Indonesian
J
our
nal
of
Electrical
Engineering
and
Computer
Science
V
ol.
36,
No.
3,
December
2024,
pp.
1421
1429
ISSN:
2502-4752,
DOI:
10.11591/ijeecs.v36.i3.pp1421-1429
r
1421
Adv
anced
contr
ol
and
optimization
strategies
f
or
a
2-phase
interlea
v
ed
boost
con
v
erter
Muhammad
Adnan
Samad
1
,
Usmono
v
Shukurillo
Y
ulbarso
vich
1
,
Sultono
v
Ruzimatjon
An
v
arjon
Ugli
1
,
Saima
Siddiqui
2
1
Department
of
Electrical
Engineering,
Electrical
Mechanics
and
Electrical
T
echnologies,
Fer
g
ana
Polytechnic
Institute,
Fer
g
ana,
Uzbekistan
2
Department
of
Mathematics,
Fer
g
ana
Polytechnic
Institute,
Fer
g
ana,
Uzbekistan
Article
Inf
o
Article
history:
Recei
v
ed
Feb
28,
2024
Re
vised
Aug
14,
2024
Accepted
Aug
26,
2024
K
eyw
ords:
Boost
con
v
erter
Interlea
v
ed
boost
con
v
erter
Model
predicti
v
e
control
Sliding
mode
control
ABSTRA
CT
Reno
wned
for
their
adeptness
in
smoothing
current
flo
w
and
maintaining
balanced
operation,
2-phase
interlea
v
ed
boost
con
v
erters
(IBC)
demonstrate
remarkable
ef
ficienc
y
,
especially
when
confronted
with
demanding
loads.
This
mak
es
them
a
preferred
choice
for
high-po
wer
applications
such
as
rene
w
able
ener
gy
systems,
hi
gh-po
wer
supplies,
and
electric
v
ehicle
po
wer
trains.
In
con-
trast,
standard
boost
con
v
erters
are
typically
f
a
v
ored
in
lo
w-po
wer
,
lo
w-demand
scenarios.
The
control
of
a
2-phase
IBC
in
v
olv
es
running
tw
o
boost
con
v
erters
in
paral
lel
b
ut
with
a
phase
shift
to
reduce
ripple
currents,
impro
v
e
ef
ficienc
y
,
and
increase
po
wer
handling
capabilities.
T
o
ensure
stability
and
optimal
perfor
-
mance,
the
control
strate
gies
for
these
con
v
erters
foc
us
on
achie
ving
balanced
operation
between
the
phases.
Hence,
the
control
of
2-phase
IBC
presents
a
sig-
nificant
challenge
due
to
their
non-minimum
phase
beha
vior
.
The
core
focus
of
this
article
is
the
implementation
of
a
composite
model
predicti
v
e
cont
rol
(MPC)
technique
to
re
gulate
a
2-phase
interlea
v
ed
boost
con
v
erter
.
It
introduces
a
no
v
el
approach,
model
predicti
v
e
sliding
mode
control
(MPSMC),
which
le
v
erages
the
strengths
of
both
MPC
and
sliding
mode
control
(SMC).
The
benefits
of
this
h
ybrid
method,
termed
MPSMC,
are
thoroughly
de
v
eloped
and
simulated
using
MA
TLAB/Simulink.
The
results,
as
discussed
in
the
respecti
v
e
section,
pro
vide
an
in-depth
understanding
of
its
ef
fecti
v
eness
in
practical
applications.
This
is
an
open
access
article
under
the
CC
BY
-SA
license
.
Corresponding
A
uthor:
Muhammad
Adnan
Samad
Department
of
Electrical
Engineering,
Electrical
Mechanics
and
Electrical
T
echnologies
Fer
g
ana
Polytechnic
Institute
Fer
g
ana,
Uzbekistan
Email:
samad.muhammad@ferpi.uz
1.
INTR
ODUCTION
A
boo
s
t
con
v
erter
is
mainly
used
to
increase
the
unre
gulated
v
oltage
to
a
re
gulated
one.
Its
applicat
ions
can
v
ary
from
battery-po
wered
de
vices,
rene
w
able
ener
gy
systems
to
automoti
v
e
applications.
Although
there
are
fe
w
limitations,
including
v
oltage
range,
ef
ficienc
y
,
EMI,
current
limitation,
and
control
comple
xity
.
In
this
paper
a
tw
o-phase
interlea
v
ed
boost
con
v
erter
is
presented
that
has
v
arious
adv
antages
o
v
er
a
single-phase
boost
con
v
erter
,
including
lo
wer
ripple
current,
increased
ef
ficienc
y
,
and
superior
po
wer
handling
capabilities,
especially
in
rene
w
able
and
electric
v
ehicle
applications,
as
discussed
in
[1]–[4].
Moreo
v
er
,
a
2-phase
inter
-
lea
v
ed
boost
con
v
erters
(IBC)
using
a
coupled
i
nd
uc
tor
is
in
v
estig
ated,
especially
for
fuel
cell
applications,
in
J
ournal
homepage:
http://ijeecs.iaescor
e
.com
Evaluation Warning : The document was created with Spire.PDF for Python.
1422
r
ISSN:
2502-4752
[5]–[7].
In
addition,
a
phase
shift
switching
scheme
for
the
DC-DC
boost
con
v
erter
with
parallel
switches
is
sho
wn
in
[8].
A
2-phase
IBC
has
tw
o
boost
con
v
erter
stages
running
in
parallel
b
ut
out
of
phase.
This
design
com-
prises
tw
o
boost
con
v
erter
stages
operating
in
tandem,
each
phase-shifted
for
the
other
,
ensuring
concurrent
operation
during
their
switching
c
ycles
as
sho
wn
in
F
igure
1.
F
or
simplicity
,
the
continuous
conduction
mode
(CCM)
is
being
tak
en
into
consideration
and
the
parasitic
resi
stances
for
both
the
inductor
and
capacitor
are
also
included.
The
phase
functions
are
out
of
phase,
which
means
that
when
one
phase
is
conducting
(on),
the
other
is
in
the
non-conducting
(of
f)
state,
and
vice
v
ersa.
By
lo
wering
the
ripple
current
in
each
indi
vidual
inductor
,
the
interlea
v
ed
operation
impro
v
es
current
sharing
across
phases
and
lo
wers
the
ripple
current
i
n
the
o
v
erall
output
v
oltage.
Interlea
ving
the
phases
minimizes
ripple
currents,
which
leads
to
a
smoother
output
v
oltage
and
less
stress
on
the
components.
The
interlea
v
ed
con
v
erter
can
handle
greater
currents
more
ef
fi-
ciently
by
distrib
uting
the
load
throughout
the
phases,
reducing
losses
and
boosting
total
con
v
erter
ef
ficienc
y
.
Ensures
balanced
current
sharing
between
phases,
distrib
uting
the
load
equally
and
pre
v
enting
one
phase
from
carrying
the
entire
load.
Higher
po
wer
handling
capacities
are
possible
wi
th
the
interlea
v
ed
arrangement
than
with
a
single-phase
boost
con
v
erter
.
After
elucidating
the
benefits
of
a
2-phase
IBC,
its
imperati
v
e
to
e
xamine
its
control
mechanisms,
gi
v
en
the
inherent
non-minimum
phase
beha
vior
characteri
stic
of
these
type
of
con-
v
erters,
which
mak
es
the
control
more
challenging.
Figure
1.
2-phase
interlea
v
ed
DC-DC
boost
con
v
erter
Muktiadji
et
al.
[9]
sho
w
the
control
of
the
boost
con
v
erter
using
observ
er
-based
backstepping
SMC
for
the
DC
microgrid.
Cunha
and
P
ag
ano
[10]
sho
ws
some
limitations
in
the
control
of
the
boost
con
v
erter
,
especially
in
its
transient
beha
vior
.
This
art
icle
presents
an
inno
v
ati
v
e
model
predicti
v
e
sliding
mode
control
(MPSMC)
strate
gy
to
re
gulate
a
2-phase
interlea
v
ed
boost
con
v
erter
,
emplo
ying
sliding
mode
control
(SMC)
within
the
inner
loop
and
model
predicti
v
e
control
(MPC)
within
the
outer
loop.
This
inte
grated
control
strat-
e
gy
substantially
enhances
the
performance
and
reliability
of
po
wer
electronic
con
v
erters,
making
it
ideal
for
demanding
applications
such
as
electric
v
ehicles,
rene
w
able
ener
gy
systems,
and
high-performance
po
wer
sup-
plies.
Samad
et
al.
[11]
introduced
the
control
strate
gies
for
boost
and
2-phase
IBC
us
ing
MP
ADRC
that
combines
the
adv
antages
of
MPC
and
acti
v
e
disturbance
rejection
control
(ADRC).
A
proportional-inte
gral
based
MPC
adapti
v
e
approach
w
as
proposed
for
boost
con
v
erters
in
[12],
follo
wed
by
the
introduction
of
a
composite
adapti
v
e
MPC
method
in
[13],
designed
to
address
model
mismatches
a
rising
from
parameter
un-
certainties
and
disturbances
in
DC-DC
boost
con
v
erter
control
designs.
Furthermore,
in
[14],
an
inno
v
ati
v
e
SMC
coupled
with
a
proportional
inte
gral
(PI)
controller
w
as
implemented
to
re
gulate
a
DC-DC
boost
con-
v
erter
.
Although
the
e
xisting
literature
has
laid
some
groundw
ork,
there
remains
significant
uncharted
territory
,
particularly
concerning
multiphase
IBC.
The
rest
of
the
article
is
or
g
anized
as
follo
ws.
In
secti
o
n
2,
we
ha
v
e
presented
the
mathemati
cal
modeling
of
a
2-phase
IBC.
In
section
3,
we
present
the
control
and
design
methodology
.
Section
4
is
about
the
results
and
discussion
of
our
w
ork.
Finally
,
we
ha
v
e
concluded
the
results
in
section
5.
2.
MA
THEMA
TICAL
MODELING
OF
A
2-PHASE
INTERLEA
VED
BOOST
CONVER
TER
Additionally
,
the
distinct
states
that
characterize
a
2-phase
IBC
are
depicted
in
Figures
2
to
5
each
representing
one
of
the
four
states
as
follo
ws.
In
Figure
2
both
switches
Q1
and
Q2
are
on,
while
in
Figure
3
Q1
is
on
and
Q2
is
of
f.
In
addition,
Q1
is
on
and
Q2
is
of
f
in
Figure
4
and
finally
,
Q1
and
Q2
are
of
f
in
Figure
5.
Indonesian
J
Elec
Eng
&
Comp
Sci,
V
ol.
36,
No.
3,
December
2024:
1421–1429
Evaluation Warning : The document was created with Spire.PDF for Python.
Indonesian
J
Elec
Eng
&
Comp
Sci
ISSN:
2502-4752
r
1423
Figure
2.
2-phase
interlea
v
ed
DC/DC
boost
con
v
erter:
Q1
and
Q2
are
on
Figure
3.
2-phase
interlea
v
ed
DC/DC
boost
con
v
erter:
Q1
is
on
and
Q2
is
of
f
Figure
4.
2-phase
interlea
v
ed
DC/DC
boost
con
v
erter:
Q1
is
on
and
Q2
is
of
f
Figure
5.
2-phase
interlea
v
ed
DC/DC
boost
con
v
erter:
Q1
and
Q2
are
of
f
Then
using
the
basic
rules
of
KCL
and
KVL
and
depending
upon
switch
states,
the
current
and
v
oltage
equation
of
all
states
ha
v
e
been
formulated
and
for
simplicity
the
only
a
v
erage
state
space
is
modeled
and
presented
as
follo
ws,
while
the
matrices
A
1
,
A
2
,
A
3
,
A
4
and
B
of
all
four
states
respecti
v
ely
are
gi
v
en
by
,
A
1
=
2
4
r
L
1
L
1
0
0
0
r
L
2
L
2
0
0
0
1
R
0
C
3
5
Advanced
contr
ol
and
optimization
str
ate
gies
for
a
2-phase
interleaved
...
(Muhammad
Adnan
Samad)
Evaluation Warning : The document was created with Spire.PDF for Python.
1424
r
ISSN:
2502-4752
A
2
=
2
4
r
L
1
L
1
0
0
0
r
L
2
L
2
1
C
0
1
L
2
1
R
0
C
3
5
A
3
=
2
4
r
L
1
L
1
r
L
2
L
2
1
C
0
0
0
1
L
1
0
1
R
0
C
3
5
A
4
=
2
4
r
L
1
L
1
0
1
C
0
r
L
2
L
2
1
C
1
L
1
1
L
2
1
R
0
C
3
5
B
=
1
L
1
1
L
2
0
0
0
0
Finally
,
a
v
eraging
and
combining
the
state
space
representation
for
all
the
states
using,
A
=
(
A
1
+
A
3
)
d
+
(
A
2
+
A
4
)
(1
d
)
yeilds
A
=
2
4
r
L
1
L
1
0
1
2
L
1
d
r
L
2
L
2
(
d
1)
r
L
2
L
2
(
d
1)
1
L
2
1
C
(2
d
+
1)
1
C
1
R
0
C
3
5
(1)
B
=
2
4
1
L
1
0
1
L
2
0
0
0
3
5
(2)
where,
v
in
is
the
input
v
oltage,
d
represent
s
the
duty
c
ycle,
r
L1
and
r
L2
are
the
parasitic
resistances
of
the
inductors
L
1
and
L
2
respecti
v
ely
,
D
1
and
D
2
are
the
diodes,
while
C
is
the
capacitance
and
r
c
is
the
parasitic
resistance
of
the
capacitor
,
and
R
o
is
the
load
resistance.
3.
CONTR
OL
AND
DESIGN
METHODOLOGY
Controlling
DC
con
v
erters
is
particularly
chal
lenging
due
to
their
non-minimum
phase
beha
vior
[15].
Historically
,
methods
such
as
proportional
inte
gral
deri
v
ati
v
e
(PID),
h
ysteresis
control,
v
oltage
control,
and
current
control
ha
v
e
been
emplo
yed.
Ho
we
v
er
,
these
techniques
ha
v
e
limitations,
including
dif
ficulty
han-
dling
non-linearities
and
lar
ge
disturbances,
EMI
issues,
increased
losses
in
high-frequenc
y
applications,
slo
w
response
to
load
changes,
limitations
in
handling
v
arying
input
v
oltages,
comple
x
design,
and
e
xcessi
v
e
chat-
tering.
In
contrast,
the
proposed
method
combines
MPC
and
SMC
to
capitalize
on
the
strengths
of
both
ap-
proaches
while
mitig
ating
their
indi
vidual
weaknesses.
The
k
e
y
adv
antages
of
this
inte
grated
control
strate
gy
include
enhanced
rob
ustness,
reduced
chattering,
impro
v
ed
transient
response,
superior
capability
in
handling
constraints,
and
increased
o
v
erall
stability
.
The
amalg
amation
of
MPC
and
SMC
as
depicted
in
Figure
6.
The
strate
gic
utilization
of
MPC
in
the
outer
loop,
combined
with
SMC
in
the
inner
loop,
underscores
a
sophisticated
approach
aimed
at
optimizing
system
performance.
Central
to
this
design,
the
outer
MPC
loop
is
responsible
for
the
generation
of
a
precise
reference
current.
Meanwhile,
operating
in
tandem,
the
inner
SMC
loop
cautiously
tracks
the
current
to
its
designated
reference
point,
finally
arranging
control
techniques
in
a
w
ay
to
achie
v
e
the
best
possible
system
performance.
T
o
control
a
2-phase
IBC
using
MPC
and
SMC,
the
choice
of
using
control
techniques
in
the
inner
and
outer
loop
depends
on
se
v
eral
f
actors,
including
control
objecti
v
es,
system
dynamics,
and
computational
requirements.
This
particul
ar
research
uses
MPC
in
the
outer
loop
due
to
the
inherent
adv
antages
lik
e
handling
multi
v
ariable
control
objecti
v
es
and
constraints
ef
fecti
v
ely
,
enabling
the
interlea
v
ed
con
v
erters
to
operate
in
unison
and
producing
the
required
system
performance.
Meanwhile,
the
characteristics
lik
e
rob
ust
tracking
Indonesian
J
Elec
Eng
&
Comp
Sci,
V
ol.
36,
No.
3,
December
2024:
1421–1429
Evaluation Warning : The document was created with Spire.PDF for Python.
Indonesian
J
Elec
Eng
&
Comp
Sci
ISSN:
2502-4752
r
1425
and
disturbance
rejection,
particularly
in
systems
with
uncertain
dynamics
or
disturbances,
mak
e
the
SMC
the
best
suitable
choice
to
track
the
current
in
the
inner
loop.
Before
designing
a
controller
an
objecti
v
e
function
is
required,
in
this
particular
case
we
took
the
current
re
gulation
problem
as
a
control
problem
formulated
as,
i
L;er
r
(
)
=
i
L;r
ef
i
L
(
)
(3)
The
said
objecti
v
e
function
can
be
optimized
by
minimizing
the
error
as
follo
ws,
minimize
J
(
)
;
(4)
subject
to
the
ma
thematical
model
of
a
2-phase
IBC.
Moreo
v
er
,
T
able
1
sho
ws
the
initial
and
tar
get
v
alues
of
the
parameters
used
in
this
research
w
ork.
Figure
6.
The
proposed
controller
design
T
able
1.
P
arameters
used
and
their
v
alues
V
ariable
V
alue
Input
v
oltage
12
V
Output
v
oltage
24
V
Duty
ratio
0.5
Switching
frequenc
y
20
kHz
Load
resistance
100
Inductance
50
mH
Conductance
1
;
000
F
3.1.
Model
pr
edicti
v
e
contr
ol
A
finite-horizon
and
optimum
control
issue
based
on
a
process
linear
prediction
model
is
solv
ed
by
the
standard
MPC
technique
[16],
[17].
Because
of
its
simplicity
in
managing
multi
v
ariable
systems,
ability
to
introduce
input/output
constraints,
and
user
-friendly
design
process,
MPC
is
becoming
more
and
more
popular
in
the
field
of
po
wer
supply
[18],
[19].
Furthermore,
the
MPC
is
a
highly
ef
fecti
v
e
control
method
based
on
the
receding
horizon
control
concept
[20],
[21].
The
basic
steps
included
are
depicted
as
a
flo
wchart
in
Figure
7.
3.2.
Slide
mode
contr
oller
Gi
v
en
its
rob
ustness
and
resilience,
the
SMC
has
emer
ged
as
a
dependable
control
technique
for
attaining
desired
system
performance,
e
v
en
in
the
presence
of
uncertainties
and
disturbances
for
DC-DC
boost
con
v
erters
[22]–[26].
As
suggested,
the
SMC
is
incorporated
into
the
inner
loop,
where
the
control
signals
are
produced
using
the
SMC
la
w
,
which
adapti
v
ely
modifies
the
duty
c
ycles
of
the
switches
in
t
he
con
v
erter
.
As
en
visioned,
the
SMC
can
be
seamlessly
inte
grated
into
each
phase
of
the
2-phase
interlea
v
ed
con
v
erter
,
adeptly
re
gulating
the
inductor
current
and
steadf
astly
maintaining
it
at
the
reference
le
v
el,
particularly
within
the
inner
loop.
The
control
la
w
ensures
that
both
phases
operate
in
synchronization,
maintaining
balanced
operation
and
minimizing
output
v
oltage
ripple.
Advanced
contr
ol
and
optimization
str
ate
gies
for
a
2-phase
interleaved
...
(Muhammad
Adnan
Samad)
Evaluation Warning : The document was created with Spire.PDF for Python.
1426
r
ISSN:
2502-4752
Figure
7.
Flo
w
chart
illustrating
the
process
4.
RESUL
TS
AND
DISCUSSION
Due
to
the
non-minimum
phase
beha
vior
,
the
control
of
these
types
of
con
v
erters
is
al
w
ays
challeng-
ing.
This
particular
research
focuses
on
a
no
v
el
technique
that
combines
the
adv
antages
of
MPC
and
SMC.
The
ef
fecti
v
eness
of
the
proposed
technique
is
sho
wn
in
Figure
8
as
compared
to
the
step
response
of
a
2-phase
IBC
without
an
y
controller
in
Figure
9.
In
addition,
it
is
e
vident
from
T
able
2,
which
compares
the
step
response
parameters
for
both
sce-
narios,
that
the
proposed
controller
significantly
impro
v
es
performance.
Moreo
v
er
,
the
limitations
associated
with
the
tw
o-phase
interlea
v
ed
boost
con
v
erter
can
be
ef
fecti
v
ely
mitig
ated
by
impl
ementing
additional
stages
of
interlea
ving
i
n
future
w
ork.
Finally
,
the
pro
v
en
results
in
this
paper
demonstrate
the
pro
v
en
ef
fecti
v
eness
of
adv
anced
control
strate
gies
by
inte
grating
MPC
and
SMC.
Furt
h
e
rmore,
the
ef
fecti
v
eness
of
the
proposed
controller
is
also
v
erified
by
sho
wing
the
response
of
the
con
v
erter
without
and
with
controller
in
the
presence
of
a
disturbance
as
depicted
in
Figures
10
and
11.
Figure
8.
Step
response
using
MPSMC
controller
Figure
9.
Step
response
without
controller
T
able
2.
Comparison
of
step
response
parameters
Step
response
parameter
W
ithout
controller
W
ith
proposed
controller
Rise
time
(seconds)
0.000554
0.0008
Settling
time
(seconds)
0.0171
0.0032
Percentage
o
v
ershoot
(%)
0.74
0.9200
Final
v
alue
1.67
0.9909
Indonesian
J
Elec
Eng
&
Comp
Sci,
V
ol.
36,
No.
3,
December
2024:
1421–1429
Evaluation Warning : The document was created with Spire.PDF for Python.
Indonesian
J
Elec
Eng
&
Comp
Sci
ISSN:
2502-4752
r
1427
Figure
10.
Disturbance
as
a
square
w
a
v
e
Figure
11.
Disturbance
as
a
unit
step
5.
CONCLUSION
In
this
paper
,
we
proposed
a
no
v
el
method
t
hat
combines
the
characteristics
of
MPC
and
SMC
for
the
proper
control
of
a
2-phase
interlea
v
ed
boost
con
v
erter
.
2-phase
IBC
is
widely
used
in
dif
ferent
applications
because
it
can
share
current
load
between
phases
and
ripple
the
output
v
oltage.
Control
strate
gies
for
such
con-
v
erters
are,
ho
we
v
er
,
v
ery
challenging
as
the
y
ha
v
e
non-minimum
phase
beha
vior
.
The
h
ybrid
control
method
we
propose
combines
the
predicti
v
e
ability
of
MPC
to
predict
future
beha
vior
and
optimize
performance,
with
SMC
that
pro
vides
rob
ust
stability
ag
ainst
uncertainty/disturbance.
The
results
of
our
study
demonstrate
that
the
inte
grated
MPSMC
approach
ef
fecti
v
ely
mitig
ates
the
control
dif
ficulties
associated
with
the
2-phase
IBC.
This
frame
w
ork
inte
grates
inner
-loop
SMC
and
outer
-loop
MPC,
sho
wcasing
the
rob
ustness
and
adaptability
of
the
de
vised
control
strate
gy
.
The
combined
technique
of
fers
an
impro
v
ed
dynamic
response,
impro
v
ed
stabil-
ity
,
and
superior
handling
of
parameter
v
ariations
and
e
xternal
disturbances
compared
to
con
v
entional
control
methods.
In
conclusion,
the
proposed
MPSMC
technique
represents
a
significant
adv
ancement
in
the
control
of
int
erlea
v
ed
boost
con
v
erters.
Future
w
ork
will
focus
on
further
optimization
and
v
alidation
of
the
proposed
control
strate
gy
in
real-w
orld
applicat
ions,
ensuring
its
rob
ustness
and
ef
fecti
v
enes
s
in
di
v
erse
operational
en-
vironments.
REFERENCES
[1]
D.
J.
S.
Ne
wlin,
R.
Ramalakshmi,
and
S.
Rajasekara
n,
“
A
performance
comparison
of
interlea
v
ed
boost
con
v
erter
and
con
v
en-
tional
boost
con
v
erter
for
rene
w
able
ener
gy
application,
”
in
2013
International
Confer
ence
on
Gr
een
High
P
erformance
Computing
(ICGHPC)
,
Mar
.
2013,
pp.
1–6,
doi:
10.1109/ICGHPC.2013.6533924.
[2]
A.
Thiyag
arajan,
S.
G.
Pra
v
een
K
umar
,
and
A.
Nandini,
“
Analysis
and
comparison
of
con
v
entional
and
interlea
v
ed
DC/DC
boost
con
v
erter
,
”
in
Second
International
Confer
ence
on
Curr
ent
T
r
ends
In
Engineering
and
T
ec
hnolo
gy
-
ICCTET
2014
,
Jul.
2014,
pp.
198–205,
doi:
10.1109/ICCTET
.2014.6966287.
[3]
A.
Alzahrani,
G.
De
v
araja
n,
S.
Subra
mani,
I.
V
aira
v
asundaram,
and
C.
U.
Ogb
uka,
“
Analysis
and
v
alidation
of
multi-de
vice
inter
-
lea
v
ed
DC-DC
boost
con
v
erter
for
electric
v
ehicle
appl
ications,
”
IET
P
ower
Electr
onics
,
v
ol.
16,
no.
9,
pp.
1548–1557,
Jul.
2023,
doi:
10.1049/pel2.12494.
[4]
D.
Ra
vi,
S.
L.
Shimi,
B.
M.
Reddy
,
and
P
.
Samuel,
“
Analysis
and
modelling
of
tw
o-phase
interlea
v
ed
DC
to
DC
boost
con
v
erter
with
lifting
capacitor
for
fuel
cell
h
ybrid
electric
v
ehicle,
”
in
Applications
of
Computing
,
A
utomation
and
W
ir
eless
Systems
in
Electrical
Engineering:
Pr
oceedings
of
MARC
2018
,
2019,
v
ol.
553,
pp.
689–699,
doi:
10.1007/978-981-13-6772-4
59.
[5]
N.
Selv
araju,
P
.
Shanmugham,
and
S.
Somkun,
“T
w
o-phas
e
interlea
v
ed
boost
con
v
erter
using
coupled
inductor
for
fuel
cell
applica-
tions,
”
Ener
gy
Pr
ocedia
,
v
ol.
138,
pp.
199–204,
2017,
doi:
10.1016/j.e
gypro.2017.10.150.
[6]
M.
Phattanasak
et
al.
,
“Study
of
tw
o-phase
interlea
v
ed
boost
con
v
erter
using
coupled
inductors
for
a
fuel
cell,
”
in
2013
10th
Interna-
tional
Confer
ence
on
Electrical
Engineering/Electr
onics,
Computer
,
T
elecommunications
and
Information
T
ec
hnolo
gy
,
May
2013,
pp.
1–6,
doi:
10.1109/ECTICon.2013.6559613.
[7]
P
.
Thounthong,
P
.
Sethakul,
S.
Rael,
and
B.
Da
v
at,
“Design
and
implementation
of
2-phase
interlea
v
ed
boost
con
v
erter
for
fuel
cell
po
wer
source,
”
in
4th
IET
International
Confer
ence
on
P
ower
Electr
onics,
Mac
hines
and
Drives
(PEMD
2008)
,
2008,
pp.
91–95,
doi:
10.1049/cp:20080489.
[8]
Y
.-J.
Le
e
and
A.
Emadi,
“Phase
shift
switching
scheme
for
DC/DC
boost
con
v
erter
with
switches
in
parallel,
”
in
2008
IEEE
V
ehicle
P
ower
and
Pr
opulsion
Confer
ence
,
Sep.
2008,
pp.
1–6,
doi:
10.1109/VPPC.2008.4677615.
[9]
R.
F
.
Muktiadji
et
al.
,
“Control
of
boost
con
v
erter
using
observ
er
-based
backstepping
sliding
mode
control
for
DC
microgrid,
”
F
r
ontier
s
in
Ener
gy
Resear
c
h
,
v
ol.
10,
p.
828978,
Mar
.
2022,
doi:
10.3389/fenr
g.2022.828978.
Advanced
contr
ol
and
optimization
str
ate
gies
for
a
2-phase
interleaved
...
(Muhammad
Adnan
Samad)
Evaluation Warning : The document was created with Spire.PDF for Python.
1428
r
ISSN:
2502-4752
[10]
F
.
B.
Cunha
and
D.
J.
P
ag
ano,
“Limitations
in
the
control
of
a
DC-DC
boost
con
v
erter
,
”
IF
A
C
Pr
oceedings
V
olumes
(IF
A
C-
P
aper
sOnline)
,
v
ol.
15,
no.
1,
pp.
211–216,
2002,
doi:
10.3182/20020721-6-es-1901.01588.
[11]
M
.
A.
Samad
et
al.
,
“Composite
model
predicti
v
e
control
for
the
boost
con
v
erter
and
tw
o-phase
interlea
v
ed
boost
con
v
erter
,
”
F
r
ontier
s
in
Ener
gy
Resear
c
h
,
v
ol.
10,
p.
1009812,
Jan.
2023,
doi:
10.3389/fenr
g.2022.1009812.
[12]
P
.
Li,
R.
Liu,
and
X.
Ma,
“
Adapti
v
e
indirect
model
predicti
v
e
control
s
chemes
for
boost
con
v
erters,
”
in
2017
36th
Chinese
Contr
ol
Confer
ence
(CCC)
,
Jul.
2017,
pp.
9203–9207,
doi:
10.23919/ChiCC.2017.8028822.
[13]
L.
Po,
L.
Ruiyu,
S.
T
ian
ying,
Z.
Jingrui,
and
F
.
Zheng,
“Composite
adapti
v
e
model
predicti
v
e
control
for
DC–DC
boost
con
v
erters,
”
IET
P
ower
Electr
onics
,
v
ol.
11,
no.
10,
pp.
1706–1717,
Aug.
2018,
doi:
10.1049/iet-pel.2017.0835.
[14]
C.
Asma,
Z.
Abdelaziz,
and
Z.
Nadia,
“Dual
loop
control
of
DC-DC
boost
con
v
erter
based
cascade
sliding
mode
control,
”
in
2017
International
Confer
ence
on
Gr
een
Ener
gy
Con
ver
sion
Systems
(GECS)
,
Mar
.
2017,
pp.
1–6,
doi:
10.1109/GECS.2017.8066151.
[15]
G.
Abbas,
M.
A.
Samad,
J.
Gu,
M.
U.
Asad,
and
U.
F
arooq,
“Set-point
tracking
of
a
DC-DC
boost
con
v
erter
through
optimized
PID
controllers,
”
in
2016
IEEE
Canadian
Confer
ence
on
Electrical
and
Computer
Engineering
(CCECE)
,
May
2016,
pp.
1–5,
doi:
10.1109/CCECE.2016.7726841.
[16]
D.
Q.
Mayne,
“Model
predicti
v
e
control:
recent
de
v
elopments
and
future
promise,
”
A
utomatica
,
v
ol.
50,
no.
12,
pp.
2967–2986,
Dec.
2014,
doi:
10.1016/j.automatica.2014.10.128.
[17]
A.
Bemporad,
M.
Morari,
V
.
Dua,
and
E.
N.
Pistik
opoulos,
“The
e
xplicit
linear
quadratic
re
gulator
for
constrained
systems,
”
A
uto-
matica
,
v
ol.
38,
no.
1,
pp.
3–20,
Jan.
2002,
doi:
10.1016/S0005-1098(01)00174-1.
[18]
S.
V
azquez
et
al.
,
“M
odel
predicti
v
e
control:
a
re
vie
w
of
its
applications
in
po
wer
electronics,
”
IEEE
Industrial
Electr
onics
Ma
ga-
zine
,
v
ol.
8,
no.
1,
pp.
16–31,
Mar
.
2014,
doi:
10.1109/MIE.2013.2290138.
[19]
P
.
Karamanak
os,
T
.
Ge
yer
,
N.
Oik
onomou,
F
.
D.
Kieferndorf,
and
S.
Mani
as,
“Direct
model
predicti
v
e
control:
a
re
vie
w
of
strate
gies
that
achie
v
e
long
prediction
interv
als
for
po
wer
electronics,
”
IEEE
Industrial
Electr
onics
Ma
gazine
,
v
ol.
8,
no.
1,
pp.
32–43,
Mar
.
2014,
doi:
10.1109/MIE.2013.2290474.
[20]
K.
Belda
and
D.
V
osmik,
“Explicit
generalized
predicti
v
e
control
of
speed
and
position
of
PMSM
dri
v
es,
”
IEEE
T
r
ansactions
on
Industrial
Electr
onics
,
v
ol.
63,
no.
6,
pp.
3889–3896,
Jun.
2016,
doi:
10.1109/TIE.2016.2515061.
[21]
M.
G.
Jude
wicz,
S.
A.
Gonzalez,
N.
I.
Eche
v
erria,
J.
R.
Fischer
,
and
D.
O.
Carrica,
“Generalized
predicti
v
e
current
control
(GPCC)
for
grid-tie
three-phase
in
v
erters,
”
IEEE
T
r
ansactions
on
Industrial
Electr
onics
,
v
ol.
63,
no.
7,
pp.
4475–4484,
Jul
.
2016,
doi:
10.1109/TIE.2015.2508934.
[22]
Q.
Hu,
Z.
Liang,
H.
Y
u,
G.
Xia,
and
X.
Y
ang,
“
Application
of
sliding
mode
control
in
control
of
po
wer
electronic
con
v
erters,
”
in
ICEMS
2001
-
Pr
oceedings
of
the
5th
International
Confer
ence
on
Electrical
Mac
hines
and
Systems
,
2001,
v
ol.
1,
pp.
608–611,
doi:
10.1109/ICEMS.2001.970749.
[23]
H.
Guldemir
,
“Sliding
mode
control
of
DC-DC
boost
con
v
erter
,
”
J
ournal
of
Applied
Sciences
,
v
ol.
5,
no.
3,
pp.
588–592,
2005,
doi:
10.3923/jas.2005.588.592.
[24]
B.
A.
Martinez-T
re
vi
˜
no,
A.
El
Aroudi,
E.
V
idal-Idiarte,
A.
Cid-P
astor
,
and
L.
Martinez-Salamero,
“Sliding-mode
control
of
a
boost
con
v
erter
under
constant
po
wer
loading
conditions,
”
IET
P
ower
Elect
r
onics
,
v
ol.
12,
no.
3,
pp.
521–529,
Mar
.
2019,
doi:
10.1049/iet-pel.2018.5098.
[25]
N.
Boujelben,
M.
Djemel,
and
N.
Derbel,
“
Analysis
of
a
quadratic
boost
con
v
erter
using
sliding
mode
controller
,
”
in
2020
17th
Inter
-
national
Multi-Confer
ence
on
Systems,
Signals
&
De
vices
(SSD)
,
Jul.
2020,
pp.
969–973,
doi:
10.1109/SSD49366.2020.9364205.
[26]
C.
S.
Sachin
and
S.
G.
Nayak,
“Design
and
simulation
for
sliding
mode
control
in
DC-DC
boost
con
v
erter
,
”
in
2017
2nd
International
Confer
ence
on
Communication
and
Electr
onics
Systems
(ICCES)
,
Oct.
2017,
pp.
440–445,
doi:
10.1109/CESYS.2017.8321317.
BIOGRAPHIES
OF
A
UTHORS
Muhammad
Adnan
Samad
recei
v
ed
his
BSEE
and
MSEE
from
P
akistan
in
the
year
2011
and
2015
respecti
v
ely
.
He
is
a
Ph.D.
scholar
of
Beijing
Institute
of
T
echnology
,
Beijing,
China.
His
research
interests
include
po
wer
electronics,
DC-DC
con
v
erters
and
their
control,
image
and
signal
processing
and
optimization
techniques
especially
MPC.
He
is
w
orking
with
the
Electrical
Engineering,
Electrical
Mechanics
and
Electrical
T
echnologies
Department
at
the
Fer
g
ana
Polytech-
nic
Institute
(FerPI),
Fer
g
ana,
Uz
bekistan
since
No
v
ember
,
2023.
He
can
be
contacted
at
email:
samad.muhammad@ferpi.uz.
Usmono
v
Shukurillo
Y
ulbarso
vich
is
a
head
of
Electrical
Engineering,
Electrical
Me-
chanics
and
Electrical
T
echnologies
Department
at
the
Fer
g
ana
Polytechnic
Institute
(Fer
PI),
Fer
-
g
ana,
Uzbekistan.
He
recei
v
ed
his
B.Eng.,
M.Eng.,
and
Ph.D.
de
grees
in
po
wer
supply
of
industrial
enterprises,
cities,
and
agriculture
from
Fer
g
ana
Polytechnic
Institute
in
1988,
1991,
and
2017,
re-
specti
v
ely
.
He
has
been
an
associate
professor
in
FerPI,
Fer
g
ana,
Uzbekistan
since
2018.
His
research
interests
include
the
field
of
ener
gy
audit,
industrial
applications,
industrial
electronics,
industrial
in-
formatics,
po
wer
electronics,
motor
dri
v
es,
applications,
engineering
systems,
artificial
intelligence,
intelligent
control,
and
digital
library
.
He
can
be
contacted
at
email:
shusmono
v1976@gmail.com.
Indonesian
J
Elec
Eng
&
Comp
Sci,
V
ol.
36,
No.
3,
December
2024:
1421–1429
Evaluation Warning : The document was created with Spire.PDF for Python.
Indonesian
J
Elec
Eng
&
Comp
Sci
ISSN:
2502-4752
r
1429
Sultono
v
Ruzimatjon
An
v
arjon
Ugli
is
a
lecturer
in
Electrical
Engineering,
Electrical
Mechanics
and
Electrica
l
T
echnologies
Department
at
the
Fer
g
ana
Polytechnic
Institute
(FerPI),
Fer
-
g
ana,
Uzbekistan
since
2017;
and
he
has
been
a
senior
lecturer
since
2019.
She
recei
v
ed
the
B.Eng.
De
gree
in
Industrial
Heat
Ener
gy
and
the
M.Eng.
de
gree
in
industrial
heat
ener
gy
,
Ph.D.
de
gree
in
electrical
dri
v
ers
from
Fer
g
ana
Polytechnic
Institute
(FerPI),
Fer
g
ana,
Uzbekistan
in
2015,
2017,
and
2023,
respecti
v
ely
.
He
w
as
an
assi
stant
of
the
Department
of
Electr
ical
Engineering,
Electri-
cal
Mechanics
and
Electric
al
T
echnologies
of
Fer
g
ana
Polytechnic
Institute
from
2017.
He
is
good
at
MA
TLAB
programming
language.
His
research
interests
i
nclude
the
field
of
po
wer
electronics,
motor
dri
v
es,
and
industrial
applications.
He
can
be
contacted
at
email:
ruzimatjonsultono
v@gmail.com.
Saima
Siddiqui
is
w
orking
as
an
associate
professor
in
the
Department
of
Mathemat-
ics
at
the
Fe
r
g
a
na
Polytechnic
Institute
(FerPI),
Fer
g
ana,
Uzbekistan.
She
c
ompleted
her
Ph.D.
in
Mathematics
from
Beijing
Institute
of
T
echnolgy
in
2022.
While
her
M.Phil,
Master’
s
and
Bach-
elor’
s
de
gree
is
from
the
Uni
v
ersity
of
the
Punjab,
Lahore,
P
akistan
in
the
yea
r
2011,
2008,
2006
respecti
v
ely
.
Her
research
interests
are
fourier
transform,
fractional
fourier
transform,
linear
canoci-
cal
transform,
and
quantum
signal
processing,
especially
in
the
field
of
signal
and
image
processing.
She
can
be
contacted
at
email:
saimasiddiqui07@gmail.com.
Advanced
contr
ol
and
optimization
str
ate
gies
for
a
2-phase
interleaved
...
(Muhammad
Adnan
Samad)
Evaluation Warning : The document was created with Spire.PDF for Python.