
t
h
e
d
er
iv
ed
eq
u
atio
n
.
5
.
2
.
3
.
T
o
t
a
l pro
j
ec
t
ef
f
o
rt
s
a
s
f
un
ct
io
n o
f
s
o
f
t
wa
re
s
ize
Dep
en
d
en
t V
ar
iab
le=
E
f
f
o
r
ts
(
P
r
o
j
ec
t E
f
f
o
r
ts
in
P
er
s
o
n
Ho
u
r
s
)
I
n
d
ep
en
d
en
t V
ar
iab
le
1
=Size
(
So
f
t
w
ar
e
Size
i
n
F
u
n
ct
io
n
P
o
in
ts
)
E
f
f
o
r
ts
=
2
3
.
2
5
*
Size
(.
814)
A
b
o
v
e
eq
u
at
io
n
is
d
er
iv
ed
,
b
ased
o
n
5
3
4
n
e
w
d
ev
elo
p
m
e
n
t
p
r
o
j
ec
ts
in
I
SB
SG
p
r
o
j
ec
t
r
ep
o
s
ito
r
y
an
d
h
av
i
n
g
R
2
(
ad
j
)
v
alu
e
as
0
.
4
5
w
h
ic
h
m
ea
n
s
4
5
%
v
ar
iab
ilit
y
is
ex
p
lai
n
ed
b
y
th
e
ab
o
v
e
eq
u
atio
n
.
Me
d
ian
M
R
E
v
alu
e
i
s
0
.
5
5
w
h
ich
i
m
p
lies
t
h
at
th
er
e
co
u
ld
b
e
5
5
%
v
ar
ian
ce
in
ac
tu
a
l
v
al
u
e
an
d
v
al
u
e
o
b
tain
u
s
in
g
t
h
e
d
er
iv
ed
eq
u
atio
n
.
5
.
2
.
4
.
P
ro
j
ec
t
du
ra
t
io
n a
s
f
u
nct
io
n o
f
s
o
f
t
w
a
re
s
ize
Dep
en
d
en
t V
ar
iab
le=
P
r
o
j
ec
t
Du
r
atio
n
(
T
o
tal
ac
tiv
e
elap
s
ed
ti
m
e
i
n
m
o
n
th
s
)
I
n
d
ep
en
d
en
t V
ar
iab
le
1
=Size
(
So
f
t
w
ar
e
Size
i
n
F
u
n
ct
io
n
P
o
in
ts
)
P
r
o
j
ec
t d
u
r
atio
n
=
0
.
5
4
3
*
Siz
e
(.
408)
A
b
o
v
e
eq
u
at
io
n
is
d
er
iv
ed
,
b
ased
o
n
4
9
4
n
e
w
d
ev
elo
p
m
e
n
t
p
r
o
j
ec
ts
in
I
SB
SG
p
r
o
j
ec
t
r
ep
o
s
ito
r
y
an
d
h
av
i
n
g
R
2
(
ad
j
)
v
alu
e
as
0
.
3
0
w
h
ic
h
m
ea
n
s
3
0
%
v
ar
iab
ilit
y
is
ex
p
lai
n
ed
b
y
th
e
ab
o
v
e
eq
u
atio
n
.
Me
d
ian
M
R
E
v
alu
e
i
s
0
.
3
9
w
h
ich
i
m
p
lies
t
h
at
th
er
e
co
u
ld
b
e
3
9
%
v
ar
ian
ce
in
ac
tu
a
l
v
al
u
e
an
d
v
al
u
e
o
b
tain
u
s
in
g
t
h
e
d
er
iv
ed
eq
u
atio
n
.
5
.
2
.
5
.
P
ro
j
ec
t
du
ra
t
io
n a
s
f
u
nct
io
n o
f
ef
f
o
r
t
Dep
en
d
en
t V
ar
iab
le=
P
r
o
j
ec
t
Du
r
atio
n
(
T
o
tal
ac
tiv
e
elap
s
ed
ti
m
e
i
n
m
o
n
th
s
)
I
n
d
ep
en
d
en
t V
ar
iab
le
1
=E
f
f
o
r
t (
T
o
tal
P
lan
n
ed
ef
f
o
r
t i
n
p
er
s
o
n
h
o
u
r
s
)
P
r
o
j
ec
t d
u
r
atio
n
=0
.
3
7
0
*
E
f
f
o
r
t
(.
328)
A
b
o
v
e
eq
u
at
io
n
is
d
er
iv
ed
,
b
ased
o
n
1
6
8
1
n
ew
d
e
v
elo
p
m
e
n
t
p
r
o
j
ec
ts
in
I
SB
SG
p
r
o
j
ec
t
r
ep
o
s
ito
r
y
an
d
h
av
i
n
g
R
2
(
ad
j
)
v
alu
e
as
0
.
3
5
w
h
ich
m
ea
n
s
3
5
%
v
ar
iab
ilit
y
is
e
x
p
lain
ed
b
y
th
e
ab
o
v
e
eq
u
atio
n
.
Me
d
ia
n
MRE
v
alu
e
is
0
.
3
6
w
h
ic
h
i
m
p
li
es
t
h
at
th
er
e
co
u
ld
b
e
3
6
%
v
ar
ian
ce
i
n
ac
t
u
al
v
al
u
e
a
n
d
v
a
l
u
e
o
b
tain
u
s
i
n
g
th
e
d
er
iv
ed
eq
u
atio
n
.
Evaluation Warning : The document was created with Spire.PDF for Python.
I
n
t J
E
lec
&
C
o
m
p
E
n
g
I
SS
N:
2
0
8
8
-
8708
Ho
w
s
o
ftw
a
r
e
s
iz
e
in
flu
en
ce
p
r
o
d
u
ctivity
a
n
d
p
r
o
ject
d
u
r
a
ti
o
n
(
Mr
id
u
l B
h
a
r
d
w
a
j
)
2013
6.
AP
P
RO
ACH
I
SB
SG
d
ata
d
o
es
n
o
t
r
ep
r
esen
t
a
n
y
m
ea
n
i
n
g
f
u
l
r
eg
r
es
s
i
o
n
eq
u
atio
n
b
et
w
ee
n
p
r
o
d
u
ctiv
it
y
a
n
d
s
o
f
t
w
ar
e
s
ize
w
h
ic
h
is
o
n
e
o
f
th
e
m
o
s
t
s
i
g
n
i
f
ica
n
t
m
etr
ic
k
n
o
w
n
in
t
h
e
b
eg
i
n
n
i
n
g
o
f
th
e
p
r
o
j
ec
t,
h
o
w
ev
er
,
it
d
o
es
r
ep
r
esen
t
th
e
r
e
g
r
ess
io
n
eq
u
atio
n
o
f
p
r
o
d
u
ctiv
it
y
w
i
th
s
o
f
t
w
ar
e
s
ize
a
n
d
m
a
x
i
m
u
m
tea
m
s
ize
(
ex
p
lai
n
in
5
.
2
.
1
)
b
u
t
m
o
s
t
o
f
t
h
e
ti
m
e
m
ax
i
m
u
m
tea
m
s
ize
i
s
n
o
t
k
n
o
w
n
i
n
t
h
e
b
eg
i
n
n
in
g
o
f
t
h
e
p
r
o
j
ec
t.
Fo
llo
w
i
n
g
s
ec
tio
n
s
e
x
p
lai
n
th
e
s
tep
b
y
s
t
ep
ap
p
r
o
ac
h
tak
en
to
estab
li
s
h
th
e
r
eg
r
es
s
io
n
eq
u
atio
n
.
6
.
1
.
Ste
ps
t
o
o
bta
in t
he
lin
ea
r
re
g
re
s
s
io
n e
qu
a
t
io
n
Usi
n
g
th
e
m
o
d
el
p
u
b
li
s
h
ed
b
y
I
SB
SG
an
d
d
i
s
cu
s
s
ed
i
n
s
ec
ti
o
n
6
.
2
,
w
e
s
i
m
u
late
t
h
e
p
r
o
d
u
ctiv
it
y
a
n
d
p
r
o
j
ec
t
d
u
r
a
tio
n
f
o
r
d
if
f
er
e
n
t
s
o
f
t
w
ar
e
s
ize
i
n
th
e
r
a
n
g
e
5
0
to
2
0
0
0
f
u
n
ctio
n
p
o
in
ts
,
a
s
s
u
m
in
g
s
o
f
t
w
ar
e
s
ize
i
t
is
n
o
r
m
all
y
d
is
tr
ib
u
ted
,
w
e
f
o
llo
w
ed
th
e
f
o
llo
w
i
n
g
s
tep
s
to
estab
lis
h
th
e
li
n
ea
r
r
eg
r
es
s
io
n
eq
u
atio
n
f
o
r
p
r
o
d
u
ctiv
it
y
a
n
d
p
r
o
j
ec
t
d
u
r
atio
n
w
ith
s
o
f
t
w
ar
e
s
iz
e.
T
ab
le
i
n
an
n
ex
u
r
e
s
h
o
w
s
t
h
e
co
m
p
let
e
d
ataset.
a.
Fo
r
all
p
r
o
j
ec
ts
,
ef
f
o
r
ts
w
er
e
d
er
iv
ed
u
s
i
n
g
th
e
r
e
g
r
es
s
io
n
eq
u
atio
n
e
x
p
lain
in
s
ec
tio
n
6
.
2
.
3
.
Fig
u
r
e
9
s
h
o
w
s
t
h
e
g
r
ap
h
f
o
r
th
e
s
ize
a
n
d
co
r
r
esp
o
n
d
in
g
e
f
f
o
r
ts
.
Fig
u
r
e
9
.
T
o
tal
ef
f
o
r
t v
/
s
s
ize
b.
P
r
o
d
u
ctiv
it
y
f
o
r
ea
ch
p
r
o
j
ec
t
w
as
ca
lc
u
late
u
s
i
n
g
th
e
e
f
f
o
r
t
an
d
s
ize
ca
lcu
lated
in
s
tep
1
(
b
y
d
iv
id
in
g
s
o
f
t
w
ar
e
s
ize
a
n
d
ef
f
o
r
t)
.
Fig
u
r
e
1
0
s
h
o
w
s
t
h
e
g
r
ap
h
f
o
r
s
o
f
t
w
ar
e
s
ize
a
n
d
p
r
o
d
u
ctiv
it
y
.
Fig
u
r
e
10
.
P
r
o
d
u
ctiv
it
y
v
/
s
s
iz
e
c.
P
r
o
j
ec
t
d
u
r
atio
n
in
p
er
s
o
n
m
o
n
th
w
a
s
esti
m
ated
u
s
i
n
g
th
e
r
eg
r
ess
io
n
eq
u
atio
n
d
escr
ib
e
in
6
.
2
.
5
.
Fig
u
r
e
1
1
s
h
o
w
s
t
h
e
g
r
ap
h
f
o
r
p
r
o
j
ec
t
d
u
r
atio
n
an
d
s
o
f
t
w
ar
e
s
ize.
Evaluation Warning : The document was created with Spire.PDF for Python.
I
SS
N
:
2
0
8
8
-
8708
I
n
t J
E
lec
&
C
o
m
p
E
n
g
,
Vo
l.
9
,
No
.
3
,
J
u
n
e
2
0
1
9
:
2
0
0
6
-
2
0
1
7
2014
Fig
u
r
e
11
.
P
r
o
j
ec
t d
u
r
atio
n
v
/s
s
ize
d.
Usi
n
g
th
e
s
tatis
tical
to
o
ls
,
o
b
tain
th
e
li
n
ea
r
r
eg
r
ess
io
n
eq
u
atio
n
s
f
o
r
p
r
o
d
u
ctiv
it
y
a
n
d
p
r
o
j
ec
t
d
u
r
atio
n
d
ep
en
d
in
g
o
n
s
o
f
t
w
ar
e
s
ize.
I
n
b
o
th
th
e
eq
u
atio
n
s
s
o
f
t
w
ar
e
s
ize
is
tak
e
n
as
i
n
d
ep
en
d
en
t
v
ar
iab
les,
w
h
i
le
p
r
o
d
u
ctiv
it
y
a
n
d
p
r
o
j
ec
t
d
u
r
atio
n
is
tak
e
n
a
s
d
ep
en
d
en
t v
ar
ia
b
les
e.
Ver
if
y
t
h
e
li
n
ea
r
eq
u
atio
n
s
o
b
tain
in
s
tep
5
w
it
h
ac
t
u
al
d
ata
f
o
r
1
0
clo
s
ed
p
r
o
j
ec
ts
.
7.
E
XP
E
R
I
M
E
NT
R
E
SU
L
T
S
Usi
n
g
t
h
e
s
tatis
t
ical
s
o
f
t
w
a
r
e
Min
itab
v
er
s
io
n
1
6
,
f
o
ll
o
w
i
n
g
lin
ea
r
r
e
g
r
ess
io
n
eq
u
atio
n
f
o
r
p
r
o
d
u
ctiv
it
y
a
n
d
s
ize
is
o
b
tain
ed
.
R
2
(
A
d
j
)
f
o
r
th
is
eq
u
atio
n
is
9
3
%
th
at
m
ea
n
s
li
n
ea
r
eq
u
at
io
n
ex
p
lain
9
2
%
o
f
v
ar
iab
ilit
y
i
n
d
atase
t.
Fi
g
u
r
e
1
2
.
to
Fig
u
r
e
1
5
.
s
h
o
w
s
th
e
o
u
tp
u
t
o
f
r
eg
r
es
s
io
n
an
al
y
s
is
o
f
s
ize
v
er
s
u
s
p
r
o
d
u
ctiv
it
y
a
n
d
s
ize
v
er
s
u
s
p
r
o
j
ec
t
tim
e
li
n
e.
Fo
llo
w
i
n
g
l
in
ea
r
r
eg
r
ess
io
n
eq
u
atio
n
f
o
r
p
r
o
j
ec
t
d
u
r
atio
n
an
d
s
ize
is
also
o
b
tain
ed
.
R
2
(
A
d
j
)
f
o
r
th
is
eq
u
atio
n
is
9
2
%
th
at
m
ea
n
s
li
n
ea
r
eq
u
atio
n
ex
p
lai
n
9
2
%
o
f
v
ar
iab
ilit
y
in
d
ataset.
P
ro
du
ct
iv
it
y
=
4
.
3
7
8
+
0
.
0
0
1
9
2
3
*
S
ize
Fig
u
r
e
12
.
R
eg
r
ess
io
n
an
al
y
s
is
f
o
r
p
r
o
d
u
ctiv
it
y
a
n
d
s
ize
Fig
u
r
e
13
.
Fit
ted
lin
e
p
lo
t f
o
r
r
eg
r
ess
io
n
an
al
y
s
is
f
o
r
p
r
o
d
u
ctiv
it
y
a
n
d
s
ize
P
ro
j
ec
t
du
ra
t
io
n = 4
.
3
7
8
+
0
.
0
0
1
9
2
3
*
Size
Evaluation Warning : The document was created with Spire.PDF for Python.
I
n
t J
E
lec
&
C
o
m
p
E
n
g
I
SS
N:
2
0
8
8
-
8708
Ho
w
s
o
ftw
a
r
e
s
iz
e
in
flu
en
ce
p
r
o
d
u
ctivity
a
n
d
p
r
o
ject
d
u
r
a
ti
o
n
(
Mr
id
u
l B
h
a
r
d
w
a
j
)
2015
Fig
u
r
e
14
.
R
eg
r
ess
io
n
an
al
y
s
is
f
o
r
p
r
o
j
ec
t d
u
r
atio
n
an
d
s
ize
Fig
u
r
e
15
.
Fit
ted
lin
e
p
lo
t o
f
r
eg
r
ess
io
n
an
al
y
s
is
f
o
r
p
r
o
j
ec
t d
u
r
atio
n
an
d
s
ize
8.
VE
RIF
I
CA
T
I
O
N
O
F
E
XP
E
RIM
E
NT
RE
SUL
T
S
L
i
n
ea
r
r
eg
r
ess
io
n
eq
u
atio
n
f
o
r
p
r
o
d
u
ctiv
it
y
a
n
d
p
r
o
j
ec
t
d
u
r
atio
n
w
as
v
er
i
f
ied
f
o
r
ac
t
u
al
p
r
o
j
ec
t
m
etr
ics
o
f
1
0
clo
s
ed
p
r
o
j
ec
ts
.
A
c
tu
al
p
r
o
j
ec
t
s
ize
o
f
th
e
s
e
p
r
o
j
ec
ts
v
ar
ies
f
r
o
m
1
7
5
f
u
n
c
tio
n
p
o
in
t
s
to
1
4
6
8
f
u
n
ctio
n
p
o
in
t
s
.
Fo
r
all
th
e
s
e
p
r
o
j
ec
ts
,
ac
tu
al
s
ize,
to
tal
ef
f
o
r
t
an
d
p
r
o
j
ec
t
d
u
r
atio
n
w
a
s
co
llected
.
W
e
ca
lcu
lated
th
e
ac
t
u
al
p
r
o
d
u
cti
v
it
y
u
s
in
g
to
tal
e
f
f
o
r
t a
n
d
s
ize.
P
r
o
d
u
ctiv
it
y
a
n
d
p
r
o
j
ec
t
d
u
r
atio
n
w
as
also
ca
lc
u
lated
b
ased
o
n
th
e
r
eg
r
es
s
io
n
eq
u
atio
n
o
b
tain
ed
in
s
ec
tio
n
7
.
Var
iatio
n
i
n
t
h
e
ac
t
u
al
m
etr
ic
a
n
d
ca
lcu
lated
m
e
tr
ic
is
ca
lc
u
lated
.
Var
iatio
n
i
n
p
r
o
d
u
ctiv
it
y
(
A
ct
u
al
v
/s
C
alc
u
lated
)
w
as
b
et
w
ee
n
-
2
.
6
%
to
2
0
.
4
%,
ex
ce
p
t
o
n
e
d
ata
p
o
in
t.
All
t
h
e
p
r
o
j
ec
ts
is
h
av
in
g
a
p
o
s
it
iv
e
v
ar
iatio
n
w
h
ic
h
m
ea
n
s
th
e
ac
t
u
al
p
r
o
d
u
ctiv
it
y
w
as
m
o
r
e
t
h
a
n
t
h
e
p
r
o
d
u
ctiv
i
t
y
ca
lcu
la
ted
u
s
in
g
t
h
e
r
e
g
r
ess
io
n
eq
u
atio
n
.
W
e
ca
n
co
n
cl
u
d
e
t
h
at
p
r
o
d
u
cti
v
it
y
i
s
s
ig
n
i
f
ica
n
t
l
y
d
ep
en
d
e
n
t
o
n
s
o
f
t
w
ar
e
s
iz
e.
P
r
o
d
u
ctiv
it
y
an
d
s
o
f
t
w
ar
e
s
ize
li
n
ea
r
r
eg
r
ess
i
o
n
r
elatio
n
s
h
ip
p
r
o
v
id
es
p
r
o
d
u
ctiv
it
y
esti
m
ate
s
w
i
t
h
2
0
%
v
ar
iatio
n
th
u
s
r
eg
r
ess
io
n
eq
u
atio
n
ca
n
b
e
a
g
o
o
d
esti
m
a
te
o
f
p
r
o
d
u
ctiv
it
y
i
n
th
e
i
n
itia
l p
h
ase
s
o
f
t
h
e
p
r
o
ject.
T
ab
le
3
.
Ver
if
icatio
n
R
es
u
lt
s
A
c
t
u
a
l
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
D
a
t
a
o
f
C
l
o
se
d
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
A
s Per R
e
g
r
e
ssi
o
n
Eq
u
c
a
t
i
o
n
%
V
a
r
i
a
t
i
o
n
S
.
N
A
c
t
u
a
l
S
i
z
e
T
o
t
a
l
Ef
f
o
r
t
s
P
r
o
d
u
c
t
i
v
i
t
y
(
F
P
/
P
H
)
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
D
u
r
a
t
i
o
n
i
n
M
o
n
t
h
s
P
r
o
d
u
c
t
i
v
i
t
y
(
F
P
/
P
H
)
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
D
u
r
a
t
i
o
n
I
n
M
o
n
t
h
s
I
n
P
r
o
d
u
c
t
i
v
i
t
y
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
D
u
r
a
t
i
o
n
i
n
M
o
n
t
h
s
1
1
7
5
1
4
0
0
0
.
1
2
5
4
.
4
6
5
0
.
1
2
3
6
4
.
7
1
4
5
2
5
1
.
1
%
-
5
.
3
%
2
2
2
8
1
5
8
3
0
.
1
4
4
4
.
9
7
4
0
.
1
2
5
2
9
6
4
.
8
1
6
4
4
4
1
4
.
9
%
3
.
3
%
3
2
5
8
1
9
8
5
0
.
1
3
0
5
.
2
3
2
0
.
1
2
6
2
5
6
4
.
8
7
4
1
3
4
3
.
0
%
7
.
3
%
4
3
2
5
2
6
0
0
0
.
1
2
5
5
.
7
4
9
0
.
1
2
8
4
5
.
0
0
2
9
7
5
-
2
.
6
%
1
4
.
9
%
5
3
3
9
2
5
6
8
0
.
1
3
2
5
.
8
4
8
0
.
1
2
8
8
4
8
5
.
0
2
9
8
9
7
2
.
4
%
1
6
.
3
%
6
4
6
7
3
1
9
9
0
.
1
4
6
6
.
6
6
5
0
.
1
3
2
9
4
4
5
.
2
7
6
0
4
1
9
.
8
%
2
6
.
3
%
7
5
6
7
3
6
1
1
0
.
1
5
7
7
.
2
1
4
0
.
1
3
6
1
4
4
5
.
4
6
8
3
4
1
1
5
.
3
%
3
1
.
9
%
8
7
7
5
4
5
0
6
0
.
1
7
2
8
.
1
9
5
0
.
1
4
2
8
5
.
8
6
8
3
2
5
2
0
.
4
%
3
9
.
6
%
9
1
2
4
5
6
8
0
3
0
.
1
8
3
9
.
9
4
4
0
.
1
5
7
8
4
6
.
7
7
2
1
3
5
1
5
.
9
%
4
6
.
8
%
10
1
4
6
8
7
5
6
7
0
.
1
9
4
1
0
.
6
3
5
0
.
1
6
4
9
7
6
7
.
2
0
0
9
6
4
1
7
.
6
%
4
7
.
7
%
Var
iatio
n
o
f
p
r
o
j
ec
t
d
u
r
atio
n
(
A
ct
u
al
v
/
s
C
a
lcu
la
ted
)
is
in
cr
ea
s
i
n
g
w
i
th
p
r
o
j
ec
t
s
ize
an
d
t
h
is
in
cr
e
m
e
n
t
i
s
n
o
t
l
in
ea
r
,
t
h
u
s
we
ca
n
co
n
cl
u
d
e
th
at
l
in
ea
r
eq
u
atio
n
d
o
es
n
o
t
ex
p
lai
n
t
h
e
r
ela
tio
n
s
h
ip
f
o
r
p
r
o
j
ec
t
d
u
r
atio
n
an
d
s
o
f
t
w
ar
e
s
ize.
W
e
ca
n
co
n
cl
u
d
e
th
at
p
r
o
j
ec
t
d
u
r
atio
n
d
o
es
n
o
t
s
i
g
n
i
f
ica
n
tl
y
d
ep
en
d
o
n
s
o
f
t
w
ar
e
s
ize
o
n
l
y
b
u
t
m
a
y
also
d
ep
en
d
o
n
an
o
th
er
m
etr
ic
ap
ar
t
f
r
o
m
s
o
f
t
w
ar
e
s
ize.
T
h
is
o
th
er
m
etr
ic
co
u
ld
b
e
th
e
tea
m
s
ize,
th
is
lea
v
es
s
co
p
e
to
f
u
r
t
h
er
an
a
l
y
s
is
th
e
p
r
o
j
ec
t
d
u
r
atio
n
w
i
th
s
o
f
t
w
ar
e
s
ize
an
d
tea
m
s
ize
a
s
d
ep
en
d
ed
v
ar
iab
les.
9.
RE
SU
L
T
AND
DI
SS
CU
SI
O
N
L
i
n
ea
r
r
eg
r
es
s
io
n
a
n
al
y
s
i
s
o
f
d
ata
p
u
b
lis
h
ed
b
y
I
SB
SG
[
1
3
]
p
r
o
v
id
es
lin
ea
r
r
eg
r
es
s
io
n
e
q
u
atio
n
f
o
r
p
r
o
d
u
ctiv
it
y
an
d
p
r
o
j
ec
t
d
u
r
atio
n
w
it
h
s
o
f
t
w
ar
e
s
ize.
Ver
i
f
i
ca
tio
n
o
f
li
n
ea
r
r
e
g
r
ess
io
n
w
i
t
h
ac
t
u
al
d
ata
o
f
1
0
p
r
o
j
ec
ts
co
n
clu
d
e
th
at
p
r
o
d
u
ctiv
it
y
is
s
i
g
n
if
ican
t
l
y
d
ep
en
d
en
t
o
n
s
o
f
t
w
ar
e
s
ize.
P
r
o
d
u
ctiv
it
y
a
n
d
s
o
f
t
w
ar
e
s
ize
Evaluation Warning : The document was created with Spire.PDF for Python.