IAES Inter national J our nal of Articial Intelligence (IJ-AI) V ol. 15, No. 4, August 2026, pp. 3164 3175 ISSN: 2252-8938, DOI: 10.11591/ijai.v15.i4.pp3164-3175 3164 Exploring cogniti v e patter ns in childr en with autism spectrum disorder using corr elation and cluster analysis Hana Bezzih 1 , Muna Darweesh 2 , Amjad Gawanmeh 2 1 Laboratoire Applied Research in Psychology and Education, Uni v ersity Mohammed Lamine Dabaghine, Setif, Algeria 2 Colle ge of Engineering and Information T echnology , Uni v ersity of Dubai, Dubai, United Arab Emirates Article Inf o Article history: Recei v ed No v 15, 2024 Re vised May 14, 2026 Accepted Jul 9, 2026 K eyw ords: Autism spectrum disorder Autism spectrum disorder assessment Cogniti v e de v elopment Correlation and cluster analysis V isual-spatial skills ABSTRA CT This paper in v estig ates the relationships between age and v e cogniti v e abilities in children diagnosed with autism spec trum disorder (ASD). Data f rom 210 children aged 6 to 12 years who completed measures of visual motor precision (VM), f acial memory (FM), spatial vision (SV), dra wing memory (DM), and orientation (OR) were analyzed. Data preparation, descripti v e statistical analysis, correlation analysis, cluster analysis, and f actor analysis were conducted. The results sho wed that age w as not signicantly associated with the cogniti v e measures. The cle arest association w as a moderate positi v e correlation between VM and FM (0.34). Cluster analysis ident ied three groups. Ho we v er , the lo w silhouette score (0.1368) indicated weak separation and substantial o v erlap between cogniti v e proles. F actor analysis suggested three latent dimensions: f actor 1 w as strongly associated with VM and FM; f actor 2 w as ne g ati v ely related to DM and moderately pos iti v ely related to OR; and f actor 3 w as primarily dri v en by SV . These ndings suggest that cogniti v e abilities in children with ASD operate relati v ely independently , with some shared mechanisms between certain skills. It can be concluded that indi vidualized approaches in assessment and interv ention strate gies are w arranted. This is an open access article under the CC BY -SA license . Corresponding A uthor: Amjad Ga w anmeh Colle ge of Engineering and Information T echnology , Uni v ersity of Dubai Dubai, United Arab Emirates Email: amjad.g a w anmeh@ieee.or g 1. INTR ODUCTION Cogniti v e v ariability is a core feature of autism spectrum disorder (ASD), a neuro-de v elopmental condition characterized by challenges in social interaction, communication, and repetiti v e beha viors. Children with ASD often e xhibit wide-ranging dif ferences in cogniti v e abilities, impacting learning, and daily functioning. K e y cogniti v e abilities, including visual motor precision (VM), f acial memory (FM) [1], spatial vision (SV) [2], dra wing memory (DM) [3], and orientation (OR) [4], play crucial roles in a child’ s capacity to eng age with and comprehend their surroundings. Understanding the relationships between these cogniti v e skills could identify de v elopmental needs of children with ASD and f acilitate the design of tar geted interv ention and educational strate gies [5]. VM refers to the coordination of visual perception and motor action, for e xample, during writing, tracing, or dra wing. Dif culties in VM may interfere with tasks that require hand-e ye coordination and ne motor control. FM refers to the ability to recognize and remember f aces and is closely link ed to social interaction. Dif culties in FM may contrib ute to challenges in recognizing people and interpreting social cues. J ournal homepage: http://ijai.iaescor e .com Evaluation Warning : The document was created with Spire.PDF for Python.
Int J Artif Intell ISSN: 2252-8938 3165 SV refers to the ability to percei v e spatial relations between objects and the self, which is needed for na vig ation and understanding spatial en vironments. DM measures the ability to recall and reproduce visual forms or patterns, reecting visual memory and visual processing. OR refers to spatial a w areness and the ability to locate oneself or objects accurately in space. T ogether , these abilities pro vide a useful prole of cogniti v e functioning in children with ASD. Pre vious research suggests that cogniti v e abilities in ASD are heterogeneous, with children sho wing dif ferent patterns of strengths and weaknesses across domains [6], [7]. Ho we v er , the relationships between these abilities remain unclear . It is not yet clear whether stronger performance in one cogniti v e domain is associated with st ronger performance in another , or whether these domains de v elop lar gely independently . Therefore, this study e xamined the correlations between age, VM, FM, SV , DM, and OR in a sample of 210 children with ASD aged 6 to 12 years. This age range w as selected because it represents an important de v elopmental period during which cogniti v e abilities are acti v ely shaping learning, communication, and adapti v e functioning. T o e xamine the relationships between the cogniti v e measures, this st u dy e xtends the pre vious results [8] and use Pearson and Spearman correlation matrices to assess both linear and rank-based relationships between age and the v e cogniti v e v ariables. This approach allo wed us to determine whether specic abilities tended to co-v ary , and whether age w as as sociated with cogniti v e performance within the sample. Identifying such associations is important because related abilities may share underlying mechanisms or may impro v e together during interv ention. This study then used K-means cluster analysis to e xamine whether children with ASD could be grouped according to their cogniti v e performance across age, VM, FM, SV , DM, and OR. This method partitions cases into groups according to similarity ac ross the selected v ariables and can re v eal possible cogniti v e proles. The dataset sho wed v ariation across the v e cogniti v e dom ains. Clustering quality w as e v aluated using the silhouette score, which reects ho w well each child ts within the assigned cluster compared with other clusters. Cluster distrib ution w as visual ized using principal component analysis (PCA) to reduce dimensionality . Additionally , f actor analysis w as conducted to e xplore relationships between cogniti v e v ariables, with the ai m of pro viding a comprehensi v e understanding of cogniti v e abilities and their correlations in children with ASD. The ndings could inform the de v elopment of tar geted interv entions that address specic cogniti v e strengths and weaknesses, ultimately enhancing educational outcomes and capabilities for children on the autism spectrum. 2. RELA TED W ORK There has been increasing interest in studying se v eral aspects of ASD using art icial intel ligence (AI) methods. V arious AI applications and algorithms ha v e been utilized to address challenges f aced by indi viduals with ASD, including early diagnosis, assessment, personalized interv entions, support, and educational methods. A comprehensi v e analysis by Salamanca et al. [9] e xamined e x ecuti v e function (EF) proles in children with ASD, re v ealing signicant decits across multiple EF domains. The children demonstrated dif culties in cogniti v e e xibility and planning. These ndings highlight the need for tar geted interv entions aimed at impro ving EF skills in children with ASD. In the area of visual-spatial processing, there is e vidence that children with ASD may utilize alte rnati v e strate gies for processing visual-spatial information. Moug a et al. [10] used adv anced e ye-tracking technology to g ain insights into ho w children with ASD percei v e and interpret spatial information. Their study unco v ered atypical g aze patterns during spatial tasks, suggesting t hat these children may dra w on dif ferent cogniti v e resources when processing spatial relationships compared with typically de v eloping peers. This research has important implications for t he de v elopment of educational materials tailored to le v erage the visual-spatial processing abilities observ ed in children with ASD. Social cognition, a k e y area of dif culty in ASD, w as focus of a longitudinal study [11]. Ov er a v e-year period, the y track ed the de v elopment of social cogniti v e skills in children with ASD. While the y observ ed impro v ements in these skills o v er time, the rate of progress w as slo wer compared to typically de v eloping peers, with theory of mind abilities sho wing the most signicant lag. These ndings are consistent with pre vious research reporting social cogniti v e dif ferences in autism [12], and emphasize the importance of early and sustained interv entions tar geting social cogniti v e skills in ASD. Se v eral studies ha v e e xplored v arious aspects of cogniti v e and beha vioral proles in indi viduals with ASD. Vries et al. [13] conducted a randomized controlled trial to e v al uate the ef cac y of cogniti v e e xibility Exploring co gnitive patterns in c hildr en with autism spectrum disor der using corr elation and ... (Hana Bezzih) Evaluation Warning : The document was created with Spire.PDF for Python.
3166 ISSN: 2252-8938 training in indi viduals with ASD. The study aimed to impro v e this critical EF in ASD participants, and the research assessed the impact of tar geted interv entions on cogniti v e e xibility , a skill often found to be challenging for indi viduals with ASD. Gabrielsen et al. [14] utilized cluster analysis to in v estig ate visual cogniti v e styles in autism, potentially identifying subgroups according t o visual processing characteristics, brain imagi ng techniques were emplo yed to in v estig ate neural mechanisms associat ed with language dif culties in this subgroup. The study demonstrated that language processing in these children dif fers from typical neural processing patterns. Brigido et al. [15] also utilized cluster analysis, focusing on beha vioral proles in ASD in order to identify distinct beha vioral subgroups within the autism spectrum. Rosello et al. [16] conducted a longitudinal study e xamining e x ecuti v e and socio-adapti v e beha viors in adolescents with ASD without intellectual disability . T racking the de v elopment of these skills o v er time and identifying distinct subgroups within this ASD population, the study sho ws ho w EF and social adaptation skills e v olv e during adolescence in dif ferent ASD subgroups, potentially informing more tailored interv entions and support strate gies. T able 1 sho ws a summary of research studies on ASD. T able 1. Summary of research studies on ASD Ref. Study focus Methods and tools Benets Limitations [17] Educational support for childre n with ASD Cogniti v e computing machine learning (ML) Personalized learning and adapti v e assistance Limited scalability , bias, and de v elopment intensi v e [12] Perception enhancement ML and wearable sensors robotic systems Impro v ed perception and social interaction Cost, discomfort, and limited accessibility [18] Early diagnosis and screening ML data mining Accurate as sessment and early interv ention Lack of specicity [19] Healthcare applications AI and data analysis Enhanced healthcare management and personalized treatment Data constraints and potential for pri v ac y concerns [20] Screening and early detection AI algorithms and data analysis Ef cient screening and early interv ention Limited scope and v alidation needed [21] Classication and detection Deep learning Accurate and early identication Requires lar ge datasets [22] ASD diagnosis ML correlation lters Diagnostic accurac y and personalized treatment Limited and Feature-dependent [23] F ace response classication ML neuroimaging Identication of neural abnormalities and early diagnosis Expensi v e, time-consuming, and limited accessibility [24] Functional connections ML optimization and neuroimaging Brain netw ork abnormalities and personalized treatment Expensi v e, time-consuming, and visual-specic [15] Beha vioral proles in ASD Cluster analysis distinct subgroups within ASD Cannot capture all ASD dimensions [25] V isual cogniti v e s tyles in ASD Cluster analysis V isual processing patterns Limited to visual cognition [26] Gesture skills in ASD Cluster analysis Gesture skil l-based subgroups F ocuses on Chinese autistic children [16] Ex ecuti v e beha viors Statistical analysis Ex ecuti v e, socio-adapti v e beha viors Children without intellectual disability [27] Diagnosis and assessment Fuzzy cogniti v e maps modeling softw are Impro v ed diagnostic accurac y Limited generalization and potential for o v ertting [10] V isual-spatial process Eye-tracking and AI Processing insi ghts Eye-tracking only [11] Social cognition in ASD Statistical analysis Long-term insights Non-AI approach and limited scope [28] Electroencephalogram (EEG) ASD prediction Deep learning and con v olutional neural netw ork (CNN) Early detection EEG-dependent [29] Emotion recognition Computer vision and ML Impro v e social int eraction F acial e xpression focus [30] ASD t raits classication Natural language processing (NLP) and transformer models Language-based insights T e xt data reliance According to T able 1, these studies across dif ferent cogniti v e domains indicate that understanding cogniti v e skills in children with ASD in v olv es v arious le v els and types of ass essment depending on the specic features of each cogniti v e prole. It seems that each child’ s cogniti v e and de v elopmental characteristics are Int J Artif Intell, V ol. 15, No. 4, August 2026: 3164–3175 Evaluation Warning : The document was created with Spire.PDF for Python.
Int J Artif Intell ISSN: 2252-8938 3167 reected in the patterns of their abilities, and naturally , the most prominent analytical methods should be chosen for assessment and classication. This literature analysis sho wed that understanding and measuring the cogniti v e abilities in children with ASD is comple x and not straightforw ard. AI algorithms can be useful in identifying correlations between cogniti v e abilities in children with ASD be yond traditional statistical methods. In addition, adv anced methods, such as clustering and f actor analysis, can be ef fecti v e in grouping proles within the ASD data, and hence, dene more accurate correlations. Deep learning can also be useful when lar ge datasets are a v ailable [31], [32]. This approach can help adv ance our understanding of ASD abilities, which will ha v e impact on ho w to handle these situations at earlier stages. 3. METHOD This study aimed to e xamine the relationships between cogniti v e abilities in children with ASD. A structured st atistical procedure w as used to describe the data, e xamine associations between v ariables, and e xplore whether the cogniti v e measures formed mea n i ngful subgroups or underlying dimensions. The procedure included: i) data preparation to ensure the quality and consistenc y of the dataset, ii) descripti v e statistical analysis to characterise the main features of the v ariables, iii) correlation analysis to e xamine the relationships between age and cogniti v e functions, i v) cluster analysis to identify possible subgroups within the sample, and v) f actor analysis to in v estig ate latent cogniti v e structures in the studied population. This approach w as used to pro vide an account of cogniti v e functioning in children with ASD, while allo wing for both common patterns across the sample and indi vidual dif ferences in cogniti v e proles. 3.1. Data pr eparation The dataset included 210 children aged 6 to 12 years. Six v ariables were included in the analysi s: age, VM, FM, SV , DM, and OR. Children’ s performance w as assessed through v e cogniti v e tasks measuring VM, FM, SV , DM, and OR. Scores for each cogniti v e skill ranged from 1 to 20, with higher v alues indicating stronger performance on the corresponding task. As sho wn in T able 2, participant 1, aged 8.2 years, scored 6 in VM, 7 in FM, 11 in SV , 13 in DM, and 4 in OR. P articipant 2, aged 7.8 years, scored higher in VM (8), b ut lo wer in FM (4), compared with participant 1. P articipant 3, aged 7.0 years, sho wed relati v ely consistent scores across VM, FM, and SV , with v alues of 5, 6, and 6, respecti v ely , while sho wing higher scores in DM (14) and OR (8). These e xamples illustrate the v ariability in cogniti v e performance across participants and across cogniti v e domains. The collected data were therefore suitable for e xamining patterns of cogniti v e performance across age and skill areas. T able 2 presents a sample of the dataset. T able 2. Cogniti v e skill measurements for participants Seq. Age VM FM SV DM OR 1 8.2 6 7 11 13 4 2 7.8 8 4 6 13 7 3 7.0 5 6 6 14 8 4 7.6 8 11 11 12 8 5 8.5 6 9 12 6 8 6 12 6 5 5 5 9 3.2. Descripti v e statistical analysis Descripti v e stat istics were calculated to pro vide an init ial characterization of the sample and the distrib ution of the cogniti v e scores. F or each v ariable, the mean, standard de viation, minimum, maximum, and the 25th, 50th, and 75th percentiles were calculated. These statistics were use d to describe the central tendenc y and v ariability of the data before conducting further analyses. This step allo wed us to identify whether children tended to score higher or lo wer in specic cogniti v e domains and whether some v ariables sho wed greater dispersion than others. F or e xample, VM sho wed the widest range of scores, while FM and DM sho wed moderate v ariability . This pattern suggested that the sample contained considerable heterogeneity in cogniti v e abilities, which supported the need for additional correlation, clustering, and f actor analyses. 3.3. Corr elation analysis F ollo wing the descripti v e analysis, a correlation matrix w as constructed to e xamine the relationshi ps between the six v ariables. Figure 1 sho ws the tw o types of correlation were used: Pearson correlation Exploring co gnitive patterns in c hildr en with autism spectrum disor der using corr elation and ... (Hana Bezzih) Evaluation Warning : The document was created with Spire.PDF for Python.
3168 ISSN: 2252-8938 for linear relationships (Figure 1(a)) and Spearman correlation for rank-based (monotonic) relationships (Figure 1(b)). Pearson correlation measure w as appl ied to detect the strength and direction of linear relationships between v ariables. The correlation coef cient ranges from -1 (perfect ne g ati v e correlation) to 1 (perfect positi v e correlation), with v alues close to 0 indicating little to no linear relationship. F or this study , Pearson correlations were used to assess ho w well one cogniti v e ability can af fect another . On t h e other hand, Spearman correlation is useful for datasets that include ordinal or rank-based data. Spearman correlation w as applied as a non-parametric alternati v e to Pearson. Spearman correlations measure ho w well the relationship between tw o v ariables can be described using a monotonic function, without assuming a linear relationship. The correlation matrices pro vided insights into whether certain cogniti v e abilities were related. F or instance, this study e xplored whether children who scored higher in VM also performed well in FM or whether age inuenced performance in specic cogniti v e domains. (a) (b) Figure 1. Correlation matrices for all v ariables of (a) Pearson and (b) Spearman 3.4. Cluster analysis Ne xt, cluster analysi s w as performed to gr o up the childre n int o dist inct clusters based on their cogniti v e abilities. PCA is used to process v ariables and K-means algorithm then partitions the dataset into k clusters, where k is a predened number of groups, and each child is assigned to the cluster with the nearest mean. K-means algorithm is used to create clusters. This algorithm seeks to minimize the within-cluster v ariance by adjusting cluster centroids iterati v ely as illustrated in Figure 2. Cluster selection: a k e y part of the K-means process is determining the appropriate number of clusters. This study initially set k = 3 , suggesting that children with ASD might be grouped into clusters of high, moderate, and lo w performance across cogniti v e d om ains. Cluster v alidity w as then e xamined using the silhouette score, which e v aluates the quality of clustering by meas uring ho w similar each data point is to its o wn cluster compared to other clusters. Scores close to 1 indicate well-dened clusters, wherea s scores near 0 indicate o v erlap between clusters. Cluster characterization: after clustering, the mean v alues of the six v ariables within each cluster were e xamined to characterize the cogniti v e proles of children in each group. This can sho w if children in certain clusters tended to ha v e high performance in specic cogniti v e areas, or displayed more generalized tendenc y across dif ferent domains, for instance stronger or weak er correlation. 3.5. F actor analysis F actor analysis is a v ariables reduction method that combines correlated v ariables together into f actors, in order to pro vide more focus on ho w these v ariables together inuence the outcomes. F or f actor e xtraction, PCA w as applied for identi fying potential f actors where v ariables are e xpected to be correlated. Then, after the f actors were e xtracted, rotation method w as applied to clarify which v ariables contrib ute the most to each Int J Artif Intell, V ol. 15, No. 4, August 2026: 3164–3175 Evaluation Warning : The document was created with Spire.PDF for Python.
Int J Artif Intell ISSN: 2252-8938 3169 f actor . Finally , f actor loa d i ngs, which represent the correlations between the original v ariables and the e xtracted f actors, were used to dene the cogniti v e structures. F or instance, a high loading of VM and FM on the same f actor indicates that these tw o abilities tend to correlate. The methodology in v olv ed a multi-step process designed to capture the relationships between cogniti v e v ariables. The results of the correlation, clustering, and f actor analysis were used to pro vide the de gree of linear and rank-based relationships between the cogniti v e abilities. While cluster analysis can t cogniti v e proles within the dataset into groups, f actor analysis can unco v er hidden cogniti v e dimensions that could e xplain ho w these abilities were related or distinct. Figure 2. Clusters of v ariables using PCA and K-means 4. RESUL TS AND AN AL YSIS The general statistics pro vided information about the cogniti v e abilities of the children. The a v erage age w as approximately 9.14 years, with a standard de viation of 1.32. The cogniti v e measures for all v e abilities under test sho wed mean scores generally in the “at risk” range of scores between 8 and 12. VM had the widest range of scores, from 2 to 19, while other v ariables sho wed moderate v ar iability . In the rst step, a correlation matrix analysis w as conducted, which re v ealed weak relationships between most v ariables, as sho wn in Figure 1. Age did not signi cantly correlate with an y cogniti v e measures, suggesting that within this age group, age w as not a strong predictor of performance on the assessed tasks. A moderate positi v e correlation between VM and FM (0.34) indicated that c h i ldren who performed better in visual motor tasks tended to score higher in FM. A weak ne g ati v e correlation emer ged between DM and OR ( 0 . 19 ), pointing to a slight in v erse relationship between these abilities. The most notable relationship observ ed w as a moderate positi v e correlation (0.34) between VM and FM, suggesting that these skills may share some underlying cogniti v e mechanisms. Age sho wed ne gligible correlations with all cogniti v e measures, indicating that it did not signicantly inuence performance on these tasks in this dataset. SV demonstrated a moderate positi v e correlation (0.183) with FM, while other correlations between v ariables were generally weak or ne gligible. DM appeared lar gely independent of other cogniti v e abilities, with v ery weak correlations across the board. T ak en together , the analysis suggests that while some cogniti v e tasks such as VM and FM may be some what related, most of the measured abilities operate with relati v e independence from each other . A cluster analysis w as conducted, which grouped the dat a into three clusters, with the lar gest clust er ha ving 78 data points and the smallest ha ving 61. Ho we v er , the silhouette score w as lo w (0.1368), indicating poor s eparation between clusters. This suggests that the v ariables used, namely age, VM, FM, SV , DM, and OR, may not clearly distinguish the groups. The weak correlations within clusters, coupled with the lo w silhouette score, imply potential o v erlap in cogniti v e proles among children across dif ferent clusters, mainly in terms of linear correlation. Figure 3 sho ws correlation between all v ariables for cluster 0. There are some small positi v e correlations between v ariables, such as between age and VM (0.12) and between FM and DM (0.20). Ho we v er , these correlations are generally weak. SV and OR sho w notable ne g ati v e correlations with other v ariables, such as -0.17 with age and -0.24 with SV . This indicates that as these v ariables increase, others tend to decrease. The heatmap indicates that there are no v ery strong correlations am on g v ariables within Exploring co gnitive patterns in c hildr en with autism spectrum disor der using corr elation and ... (Hana Bezzih) Evaluation Warning : The document was created with Spire.PDF for Python.
3170 ISSN: 2252-8938 cluster 0. Most correl ations are weak, with a fe w moderate ones. This suggests that the v ariables do not ha v e strong linear relationships within this cluster . Figure 4 also sho ws correlation between all v ariables for cluster 1. The most notable relationship is the positi v e correlation between age and DM (0.440), suggesti ng that age has a more substantial ef fect on DM compared to other v ariables. SV tends to sho w more signicant ne g ati v e correlations with VM, indicating an in v erse relationship in this cluster . Other correlations are generally weak, with man y v alues close to zero, indicating minim al relationships between those v ariables. Figure 5 sho ws correlation between all v ariables for cluster 2. The most notable relationship in this cluster is the positi v e correlation between age and DM (0.304), suggesting that age has a more signicant ef fect on DM in this cluster . VM and SV sho w a moderate ne g ati v e correlation, indicating an in v erse relationship. Most other correlations are weak, with se v eral v ariables ha ving minimal or no signicant relationships with each other . Figure 3. Correlation matrix between all v ariables for clusters 0 Figure 4. Correlation matrix between all v ariables for clusters 1 Figure 6 sho ws heatmap for relationships between v ariables and f actors. VM (0.603) and FM (0.642) ha v e strong positi v e loadings on f actor 1, suggesting that these v ariables are closely related and lik ely contrib ute Int J Artif Intell, V ol. 15, No. 4, August 2026: 3164–3175 Evaluation Warning : The document was created with Spire.PDF for Python.
Int J Artif Intell ISSN: 2252-8938 3171 to this f actor . SV (0.329) also has a moderate positi v e loading, indicating it shares some relationship with this f actor b ut is less strongly associated. Age (-0.088) and DM (0.040) ha v e v ery lo w loadings, suggesting the y do not contrib ute signicantly to f actor 1. OR (0.235) demonstrated a weak positi v e loading, indicating a limited association with f actor 1. F actor 1 w as strongly associated with VM and FM, suggesting that these tw o v ariables represent a shared cogniti v e dimension. The gure also illustrates that DM (-0.404) demonstrated a st rong ne g ati v e loading on f actor 2, indicating an in v erse relationship with this f actor . OR (0.372) sho wed a moderate positi v e loading, reecting a moderate association with f actor 2. VM (0.018), FM (-0.097), and age (0.010) demonstrated v ery lo w loadings, suggesting that these v ariables do not signicantly contrib ute to this f actor . SV (-0.003) e xhibited a ne gligible loading, indicating the absence of a signicant relationship with f actor 2. Therefore, f actor 2 demonstrated a strong ne g ati v e association with DM and a moderate positi v e association with OR, suggesting that these abilities are connected to a dif ferent cogniti v e dimension. Figure 5. Correlation matrix between all v ariables for cluster 2 Figure 6. Relationships between v ariables and f actors Exploring co gnitive patterns in c hildr en with autism spectrum disor der using corr elation and ... (Hana Bezzih) Evaluation Warning : The document was created with Spire.PDF for Python.
3172 ISSN: 2252-8938 Finally , SV (0.357) demonst rated a moderate positi v e loading on f actor 3, indicating a notable relationship with this f actor . VM (-0.142) and DM (-0.167) e xhibited weak ne g ati v e loadings, suggesting limited relationships with this f actor , while FM (0.025) and OR (-0.153) ha v e v ery weak loadings, indicating minimal contrib ution to f actor 3. Age (-0.127) also has a v ery weak loading. Thus, f actor 3 w as mainly dri v en by SV , with minimal contrib utions from other v ariables. These results deserv e attention because the y suggest that the underlying cogniti v e structure is characterized by distinct dimensions, with some v ariables clustering together while others sho w contrasting relationships. It seems that each f actor’ s cogniti v e composition is reected in the de v elopment of the child’ s processing frame w ork, and naturally , the most prominent dimension captures the abilities most closely associated with shared cogniti v e mechanisms. Figure 7 pro vides a comprehensi v e vie w of the data f actor scores and loadings. Figure 7. Comprehensi v e vie w of the data f actor scores and loadings 5. DISCUSSION AND RECOMMEND A TIONS In the present analysis, weak correlations were found among most of the assessed abilities, suggesting that these cogniti v e domains operate with relati v e independence. This nding challenges the assumption that cogniti v e skills in children with ASD are closely connected or de v elop in a uniform pattern. Instead, it supports the vie w that cogniti v e de v elopment in ASD is comple x, une v en, and highly indi vidual during this important age range. The analysis of cogniti v e skills in children with ASD of fers se v eral practical benets. By identifying specic cogniti v e proles, interv entions can be personalized and made more responsi v e to the child’ s strengths and weaknesses. Distinct patterns of cogniti v e functioning may also support earlier ASD identication and more timely interv ention. These ndings may also inform teaching strate gies that are better aligned with the cogniti v e processing styles of children with ASD [33]. The inte gration of PCA-dri v en clustering with f actor analysis in this study pro vi d e s a useful frame w ork for identifying latent cogniti v e structures in ASD populations. This multi-method approach allo wed us to e xamine both possible subgroups and underlying dimensions of cogniti v e v ariability . The ndings suggest potential applications in adapti v e educational tools and personalised therap y plans. This may be useful because the moderate positi v e correlation between VM and FM suggests some shared cogniti v e mechanisms between these abilities. Future e xtensions may include AI-enhanced clustering methods that use deep learning algorithms for more sophisticated pattern recognition, longitudinal tracking systems that monitor cogniti v e de v elopment o v er e xtended periods, and multimodal inte gration of beha vioral, cogniti v e, and neurobiological data. ML prediction models may also be de v eloped to forecast de v elopmental trajectories from early cogniti v e proles, ena b l ing ea rlier and m ore ta r get ed i nterv ention. In addition, adapti v e assessment tools that adjust in real time according to a child’ s cogniti v e prole may pro vide more accurate and indi vidualised e v aluation. Int J Artif Intell, V ol. 15, No. 4, August 2026: 3164–3175 Evaluation Warning : The document was created with Spire.PDF for Python.
Int J Artif Intell ISSN: 2252-8938 3173 Finally , this study intends to consider other aspects in this group of children, including attention decit h yperacti vity disorder [34]. 6. CONCLUSION This study in v estig ated cogniti v e patterns in children with ASD aged 6 to 12 years using correl ation analysis, cluster analysis, and f actor analysis. The results sho wed weak correlations between most cogniti v e v ariables, and age w as not signicantly associated with cogniti v e performance. The clearest association w as a moderate positi v e correlation (0.34) between VM and FM, suggesting possible shared underlying mechanisms. Cluster analysis identied three groups, b ut the lo w silhouette score (0.13 68) indicated weak separation and substantial o v erlap between cogniti v e proles. F act or analysis identied three dimensions: f actor 1 w as associated with VM and FM, f actor 2 w as associated with DM and OR, and f actor 3 w as primarily associated with SV . These ndings demonstrate the heterogeneous nature of cogniti v e abilities in children with ASD and support the need for indi vidualized assessment and i nterv ention. The study contrib utes a frame w ork that combines PCA-dri v en clustering with f actor analysis for cogniti v e proling in ASD. Future research should e xamine longitudinal de v elopmental trajectories, AI-enhanced prediction models, broader cogniti v e domains, and the inte gration of neurobiological and en vironmental f actors. Exploring non-linear relationships and using more sophisticated clustering techniques may re v eal patterns that were not captured in the present analysis. Combining cogniti v e assessment with neuro-imaging may also help link cogniti v e proles to underlying brain structure and function. FUNDING INFORMA TION Authors state no funding in v olv ed. A UTHOR CONTRIB UTIONS ST A TEMENT This journal uses the Contrib utor Roles T axonomy (CRediT) to recognize indi vidual author contrib utions, reduce authorship disputes, and f acilitate collaboration. Name of A uthor C M So V a F o I R D O E V i Su P Fu Hana Bezzih Muna Darweesh Amjad Ga w anmeh C : C onceptualization I : I n v estig ation V i : V i sualization M : M ethodology R : R esources Su : Su pervision So : So ftw are D : D ata Curation P : P roject Administration V a : V a lidation O : Writing - O riginal Draft Fu : Fu nding Acquisition F o : F o rmal Analysis E : Writing - Re vie w & E diting CONFLICT OF INTEREST ST A TEMENT Authors state no conict of interest. D A T A A V AILABILITY The data that support the ndings of this study are a v ailable on request from the corresponding author , [A G]. The data, which contain information that could compromise the pri v ac y of research participants, are not publicly a v ailable due to certain restrictions. REFERENCES [1] M. Stanti ´ c, E. Ichijo, C. Catmur , and G. Bird, “F ace memory and f ace perception in autism, A utism , v ol. 26, no. 1, pp. 276–280, Jan. 2022, doi: 10.1177/13623613211027685. [2] J. A. Little, “V isi on in children with autism spectrum disorder: a critical re vie w , Clinical and e xperimental opt ometry , v ol. 101, no. 4, pp. 504–513, Jul. 2018, doi: 10.1111/cxo.12651. Exploring co gnitive patterns in c hildr en with autism spectrum disor der using corr elation and ... (Hana Bezzih) Evaluation Warning : The document was created with Spire.PDF for Python.