Inter national J our nal of Electrical and Computer Engineering (IJECE) V ol. 15, No. 6, December 2025, pp. 5380 5387 ISSN: 2088-8708, DOI: 10.11591/ijece.v15i6.pp5380-5387 5380 Enhanced matrix pencil method f or r ob ust and efcient dir ection of arri v al estimation in sparse and multi-fr equency en vir onments Ashraya A. N., Punithkumar M. B. Department of Electronics and Communication Engineering, PES Colle ge of Engineering, Mandya, India Article Inf o Article history: Recei v ed Jan 11, 2025 Re vised Sep 3, 2025 Accepted Sep 15, 2025 K eyw ords: Direction of arri v al estimation Lo w signal-to-noise ratio Matrix pencil method P article sw arm optimization Signal processing Sparse arrays ABSTRA CT Accurate direction of arri v al (DO A) estimation is vital for applications in radar , sonar , wireless communication, and localization. This paper proposes an en- hanced matrix pencil method (MPM) frame w ork to o v ercome limitations of traditional methods such as noise sensiti vity , computational inef cienc y , and challenges with sparse arrays. The frame w ork incorporates w a v elet-based de- noising for impro v ed rob ustness in lo w signal -to-noise ratio (SNR) en viron- ments and emplo ys particle sw arm optimizati on (PSO) to optimize k e y param- eters, achie ving a balance between accurac y and ef cienc y . Extending MPM to tw o-dimensional (2D) DO A estimation, the method precisely determines az- imuth and ele v ation angles. Comprehensi v e mathematical formulations and eigen v alue computations underlie the proposed enhancements. Simulation re- sults v alidate its superiority o v er state-of-the-a rt techniques lik e MUSIC and ES- PRIT , achie vi ng up to 30% impro v ement in root mean square error (RMSE) and reducing computational time by 20%–30%. Sensiti vity analysis demonstrates rob ustness across v arying noise le v el s, array geometries, and multi-frequenc y scenarios. This scalable and ef cient frame w ork addres ses critical challenges in DO A estimation and of fers promising directions for future adv ancements in real-time and resource-constrained en vironments. This is an open access article under the CC BY -SA license . Corresponding A uthor: Ashraya A. N. Department of Electronics and Communication Engineering, PES Colle ge of Engineering Mandya, Karnataka, India Email: ashraya009@gmail.com 1. INTR ODUCTION Accurate estimation of the direction of arri v al (DO A) of incoming signals is a cornerstone of modern signal processing, with applications spanning radar , sonar , wireless communication, and radio astronomy [1]. The increasing demand for high-resolution, real-time DO A estimation in adv anced applications such as 5G, autonomous v ehicles, and internet of things (IoT) systems underscores the need for rob ust and computationally ef cient algorithms [2], [3]. The matrix pencil method (MPM) has g ained recognition for its lo w computational comple xity and ability to handle challenging scenarios, outperforming traditional approaches lik e MUSIC and ESPRIT , particularly in lo w signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) en vironments and for coherent signals [4]–[6]. Despite its adv antages, standard implementations of MPM f ace se v eral challenges, including ambi- guities in sparse arrays, mutual coupling ef fects am ong closely spaced sensors, and dif culties in processing multi-frequenc y signals [7]–[9]. These limitations restrict the practical applicability of MPM in dynamic en vi- J ournal homepage: http://ijece .iaescor e .com Evaluation Warning : The document was created with Spire.PDF for Python.
Int J Elec & Comp Eng ISSN: 2088-8708 5381 ronments where precise localization of signal sources is crucial [10], [11]. This research proposes an enhanced MPM-based frame w ork that incorporates w a v elet-based de-noising for impro v ed rob ustness in lo w SNR con- ditions and a unitary matrix transformation to address mutual coupling ef fects. Additionally , the frame w ork e xtends MPM’ s capabilities t o support multi -frequenc y signals and scalable one-dim ensional (1D) and tw odi- mensional (2D) DO A estimation, tailored for sparse and irre gular arrays [12]–[14]. 2. CONTRIB UTION This paper mak es signicant contrib utions to the eld of DO A estimation by addressing k e y limi ta- tions of the MPM. The major contrib utions of this research are summarized belo w: Proposed a no v el MPM frame w ork for one-dimensional (1D) and tw o-dimens ional (2D) DO A estimation, incorporating w a v elet-based de-noising to enhance rob ustness in SNR en vironments and a unitary matrix transformation to mitig ate mutual coupling ef fects. Introduced particle sw arm optimization (PSO) to ne-tune critical MPM parameters, including the pencil f actor and noise thresholds. Comprehensi v ely performed an e xtensi v e sensiti vity analys is under v arying noise le v els, array congura- tions, and signal frequencies. The proposed contrib utions establish a rob ust and computationally ef cient solution for DO A es ti- mation, enabling the practical deplo yment of MPM in adv anced signal processing applications and modern communication systems. 3. PR OPOSED METHODOLOGY The proposed frame w ork emplo ys the MPM for ef cient and rob ust DO A estimation, addressi ng chal- lenges such as sparse arrays, multi-frequenc y signals, and mutual coupling ef fects. This methodology inte grates a system model, signal formulation, and adv anced techniques tailored to enhance MPM’ s performance. A uniform linear array (ULA) with M antenna elements, spaced d apart, is considered. The recei v ed signal at the m -th antenna is modeled as [15] in (1): x m ( t ) = N X i =1 s i ( t ) e j 2 π d sin( θ i ) + n m ( t ) (1) where s i ( t ) represents the i -th source signal, λ is the w a v elength, and n m ( t ) is additi v e noise. Collecti v ely , the recei v ed signals are e xpressed in (2): X ( t ) = A ( θ ) S ( t ) + N ( t ) (2) where A ( θ ) is the steering matrix, S ( t ) is the source signal matrix, and N ( t ) is the noise matrix. DO A estimation with MPM proceeds as follo ws: The DO A estimation process using the MPM in- v olv es three major steps. First, the recei v ed data are transformed into a Hank el matrix Y as Y = x (1) x (2) · · · x ( L ) x (2) x (3) · · · x ( L + 1) . . . . . . . . . . . . x ( K ) x ( K + 1) · · · x ( M ) , L is the pencil parameter . Ne xt, singular v alue decomposition (SVD) is applied to Y , i.e., Y = U Σ V H , where the dominant singular v alues represent the signal subspace. Subsequently , submatrices Y 1 and Y 2 are formed by e xcluding the last and rst ro ws of Y , respecti v ely , and the relation Y 2 = Λ Y 1 , θ i = arcsin λ 2 π d arg ( λ i ) is solv ed to obtain the eigen v alues λ i and compute the DO A angles. This compact formulation enhances read- ability while re taining the essential mathematical clarity of the MPM procedure. This streamlined methodology ensures rob ust and computationally ef cient DO A estimation, making it suitable for real-w orld applications such as radar and communication systems. Enhanced matrix pencil method for r ob ust and ef cient dir ection of arrival estimation in ... (Ashr aya A N) Evaluation Warning : The document was created with Spire.PDF for Python.
5382 ISSN: 2088-8708 4. PR OPOSED EFFICIENT TECHNIQ UE FOR DO A ESTIMA TION WITH NUMERICAL COM- PUT A TION The proposed frame w ork enhances rob ustness and optimizes performance in DO A estimation by in- te grating adv anced techniques. Donoho’ s w a v elet shrinkage is applied to remo v e high-frequenc y noise under lo w SNR conditions while preserving the signal structure [16]. PSO is used to optimize the pencil parameter L and singular v alue selection thresholds, minimizing the root mean square error (RMSE) of DO A estimation: Fitness = 1 N N X i =1 ( ˆ θ i θ i ) 2 . The frame w ork, illustrated in Figure 1, consists of signal preprocessing, Hank el matrix formation, eigen v alue computation, and DO A estimation [17]–[19]. Comprehensi v e mathematical deri v ations in section 4 ensure theoretical rigor and reproducibility . By combining w a v elet-based de-noising, MPM, eigen v alue com- putation, and PSO-based optimization, the frame w ork achie v es high accurac y and computational ef cienc y , addressing critical challenges in DO A estimation. Figure 1. Block diagram of the proposed DO A estimation frame w ork using matrix pencil method 4.1. W a v elet-based de-noising T o impro v e rob ustness in l o w SNR en vironments, Donoho’ s w a v elet de-noising is applied to the re- cei v ed signal x ( t ) . The signal is decomposed as: x ( t ) = K X k =0 c k ψ k ( t ) , where c k are the w a v elet coef cients, and ψ k ( t ) are w a v elet basis functions [18]. Thresholding c k eliminates high-frequenc y noise, yielding a noise-reduced signal [20]. 4.2. Matrix pencil method (MPM) f ormulation The de-noised signal is transformed into a Hank el matrix Y to capture spatial and temporal character - istics: Y = x (0) x (1) · · · x ( L 1) x (1) x (2) · · · x ( L ) . . . . . . . . . . . . x ( M L + 1) x ( M L + 2) · · · x ( M ) , where L is the pencil parameter [21]. 4.3. Eigen v alue computation Submatrices Y 1 and Y 2 are constructed by remo ving the last and rst ro ws of Y , respecti v ely: Y 2 = ΛY 1 , where Λ contains eigen v alues. The DO A angles θ i are obtained as: θ i = arcsin λ 2 π d arg ( λ i ) [ 22 ] . Int J Elec & Comp Eng, V ol. 15, No. 6, December 2025: 5380-5387 Evaluation Warning : The document was created with Spire.PDF for Python.
Int J Elec & Comp Eng ISSN: 2088-8708 5383 4.4. Optimization with particle swarm optimization (PSO) PSO optimizes the pencil parameter L and noise thresholds. The tness function minimizes DO A estimation error: Fitness = 1 N N X i =1 ˆ θ i θ i 2 , where ˆ θ i and θ i are the estimated and actual DO As [5]. P articl es iterati v ely update their positions and v elocities based on indi vidual and global best positions, ensuring ef cient e xploration of the solution space. The con v er - gence curv e, illustrated in Figure 2, demonstrates rapid initial impro v ement follo wed by gradual renement, indicating rob ust and ef cient optimization [23]. The inte gration of these techniques ensures high accurac y and computational ef cienc y , making the proposed frame w ork suitable for real-w orld DO A estimation challenges. Figure 2. Con v er gence graph of the proposed PSO optimization 5. RESUL TS AND COMP ARA TIVE AN AL YSIS Before conducting result analysis, sensiti vity analysis is conducted to e v aluate the rob ustness of the proposed method by systematically v arying k e y parameters, i ncluding noise le v els within an SNR range of -10 dB to +20 dB, array congurations such as uniform and sparse setups, and signal frequencies encompassing single and multi-frequenc y scenarios. The impact of these v ariations on estimation accurac y is thoroughly analyzed to g ain insights into the resilience of the proposed approach. The performance of the proposed MPM frame w ork for DO A estimation is e v aluated based on se v eral metrics, including root mean square error (RMSE) v ersus signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) depicts i n Figure 3(a), computational ef cienc y , and rob ustness under v arying conditions depicts in Figure 3(b). Comparati v e analyses are conducted ag ainst state-of-the-art methods such as MUSIC and ESPRIT to demonstrate the ef fecti v eness of the proposed approach depicts in Figure 4(a) [1], [5],[7]. The simulations were performed using a uniform linear array (ULA) of 8 elements with half-w a v elength spacing ( d = λ/ 2 ). Source signals were generated across a range of angles with the follo wing congurations: signal frequencies of 1 GHz and 2 GHz, SNR le v els v arying from 10 dB to 20 dB, three source signals ( N = 3 ), and optimization settings in v olving PSO with 50 particles and 100 iterations. Performance e v al uation focused on three metrics. First, RMSE measured the de viation of estim ated angles from true angles using the formula: RMSE = v u u t 1 N N X i =1 ( ˆ θ i θ i ) 2 . Second, computational ef cienc y w as assessed by the time required for DO A estimation in seconds. Third, rob ustness w as analyzed by studying the sensiti vity of the proposed method to noise and sparse array congu- rations. Enhanced matrix pencil method for r ob ust and ef cient dir ection of arrival estimation in ... (Ashr aya A N) Evaluation Warning : The document was created with Spire.PDF for Python.
5384 ISSN: 2088-8708 (a) (b) Figure 3. Performance comparison of dif ferent DO A estimation techniques (a) comparison of RMSE for dif ferent methods under v arying SNR le v els and (b) computational ef cienc y comparison between MPM, MUSIC, and ESPRIT The results demonstrate that the proposed MPM consistently outperforms MUSIC and ESPRIT across v arying SNR le v els. As sho wn in Figure 4(a), the proposed method achie v es sub-de gree accurac y e v en at SNR = 5 dB, highlighting its superior rob ustness and precision in lo w-SNR en vironments. This establishes the proposed MPM frame w ork as a rob ust and ef cient solution for DO A estimation in practical scenarios. T able 1 and Figure 3(b) highlight the computational ef cienc y of the proposed MPM, achie ving a 30% reduction in computational time compared to MUSIC and a 20% impro v ement o v er ESPRIT . Computational ef cienc y is critical for real-time applications in communication and radar systems, where rapid processing is essential [1], [9], [3]. The proposed MPM eliminates co v ariance matrix construction and directly operates on structured signal matrices, signicantly reducing o v erhead. Streamlined eigen v alue computation and PSO further enhance ef cienc y , balancing accurac y and computational demands. These adv ancements mak e the frame w ork scalable and suitable for real-w orld systems requiring ef cient and precise DO A estimation. Furthermore, Figure 4(b) illustrates the rob ustness of the proposed frame w ork under sparse array congurations. The method maintains high accurac y across v arying element spacings, demonstrating its adapt- ability to non-uniform arrays. Moreo v er , the proposed MPM frame w ork w as compared with e xisting methods, including MUSIC and ESPRIT , based on RMSE, computational ef cienc y , and rob ustness [15], [19], [24]. The analysis re v ealed that the proposed method achie v es a 20%–30% impro v ement in accurac y under lo w SNR conditions. Computational ef cienc y is enhanced through direct eigen v alue computation and optimized pencil parameters. Additionally , the proposed frame w ork demonstrates superior rob ustness, particularly in handling sparse and irre gular array congurations, outperforming state-of-the-art techniques [1], [25], [5]. Int J Elec & Comp Eng, V ol. 15, No. 6, December 2025: 5380-5387 Evaluation Warning : The document was created with Spire.PDF for Python.
Int J Elec & Comp Eng ISSN: 2088-8708 5385 (a) (b) Figure 4. Comprehensi v e analysis of rob ustness and ef cienc y of the proposed frame w ork (a) comparati v e analysis of computational ef cienc y and (b) performance of the proposed method under sparse array congurations T able 1. Computational ef cienc y comparison Method Comput ation time (s) Accurac y (RMSE) SNR range (dB) Proposed MPM 0.45 0.8 -10 to 20 MUSIC 0.65 1.5 -5 to 20 ESPRIT 0.55 1.2 -7 to 20 6. DISCUSSION The proposed MPM frame w ork enhances DO A estimation by inte grating w a v elet-based de-noising and PSO, achie ving high accurac y in lo w SNR conditions and impro v ed computational ef cienc y by eliminat- ing co v ariance matrix construction. Its rob ust performance with sparse arrays and 2D DO A estimation broadens its applicability to adv anced radar and localization systems. Challenges include the computational o v erhead of PSO for lar ge-scale arrays, renement needed for closely spaced multi-frequenc y signals, and hardw are implementation constraints in resource-limited en vironments. Future directions in v olv e adapti v e optimization techniques lik e genetic algorithms (GA), impro v ed multi-frequenc y signal handling, and hardw are acceleration using FPGAs or GPUs. Incorporating machine learning models could further enable adapti v e DO A estimation in dynamic scenarios. In summary , the frame w ork of fers a scala b l e and ef cient solution for DO A estimation with signicant potential for further adv ancements. 7. CONCLUSION This paper presents an enhanced MPM frame w ork for DO A estimation, addressing critical chal lenges such as noise sensiti vity , computational inef cienc y , and limitations with sparse and irre gular array congura- Enhanced matrix pencil method for r ob ust and ef cient dir ection of arrival estimation in ... (Ashr aya A N) Evaluation Warning : The document was created with Spire.PDF for Python.
5386 ISSN: 2088-8708 tions. The proposed method achie v es 20%–30% higher accurac y , with reduced RMSE compared to MUSIC and ESPRIT under lo w SNR conditions. Computational ef cienc y is signicantly i mpro v ed, reducing e x ecu- tion time by 30% through direct eigen v alue computation. The frame w ork maintains sub-de gree accurac y in sparse and irre gular arrays and e xtends its scalability to 2D DO A estimation, broadening its applicability to adv anced radar and localization systems. Comparati v e analyses further v alidate the method’ s superiority in terms of RMSE, SNR thresholds, computational time (0.45 seconds vs. 0.65 seconds for MUSIC and 0.55 seconds for ESPRIT), and adaptability to non-uniform arrays. Future research direct ions include inte grating adv anced optimization techniques such as genetic algorithms or deep reinforcement learning, enhancing multi-frequenc y signal handling, e xploring hardw are acceleration using FPGAs or GPUs, and le v eraging machine learning for adapti v e DO A estimation. In summary , the proposed MPM frame w ork of fers a rob ust, ef cient, and scalable solution for modern com- munication and radar systems. Addressi ng the outlined future direct ions will further enhance its impact and applicability in real-w orld scenarios. REFERENCES [1] C . Greif f, F . Gio v anneschi, and M. A. Gonzalez-Huici, “Matrix pencil method for doa estimation with interpolated arrays, in 2020 IEEE International Radar Conference (RAD AR) , 2020, pp. 566– 571, doi: 10.1109/RAD AR42522.2020.9114577. [2] B . Boustani, A. Baghdad, A. Sahel, and A. Badri, “Performance analysis of direction of arri v al algorithms for smart an- tenna, International Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering (IJECE) , v ol. 9, no. 6, pp. 4873-4881, 2019, doi: 10.11591/ijece.v9i6.pp4873-4881. [3] L. Li, Y . Chen, B. Zang, and L. Jiang, A high-precision tw o-di mensional DO A estimation algorithm with parallel coprime array , Circuits, Systems, and Signal Processing , v ol. 41, no. 12, pp. 6960–6974, 2022, doi: 10.1007/s00034-022-02102-7. [4] K . Raghu and K. N. Prameela, “Bayesian learning scheme for sparse DO A estimation based on maximum- a-posteriori of h y- perparameters, International Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering (IJECE) , v ol. 11, no. 4, pp3049-3058, 2021, doi: 10.11591/ijece.v11i4.pp3049-3058. [5] M. A. Ihedrane and S. Bri, “Direction of arri v al in tw o dimensions with matrix pencil method, in International Conference on Information T echnology and Communication Systems , 2018, pp. 219–228, doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-64719-7-19. [6] M. Pesa v ento, M. T rinh-Hoang, and M. V iber g, “Three more decades in array signal processing research: An optimiza- tion and structure e xploitation perspecti v e, IEEE Signal Processing Mag azine , v ol. 40, no. 4, pp. 92–106, 2023, doi: 10.1109/MSP .2023.3255558. [7] H. T . Thanh and V . V an Y em, “Rob ust system architecture for DO A estimation based on total forw ard backw ard matrix pencil algorithm, International Journal of Computer Applications , v ol. 126, no. 4, 2015, doi: 10.5120/ijca2015906033. [8] S. Zheng, Z. Y ang, W . Shen, L. Zhang, J. Zhu, Z. Zhao, and X. Y ang, “Deep learning-based doa estimation, IEEE T ransactions on Cogniti v e Communications and Netw orking , v ol. 10, no. 3, pp. 819-835, 2024, doi: 10.1109/TCCN.2024.3360527. [9] J. K oh and T . K. Sarkar , High resolution doa estimation using matrix pencil, IEEE Antennas and Propag ation Society Symposium , v ol. 1, v ol. 1, pp. 423–426, 2004, doi: 10.1109/APS.2004.1329664. [10] J. Song, L. Cao, Z. Zhao, D. W ang, and C. Fu, “F ast DO A estimation algorithms via positi v e incremental modied cholesk y decomposition for augmented coprime array sensors, Sensors , v ol. 23, no. 21, p. 8990, 2023, doi: 10.3390/s23218990. [11] A. Azarbar , G. Dadashzadeh, and H. Bakhshi, “2-D DO A estimation with matrix pencil method in the presence of mutua l coupling, The Applied Computational Electromagnetics Society Journal (A CES) , pp. 742–748, 2012. [12] P . Chen, Z. Chen, L. Liu, Y . Chen, and X. W ang, “SDO A-Net: An ef cient deep-learning-based DO A estimation netw ork for im- perfect array , IEEE T r ansactions on Instrumentation and Measur ement , v ol. 73, pp. 1–12, 2024, doi: 10.1109/TIM.2024.3391338. [13] I. Aboumahmoud, A. Muqaibel, M. Alhassoun, and S. Ala wsh, A re vie w of sparse sensor arrays for tw o-dimensional direction-of- arri v al estimation, IEEE Access , v ol. 9, pp. 92999–93017, 2021, doi: 10.1109/A CCESS.2021.3092529. [14] Y . Liu, L. Zhang, C. Zhu, and Q. H. Liu, “Synthesis of nonuniformly spaced linear arrays with frequenc y-in v ariant patterns by the generalized matrix pencil methods, IEEE T r ansactions on Antennas and Pr opa gation , v ol. 63, no. 4, pp. 1614–1625, Apr . 2015, doi: 10.1109/T AP .2015.2394497. [15] T . Lin, X. Zhou, Y . Zhu, and Y . Jiang, “Hybrid beamforming optimization for DO A estimation based on the CRB analysis, IEEE Signal Pr ocessing Letter s , v ol. 28, pp. 1490–1494, 2021, doi: 10.1109/LSP .2021.3092613. [16] Y errisw amy and Jag adeesha, “F ault tolerant matrix pencil method for direction of arri v al estimation, Signal Ima g e Pr ocessing: An International J ournal , v ol. 2, no. 3, pp. 55–67, Sep. 2011, doi: 10.5121/sipij.2011.2306. [17] N. Y ilmazer , J. K oh, and T . K. Sarkar , “Utilization of a unitary transform for ef cient computation in the matrix pencil method to nd the direction of arri v al, IEEE T r ansactions on Antennas and Pr opa gation , v ol. 54, no. 1, pp. 175–180, 2006, doi: 10.1109/T AP .2005.861567. [18] R. K. Arumug am, A. Froehly , P . W allrath, R. Herschel, and N. Pohl, “Matrix pencil based estimation of parame ters in 2D for non- collinear uniform linear arrays, in Pr oceedings of the 2024 21st Eur opean Radar Confer ence (EuRAD 2024) , pp. 364–367, 2024, doi: 10.23919/EuRAD61604.2024.10734880. [19] L. A. T rinh, N. D. Thang, D. Kim, S. Lee, and S. Chang, Application of matrix pencil algorithm to mobile robot localization using h ybrid DO A/T O A estimation, International J ournal of Advanced Robotic Systems , v ol. 9, 2012, doi: 10.5772/54712. [20] P . Rocca, M. A. Hannan, M. Salucci, and A. Massa, “Single-snapshot DO A estimation in array antennas with mutual coupling through a multiscaling BCS strate gy , IEEE T r ansactions on Antennas and Pr opa gation , v ol. 65, no. 6, pp. 3203–3213, 2017, doi: 10.1109/T AP .2017.2684137. [21] T . T irer and O. Bialer , “Direction of arri v al estimation and phase-correction for noncoherent subarrays: A con v e x op- Int J Elec & Comp Eng, V ol. 15, No. 6, December 2025: 5380-5387 Evaluation Warning : The document was created with Spire.PDF for Python.
Int J Elec & Comp Eng ISSN: 2088-8708 5387 timization approach, IEEE T r ansactions on Aer ospace and Electr onic Systems , v ol. 58, no. 6, pp. 5571–5585, 2022, doi: 10.1109/T AES.2022.3175465. [22] X. Jin et al. , “Of f-grid DO A estimation algorithm based on e xpanded matr ix and matrix pencil, in Pr oceedings of the IEEE V ehicular T ec hnolo gy Confer ence , 2024, pp. 1–6, doi: 10.1109/VTC2024-Spring62846.2024.10683422. [23] Y . Zheng and Y . Y u, “Joint estimation of DO A and TDO A of multiple reections by matrix pencil in mobile communications, IEEE Access , v ol. 7, pp. 15469–15477, 2019, doi: 10.1109/A CCESS.2019.2895102. [24] H. A. T anti, A. Datta, and S. Ananthakrishnan, “Snapshot a v eraged matrix pencil method (SAM) for direction of arri v al estimation, Experimental Astr onomy , v ol. 56, no. 1, pp. 267–292, 2023, doi: 10.1007/s10686-023-09897-6. [25] R. Shari and S. Jacob, “Comparati v e study of DO A estimation algorithms, in Pr oceedings of the INDIC ON 2022 - IEEE 19 th India Council International Confer ence , 2022, pp. 1–4, doi: 10.1109/INDICON56171.2022.10040076. BIOGRAPHIES OF A UTHORS Ashraya A. N. w orking as an ass istant professor in the Department of Electronics and Communication Engineering PES Colle ge of Engineering, Mandya has about 10 years of teaching e xperience. She recei v ed her B.E de gree in Electronics and Communication Engineering and M.T ech. de gree in Digital Electronics and Communication from V isv esv araya T echnological Uni v ersity , Be- lag a vi, Karnataka. Her areas of research includes communication, signal processing. She can be contacted at email: ashraya009@gmail.com. Punith K umar M. B. obtained his B.E. de gree in electronics and communication engineer - ing from The National Institute of Engineering, Mysore in 2007, and the M.T ech in VLSI design and embedded systems from PES Colle ge of Engineering, Mandya under the The V isv esv araya T echno- logical Uni v ersity (VTU), Belg aum in 2010 and Ph.D. de grees in Electronics from the Uni v ersity of Mysore (UoM), Mysore, India, in 2017. He presently w orking as professor and HOD in Department of Electronics and Communication Engineering, PES Colle ge of Engineering Mandya. His current research interests include image processing, video processing, video shot detection, and embedded system. Published 30 paper in the international and national journal and obtained one patent, Pub- lished the book on his research w ork. Dr . Punith K umar M B is a Member of IEEE. Life Member of the Indian Society for T echnical Education (ISTE) and associate member of the Institution of Engi- neers (AMIE), He w as the Judge, Chairperson and Re vie w member for the National and International Conference. He can be contacted at email: punithkumarmb@pesce.ac.in. Enhanced matrix pencil method for r ob ust and ef cient dir ection of arrival estimation in ... (Ashr aya A N) Evaluation Warning : The document was created with Spire.PDF for Python.