I
nte
rna
t
io
na
l J
o
urna
l o
f
E
v
a
lua
t
io
n a
nd
Resea
rc
h in E
du
ca
t
io
n (
I
J
E
RE
)
Vo
l.
15
,
No
.
5
,
Octo
b
er
20
26
,
p
p
.
4
1
1
4
~
4
1
2
1
I
SS
N:
2
2
5
2
-
8
8
2
2
,
DOI
: 1
0
.
1
1
5
9
1
/
ijer
e
.
v
15
i
5
.
3
9
5
1
8
4114
J
o
ur
na
l ho
m
ep
a
g
e
:
h
ttp
:
//ij
ere.
ia
esco
r
e.
co
m
The rela
tions
hip
betwee
n crea
tivit
y
and pro
g
ra
mm
ing
skills
a
mo
ng
lower seco
nda
ry
scho
o
l stud
ents
Ra
t
t
a
na
wa
dee
M
uens
ripo
o
m
1
,
M
a
na
So
pa
2
1
I
n
n
o
v
a
t
i
o
n
i
n
C
o
m
p
u
t
e
r
E
d
u
c
a
t
i
o
n
,
U
d
o
n
T
h
a
n
i
R
a
j
a
b
h
a
t
U
n
i
v
e
r
s
i
t
y
,
U
d
o
n
T
h
a
n
i
,
T
h
a
i
l
a
n
d
2
F
a
c
u
l
t
y
o
f
Ed
u
c
a
t
i
o
n
,
U
d
o
n
T
h
a
n
i
R
a
j
a
b
h
a
t
U
n
i
v
e
r
si
t
y
,
U
d
o
n
T
h
a
n
i
,
Th
a
i
l
a
n
d
Art
icle
I
nfo
AB
S
T
RAC
T
A
r
ticle
his
to
r
y:
R
ec
eiv
ed
Mar
15
,
2
0
2
6
R
ev
is
ed
Au
g
5
,
2
0
2
6
Acc
ep
ted
Au
g
29
,
2
0
2
6
Th
is
stu
d
y
a
d
d
re
ss
e
s
th
e
li
m
it
e
d
e
m
p
h
a
sis
o
n
c
re
a
ti
v
i
ty
i
n
l
o
we
r
se
c
o
n
d
a
ry
p
ro
g
ra
m
m
in
g
c
las
sro
o
m
s,
w
h
e
re
in
str
u
c
ti
o
n
o
f
ten
re
li
e
s
o
n
imitatio
n
-
b
a
se
d
c
o
d
in
g
p
ra
c
ti
c
e
s.
T
o
a
d
d
re
ss
t
h
i
s
issu
e
,
th
e
S
y
n
e
c
ti
c
s
in
str
u
c
ti
o
n
a
l
m
o
d
e
l
wa
s
a
p
p
li
e
d
t
o
e
n
h
a
n
c
e
st
u
d
e
n
ts
’
c
re
a
ti
v
it
y
a
n
d
p
r
o
g
ra
m
m
i
n
g
sk
il
ls.
A
q
u
a
si
-
e
x
p
e
rime
n
tal
d
e
si
g
n
wa
s
c
o
n
d
u
c
te
d
with
60
stu
d
e
n
ts
d
i
v
id
e
d
i
n
t
o
e
x
p
e
rime
n
tal
a
n
d
c
o
n
tr
o
l
g
ro
u
p
s
.
Da
ta
we
re
c
o
ll
e
c
ted
u
sin
g
c
re
a
ti
v
it
y
a
n
d
p
ro
g
ra
m
m
in
g
sk
il
l
a
ss
e
ss
m
e
n
ts
a
n
d
a
n
a
l
y
z
e
d
u
si
n
g
in
d
e
p
e
n
d
e
n
t
sa
m
p
les
t
-
tes
t
a
n
d
P
e
a
rso
n
c
o
rre
lati
o
n
.
Th
e
re
su
lt
s
sh
o
we
d
t
h
a
t
t
h
e
e
x
p
e
rime
n
tal
g
ro
u
p
a
c
h
iev
e
d
si
g
n
i
fica
n
tl
y
h
ig
h
e
r
sc
o
re
s
in
c
re
a
ti
v
it
y
(M
=
9
.
9
1
,
S
D=
0
.
9
5
)
a
n
d
p
r
o
g
ra
m
m
in
g
sk
il
ls
(M
=
3
4
.
6
7
,
S
D=
1
.
8
3
)
th
a
n
t
h
e
c
o
n
t
ro
l
g
r
o
u
p
(p
<
0
.
0
0
1
)
.
A
stro
n
g
p
o
siti
v
e
c
o
rre
latio
n
wa
s
fo
u
n
d
b
e
twe
e
n
c
re
a
ti
v
it
y
a
n
d
p
ro
g
ra
m
m
in
g
s
k
il
ls
(r=
0
.
7
1
0
,
p
<
0
.
0
0
1
)
.
T
h
e
se
fin
d
in
g
s
i
n
d
i
c
a
te
th
a
t
c
re
a
ti
v
it
y
is
a
k
e
y
fa
c
to
r
i
n
p
ro
g
r
a
m
m
in
g
p
e
rfo
rm
a
n
c
e
a
n
d
th
a
t
t
h
e
S
y
n
e
c
ti
c
s
m
o
d
e
l
is
e
ffe
c
ti
v
e
in
e
n
h
a
n
c
in
g
b
o
t
h
c
re
a
ti
v
e
th
in
k
in
g
a
n
d
tec
h
n
i
c
a
l
sk
il
ls.
Th
e
stu
d
y
p
ro
v
i
d
e
s
p
ra
c
ti
c
a
l
imp
li
c
a
ti
o
n
s
f
o
r
imp
r
o
v
in
g
p
r
o
g
ra
m
m
in
g
e
d
u
c
a
ti
o
n
in
21
st
-
c
e
n
tu
r
y
c
las
sro
o
m
s.
K
ey
w
o
r
d
s
:
C
o
m
p
u
tatio
n
al
th
in
k
i
n
g
C
r
ea
tiv
ity
Pra
ctica
l sk
ills
Pro
g
r
am
m
in
g
s
k
ills
Sy
n
ec
tics
m
o
d
el
T
h
is i
s
a
n
o
p
e
n
a
c
c
e
ss
a
rticle
u
n
d
e
r th
e
CC B
Y
-
SA
li
c
e
n
se
.
C
o
r
r
e
s
p
o
nd
ing
A
uth
o
r
:
R
attan
awa
d
ee
Mu
en
s
r
ip
o
o
m
I
n
n
o
v
atio
n
in
C
o
m
p
u
ter
E
d
u
c
atio
n
,
Ud
o
n
T
h
an
i Rajab
h
at
U
n
iv
er
s
ity
6
4
T
h
a
h
an
R
o
ad
,
Ma
k
Kh
ae
n
g
Su
b
d
is
tr
ict,
Mu
ea
n
g
Ud
o
n
T
h
an
i D
is
tr
ict,
Ud
o
n
T
h
a
n
i 4
1
0
0
0
,
T
h
ailan
d
E
m
ail: 6
5
1
2
0
6
1
2
1
0
6
@
u
d
r
u
.
a
c.
th
1.
I
NT
RO
D
UCT
I
O
N
I
n
th
e
2
1
s
t
ce
n
tu
r
y
,
e
d
u
ca
ti
o
n
al
p
a
r
ad
ig
m
s
em
p
h
asize
d
ev
elo
p
in
g
ess
en
tial
s
k
ills
f
o
r
d
i
g
ital
ec
o
n
o
m
ies.
C
r
ea
tiv
ity
,
in
n
o
v
atio
n
,
an
d
c
o
m
p
u
tatio
n
al
th
i
n
k
in
g
ar
e
n
o
w
co
r
e
co
m
p
eten
cies
r
eq
u
ir
ed
f
o
r
s
u
s
tain
ab
le
d
ev
elo
p
m
en
t
a
n
d
g
lo
b
al
c
o
m
p
etitiv
en
ess
.
R
eg
io
n
ally
an
d
in
ter
n
atio
n
ally
,
th
is
s
h
if
tin
g
p
ar
a
d
ig
m
is
h
ea
v
ily
d
r
iv
e
n
b
y
co
m
p
r
eh
e
n
s
iv
e
ed
u
ca
tio
n
al
p
o
licy
f
r
a
m
ewo
r
k
s
an
d
f
o
u
n
d
atio
n
al
co
r
e
cu
r
r
icu
la,
wh
ic
h
s
y
s
tem
atica
lly
p
r
io
r
itize
lear
n
er
s
’
cr
ea
tiv
ity
,
cr
itical
t
h
in
k
in
g
,
an
d
tech
n
o
lo
g
ical
co
m
p
eten
ce
to
cu
ltiv
ate
a
r
esil
ien
t f
u
tu
r
e
wo
r
k
f
o
r
ce
[
1
]
,
[
2
]
.
C
r
ea
tiv
ity
en
ab
les
in
d
iv
id
u
als
to
g
en
er
ate
n
o
v
el
id
ea
s
an
d
s
o
lv
e
p
r
o
b
lem
s
ef
f
ec
tiv
ely
.
T
o
r
r
an
ce
[
3
]
d
ef
in
ed
cr
ea
tiv
ity
th
r
o
u
g
h
f
lu
en
cy
,
f
lex
ib
ilit
y
,
o
r
i
g
in
ality
,
an
d
elab
o
r
atio
n
,
wh
ile
Gu
ilfo
r
d
[
4
]
co
n
n
ec
ted
it
to
d
iv
er
g
en
t
th
in
k
in
g
.
I
n
co
m
p
u
t
er
ed
u
ca
tio
n
,
p
r
o
g
r
am
m
in
g
s
k
ills
r
ep
r
esen
t
p
r
ac
tical
co
m
p
eten
cies
in
teg
r
atin
g
co
g
n
itiv
e
an
d
p
s
y
ch
o
m
o
to
r
d
o
m
ain
s
.
Simp
s
o
n
[
5
]
p
s
y
ch
o
m
o
to
r
ta
x
o
n
o
m
y
o
u
tlin
es
th
at
co
m
p
eten
ce
is
d
ev
elo
p
e
d
th
r
o
u
g
h
s
tr
u
ctu
r
ed
p
r
ac
tice
an
d
p
r
o
g
r
ess
iv
e
ac
q
u
i
s
itio
n
r
ath
er
th
an
r
o
te
m
em
o
r
i
za
tio
n
.
T
o
p
r
o
m
o
te
cr
ea
tiv
e
th
i
n
k
in
g
,
Go
r
d
o
n
[
6
]
d
ev
elo
p
ed
th
e
Sy
n
ec
tics
m
o
d
el,
wh
ich
u
s
es
an
alo
g
ical
p
r
o
ce
s
s
es
,
in
clu
d
in
g
d
i
r
ec
t
an
alo
g
y
,
p
er
s
o
n
al
an
al
o
g
y
,
a
n
d
co
m
p
r
ess
ed
co
n
f
lict
,
to
co
n
n
ec
t
u
n
f
am
iliar
co
n
ce
p
ts
with
f
am
iliar
ex
p
er
i
en
ce
s
.
T
h
is
m
o
d
el
is
wid
ely
r
ec
o
g
n
ized
f
o
r
s
tim
u
latin
g
cr
e
ativ
ity
an
d
p
r
o
b
lem
-
s
o
lv
in
g
[
7
]
.
Sch
o
lar
s
s
u
g
g
est t
h
at
cr
ea
tiv
ity
ca
n
b
e
s
y
s
tem
atica
lly
n
u
r
tu
r
e
d
.
B
eg
h
etto
a
n
d
Kau
f
m
an
[
8
]
ar
g
u
ed
th
at
class
r
o
o
m
en
v
ir
o
n
m
e
n
ts
en
co
u
r
a
g
in
g
e
x
p
lo
r
atio
n
f
o
s
ter
cr
ea
tiv
ity
,
w
h
ile
Sawy
er
[
9
]
h
ig
h
lig
h
ted
th
at
Evaluation Warning : The document was created with Spire.PDF for Python.
I
n
t
J
E
v
al
&
R
es E
d
u
c
I
SS
N:
2252
-
8
8
2
2
Th
e
r
ela
tio
n
s
h
ip
b
etw
ee
n
crea
tivity
a
n
d
p
r
o
g
r
a
mmin
g
s
kills
a
mo
n
g
lo
w
er
…
(
R
a
tta
n
a
w
a
d
ee
Mu
en
s
r
ip
o
o
m
)
4115
co
llab
o
r
ativ
e
th
in
k
in
g
s
u
p
p
o
r
ts
d
ee
p
er
in
n
o
v
atio
n
.
T
h
is
alig
n
s
with
Sweller
[
1
0
]
i
n
s
tr
u
ctio
n
al
d
esig
n
p
r
in
cip
les
r
eg
a
r
d
in
g
cr
ea
tiv
it
y
an
d
W
ad
e
[
1
1
]
an
aly
tical
th
in
k
in
g
s
tr
ateg
ies.
Fu
r
th
e
r
m
o
r
e,
Da
v
ies
[
1
2
]
em
p
h
asized
th
at
s
tr
u
ctu
r
ed
in
s
tr
u
ctio
n
al
p
r
o
ce
s
s
es
in
f
lu
en
c
e
lear
n
in
g
o
u
tco
m
es,
an
d
J
o
y
ce
et
a
l.
[
1
3
]
n
o
ted
th
at
in
s
tr
u
ctio
n
al
m
o
d
els
s
y
s
tem
atica
lly
im
p
r
o
v
e
co
g
n
itiv
e
an
d
p
r
ac
tical
s
k
ills
.
Fu
r
th
e
r
m
o
r
e,
estab
lis
h
in
g
s
tan
d
ar
d
ized
b
en
c
h
m
ar
k
s
f
o
r
ed
u
ca
tio
n
al
o
u
tc
o
m
es
r
eq
u
ir
es
r
o
b
u
s
t
s
y
s
tem
atic
f
r
am
ewo
r
k
s
,
as
em
p
h
asized
b
y
W
alb
ess
er
[
14
]
,
wh
o
s
e
ev
alu
atio
n
m
o
d
els
clar
if
y
h
o
w
b
eh
av
io
r
al
o
b
jectiv
es
an
d
s
tr
u
ctu
r
ed
c
u
r
r
icu
lu
m
d
esig
n
s
d
ir
ec
tly
d
ictate
m
ea
s
u
r
ab
le
lear
n
in
g
ac
h
iev
em
e
n
ts
.
Dev
elo
p
in
g
p
r
a
ctica
l
s
k
ills
r
eq
u
ir
es
co
n
tin
u
o
u
s
en
g
a
g
em
en
t,
as
m
ap
p
ed
b
y
H
ar
r
o
w
[1
5
]
p
s
y
ch
o
m
o
t
o
r
s
tag
es.
I
n
co
m
p
u
ter
ed
u
ca
tio
n
,
th
ese
s
k
ills
g
r
o
w
th
r
o
u
g
h
ac
tiv
e
p
r
o
b
lem
-
s
o
lv
in
g
.
W
estco
tt
an
d
Sm
ith
[
1
6
]
s
u
g
g
ested
th
at
cr
ea
tiv
e
teac
h
in
g
ap
p
r
o
ac
h
es
im
p
r
o
v
e
c
o
n
ce
p
tu
al
u
n
d
e
r
s
tan
d
in
g
in
tec
h
n
ical
s
u
b
jects
lik
e
m
ath
em
atics.
T
h
u
s
,
em
b
ed
d
in
g
Sy
n
ec
tics
in
to
p
r
o
g
r
am
m
i
n
g
m
a
y
en
h
an
ce
b
o
th
c
r
ea
tiv
e
an
d
tech
n
ical
co
m
p
eten
ce
.
Pre
v
io
u
s
r
esear
ch
p
r
o
v
es
Sy
n
ec
tics
’
ef
f
icac
y
in
cr
ea
tiv
e
d
o
m
ain
s
,
in
clu
d
in
g
d
an
ce
p
r
o
d
u
ctio
n
[
1
7
]
,
liter
ac
y
s
k
ills
[
1
8
]
,
an
d
cr
ea
tiv
e
wr
itin
g
[
1
9
]
.
R
ec
en
t
s
tu
d
ies
also
em
p
h
asize
its
r
o
le
in
tech
n
ical
ar
ea
s
;
Pease
et
a
l.
[
20
]
n
o
ted
th
at
c
o
m
p
u
tatio
n
al
cr
ea
tiv
ity
d
r
iv
es
s
cien
tific
an
d
m
ath
em
atica
l
d
is
co
v
er
y
.
Oth
er
g
lo
b
al
f
r
a
m
ewo
r
k
s
s
u
p
p
o
r
t
in
te
g
r
atin
g
cr
ea
tiv
ity
in
to
co
m
p
u
tatio
n
al
task
s
to
im
p
r
o
v
e
p
r
o
b
lem
-
s
o
lv
in
g
[
2
1
]
−
[2
3
].
Desp
ite
its
v
alu
e,
lim
ited
r
esear
ch
a
p
p
lies
Sy
n
ec
tics
to
lo
wer
s
ec
o
n
d
ar
y
p
r
o
g
r
am
m
in
g
in
s
tr
u
ctio
n
.
Ma
n
y
class
r
o
o
m
s
s
till
r
el
y
o
n
im
itatio
n
-
b
ased
in
s
tr
u
ctio
n
,
wh
er
e
s
tu
d
e
n
ts
f
o
llo
w
s
tep
-
by
-
s
tep
co
d
i
n
g
with
o
u
t
in
d
ep
en
d
en
t
p
r
o
b
lem
-
s
o
lv
in
g
[
2
4
]
,
[
2
5
]
.
C
o
n
s
eq
u
en
tly
,
s
tu
d
en
ts
m
aster
p
r
o
g
r
am
m
in
g
s
y
n
tax
b
u
t
s
tr
u
g
g
le
to
d
esig
n
o
r
ig
i
n
al
s
o
lu
tio
n
s
o
r
ap
p
ly
d
i
v
er
g
e
n
t
th
in
k
i
n
g
[
2
6
]
.
T
h
is
cr
ea
tes
a
cr
itical
g
ap
wh
er
e
cr
ea
tiv
ity
is
n
eg
lecte
d
alo
n
g
s
id
e
tech
n
ical
k
n
o
wled
g
e
[
2
7
]
.
W
h
ile
ed
u
ca
tio
n
al
p
o
licies
ad
v
o
ca
te
f
o
r
in
n
o
v
atio
n
[
2
8
]
,
ac
tu
al
class
r
o
o
m
p
r
ac
tice
r
em
ain
s
d
is
co
n
n
ec
ted
[
2
5
]
,
[
2
9
].
Ap
p
ly
in
g
Sy
n
ec
tics
as
a
f
o
r
m
al
m
o
d
el
to
s
im
u
ltan
e
o
u
s
ly
d
ev
elo
p
cr
ea
tiv
e
co
g
n
itio
n
an
d
tech
n
ical
p
r
o
g
r
a
m
m
in
g
p
r
o
f
icien
cy
i
n
l
o
wer
s
ec
o
n
d
a
r
y
s
tu
d
e
n
ts
r
ep
r
e
s
en
ts
a
n
o
v
el
ap
p
r
o
ac
h
.
T
h
is
s
tu
d
y
ad
d
r
ess
es
th
is
g
ap
b
y
in
v
esti
g
atin
g
if
a
cr
e
ativ
e
-
th
in
k
in
g
in
ter
v
e
n
tio
n
ca
n
d
ir
ec
tly
en
h
a
n
ce
a
tec
h
n
ic
al,
p
r
ac
tical
s
k
ill.
I
t
m
ak
es
th
r
ee
c
o
n
tr
ib
u
tio
n
s
:
ap
p
ly
in
g
Sy
n
ec
tics
to
co
m
p
u
t
er
p
r
o
g
r
am
m
i
n
g
,
p
r
o
v
i
d
in
g
e
m
p
ir
ical
ev
id
en
ce
o
n
th
e
cr
ea
tiv
ity
-
p
r
o
g
r
a
m
m
in
g
r
elatio
n
s
h
ip
,
an
d
f
o
cu
s
in
g
o
n
a
cr
itical
d
ev
elo
p
m
en
tal
s
tag
e
in
s
ec
o
n
d
a
r
y
ed
u
ca
tio
n
.
T
h
u
s
,
th
is
s
tu
d
y
ai
m
s
to
:
i
)
in
v
esti
g
ate
th
e
ef
f
ec
t
o
f
th
e
Sy
n
ec
tics
m
o
d
el
o
n
s
tu
d
en
ts
’
cr
ea
tiv
ity
an
d
p
r
o
g
r
a
m
m
in
g
s
k
ills
,
an
d
ii
)
ex
am
in
e
th
e
r
elatio
n
s
h
ip
b
et
wee
n
cr
ea
tiv
ity
an
d
p
r
o
g
r
am
m
in
g
p
er
f
o
r
m
an
ce
.
B
ased
o
n
th
e
r
esear
ch
o
b
jectiv
es,
th
e
f
o
llo
win
g
r
esear
ch
q
u
e
s
tio
n
s
wer
e
f
o
r
m
u
lated
:
−
Do
es
th
e
Sy
n
ec
tics
in
s
tr
u
ctio
n
al
m
o
d
el
s
ig
n
if
ican
tly
im
p
r
o
v
e
s
tu
d
en
ts
’
cr
ea
tiv
ity
an
d
p
r
o
g
r
am
m
in
g
s
k
ills
co
m
p
ar
ed
to
co
n
v
en
tio
n
al
in
s
tr
u
ctio
n
?
(
R
Q1
)
−
I
s
th
er
e
a
s
ig
n
if
ican
t r
elatio
n
s
h
ip
b
etwe
en
s
tu
d
e
n
ts
’
cr
ea
tiv
ity
an
d
t
h
eir
p
r
o
g
r
am
m
in
g
s
k
ill
s
?
(
R
Q2
)
2.
M
E
T
H
O
D
2
.
1
.
Resea
rc
h desi
g
n
T
h
is
s
tu
d
y
em
p
lo
y
ed
a
s
tatic
-
g
r
o
u
p
co
m
p
ar
is
o
n
d
esig
n
,
wh
ich
is
a
ty
p
e
o
f
q
u
asi
-
ex
p
er
im
e
n
tal,
p
o
s
t
-
test
-
o
n
ly
co
n
tr
o
l
g
r
o
u
p
d
esig
n
.
T
h
e
p
u
r
p
o
s
e
o
f
th
is
d
esig
n
i
s
to
co
m
p
ar
e
th
e
o
u
tco
m
es
b
e
twee
n
a
g
r
o
u
p
th
at
r
ec
eiv
es
th
e
ex
p
e
r
im
en
tal
in
t
er
v
en
tio
n
an
d
a
g
r
o
u
p
t
h
at
d
o
es
n
o
t,
in
o
r
d
e
r
to
d
eter
m
in
e
th
e
ef
f
ec
t
o
f
th
e
tr
ea
tm
en
t.
T
ab
le
1
p
r
esen
ts
th
e
r
esear
ch
d
esig
n
u
s
ed
in
th
is
s
tu
d
y
,
illu
s
tr
atin
g
th
e
s
tatic
-
g
r
o
u
p
co
m
p
ar
is
o
n
s
tr
u
ctu
r
e,
in
clu
d
i
n
g
th
e
e
x
p
er
im
en
tal
an
d
co
n
tr
o
l
g
r
o
u
p
s
,
th
e
ap
p
lie
d
tr
ea
tm
en
t,
an
d
th
e
p
o
s
t
-
test
m
ea
s
u
r
em
en
ts
.
T
ab
le
1
.
R
esear
ch
d
esig
n
s
tati
c
g
r
o
u
p
co
m
p
ar
is
o
n
d
esig
n
G
r
o
u
p
Tr
e
a
t
me
n
t
(
X
)
P
o
st
-
t
e
st
me
a
su
r
e
me
n
t
Ex
p
e
r
i
m
e
n
t
a
l
X
O
₁
C
o
n
t
r
o
l
-
O
₂
X
r
e
p
r
e
s
e
n
t
s
t
h
e
i
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
a
l
i
n
t
e
r
v
e
n
t
i
o
n
u
s
i
n
g
t
h
e
S
y
n
e
c
t
i
c
s
m
o
d
e
l
.
O
₁
r
e
p
r
e
s
e
n
t
s
t
h
e
p
o
st
-
t
e
st
r
e
su
l
t
s
o
f
t
h
e
e
x
p
e
r
i
me
n
t
a
l
g
r
o
u
p
,
a
n
d
O
₂
r
e
p
r
e
s
e
n
t
s
t
h
e
p
o
st
-
t
e
st
r
e
su
l
t
s
o
f
t
h
e
c
o
n
t
r
o
l
g
r
o
u
p
.
2
.
2
.
P
o
pu
la
t
io
n a
nd
s
a
m
pli
ng
T
h
e
p
o
p
u
latio
n
f
o
r
th
is
s
tu
d
y
co
n
s
is
ted
o
f
lo
we
r
s
ec
o
n
d
ar
y
s
ch
o
o
l
s
tu
d
en
ts
en
r
o
lled
at
th
e
Dem
o
n
s
tr
atio
n
Sch
o
o
l
o
f
Ud
o
n
T
h
an
i
R
ajab
h
at
Un
iv
er
s
ity
,
u
n
d
er
th
e
Min
is
tr
y
o
f
Hig
h
er
E
d
u
ca
tio
n
,
Scien
ce
,
R
esear
ch
an
d
I
n
n
o
v
atio
n
,
d
u
r
i
n
g
th
e
f
ir
s
t
s
em
ester
o
f
th
e
2
0
2
5
ac
ad
em
ic
y
ea
r
.
A
to
tal
o
f
2
7
0
s
tu
d
en
ts
ac
r
o
s
s
n
in
e
class
r
o
o
m
s
wer
e
in
clu
d
ed
in
th
e
p
o
p
u
latio
n
.
T
h
e
s
am
p
le
was
d
iv
id
ed
in
to
two
g
r
o
u
p
s
as
ex
p
er
im
en
tal
an
d
co
n
tr
o
l
g
r
o
u
p
.
Evaluation Warning : The document was created with Spire.PDF for Python.
I
SS
N
:
2
2
5
2
-
8
8
2
2
I
n
t
J
E
v
al
&
R
es E
d
u
c
,
Vo
l
.
15
,
No
.
5
,
Octo
b
er
20
26
:
4
1
1
4
-
4121
4116
2
.
2
.
1
.
E
x
perim
ent
a
l
g
ro
up
T
h
is
g
r
o
u
p
c
o
m
p
r
is
ed
3
0
lo
w
er
s
ec
o
n
d
a
r
y
s
ch
o
o
l
s
tu
d
e
n
ts
f
r
o
m
t
h
e
d
e
m
o
n
s
tr
atio
n
s
ch
o
o
l
o
f
U
d
o
n
T
h
an
i
R
ajab
h
at
Un
iv
er
s
ity
wh
o
p
ar
ticip
ated
in
in
s
tr
u
ctio
n
al
ac
tiv
ities
b
ased
o
n
th
e
S
y
n
ec
ti
cs
teac
h
in
g
m
o
d
el
co
m
b
in
ed
with
p
r
ac
tical
ap
p
licatio
n
.
T
h
e
p
a
r
ticip
an
ts
wer
e
s
elec
ted
u
s
in
g
v
o
lu
n
tar
y
s
am
p
lin
g
f
r
o
m
s
tu
d
en
ts
en
r
o
lled
in
t
h
e
co
u
r
s
e
lear
n
in
g
s
k
ills
.
2
.
2
.
2
.
Co
ntr
o
l
g
r
o
up
T
h
is
g
r
o
u
p
co
n
s
is
ted
o
f
3
0
lo
wer
s
ec
o
n
d
ar
y
s
ch
o
o
l
s
tu
d
en
ts
f
r
o
m
th
e
d
em
o
n
s
tr
atio
n
s
ch
o
o
l
o
f
Ud
o
n
T
h
an
i
R
ajab
h
at
Un
i
v
er
s
ity
wh
o
r
ec
eiv
e
d
c
o
n
v
e
n
tio
n
al
i
n
s
tr
u
ctio
n
.
T
h
e
p
ar
ticip
an
ts
wer
e
s
elec
ted
u
s
in
g
v
o
lu
n
tar
y
s
am
p
lin
g
f
r
o
m
s
tu
d
en
ts
en
r
o
lled
in
t
h
e
co
u
r
s
e
lear
n
in
g
s
k
ills
.
I
t
s
h
o
u
ld
b
e
n
o
ted
th
at
b
ec
au
s
e
a
n
o
n
-
p
r
o
b
ab
ilit
y
v
o
lu
n
tar
y
s
am
p
lin
g
ap
p
r
o
ac
h
was
ad
o
p
ted
d
u
e
to
in
s
titu
tio
n
al
s
ch
ed
u
lin
g
co
n
s
tr
ain
ts
,
p
ar
ticip
an
ts
co
u
l
d
n
o
t
b
e
r
a
n
d
o
m
ly
ass
ig
n
ed
to
th
e
g
r
o
u
p
s
,
wh
ich
r
e
p
r
esen
ts
a
m
eth
o
d
o
lo
g
ical
lim
itatio
n
r
eg
ar
d
in
g
p
o
ten
tial selec
tio
n
b
ias.
2.
3
.
I
ns
t
rum
ent
s
2
.
3
.
1
.
I
ns
t
ruct
io
na
l
a
ct
iv
it
ies
Six
2
-
h
o
u
r
less
o
n
p
lan
s
(
1
2
h
o
u
r
s
to
tal)
b
ased
o
n
th
e
6
-
s
tep
Sy
n
ec
tics
in
s
tr
u
ctio
n
al
m
o
d
el
wer
e
d
ev
elo
p
e
d
,
co
v
er
in
g
s
to
r
y
d
e
s
ig
n
,
s
to
r
y
b
o
ar
d
in
g
,
a
n
d
Scr
a
tch
an
im
atio
n
.
C
o
n
ten
t
v
alid
i
ty
was
v
er
if
ied
b
y
th
r
ee
co
m
p
u
ter
ed
u
ca
tio
n
e
x
p
er
ts
,
y
ield
in
g
in
d
ex
o
f
item
-
o
b
jectiv
e
co
n
g
r
u
en
ce
(
I
OC
)
v
a
lu
es
o
f
0
.
9
5
,
0
.
9
3
,
0
.
9
7
,
1
.
0
0
,
0
.
9
8
,
a
n
d
0
.
9
2
,
r
es
p
ec
tiv
ely
[
3
0
]
.
2
.
3
.
2
.
Cre
a
t
iv
it
y
a
s
s
ess
m
ent
ins
t
rum
ent
T
h
e
cr
ea
tiv
ity
ass
ess
m
en
t
in
s
tr
u
m
en
t
was
a
s
u
b
jectiv
e
test
in
g
f
o
r
m
v
alid
ated
b
y
th
r
ee
ex
p
er
ts
(
I
OC
=1
.
0
0
)
d
esig
n
ed
to
ev
alu
ate
d
iv
er
g
en
t
th
in
k
in
g
s
k
ills
b
ased
o
n
T
o
r
r
an
ce
’
s
co
r
e
co
m
p
o
n
en
ts
:
f
lu
en
cy
,
f
lex
ib
ilit
y
,
o
r
ig
in
ality
,
an
d
elab
o
r
atio
n
.
T
o
estab
lis
h
h
ig
h
p
s
y
ch
o
m
etr
ic
tr
an
s
p
ar
en
cy
,
a
p
ilo
t
test
was
co
n
d
u
cted
with
3
0
n
o
n
-
s
am
p
led
d
em
o
g
r
ap
h
ic
p
ee
r
s
,
y
ield
in
g
an
in
ter
n
al
co
n
s
is
ten
cy
C
r
o
n
b
ac
h
’
s
alp
h
a
co
ef
f
icien
t
o
f
0
.
8
1
.
Fu
r
th
er
m
o
r
e,
to
elim
in
ate
in
d
iv
id
u
al
g
r
ad
in
g
s
u
b
jectiv
ity
,
all
s
tu
d
en
t
test
o
u
tco
m
es
wer
e
ev
alu
ated
in
d
ep
en
d
en
tly
b
y
a
p
an
el
o
f
th
r
ee
b
lin
d
ed
ex
p
er
t
ass
ess
o
r
s
u
s
in
g
p
r
ed
ef
in
ed
,
o
b
jectiv
e
r
u
b
r
ic
cr
iter
ia.
T
h
e
in
ter
-
r
ater
r
eliab
ilit
y
am
o
n
g
th
e
th
r
ee
ev
alu
ato
r
s
was
s
tatis
tically
co
m
p
u
ted
u
s
in
g
th
e
in
tr
ac
lass
co
r
r
elatio
n
co
ef
f
icien
t
(
I
C
C
)
two
-
way
m
ix
ed
ef
f
ec
ts
m
o
d
el
u
n
d
er
th
e
co
n
s
is
ten
cy
d
ef
in
itio
n
,
y
ield
in
g
an
av
er
ag
e
m
ea
s
u
r
es
I
C
C
v
alu
e
o
f
0
.
8
2
1
(
9
5
%
co
n
f
id
en
ce
in
ter
v
al:
0
.
6
7
2
,
0
.
9
0
9
;
F(2
9
,
5
8
)
=5
.
5
9
2
,
p
<0
.
0
0
1
)
,
in
d
icatin
g
an
ex
ce
llen
t a
n
d
h
ig
h
ly
s
tan
d
ar
d
ized
lev
el
o
f
in
ter
-
r
ater
co
n
s
is
ten
cy
.
2
.
3
.
3
.
P
ro
g
r
a
mm
ing
s
k
ill a
s
s
ess
m
ent
ins
t
rum
ent
T
h
e
p
r
o
g
r
am
m
in
g
s
k
ill
ass
ess
m
en
t
in
s
tr
u
m
en
t
u
tili
ze
d
a
s
tan
d
ar
d
ized
p
er
f
o
r
m
an
ce
-
b
ased
r
u
b
r
ic
d
esig
n
ed
to
m
ea
s
u
r
e
co
m
p
u
tin
g
p
r
o
d
u
ct
q
u
ality
an
d
alg
o
r
ith
m
ic
task
ex
ec
u
tio
n
in
Scr
atch
(
f
o
cu
s
in
g
o
n
s
cr
ip
t
lo
g
ic,
co
n
tr
o
l
s
tr
u
ctu
r
es,
ev
en
ts
,
an
d
d
eb
u
g
g
in
g
p
r
o
f
icien
cy
)
.
T
h
e
r
u
b
r
ic
co
n
s
is
ted
o
f
f
iv
e
co
r
e
ass
ess
m
en
t
cr
iter
ia
s
co
r
ed
o
n
a
4
-
p
o
in
t
s
ca
le
(
to
talin
g
2
0
p
o
in
ts
)
.
C
o
n
ten
t
v
alid
ity
was
co
n
f
ir
m
ed
b
y
th
r
ee
ex
p
er
ts
(
I
OC
=1
.
0
0
)
.
I
n
a
p
ilo
t
test
with
3
0
n
o
n
-
s
am
p
led
p
ee
r
s
,
th
e
r
u
b
r
ic
cr
iter
ia
ac
h
iev
ed
a
C
r
o
n
b
ac
h
’
s
alp
h
a
co
ef
f
icien
t
o
f
0
.
8
7
.
T
o
en
s
u
r
e
s
tr
ict
o
b
jectiv
ity
ac
r
o
s
s
th
e
ex
p
er
im
en
tal
an
d
co
n
tr
o
l
g
r
o
u
p
s
,
all
p
r
o
g
r
am
m
in
g
p
r
o
d
u
cts
wer
e
in
d
ep
en
d
en
tly
ev
alu
ated
b
y
th
e
s
am
e
p
an
el
o
f
th
r
ee
b
lin
d
ed
ex
p
er
t
ass
ess
o
r
s
.
T
h
e
in
ter
-
r
ater
r
eliab
ilit
y
was
ca
lcu
lated
u
s
in
g
th
e
I
C
C
two
-
way
m
ix
ed
ef
f
ec
ts
m
o
d
el,
y
ield
in
g
an
av
er
ag
e
m
ea
s
u
r
es
I
C
C
v
alu
e
o
f
0
.
7
5
7
(
9
5
%
co
n
f
id
en
ce
in
ter
v
al:
0
.
5
5
4
,
0
.
8
7
6
;
F(2
9
,
5
8
)
=4
.
1
1
5
,
p
<0
.
0
0
1
)
.
T
h
is
r
esu
lt
d
em
o
n
s
tr
ates
a
s
tatis
tically
s
ig
n
if
ican
t a
n
d
g
o
o
d
lev
el
o
f
g
r
ad
in
g
s
tab
ilit
y
an
d
s
tan
d
ar
d
izatio
n
am
o
n
g
th
e
ev
alu
ato
r
s
.
2.
4
.
Da
t
a
a
na
ly
s
is
pro
ce
du
r
e
T
h
e
r
esear
ch
er
im
p
lem
en
ted
th
e
s
tu
d
y
ac
co
r
d
in
g
to
th
e
f
o
llo
win
g
s
tep
s
:
th
e
in
s
tr
u
ctio
n
al
ac
tiv
ities
wer
e
co
n
d
u
cted
s
eq
u
en
tially
ac
co
r
d
in
g
to
th
e
less
o
n
p
lan
s
.
Af
ter
ea
ch
in
s
tr
u
ctio
n
al
s
ess
io
n
,
s
tu
d
en
ts
wer
e
ass
ess
ed
u
s
in
g
th
e
cr
ea
tiv
ity
ass
ess
m
en
t
f
o
r
m
an
d
th
e
p
r
ac
tical
p
r
o
g
r
am
m
in
g
s
k
ills
ass
ess
m
en
t
f
o
r
m
,
an
d
th
eir
s
co
r
es we
r
e
r
ec
o
r
d
ed
.
Data
an
aly
s
is
:
−
C
o
m
p
ar
ativ
e
an
aly
s
is
:
an
in
d
ep
en
d
en
t
s
am
p
les
t
-
test
was
u
s
ed
to
co
m
p
ar
e
th
e
m
ea
n
p
o
s
t
-
test
s
co
r
es
f
o
r
cr
ea
tiv
ity
an
d
p
r
ac
tical
p
r
o
g
r
am
m
in
g
s
k
ills
b
etwe
en
th
e
e
x
p
er
im
en
tal
g
r
o
u
p
an
d
th
e
c
o
n
tr
o
l
g
r
o
u
p
to
d
eter
m
in
e
if
a
s
tatis
tically
s
ig
n
if
ican
t d
if
f
er
e
n
ce
ex
is
ted
.
−
An
aly
s
is
o
f
th
e
r
elatio
n
s
h
ip
b
etwe
en
cr
ea
tiv
ity
an
d
p
r
ac
tica
l
p
r
o
g
r
am
m
in
g
s
k
ills
th
e
r
elatio
n
s
h
ip
b
etwe
en
s
tu
d
en
ts
’
cr
ea
tiv
ity
a
n
d
th
ei
r
p
r
ac
tical
p
r
o
g
r
am
m
in
g
s
k
ills
f
o
llo
win
g
th
e
im
p
lem
en
tatio
n
o
f
th
e
Sy
n
ec
tics
-
b
ased
in
s
tr
u
ctio
n
al
ac
tiv
ities
was
an
aly
ze
d
u
s
in
g
th
e
Pear
s
o
n
p
r
o
d
u
ct
-
m
o
m
en
t
co
r
r
elatio
n
co
ef
f
icien
t
(
r
)
.
T
h
e
co
r
r
elatio
n
co
ef
f
icien
t
r
a
n
g
es
f
r
o
m
-
1
t
o
+1
,
wh
er
e
th
e
s
tr
en
g
th
o
f
th
e
co
r
r
elatio
n
was
in
ter
p
r
eted
ac
co
r
d
in
g
t
o
C
o
h
en
[
31
]:
i)
a
n
eg
ativ
e
v
alu
e
in
d
icate
s
an
in
v
er
s
e
r
elatio
n
s
h
ip
; ii)
a
p
o
s
itiv
e
v
alu
e
in
d
icate
s
a
d
ir
ec
t lin
ea
r
r
elatio
n
s
h
ip
; a
n
d
iii)
a
v
alu
e
o
f
0
in
d
icate
s
n
o
r
elatio
n
s
h
ip
b
etwe
en
th
e
v
ar
ia
b
les.
Evaluation Warning : The document was created with Spire.PDF for Python.
I
n
t
J
E
v
al
&
R
es E
d
u
c
I
SS
N:
2252
-
8
8
2
2
Th
e
r
ela
tio
n
s
h
ip
b
etw
ee
n
crea
tivity
a
n
d
p
r
o
g
r
a
mmin
g
s
kills
a
mo
n
g
lo
w
er
…
(
R
a
tta
n
a
w
a
d
ee
Mu
en
s
r
ip
o
o
m
)
4117
3.
RE
SU
L
T
S AN
D
D
I
SCU
SS
I
O
N
3
.
1
.
Resul
t
s
3
.
1
.
1
.
R
esu
lt
s
o
f
t
he
co
m
pa
riso
n
o
f
m
ea
n
s
co
re
s
o
f
cr
ea
t
i
v
it
y
a
n
d
pro
g
ra
mm
ing
pra
c
t
ice
s
k
il
ls
bet
wee
n
t
he
ex
perim
ent
a
l a
nd
co
ntr
o
l g
ro
up
s
As s
h
o
wn
in
T
ab
le
2
,
it wa
s
f
o
u
n
d
th
at:
−
C
r
ea
tiv
ity
:
th
e
ex
p
er
im
en
tal
g
r
o
u
p
ac
h
iev
ed
a
m
ea
n
cr
ea
tiv
i
ty
s
co
r
e
o
f
9
.
9
1
with
a
s
tan
d
a
r
d
d
ev
iatio
n
o
f
0
.
9
5
,
wh
er
ea
s
th
e
c
o
n
tr
o
l
g
r
o
u
p
o
b
tain
ed
a
m
ea
n
s
co
r
e
o
f
8
.
6
9
with
a
s
tan
d
ar
d
d
ev
iatio
n
o
f
1
.
5
5
.
T
h
e
t
-
test
an
aly
s
is
r
ev
ea
led
a
t
-
v
a
lu
e
o
f
3
.
6
7
6
a
n
d
a
p
-
v
alu
e
le
s
s
th
an
0
.
0
0
1
(
p<
0
.
0
0
1
)
,
wh
i
ch
is
b
elo
w
th
e
s
tatis
t
ical
s
ig
n
if
ican
ce
lev
el
o
f
0
.
0
5
.
T
h
e
r
ef
o
r
e
,
it
ca
n
b
e
co
n
clu
d
ed
th
at
th
er
e
is
a
s
tatis
tically
s
ig
n
if
ican
t
d
if
f
er
en
ce
i
n
cr
ea
tiv
ity
b
et
wee
n
th
e
ex
p
er
im
e
n
tal
an
d
co
n
tr
o
l
g
r
o
u
p
.
T
h
e
e
x
p
er
im
en
tal
g
r
o
u
p
d
em
o
n
s
tr
ated
s
ig
n
if
ica
n
tly
h
ig
h
er
cr
ea
tiv
ity
th
a
n
th
e
c
o
n
tr
o
l
g
r
o
u
p
.
−
Pra
ctica
l
p
r
o
g
r
am
m
in
g
s
k
ills
:
th
e
ex
p
er
im
en
tal
g
r
o
u
p
h
a
d
a
m
ea
n
p
r
o
g
r
am
m
in
g
p
er
f
o
r
m
an
ce
s
co
r
e
o
f
3
4
.
6
7
with
a
s
tan
d
ar
d
d
e
v
iatio
n
o
f
1
.
8
3
,
wh
ile
th
e
co
n
t
r
o
l
g
r
o
u
p
h
a
d
a
m
ea
n
s
co
r
e
o
f
2
9
.
1
9
with
a
s
tan
d
ar
d
d
ev
iatio
n
o
f
4
.
8
5
.
T
h
e
t
-
test
r
esu
lts
in
d
icate
d
a
t
-
v
alu
e
o
f
5
.
7
9
0
an
d
a
p
-
v
alu
e
less
th
an
0
.
0
0
1
(
p
<0
.
0
0
1
)
,
wh
ic
h
is
s
tati
s
tica
lly
s
ig
n
if
ican
t
at
th
e
0
.
0
5
lev
el.
T
h
is
in
d
icate
s
a
s
tatis
t
ic
ally
s
ig
n
if
ican
t
d
if
f
er
en
ce
b
etwe
en
th
e
two
g
r
o
u
p
s
,
with
th
e
e
x
p
er
im
en
tal
g
r
o
u
p
ex
h
ib
itin
g
s
u
b
s
tan
tially
h
ig
h
er
p
r
o
g
r
a
m
m
in
g
s
k
ills
th
an
th
e
c
o
n
tr
o
l g
r
o
u
p
.
T
h
e
ef
f
ec
t
s
ize
an
aly
s
is
s
h
o
wed
a
lar
g
e
ef
f
ec
t
o
f
t
h
e
Sy
n
e
ctics
in
s
tr
u
ctio
n
al
m
o
d
el
o
n
cr
ea
tiv
ity
(
C
o
h
en
’
s
d
=0
.
9
4
)
an
d
p
r
ac
tical
p
r
o
g
r
a
m
m
in
g
s
k
ills
(
C
o
h
en
’
s
d
=1
.
4
8
)
,
in
d
icatin
g
th
at
th
e
i
n
ter
v
en
tio
n
h
ad
a
s
u
b
s
tan
tial
im
p
ac
t o
n
s
tu
d
e
n
ts
’
lear
n
in
g
o
u
tco
m
es.
T
ab
le
2
.
C
o
m
p
a
r
is
o
n
o
f
m
ea
n
s
co
r
es o
f
cr
ea
tiv
ity
an
d
p
r
o
g
r
a
m
m
in
g
p
r
ac
tice
s
k
ills
o
f
s
tu
d
en
ts
in
th
e
ex
p
er
im
en
tal
g
r
o
u
p
an
d
th
e
co
n
tr
o
l g
r
o
u
p
V
a
r
i
a
b
l
e
s St
u
d
i
e
d
Ex
p
e
r
i
m
e
n
t
a
l
g
r
o
u
p
(
n
=
3
0
)
C
o
n
t
r
o
l
g
r
o
u
p
(
n
=
3
0
)
t
P
̅
S
.
D
.
̅
S
.
D
.
C
r
e
a
t
i
v
i
t
y
9
.
9
1
0
.
9
5
8
.
6
9
1
.
5
5
3
.
6
7
6
<
0
.
0
0
1
P
r
a
c
t
i
c
a
l
p
r
o
g
r
a
mm
i
n
g
sk
i
l
l
s
3
4
.
6
7
1.
8
3
2
9
.
1
9
4
.
8
5
5
.
7
9
0
<
0
.
0
0
1
3
.
1
.
2
.
R
esu
lt
s
o
f
t
he
a
na
l
y
s
is
o
f
t
he
re
la
t
io
ns
hip
bet
wee
n
cr
ea
t
iv
it
y
a
nd
pro
g
ra
m
m
ing
s
k
ill
s
f
o
llo
wing
t
he
im
plem
ent
a
t
io
n o
f
Sy
nect
ics
-
ba
s
ed
lea
rning
a
ct
iv
it
ies
f
o
r
lo
wer
s
ec
o
nd
a
ry
s
cho
o
l
s
t
ud
ent
s
T
h
is
s
ec
tio
n
p
r
esen
ts
th
e
f
i
n
d
in
g
s
r
e
g
ar
d
in
g
th
e
r
elatio
n
s
h
ip
b
etwe
en
s
tu
d
en
ts
’
cr
e
ativ
ity
an
d
p
r
o
g
r
a
m
m
in
g
s
k
ills
af
ter
th
e
in
ter
v
en
tio
n
.
T
a
b
le
3
p
r
esen
ts
th
e
co
r
r
elatio
n
an
aly
s
is
b
etwe
en
cr
ea
tiv
ity
an
d
p
r
o
g
r
a
m
m
in
g
s
k
ills
f
o
llo
win
g
th
e
im
p
lem
en
tatio
n
o
f
th
e
Sy
n
ec
tics
in
s
tr
u
ctio
n
al
m
o
d
el.
T
h
e
r
esu
lts
p
r
esen
ted
in
T
ab
le
3
in
d
icate
th
at,
b
ased
o
n
th
e
Pear
s
o
n
c
o
r
r
elatio
n
a
n
aly
s
is
,
cr
ea
tiv
ity
was
f
o
u
n
d
to
h
av
e
a
s
tatis
tically
s
ig
n
if
ican
t,
s
tr
o
n
g
p
o
s
itiv
e
co
r
r
elatio
n
with
p
r
o
g
r
am
m
in
g
p
er
f
o
r
m
a
n
ce
am
o
n
g
s
tu
d
en
ts
in
th
e
ex
p
er
im
e
n
tal
g
r
o
u
p
wh
o
p
a
r
ticip
ated
in
t
h
e
Sy
n
ec
tics
-
b
ased
in
s
tr
u
ctio
n
al
ac
tiv
ities
(
r
=0
.
7
1
0
,
p
<
0
.
0
0
1
)
.
A
Pear
s
o
n
co
r
r
elatio
n
v
alu
e
o
f
0
.
7
1
0
d
em
o
n
s
tr
ates
a
h
ig
h
lev
el
o
f
p
o
s
itiv
e
ass
o
ciatio
n
b
etw
ee
n
cr
ea
tiv
ity
an
d
p
r
o
g
r
a
m
m
in
g
s
k
ills
.
T
h
is
f
in
d
in
g
s
u
g
g
ests
th
at
h
ig
h
er
lev
els
o
f
cr
ea
tiv
ity
ar
e
s
ig
n
if
ica
n
tly
ass
o
ciate
d
with
h
ig
h
er
lev
els
o
f
p
r
o
g
r
am
m
in
g
p
er
f
o
r
m
a
n
ce
.
Acc
o
r
d
in
g
to
C
o
h
en
’
s
[
3
1
]
in
ter
p
r
etatio
n
cr
iter
ia,
th
e
o
b
tain
ed
co
r
r
elatio
n
c
o
ef
f
icien
t
(
r
=
0
.
7
1
0
)
in
d
icate
s
a
lar
g
e
p
o
s
itiv
e
r
elatio
n
s
h
ip
b
etwe
en
c
r
ea
tiv
ity
an
d
p
r
o
g
r
am
m
i
n
g
s
k
ills
.
T
ab
le
3
.
C
o
r
r
elatio
n
b
etwe
en
cr
ea
tiv
ity
an
d
p
r
o
g
r
am
m
in
g
s
k
ills
C
o
r
r
e
l
a
t
i
o
n
s
V
a
r
i
a
b
l
e
s
P
r
a
c
t
i
c
a
l
p
r
o
g
r
a
mm
i
n
g
sk
i
l
l
s
C
r
e
a
t
i
v
i
t
y
P
r
a
c
t
i
c
a
l
p
r
o
g
r
a
mm
i
n
g
sk
i
l
l
s
P
e
a
r
so
n
c
o
r
r
e
l
a
t
i
o
n
1
0
.
7
1
0
**
S
i
g
.
(
2
-
t
a
i
l
e
d
)
0
.
0
0
0
N
30
30
C
r
e
a
t
i
v
i
t
y
P
e
a
r
so
n
c
o
r
r
e
l
a
t
i
o
n
0
.
7
1
0
**
1
S
i
g
.
(
2
-
t
a
i
l
e
d
)
0
.
0
0
0
N
30
30
*
*
C
o
r
r
e
l
a
t
i
o
n
i
s si
g
n
i
f
i
c
a
n
t
a
t
t
h
e
0
.
0
1
l
e
v
e
l
(
2
-
t
a
i
l
e
d
)
.
T
h
e
s
ca
tter
p
lo
t
in
Fig
u
r
e
1
illu
s
tr
ates
a
clea
r
p
o
s
itiv
e
in
f
lu
en
ce
o
f
cr
ea
tiv
ity
o
n
p
r
o
g
r
am
m
in
g
s
k
ills
.
T
h
e
tr
en
d
lin
e
a
n
d
r
e
g
r
ess
io
n
eq
u
atio
n
in
d
icate
a
s
tatis
tica
lly
s
ig
n
if
ican
t
p
r
ed
ictiv
e
r
elat
io
n
s
h
ip
.
C
r
ea
tiv
ity
ac
co
u
n
ts
f
o
r
5
0
.
4
% o
f
th
e
v
ar
i
an
ce
in
p
r
o
g
r
a
m
m
in
g
s
k
ills
(
R
²=
0
.
5
0
4
)
,
s
u
g
g
esti
n
g
th
at
cr
ea
t
iv
ity
is
a
m
o
d
er
ate
to
s
tr
o
n
g
p
r
ed
icto
r
o
f
s
tu
d
en
t
s
’
p
r
ac
tical
p
r
o
g
r
am
m
i
n
g
p
e
r
f
o
r
m
an
ce
.
T
h
is
f
in
d
in
g
d
em
o
n
s
tr
ates
th
at
h
ig
h
er
lev
els o
f
cr
ea
tiv
ity
ar
e
ass
o
cia
ted
with
h
ig
h
er
lev
els o
f
p
r
o
g
r
am
m
in
g
p
r
o
f
icien
c
y
.
Evaluation Warning : The document was created with Spire.PDF for Python.
I
SS
N
:
2
2
5
2
-
8
8
2
2
I
n
t
J
E
v
al
&
R
es E
d
u
c
,
Vo
l
.
15
,
No
.
5
,
Octo
b
er
20
26
:
4
1
1
4
-
4121
4118
Fig
u
r
e
1
.
Scatter
p
l
o
t illu
s
tr
atin
g
th
e
r
elatio
n
s
h
ip
b
etwe
en
c
r
ea
tiv
ity
an
d
p
r
o
g
r
am
m
in
g
s
k
ills
3
.
2
.
Dis
cus
s
io
n
T
h
e
f
in
d
in
g
s
o
f
th
is
s
tu
d
y
p
r
o
v
id
e
em
p
ir
ical
ev
i
d
en
ce
f
o
r
th
e
ef
f
icac
y
o
f
th
e
Sy
n
ec
tics
in
s
tr
u
ctio
n
al
m
o
d
el
in
b
r
id
g
in
g
th
e
g
ap
b
et
wee
n
cr
ea
tiv
e
c
o
g
n
itio
n
an
d
t
ec
h
n
ical
s
k
ill
d
ev
el
o
p
m
en
t.
Stu
d
en
ts
u
n
d
er
g
o
in
g
Sy
n
ec
tics
-
b
ased
in
s
tr
u
ctio
n
ac
h
iev
ed
s
ig
n
if
ican
tly
h
ig
h
e
r
s
co
r
es
in
b
o
th
cr
ea
tiv
ity
an
d
p
r
o
g
r
am
m
in
g
p
r
o
f
icien
c
y
co
m
p
ar
e
d
to
th
o
s
e
in
t
h
e
co
n
v
en
tio
n
al
“
f
o
llo
w
-
th
e
-
ex
am
p
le
”
g
r
o
u
p
.
T
h
is
co
r
e
f
in
d
in
g
v
alid
ates
Go
r
d
o
n
[
6
]
f
o
u
n
d
atio
n
al
th
eo
r
y
th
at
s
tr
u
ctu
r
ed
an
al
o
g
ical
th
in
k
in
g
ca
n
b
r
ea
k
c
o
g
n
itiv
e
f
ix
atio
n
an
d
d
ir
ec
tly
en
h
an
ce
p
r
o
b
lem
-
s
o
lv
in
g
ca
p
a
cities in
p
r
ac
tical
d
o
m
ain
s
.
T
h
e
d
escr
ip
tiv
e
s
tatis
tics
an
d
lar
g
e
ef
f
ec
t
s
izes
(
C
o
h
en
’
s
d
=0
.
9
4
f
o
r
cr
ea
tiv
ity
;
d
=1
.
4
8
f
o
r
p
r
o
g
r
a
m
m
in
g
)
d
em
o
n
s
tr
ate
t
h
at
th
e
in
ter
v
e
n
tio
n
e
x
er
ted
a
tr
an
s
f
o
r
m
ativ
e
im
p
ac
t
r
ath
er
th
an
a
m
ar
g
in
al
im
p
r
o
v
em
e
n
t.
W
h
ile
tr
ad
itio
n
al
p
r
o
g
r
am
m
i
n
g
in
s
tr
u
ctio
n
o
f
ten
lim
its
lo
wer
s
ec
o
n
d
ar
y
s
tu
d
en
ts
to
r
o
te
s
y
n
tax
im
itatio
n
[
2
4
]
,
[
2
5
]
leav
i
n
g
th
em
ill
-
eq
u
ip
p
ed
f
o
r
in
d
ep
en
d
en
t
alg
o
r
ith
m
ic
d
esig
n
[
2
6
]
,
t
h
e
Sy
n
ec
tics
m
o
d
el
o
f
f
er
s
an
ex
p
licit
m
ec
h
an
is
m
f
o
r
g
e
n
er
ativ
e
th
in
k
in
g
.
Sp
ec
if
ic
p
h
ases
,
s
u
ch
as
p
er
s
o
n
al
an
alo
g
y
(
e.
g
.
,
co
n
ce
p
tu
alizin
g
o
n
eself
as
a
lin
e
o
f
co
d
e)
an
d
co
m
p
r
e
s
s
ed
co
n
f
lict
(
e.
g
.
,
r
eso
lv
in
g
o
p
p
o
s
in
g
co
n
ce
p
tu
al
f
o
r
ce
s
with
in
a
p
r
o
g
r
am
’
s
l
o
g
ic)
,
f
o
r
ce
d
s
tu
d
e
n
ts
to
tr
a
n
s
ce
n
d
s
tan
d
ar
d
d
esig
n
p
ar
a
d
ig
m
s
.
B
y
ac
tiv
el
y
d
estab
ilizin
g
f
am
iliar
ass
u
m
p
t
io
n
s
,
th
e
m
o
d
el
s
y
s
tem
atica
lly
g
u
id
e
d
lear
n
e
r
s
to
c
o
n
s
tr
u
ct
o
r
ig
in
al
alg
o
r
ith
m
ic
p
ath
way
s
,
co
n
f
ir
m
in
g
p
r
io
r
ass
er
tio
n
s
th
at
cr
ea
tiv
e
clas
s
r
o
o
m
e
n
v
ir
o
n
m
en
ts
p
r
o
m
o
t
e
d
ee
p
er
tech
n
ical
in
n
o
v
atio
n
[
8
]
,
[
9
]
,
[
1
6
].
C
r
itically
,
th
e
s
tr
o
n
g
p
o
s
itiv
e
co
r
r
elatio
n
(
r
=0
.
7
1
0
,
p
<0
.
0
0
1
)
an
d
r
eg
r
ess
io
n
a
n
aly
s
is
(
R²
=0
.
5
0
4
)
r
ed
ef
in
e
th
e
in
ter
p
lay
b
etwe
e
n
cr
ea
tiv
e
th
in
k
in
g
a
n
d
co
m
p
u
tatio
n
al
p
er
f
o
r
m
an
ce
.
C
r
ea
tiv
ity
is
f
r
eq
u
en
tly
m
is
ch
ar
ac
ter
ized
as
a
s
o
f
t
s
k
i
ll
s
ep
ar
ate
f
r
o
m
tech
n
ical
s
cien
ce
,
tech
n
o
lo
g
y
,
en
g
in
ee
r
in
g
,
an
d
m
ath
em
atics
(
STE
M
)
co
m
p
eten
cies.
Ho
we
v
er
,
th
ese
d
ata
in
d
icate
th
at
cr
ea
tiv
e
ca
p
ac
ity
ac
co
u
n
ts
f
o
r
o
v
er
h
alf
o
f
th
e
v
ar
ian
ce
in
s
tu
d
e
n
ts
’
p
r
ac
tica
l
p
r
o
g
r
a
m
m
in
g
s
k
ills
.
T
h
is
p
r
ed
ictiv
e
r
elatio
n
s
h
ip
s
u
g
g
ests
th
at
th
e
co
g
n
itiv
e
f
lex
ib
ilit
y
an
d
o
r
ig
in
ality
n
u
r
t
u
r
ed
b
y
Sy
n
ec
tics
ar
e
f
o
u
n
d
at
io
n
al
to
th
e
p
s
y
ch
o
m
o
to
r
an
d
lo
g
ical
d
em
a
n
d
s
o
f
d
eb
u
g
g
in
g
,
s
tr
u
ctu
r
in
g
lo
g
ic,
an
d
wr
itin
g
co
d
e
[
5
]
,
[
1
5
]
.
C
o
n
s
eq
u
en
tly
,
ex
p
a
n
d
in
g
co
m
p
u
tatio
n
al
cr
ea
tiv
ity
f
r
o
m
ar
tis
tic
f
ield
s
[
1
7
]
−
[1
9
]
i
n
to
tech
n
ical
d
is
cip
lin
es
is
n
o
t
m
er
ely
ad
jace
n
t
to
co
m
p
u
ter
s
cien
ce
ed
u
ca
tio
n
;
it is
a
p
ed
ag
o
g
ical
p
r
er
eq
u
is
ite
f
o
r
h
i
g
h
-
lev
el
tec
h
n
ical
m
aster
y
[
20
].
T
o
co
n
tex
tu
alize
t
h
e
b
r
o
ad
er
ac
ad
em
ic
im
p
ac
t
o
f
th
ese
f
in
d
in
g
s
,
th
e
o
u
tco
m
es
o
f
t
h
is
s
tu
d
y
we
r
e
s
y
s
tem
atica
lly
co
m
p
ar
ed
with
a
n
etwo
r
k
o
f
p
r
io
r
g
lo
b
al
r
es
ea
r
ch
.
T
h
e
em
p
ir
ical
alig
n
m
e
n
t
o
b
s
er
v
e
d
ac
r
o
s
s
m
u
ltip
le
d
o
m
ain
s
s
tr
o
n
g
ly
c
o
r
r
o
b
o
r
ates
th
e
u
n
i
v
er
s
al
ad
ap
tab
ilit
y
o
f
th
e
Sy
n
ec
tics
m
o
d
el.
Sp
ec
if
ically
,
th
e
s
ig
n
if
ican
t
leap
in
cr
ea
tiv
e
p
er
f
o
r
m
an
ce
r
eso
n
ates
with
th
e
m
iles
to
n
es
ac
h
iev
ed
b
y
W
ih
ar
s
ih
et
a
l.
[1
7
]
in
p
er
f
o
r
m
ativ
e
a
r
ts
,
Su
n
en
d
a
r
et
a
l.
[1
8
]
in
lin
g
u
is
tic
liter
ac
y
,
an
d
Sap
u
tr
o
an
d
W
ar
au
lia
[
1
9
]
in
cr
ea
tiv
e
wr
itin
g
,
th
er
e
b
y
s
u
b
s
tan
tiatin
g
th
at
an
al
o
g
ical
d
estab
ilizatio
n
ef
f
ec
tiv
ely
n
u
r
tu
r
es
c
o
g
n
it
iv
e
f
lu
en
c
y
ac
r
o
s
s
b
o
th
ar
tis
tic
an
d
tech
n
ical
cu
r
r
icu
la.
Evaluation Warning : The document was created with Spire.PDF for Python.
I
n
t
J
E
v
al
&
R
es E
d
u
c
I
SS
N:
2252
-
8
8
2
2
Th
e
r
ela
tio
n
s
h
ip
b
etw
ee
n
crea
tivity
a
n
d
p
r
o
g
r
a
mmin
g
s
kills
a
mo
n
g
lo
w
er
…
(
R
a
tta
n
a
w
a
d
ee
Mu
en
s
r
ip
o
o
m
)
4119
Fu
r
th
er
m
o
r
e
,
th
e
r
o
b
u
s
t
p
r
ed
ictiv
e
r
elatio
n
s
h
ip
b
etwe
e
n
cr
ea
tiv
ity
a
n
d
c
o
m
p
u
tatio
n
al
s
k
ill
(
R²
=0
.
5
0
4
)
d
ir
ec
tly
p
ar
allels
th
e
th
eo
r
etica
l
ass
er
tio
n
s
o
f
Pe
ase
et
a
l.
[
20
]
r
eg
ar
d
in
g
c
o
m
p
u
tatio
n
al
cr
ea
tiv
ity
,
as
well
as
th
e
em
p
ir
ical
f
r
am
e
wo
r
k
s
o
f
Gr
o
v
er
a
n
d
Pea
[2
4
]
an
d
R
esn
ick
[
2
6
]
,
w
h
o
a
r
g
u
e
d
th
at
p
r
o
g
r
am
m
in
g
m
aster
y
ca
n
n
o
t
th
r
iv
e
o
n
s
y
n
tax
ac
q
u
is
itio
n
alo
n
e
b
u
t
r
eq
u
ir
es
h
ig
h
-
lev
el
d
iv
er
g
en
t
p
r
o
b
lem
-
s
o
lv
in
g
.
T
h
is
s
tu
d
y
also
s
tr
en
g
th
en
s
th
e
p
ed
ag
o
g
ical
p
o
s
itio
n
s
o
f
B
eg
h
ett
o
an
d
Kau
f
m
a
n
[
8
]
a
n
d
Sawy
er
[
9
]
,
p
r
o
v
in
g
th
at
s
tr
u
ctu
r
ed
cr
ea
tiv
e
in
te
r
v
en
tio
n
s
m
itig
ate
th
e
lim
itatio
n
s
o
f
tr
ad
itio
n
al,
im
itatio
n
-
h
ea
v
y
c
o
m
p
u
ter
ed
u
ca
tio
n
as
cr
itiq
u
ed
b
y
L
y
e
an
d
Ko
h
[
2
5
]
.
L
astl
y
,
t
h
e
p
s
y
c
h
o
m
o
t
o
r
s
tab
ilit
y
ca
p
tu
r
ed
i
n
th
e
p
r
o
g
r
am
m
in
g
r
u
b
r
ics
b
r
id
g
es
th
e
f
o
u
n
d
atio
n
al
tax
o
n
o
m
ies
o
f
Simp
s
o
n
[
5
]
an
d
Har
r
o
w
[
1
5
]
,
d
e
m
o
n
s
tr
atin
g
th
at
t
ec
h
n
ical
ex
ec
u
tio
n
is
a
d
ir
ec
t
d
o
w
n
s
tr
ea
m
b
y
p
r
o
d
u
ct
o
f
s
tr
u
ctu
r
ed
c
o
n
ce
p
tu
al
o
r
ig
in
atio
n
.
B
ey
o
n
d
ac
a
d
e
m
ic
s
y
n
th
esis
,
th
is
r
esear
ch
d
eliv
er
s
th
r
ee
f
o
u
n
d
a
tio
n
al
co
n
tr
ib
u
tio
n
s
to
th
e
f
ield
o
f
c
o
m
p
u
te
r
ed
u
ca
tio
n
:
−
T
h
eo
r
etica
l
co
n
tr
ib
u
tio
n
:
it
e
x
p
an
d
s
t
h
e
b
o
u
n
d
ar
ies
o
f
G
o
r
d
o
n
[
6
]
Sy
n
ec
tics
th
eo
r
y
b
y
p
r
o
v
i
n
g
th
at
a
m
o
d
el
o
r
ig
in
ally
d
esig
n
e
d
f
o
r
th
e
h
u
m
a
n
ities
is
h
ig
h
ly
ap
p
licab
le
to
alg
o
r
ith
m
ic
an
d
d
eter
m
in
is
tic
STE
M
f
ield
s
,
ef
f
ec
tiv
ely
tr
a
n
s
f
o
r
m
in
g
h
o
w
th
e
in
ter
s
ec
t
io
n
b
etwe
en
cr
ea
tiv
e
c
o
g
n
iti
o
n
an
d
lo
g
ical
p
r
o
g
r
a
m
m
in
g
is
co
n
ce
p
tu
alize
d
.
−
Pra
ctica
l/
em
p
ir
ical
co
n
tr
ib
u
tio
n
:
it
p
r
o
v
id
es
f
r
o
n
tlin
e
co
m
p
u
ter
s
cien
ce
ed
u
ca
to
r
s
with
a
v
alid
ated
,
tu
r
n
k
ey
p
e
d
ag
o
g
ical
s
tr
ateg
y
(
th
e
6
-
s
tep
Sy
n
ec
tics
f
r
am
ew
o
r
k
)
to
tr
an
s
ce
n
d
m
ec
h
an
ical
co
d
in
g
p
r
ac
tices,
o
f
f
er
in
g
co
n
c
r
ete
ev
id
e
n
ce
th
a
t
n
u
r
tu
r
i
n
g
s
tu
d
en
t
c
r
ea
tiv
ity
d
ir
ec
tly
im
p
r
o
v
es
in
d
ep
e
n
d
en
t
d
eb
u
g
g
in
g
an
d
co
d
e
q
u
ality
.
−
Me
th
o
d
o
lo
g
ical
co
n
tr
ib
u
tio
n
:
b
y
r
ig
o
r
o
u
s
ly
d
ep
lo
y
in
g
a
d
u
al
-
in
s
tr
u
m
en
t
v
alid
atio
n
p
r
o
ce
s
s
b
ac
k
ed
b
y
s
o
lid
in
ter
n
al
co
n
s
is
ten
cy
test
in
g
(
α=
0
.
8
1
an
d
0
.
8
7
)
an
d
u
tili
zin
g
a
r
ig
o
r
o
u
s
tr
ip
le
-
ass
es
s
o
r
p
an
els
ap
p
r
o
ac
h
to
g
u
ar
a
n
tee
in
ter
-
r
a
ter
o
b
jectiv
ity
f
o
r
b
o
th
c
r
ea
tiv
ity
an
d
tech
n
ical
task
s
(
I
C
C
=
0
.
8
2
1
a
n
d
0
.
7
5
7
,
r
esp
ec
tiv
ely
)
,
th
is
s
tu
d
y
est
ab
lis
h
es
a
h
ig
h
l
y
r
eliab
le
a
n
d
r
e
p
licab
le
em
p
ir
ical
b
lu
e
p
r
in
t
f
o
r
f
u
tu
r
e
r
esear
ch
er
s
s
ee
k
in
g
to
q
u
an
tif
y
s
o
f
t
-
s
k
ill v
ar
ian
ce
s
with
in
h
i
g
h
ly
tech
n
ical
p
er
f
o
r
m
an
ce
task
s
.
4.
CO
NCLU
SI
O
N
T
h
is
s
tu
d
y
in
v
esti
g
ated
th
e
im
p
ac
t
o
f
th
e
Sy
n
ec
tics
in
s
tr
u
ctio
n
al
m
o
d
el
o
n
th
e
cr
ea
tiv
ity
an
d
p
r
ac
tical
p
r
o
g
r
am
m
in
g
s
k
ills
o
f
lo
wer
s
ec
o
n
d
a
r
y
s
ch
o
o
l
s
tu
d
en
ts
,
wh
ile
ex
p
lo
r
in
g
th
e
u
n
d
er
ly
in
g
r
elatio
n
s
h
ip
b
etwe
en
th
ese
two
d
o
m
ain
s
.
T
h
e
em
p
i
r
ical
ev
id
en
ce
d
em
o
n
s
tr
ates
th
at
in
teg
r
ati
n
g
an
al
o
g
ical
an
d
m
etap
h
o
r
ical
th
in
k
i
n
g
in
to
p
r
o
g
r
am
m
in
g
task
s
y
ield
s
s
u
p
er
io
r
o
u
tco
m
es c
o
m
p
ar
e
d
to
co
n
v
en
tio
n
al,
im
itatio
n
-
h
ea
v
y
i
n
s
tr
u
ctio
n
.
Fu
r
th
er
m
o
r
e,
th
e
s
tu
d
y
u
n
co
v
er
s
a
p
o
wer
f
u
l,
p
o
s
itiv
e
p
r
e
d
ictiv
e
r
elatio
n
s
h
ip
wh
er
e
cr
ea
tiv
e
ca
p
ac
ities
ac
co
u
n
t
f
o
r
ap
p
r
o
x
im
ately
5
0
.
4
%
o
f
t
h
e
v
ar
ian
ce
i
n
p
r
o
g
r
am
m
i
n
g
p
er
f
o
r
m
an
ce
.
T
h
is
p
r
o
v
es
th
at
cr
ea
tiv
e
th
in
k
i
n
g
o
p
er
ates
as
a
p
r
im
ar
y
co
g
n
iti
v
e
d
r
iv
er
f
o
r
tech
n
ical
an
d
al
g
o
r
ith
m
ic
p
r
o
b
lem
-
s
o
lv
in
g
in
co
m
p
u
ter
ed
u
ca
tio
n
.
T
h
e
f
in
d
in
g
s
o
f
f
er
s
ev
er
al
cr
i
tical
im
p
licatio
n
s
f
o
r
2
1
s
t
-
ce
n
tu
r
y
ed
u
ca
tio
n
al
r
e
f
o
r
m
an
d
class
r
o
o
m
p
r
ac
tice:
i)
p
ed
ag
o
g
ical
s
h
if
t:
co
m
p
u
ter
s
cien
ce
c
u
r
r
icu
la
m
u
s
t
tr
an
s
itio
n
awa
y
f
r
o
m
m
ec
h
an
is
tic,
r
o
te
co
d
in
g
ex
er
cises
.
I
n
s
tr
u
cto
r
s
s
h
o
u
l
d
f
o
r
m
ally
em
b
ed
g
e
n
er
ativ
e
t
h
in
k
in
g
f
r
am
ewo
r
k
s
—
s
u
ch
as
d
ir
ec
t
an
d
p
er
s
o
n
a
l
an
alo
g
ies
—
in
to
s
tan
d
ar
d
tech
n
ical
less
o
n
s
to
cu
ltiv
ate
b
o
th
tech
n
ical
liter
ac
y
an
d
cr
ea
tiv
e
co
g
n
itiv
e
ca
p
ac
it
y
s
im
u
ltan
eo
u
s
ly
;
ii)
cu
r
r
icu
lu
m
co
h
esio
n
:
ed
u
ca
tio
n
al
p
o
licy
m
ak
er
s
aim
in
g
to
f
u
lf
ill
n
atio
n
al
m
an
d
ates
r
eg
ar
d
in
g
co
m
p
u
tatio
n
al
in
n
o
v
atio
n
m
u
s
t
ac
tiv
ely
alig
n
h
ig
h
-
lev
el
p
o
licies
with
class
r
o
o
m
ac
tiv
ities
b
y
em
b
ed
d
in
g
c
o
g
n
itiv
e
f
lex
ib
ili
ty
r
u
b
r
ics
d
ir
ec
tly
in
to
STE
M
an
d
co
m
p
u
tin
g
g
r
ad
in
g
cr
i
ter
ia
;
an
d
iii)
ac
tiv
e
lear
n
in
g
e
n
v
ir
o
n
m
en
ts
:
to
f
a
cilitate
p
s
y
ch
o
m
o
to
r
an
d
c
o
g
n
itiv
e
s
k
ill
ac
q
u
is
itio
n
in
c
o
m
p
u
ter
ed
u
ca
tio
n
,
lear
n
in
g
en
v
ir
o
n
m
e
n
ts
m
u
s
t
b
e
d
esig
n
ed
to
to
ler
ate
ex
p
er
i
m
en
tatio
n
,
en
co
u
r
ag
e
d
i
v
er
g
e
n
t
p
r
o
b
lem
-
s
o
l
v
in
g
,
an
d
p
r
o
v
id
e
s
tr
u
ct
u
r
ed
f
r
am
e
wo
r
k
s
f
o
r
c
o
llab
o
r
ativ
e
r
is
k
-
ta
k
in
g
.
Desp
ite
th
ese
co
n
tr
ib
u
tio
n
s
,
ce
r
tain
lim
itatio
n
s
m
u
s
t
b
e
a
ck
n
o
wled
g
e
d
.
First,
th
is
s
tu
d
y
u
tili
ze
d
a
n
o
n
-
p
r
o
b
a
b
ilit
y
v
o
lu
n
ta
r
y
s
am
p
lin
g
m
eth
o
d
to
r
ec
r
u
it
p
a
r
ticip
an
ts
f
r
o
m
a
s
in
g
le
d
em
o
n
s
t
r
atio
n
s
ch
o
o
l,
an
d
th
e
s
am
p
le
s
ize
wa
s
r
elativ
ely
s
m
all
(
n
=6
0
)
.
B
ec
au
s
e
r
an
d
o
m
ass
ig
n
m
en
t
was
n
o
t
f
ea
s
ib
l
e,
p
o
ten
tial
s
elec
tio
n
b
ias
m
ay
b
e
p
r
esen
t;
f
o
r
in
s
tan
ce
,
s
tu
d
en
ts
wh
o
v
o
lu
n
teer
ed
m
ig
h
t
h
av
e
p
o
s
s
ess
ed
h
ig
h
er
in
itial
b
aselin
e
m
o
tiv
atio
n
,
d
is
tin
ct
p
r
io
r
lear
n
in
g
ch
ar
ac
ter
is
tics
,
o
r
g
r
ea
ter
in
ter
est
in
co
m
p
u
ter
tech
n
o
lo
g
y
th
an
th
e
g
en
er
al
s
tu
d
en
t
p
o
p
u
latio
n
.
T
h
ese
f
ac
to
r
s
m
ay
lim
it
th
e
im
m
ed
iate
in
ter
n
al
v
alid
ity
an
d
th
e
g
en
er
aliza
b
ilit
y
o
f
t
h
e
f
in
d
in
g
s
to
b
r
o
ad
er
,
m
o
r
e
d
iv
er
s
e
p
u
b
lic
s
ch
o
o
l
s
ettin
g
s
.
F
u
tu
r
e
r
esear
ch
s
h
o
u
l
d
ad
d
r
ess
th
ese
co
n
s
tr
ain
ts
b
y
em
p
lo
y
in
g
lar
g
er
,
r
an
d
o
m
ly
a
s
s
ig
n
ed
r
an
d
o
m
s
am
p
les
ac
r
o
s
s
m
u
ltip
le
g
eo
g
r
ap
h
ical
lo
ca
t
io
n
s
.
Ad
d
itio
n
ally
,
lo
n
g
itu
d
in
al
s
tu
d
ies
ar
e
r
ec
o
m
m
en
d
ed
to
tr
ac
k
th
e
lo
n
g
-
t
er
m
r
eten
tio
n
o
f
th
ese
cr
ea
ti
v
e
p
r
o
b
lem
-
s
o
lv
in
g
s
k
ills
an
d
to
e
v
alu
ate
wh
et
h
er
th
e
co
g
n
itiv
e
b
en
ef
its
o
f
Sy
n
ec
tics
tr
an
s
f
er
s
u
cc
ess
f
u
lly
to
ad
jace
n
t
tec
h
n
ical
f
ield
s
s
u
ch
as a
d
v
an
ce
d
m
ath
e
m
atics,
p
h
y
s
ics,
an
d
r
o
b
o
tics
.
Evaluation Warning : The document was created with Spire.PDF for Python.
I
SS
N
:
2
2
5
2
-
8
8
2
2
I
n
t
J
E
v
al
&
R
es E
d
u
c
,
Vo
l
.
15
,
No
.
5
,
Octo
b
er
20
26
:
4
1
1
4
-
4121
4120
ACK
NO
WL
E
DG
M
E
N
T
S
T
h
e
au
th
o
r
s
g
r
ate
f
u
lly
ac
k
n
o
wled
g
e
th
e
ex
p
er
tis
e
an
d
v
al
u
ab
le
co
n
tr
ib
u
tio
n
s
o
f
th
e
ex
p
er
t
p
an
el
,
Ass
t.
Pro
f
.
Dr
.
Kan
is
o
r
n
J
ee
k
r
ato
k
,
Ass
t.
Pro
f
.
Dr
.
Su
ttik
ar
n
B
o
jak
r
ap
an
,
an
d
Ass
t.
Pro
f
.
Nip
o
l
Su
n
g
s
u
tti
,
f
o
r
th
eir
ass
is
tan
ce
in
v
alid
atin
g
t
h
e
r
esear
ch
in
s
tr
u
m
en
ts
.
Fin
al
ly
,
th
e
a
u
th
o
r
s
th
an
k
th
e
a
d
m
i
n
is
tr
ato
r
s
,
teac
h
er
s
,
an
d
s
tu
d
e
n
ts
o
f
th
e
Dem
o
n
s
t
r
atio
n
Sch
o
o
l
o
f
U
d
o
n
T
h
a
n
i
R
ajab
h
at
Un
iv
e
r
s
ity
f
o
r
th
ei
r
co
o
p
er
atio
n
an
d
p
ar
ticip
atio
n
in
t
h
is
s
tu
d
y
.
F
UNDING
I
NF
O
R
M
A
T
I
O
N
Au
th
o
r
s
s
tate
n
o
f
u
n
d
in
g
in
v
o
lv
ed
.
AUTHO
R
CO
NT
RI
B
UT
I
O
NS ST
A
T
E
M
E
N
T
T
h
is
jo
u
r
n
al
u
s
es
th
e
C
o
n
t
r
ib
u
to
r
R
o
les
T
a
x
o
n
o
m
y
(
C
R
ed
iT)
to
r
ec
o
g
n
ize
in
d
iv
i
d
u
al
au
th
o
r
co
n
tr
ib
u
tio
n
s
,
r
ed
u
ce
au
th
o
r
s
h
ip
d
is
p
u
tes,
an
d
f
ac
ilit
ate
co
llab
o
r
atio
n
.
Na
m
e
o
f
Aut
ho
r
C
M
So
Va
Fo
I
R
D
O
E
Vi
Su
P
Fu
R
attan
awa
d
ee
Mu
en
s
r
ip
o
o
m
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Ma
n
a
So
p
a
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
C
:
C
o
n
c
e
p
t
u
a
l
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
M
:
M
e
t
h
o
d
o
l
o
g
y
So
:
So
f
t
w
a
r
e
Va
:
Va
l
i
d
a
t
i
o
n
Fo
:
Fo
r
mal
a
n
a
l
y
s
i
s
I
:
I
n
v
e
s
t
i
g
a
t
i
o
n
R
:
R
e
so
u
r
c
e
s
D
:
D
a
t
a
C
u
r
a
t
i
o
n
O
:
W
r
i
t
i
n
g
-
O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l
D
r
a
f
t
E
:
W
r
i
t
i
n
g
-
R
e
v
i
e
w
&
E
d
i
t
i
n
g
Vi
:
Vi
su
a
l
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
Su
:
Su
p
e
r
v
i
s
i
o
n
P
:
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
a
d
mi
n
i
st
r
a
t
i
o
n
Fu
:
Fu
n
d
i
n
g
a
c
q
u
i
si
t
i
o
n
CO
NF
L
I
C
T
O
F
I
N
T
E
R
E
S
T
ST
A
T
E
M
E
NT
Au
th
o
r
s
s
tate
n
o
co
n
f
lict o
f
in
t
er
est.
I
NF
O
RM
E
D
CO
NS
E
N
T
W
e
h
av
e
o
b
tain
ed
in
f
o
r
m
ed
c
o
n
s
en
t f
r
o
m
all
in
d
iv
id
u
als in
c
lu
d
ed
in
t
h
is
s
tu
d
y
.
E
T
H
I
CAL AP
P
RO
V
AL
T
h
e
r
esear
ch
r
elate
d
to
h
u
m
a
n
u
s
e
h
as
b
ee
n
co
m
p
lied
with
all
th
e
r
elev
an
t
n
atio
n
al
r
eg
u
l
atio
n
s
an
d
in
s
titu
tio
n
al
p
o
licies
in
ac
co
r
d
an
ce
with
th
e
te
n
ets
o
f
t
h
e
He
ls
in
k
i
Dec
lar
atio
n
an
d
h
as
b
ee
n
ap
p
r
o
v
e
d
b
y
th
e
au
th
o
r
s
’
in
s
titu
tio
n
al
r
e
v
iew
b
o
ar
d
,
No
.
0
6
2
2
.
7
/1
1
2
.
DATA AV
AI
L
AB
I
L
I
T
Y
Der
iv
ed
d
ata
s
u
p
p
o
r
tin
g
th
e
f
i
n
d
in
g
s
o
f
th
is
s
tu
d
y
ar
e
av
ailab
le
f
r
o
m
th
e
co
r
r
esp
o
n
d
i
n
g
au
th
o
r
[
R
M]
o
n
r
eq
u
est.
RE
F
E
R
E
NC
E
S
[
1
]
U
N
ESCO
,
R
e
i
m
a
g
i
n
i
n
g
O
u
r
Fu
t
u
res
T
o
g
e
t
h
e
r:
A
N
e
w
S
o
c
i
a
l
C
o
n
t
r
a
c
t
f
o
r
Ed
u
c
a
t
i
o
n
.
P
a
r
i
s
,
F
r
a
n
c
e
:
U
N
ES
C
O
P
u
b
l
i
s
h
i
n
g
,
2
0
2
1
.
[
2
]
O
EC
D
,
“
P
I
S
A
2
0
2
2
c
r
e
a
t
i
v
e
t
h
i
n
k
i
n
g
f
r
a
mew
o
r
k
,
”
i
n
PI
S
A
2
0
2
2
As
sess
m
e
n
t
a
n
d
A
n
a
l
y
t
i
c
a
l
Fr
a
m
e
w
o
rk
.
O
EC
D
,
E
d
.
,
P
a
r
i
s:
O
EC
D
P
u
b
l
i
s
h
i
n
g
,
2
0
2
3
,
p
p
.
1
4
0
–
1
9
6
.
[
3
]
E.
P
.
To
r
r
a
n
c
e
,
E
d
u
c
a
t
i
o
n
a
n
d
t
h
e
c
re
a
t
i
v
e
p
o
t
e
n
t
i
a
l
.
M
i
n
n
e
a
p
o
l
i
s,
M
N
:
U
n
i
v
e
r
si
t
y
o
f
M
i
n
n
e
s
o
t
a
P
r
e
ss
,
1
9
6
3
.
[
4
]
J.
P
.
G
u
i
l
f
o
r
d
,
T
h
e
n
a
t
u
r
e
o
f
h
u
m
a
n
i
n
t
e
l
l
i
g
e
n
c
e
.
N
e
w
Y
o
r
k
,
N
Y
:
M
c
G
r
a
w
-
H
i
l
l
,
1
9
6
7
.
[
5
]
E.
J.
S
i
m
p
s
o
n
,
T
h
e
c
l
a
ssi
f
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
o
f
e
d
u
c
a
t
i
o
n
a
l
o
b
j
e
c
t
i
v
e
s
i
n
t
h
e
p
s
y
c
h
o
m
o
t
o
r
d
o
m
a
i
n
.
W
a
s
h
i
n
g
t
o
n
D
C
:
G
r
y
p
h
o
n
H
o
u
se,
1
9
7
2
.
[
6
]
W
.
J.
G
o
r
d
o
n
,
S
y
n
e
c
t
i
c
s:
t
h
e
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
o
f
c
re
a
t
i
v
e
c
a
p
a
c
i
t
y
.
N
e
w
Y
o
r
k
:
H
a
r
p
e
r
a
n
d
R
o
w
,
1
9
6
1
.
[
7
]
B
.
S
.
B
l
o
o
m,
J.
T
.
H
a
st
i
n
g
s,
a
n
d
G
.
F
.
M
a
d
a
u
s,
H
a
n
d
b
o
o
k
o
n
f
o
rm
a
t
i
v
e
a
n
d
su
m
m
a
t
i
v
e
e
v
a
l
u
a
t
i
o
n
o
f
st
u
d
e
n
t
l
e
a
r
n
i
n
g
.
N
e
w
Y
o
r
k
,
NY
:
M
c
G
r
a
w
-
H
i
l
l
,
1
9
7
1
.
[
8
]
R
.
A
.
B
e
g
h
e
t
t
o
a
n
d
J
.
C
.
K
a
u
f
m
a
n
,
N
u
rt
u
ri
n
g
c
re
a
t
i
v
i
t
y
i
n
t
h
e
c
l
a
ssro
o
m
.
C
a
m
b
r
i
d
g
e
,
U
.
K
.
:
C
a
mb
r
i
d
g
e
U
n
i
v
e
r
s
i
t
y
P
r
e
ss
,
2
0
1
0
.
[
9
]
R
.
K
.
S
a
w
y
e
r
,
Ex
p
l
a
i
n
i
n
g
C
re
a
t
i
v
i
t
y
:
T
h
e
S
c
i
e
n
c
e
o
f
H
u
m
a
n
I
n
n
o
v
a
t
i
o
n
,
2
n
d
e
d
.
N
e
w
Y
o
r
k
,
N
Y
:
O
x
f
o
r
d
U
n
i
v
e
r
s
i
t
y
P
r
e
ss
,
2
0
1
2
.
[
1
0
]
J.
S
w
e
l
l
e
r
,
J.
J
.
G
.
v
a
n
M
e
r
r
i
ë
n
b
o
e
r
,
a
n
d
F
.
P
a
a
s
,
“
C
o
g
n
i
t
i
v
e
a
r
c
h
i
t
e
c
t
u
r
e
a
n
d
i
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
a
l
d
e
s
i
g
n
:
2
0
y
e
a
r
s
l
a
t
e
r
,”
E
d
u
c
a
t
i
o
n
a
l
Psy
c
h
o
l
o
g
y
R
e
v
i
e
w
,
v
o
l
.
3
1
,
p
p
.
2
6
1
–
2
9
2
,
2
0
1
9
,
d
o
i
:
1
0
.
1
0
0
7
/
s
1
0
6
4
8
-
019
-
0
9
4
6
5
-
5.
Evaluation Warning : The document was created with Spire.PDF for Python.
I
n
t
J
E
v
al
&
R
es E
d
u
c
I
SS
N:
2252
-
8
8
2
2
Th
e
r
ela
tio
n
s
h
ip
b
etw
ee
n
crea
tivity
a
n
d
p
r
o
g
r
a
mmin
g
s
kills
a
mo
n
g
lo
w
er
…
(
R
a
tta
n
a
w
a
d
ee
Mu
en
s
r
ip
o
o
m
)
4121
[
1
1
]
C
.
A
.
W
a
d
e
,
“
U
si
n
g
w
r
i
t
i
n
g
t
o
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
a
n
d
a
ssess
c
r
i
t
i
c
a
l
t
h
i
n
k
i
n
g
,
”
T
e
a
c
h
i
n
g
o
f
Ps
y
c
h
o
l
o
g
y
,
v
o
l
.
2
2
,
n
o
.
1
,
p
p
.
2
4
–
2
8
,
1
9
9
5
,
d
o
i
:
1
0
.
1
2
0
7
/
s
1
5
3
2
8
0
2
3
t
o
p
2
2
0
1
_
8
.
[
1
2
]
I
.
K
.
D
a
v
i
e
s,
T
h
e
m
a
n
a
g
e
m
e
n
t
o
f
l
e
a
r
n
i
n
g
.
L
o
n
d
o
n
,
U
.
K
.
:
M
c
G
r
a
w
-
H
i
l
l
,
1
9
7
1
.
[
1
3
]
B
.
R
.
J
o
y
c
e
,
M
.
W
e
i
l
,
a
n
d
E.
C
a
l
h
o
u
n
,
M
o
d
e
l
s
o
f
t
e
a
c
h
i
n
g
,
9
t
h
e
d
.
B
o
s
t
o
n
,
M
A
:
P
e
a
r
s
o
n
,
2
0
1
5
.
[
1
4
]
H
.
H
.
W
a
l
b
e
sser,
“
R
e
v
i
e
w
s
:
T
y
l
e
r
,
R
a
l
p
h
W
.
,
G
a
g
n
é
,
R
o
b
e
r
t
M
.
,
a
n
d
S
c
r
i
v
e
n
,
M
i
c
h
a
e
l
.
P
e
r
s
p
e
c
t
i
v
e
s
o
f
C
u
r
r
i
c
u
l
u
m
Ev
a
l
u
a
t
i
o
n
,
”
Am
e
ri
c
a
n
E
d
u
c
a
t
i
o
n
a
l
Re
s
e
a
r
c
h
J
o
u
r
n
a
l
,
v
o
l
.
5
,
n
o
.
1
,
p
p
.
1
2
0
–
12
1
,
1
9
6
8
,
d
o
i
:
1
0
.
3
1
0
2
/
0
0
0
2
8
3
1
2
0
0
5
0
0
1
1
2
0
.
[
1
5
]
A
.
J.
H
a
r
r
o
w
,
A
t
a
x
o
n
o
m
y
o
f
t
h
e
p
s
y
c
h
o
m
o
t
o
r
d
o
m
a
i
n
:
A
g
u
i
d
e
f
o
r
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
i
n
g
b
e
h
a
v
i
o
r
a
l
o
b
j
e
c
t
i
v
e
s
.
N
e
w
Y
o
r
k
,
N
Y
:
Lo
n
g
ma
n
,
1
9
7
2
.
[
1
6
]
A
.
M
.
W
e
s
t
c
o
t
t
a
n
d
J
.
A
.
S
mi
t
h
,
C
r
e
a
t
i
v
e
t
e
a
c
h
i
n
g
o
f
m
a
t
h
e
m
a
t
i
c
s
i
n
t
h
e
e
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
ry
s
c
h
o
o
l
.
B
o
s
t
o
n
,
M
A
:
A
l
l
y
n
a
n
d
B
a
c
o
n
,
1
9
6
7
.
[
1
7
]
R
.
W
i
h
a
r
si
h
,
K
u
sn
a
d
i
,
a
n
d
T.
M
.
S
o
f
a
,
“
T
h
e
e
f
f
e
c
t
o
f
t
h
e
s
y
n
e
c
t
i
c
mo
d
e
l
o
n
c
r
e
a
t
i
v
i
t
y
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
me
n
t
o
f
s
t
u
d
e
n
t
s’
d
a
n
c
e
w
o
r
k
s
,”
i
n
4
t
h
I
n
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
o
n
a
l
C
o
n
f
e
re
n
c
e
o
n
Ar
t
s
a
n
d
A
rt
s
Ed
u
c
a
t
i
o
n
(
I
C
AA
E
2
0
2
0
)
,
2
0
2
1
,
p
p
.
2
4
8
–
2
5
2
,
d
o
i
:
1
0
.
2
9
9
1
/
a
s
se
h
r
.
k
.
2
1
0
6
0
2
.
0
4
9
.
[
1
8
]
D
.
S
u
n
e
n
d
a
r
,
T.
I
.
H
a
r
d
i
n
i
,
a
n
d
I
.
S
.
K
a
r
i
ma
h
,
“
S
e
l
f
-
l
i
t
e
r
a
c
y
s
y
n
e
c
t
i
c
w
r
i
t
i
n
g
m
o
d
e
l
a
n
d
c
h
a
l
l
e
n
g
e
o
n
2
1
s
t
c
e
n
t
u
r
y
sk
i
l
l
s
,
”
i
n
Fi
f
t
h
I
n
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
o
n
a
l
C
o
n
f
e
re
n
c
e
o
n
L
a
n
g
u
a
g
e
,
L
i
t
e
ra
t
u
re,
C
u
l
t
u
re
,
a
n
d
E
d
u
c
a
t
i
o
n
(
I
C
O
L
L
I
T
E
2
0
2
1
)
,
2
0
2
1
,
p
p
.
1
6
3
–
169
,
d
o
i
:
1
0
.
2
9
9
1
/
a
sse
h
r
.
k
.
2
1
1
1
1
9
.
0
2
6
.
[
1
9
]
A
.
N
.
S
a
p
u
t
r
o
a
n
d
A
.
W
a
r
a
u
l
i
a
,
“
S
y
n
e
c
t
i
c
s
m
u
l
t
i
l
i
t
e
r
a
c
y
l
e
a
r
n
i
n
g
m
o
d
e
l
i
n
w
r
i
t
i
n
g
s
h
o
r
t
s
t
o
r
i
e
s
,
”
i
n
P
r
o
c
e
e
d
i
n
g
s
o
f
t
h
e
3
r
d
I
n
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
o
n
a
l
C
o
n
f
e
r
e
n
c
e
o
n
E
d
u
c
a
t
i
o
n
a
n
d
T
e
c
h
n
o
l
o
g
y
(
I
C
E
T
E
C
H
2
0
2
2
)
,
2
0
2
3
,
p
p
.
3
6
7
–
3
7
5
,
d
o
i
:
1
0
.
2
9
9
1
/
9
7
8
-
2
-
3
8
4
7
6
-
0
5
6
-
5
_
3
9
.
[
2
0
]
A
.
P
e
a
s
e
e
t
a
l
.
,
“
Th
e
i
mp
o
r
t
a
n
c
e
o
f
a
p
p
l
y
i
n
g
c
o
mp
u
t
a
t
i
o
n
a
l
c
r
e
a
t
i
v
i
t
y
t
o
s
c
i
e
n
t
i
f
i
c
a
n
d
mat
h
e
ma
t
i
c
a
l
d
o
ma
i
n
s,”
i
n
Pr
o
c
e
e
d
i
n
g
s
o
f
t
h
e
1
0
t
h
I
n
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
o
n
a
l
C
o
n
f
e
re
n
c
e
o
n
C
o
m
p
u
t
a
t
i
o
n
a
l
C
re
a
t
i
v
i
t
y
,
I
C
C
C
2
0
1
9
,
2
0
1
9
,
p
p
.
2
5
0
–
2
5
7
.
[
2
1
]
M
.
C
si
k
s
z
e
n
t
m
i
h
a
l
y
i
,
C
re
a
t
i
v
i
t
y
:
f
l
o
w
a
n
d
t
h
e
p
s
y
c
h
o
l
o
g
y
o
f
d
i
sc
o
v
e
ry
a
n
d
i
n
v
e
n
t
i
o
n
.
N
e
w
Y
o
r
k
,
N
Y
:
H
a
r
p
e
r
P
e
r
e
n
n
i
a
l
,
1
9
9
7
.
[
2
2
]
K
.
B
r
e
n
n
a
n
a
n
d
M
.
R
e
sn
i
c
k
,
“
N
e
w
f
r
a
mew
o
r
k
s
f
o
r
st
u
d
y
i
n
g
a
n
d
a
sse
s
si
n
g
t
h
e
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
o
f
c
o
m
p
u
t
a
t
i
o
n
a
l
t
h
i
n
k
i
n
g
,
”
i
n
Pro
c
e
e
d
i
n
g
s
o
f
t
h
e
2
0
1
2
An
n
u
a
l
Me
e
t
i
n
g
o
f
t
h
e
Am
e
r
i
c
a
n
E
d
u
c
a
t
i
o
n
a
l
R
e
se
a
rc
h
As
so
c
i
a
t
i
o
n
(
A
ERA)
,
A
p
r
.
2
0
1
2
,
p
p
.
1
–
2
5
.
[
2
3
]
R
.
I
sr
a
e
l
-
F
i
s
h
e
l
s
o
n
a
n
d
A
.
H
e
r
s
h
k
o
v
i
t
z
,
“
S
t
u
d
y
i
n
g
i
n
t
e
r
r
e
l
a
t
i
o
n
s
o
f
c
o
mp
u
t
a
t
i
o
n
a
l
t
h
i
n
k
i
n
g
a
n
d
c
r
e
a
t
i
v
i
t
y
:
A
s
c
o
p
i
n
g
r
e
v
i
e
w
(
2
0
1
1
–
2
0
2
0
)
,
”
C
o
m
p
u
t
e
rs &
E
d
u
c
a
t
i
o
n
,
v
o
l
.
1
7
6
,
p
.
1
0
4
3
5
3
,
2
0
2
2
,
d
o
i
:
1
0
.
1
0
1
6
/
j
.
c
o
m
p
e
d
u
.
2
0
2
1
.
1
0
4
3
5
3
.
[
2
4
]
S
.
G
r
o
v
e
r
a
n
d
R
.
P
e
a
,
“
C
o
m
p
u
t
a
t
i
o
n
a
l
t
h
i
n
k
i
n
g
i
n
K
–
1
2
,
”
E
d
u
c
a
t
i
o
n
a
l
Re
se
a
rc
h
e
r
,
v
o
l
.
4
2
,
n
o
.
1
,
p
p
.
3
8
–
4
3
,
Ja
n
.
2
0
1
3
,
d
o
i
:
1
0
.
3
1
0
2
/
0
0
1
3
1
8
9
X
1
2
4
6
3
0
5
1
.
[
2
5
]
S
.
Y
.
L
y
e
a
n
d
J.
H
.
L.
K
o
h
,
“
R
e
v
i
e
w
o
n
t
e
a
c
h
i
n
g
a
n
d
l
e
a
r
n
i
n
g
o
f
c
o
m
p
u
t
a
t
i
o
n
a
l
t
h
i
n
k
i
n
g
t
h
r
o
u
g
h
p
r
o
g
r
a
m
mi
n
g
:
w
h
a
t
i
s
n
e
x
t
f
o
r
K
-
1
2
?
”
C
o
m
p
u
t
e
rs
i
n
H
u
m
a
n
Be
h
a
v
i
o
r
,
v
o
l
.
4
1
,
p
p
.
5
1
–
6
1
,
D
e
c
.
2
0
1
4
,
d
o
i
:
1
0
.
1
0
1
6
/
j
.
c
h
b
.
2
0
1
4
.
0
9
.
0
1
2
.
[
2
6
]
M
.
R
e
sn
i
c
k
,
“
A
l
l
I
r
e
a
l
l
y
n
e
e
d
t
o
k
n
o
w
(
a
b
o
u
t
c
r
e
a
t
i
v
e
t
h
i
n
k
i
n
g
)
I
l
e
a
r
n
e
d
(
b
y
st
u
d
y
i
n
g
h
o
w
c
h
i
l
d
r
e
n
l
e
a
r
n
)
i
n
k
i
n
d
e
r
g
a
r
t
e
n
,
”
i
n
Pro
c
e
e
d
i
n
g
s
o
f
t
h
e
6
t
h
AC
M
S
I
G
C
H
I
C
o
n
f
e
re
n
c
e
o
n
C
r
e
a
t
i
v
i
t
y
& C
o
g
n
i
t
i
o
n
,
2
0
0
7
,
p
p
.
1
–
6
,
d
o
i
:
1
0
.
1
1
4
5
/
1
2
5
4
9
6
0
.
1
2
5
4
9
6
1
.
[
2
7
]
P
.
M
i
s
h
r
a
a
n
d
M
.
J.
K
o
e
h
l
e
r
,
“
Te
c
h
n
o
l
o
g
i
c
a
l
p
e
d
a
g
o
g
i
c
a
l
c
o
n
t
e
n
t
k
n
o
w
l
e
d
g
e
:
a
f
r
a
mew
o
r
k
f
o
r
t
e
a
c
h
e
r
k
n
o
w
l
e
d
g
e
,
”
T
e
a
c
h
e
rs
C
o
l
l
e
g
e
R
e
c
o
rd
:
T
h
e
V
o
i
c
e
o
f
S
c
h
o
l
a
rs
h
i
p
i
n
E
d
u
c
a
t
i
o
n
,
v
o
l
.
1
0
8
,
n
o
.
6
,
p
p
.
1
0
1
7
–
1
0
5
4
,
J
u
n
.
2
0
0
6
,
d
o
i
:
1
0
.
1
1
1
1
/
j
.
1
4
6
7
-
9
6
2
0
.
2
0
0
6
.
0
0
6
8
4
.
x
.
[
2
8
]
O
EC
D
,
T
h
e
f
u
t
u
re
o
f
e
d
u
c
a
t
i
o
n
a
n
d
s
k
i
l
l
s
2
0
3
0
.
P
a
r
i
s
:
O
E
C
D
P
u
b
l
i
s
h
i
n
g
,
2
0
1
8
.
[
2
9
]
M
.
U
.
B
e
r
s
,
C
o
d
i
n
g
a
s
a
p
l
a
y
g
r
o
u
n
d
:
p
r
o
g
ra
m
m
i
n
g
a
n
d
c
o
m
p
u
t
a
t
i
o
n
a
l
t
h
i
n
k
i
n
g
i
n
t
h
e
e
a
rl
y
c
h
i
l
d
h
o
o
d
c
l
a
ssro
o
m
,
2
n
d
e
d
.
N
e
w
Y
o
r
k
,
N
Y
,
U
S
A
:
R
o
u
t
l
e
d
g
e
,
2
0
2
0
.
[
3
0
]
R
.
J
.
R
o
v
i
n
e
l
l
i
a
n
d
R
.
K
.
H
a
m
b
l
e
t
o
n
,
“
O
n
t
h
e
u
se
o
f
c
o
n
t
e
n
t
sp
e
c
i
a
l
i
st
s
i
n
t
h
e
a
ss
e
ssm
e
n
t
o
f
c
r
i
t
e
r
i
o
n
-
r
e
f
e
r
e
n
c
e
d
t
e
st
i
t
e
m
v
a
l
i
d
i
t
y
,
”
D
u
t
c
h
J
o
u
rn
a
l
o
f
E
d
u
c
a
t
i
o
n
a
l
Re
s
e
a
r
c
h
,
v
o
l
.
2
,
n
o
.
2
,
p
p
.
4
9
–
6
0
,
1
9
7
7
.
[
3
1
]
J.
C
o
h
e
n
,
S
t
a
t
i
s
t
i
c
a
l
p
o
w
e
r
a
n
a
l
y
si
s
f
o
r t
h
e
b
e
h
a
v
i
o
r
a
l
sc
i
e
n
c
e
s
,
2
n
d
e
d
.
H
i
l
l
sd
a
l
e
,
N
J:
La
w
r
e
n
c
e
Er
l
b
a
u
m
A
sso
c
i
a
t
e
s,
1
9
8
8
.
B
I
O
G
RAP
H
I
E
S O
F
AUTH
O
RS
Ra
tta
n
a
wa
d
e
e
Mu
e
n
sr
ip
o
o
m
is
a
tea
c
h
e
r
a
t
th
e
De
m
o
n
stra
ti
o
n
S
c
h
o
o
l
o
f
Ud
o
n
Th
a
n
i
Ra
jab
h
a
t
Un
i
v
e
rsity
,
T
h
a
il
a
n
d
.
S
h
e
re
c
e
iv
e
d
h
e
r
Ba
c
h
e
l
o
r
o
f
Ed
u
c
a
ti
o
n
(B
.
Ed
.
)
i
n
2
0
1
5
a
n
d
h
e
r
M
a
ste
r
o
f
E
d
u
c
a
ti
o
n
(
M
.
Ed
.
)
i
n
I
n
n
o
v
a
ti
o
n
in
C
o
m
p
u
ter
E
d
u
c
a
ti
o
n
i
n
2
0
2
5
,
b
o
th
fr
o
m
Ud
o
n
T
h
a
n
i
Ra
jab
h
a
t
Un
iv
e
rsit
y
.
He
r
p
rima
ry
re
se
a
r
c
h
in
tere
sts
in
c
lu
d
e
c
o
m
p
u
ter
e
d
u
c
a
ti
o
n
,
p
e
d
a
g
o
g
ica
l
i
n
terv
e
n
t
io
n
s
fo
r
c
re
a
ti
v
it
y
,
in
str
u
c
ti
o
n
a
l
d
e
sig
n
,
a
n
d
e
n
h
a
n
c
in
g
p
r
o
g
ra
m
m
in
g
sk
il
ls
fo
r
se
c
o
n
d
a
ry
sc
h
o
o
l
stu
d
e
n
ts.
Th
is
p
a
p
e
r
is
d
e
ri
v
e
d
fr
o
m
h
e
r
m
a
ste
r
’
s
th
e
sis.
S
h
e
c
a
n
b
e
c
o
n
tac
ted
a
t
e
m
a
il
:
6
5
1
2
0
6
1
2
1
0
6
@u
d
ru
.
a
c
.
th
.
Ma
n
a
S
o
p
a
is
a
n
a
ss
istan
t
p
r
o
fe
ss
o
r
in
th
e
F
a
c
u
lt
y
o
f
Ed
u
c
a
ti
o
n
a
t
U
d
o
n
T
h
a
n
i
Ra
jab
h
a
t
Un
i
v
e
rsity
,
T
h
a
il
a
n
d
,
s
p
e
c
ializin
g
in
c
o
m
p
u
ter
e
d
u
c
a
ti
o
n
.
He
se
rv
e
d
a
s
th
e
p
ri
n
c
ip
a
l
th
e
sis
a
d
v
iso
r
fo
r
th
is
re
se
a
rc
h
.
His
e
x
p
e
rti
se
l
ies
in
e
d
u
c
a
ti
o
n
a
l
tec
h
n
o
lo
g
y
,
i
n
n
o
v
a
ti
o
n
i
n
c
o
m
p
u
ter
e
d
u
c
a
ti
o
n
,
i
n
stru
c
ti
o
n
a
l
d
e
sig
n
f
o
r
2
1
st
-
c
e
n
tu
r
y
sk
il
l
s,
a
n
d
re
se
a
rc
h
i
n
lea
rn
in
g
p
ro
c
e
ss
e
s.
He
c
a
n
b
e
c
o
n
tac
ted
a
t
e
m
a
il
:
m
a
n
a
so
p
a
@u
d
ru
.
a
c
.
th
.
Evaluation Warning : The document was created with Spire.PDF for Python.