Inter national J our nal of Recongurable and Embedded Systems (IJRES) V ol. 15, No. 3, No v ember 2026, pp. 819 ∼ 836 ISSN: 2089-4864, DOI: 10.11591/ijres.v15.i3.pp819-836 ❒ 819 Heter ogeneous inter net of things de vice inter operability using f og-based adapti v e semantic mechanism De v amekalai Nagasundaram 1 , Selv akumar Manickam 1 , Mahmood A. Al-Shar eeda 2,3 , Huda Mohammed Alsay ednoor 4 , Ali A. Y assin 5 , Shankar Karuppayah 1 1 Cybersecurity Research Centre (CYRES), Uni v ersiti Sains Malaysia, Pulau Pinang, Malaysia 2 Department of Computer Engineering T echnologies and Articial Intelligence, Basrah Engineering Polytechnic Colle ge, Southern T echnical Uni v ersity , Basra, Iraq 3 Colle ge of Engineering, Al-A yen Uni v ersity , Thi-Qar , Iraq 4 Shatt Al-Arab Uni v ersity Colle ge, Basra, Iraq 5 Department of Computer Science, Colle ge of Education for Pure Sciences, Uni v ersity of Basrah, Basrah, Iraq Article Inf o Article history: Recei v ed Apr 21, 2026 Re vised Jun 23, 2026 Accepted Sep 11, 2026 K eyw ords: Adapti v e semantic mechanism F og computing Internet of things Ontology enrichment Resource description frame w ork Semantic interoperability ABSTRA CT W ith the rapid gro wth of heterogeneous internet of things (IoT) ecosystems, insuf cient semantic interoperability caused by non-uniform communication pro- tocols, data formats, a nd semantic representations has become a core challenge in the eld. Existing cloud-based, static ontology schemes ha v e defects including high latenc y , lar ge o v erhead, and poor adapt ability . This paper proposes the dynamic semantic fog (DSF) fram e w ork, which performs semantic processing at the fog layer to achie v e real-time interoperability . The frame w ork inte grates four core modules: w orkload of oading, resource description frame w ork (RDF) generation, semantic representation, and adapti v e ontology e xpansion. It sup- ports dynamic access to ne wly added IoT de vices. T ests were completed using iF ogSim in a smart city traf c scenario. Compared with traditional cloud solu- tions, the frame w ork re duces latenc y , ener gy consumption, and netw ork usage rate by 51.7%, 41.3%, and 55.6% respecti v ely , and can support dynamic semantic interoperability for heterogeneous IoT en vironments. This is an open access article under the CC BY -SA license . Corresponding A uthor: Selv akumar Manickam Cybersecurity Research Centre (CYRES), Uni v ersiti Sains Malaysia Pulau Pinang, 11800, Malaysia Email: selv a@usm.my 1. INTR ODUCTION W ith the rapid de v elopments of internet of things (IoT) paradigms, billions of heterogeneous de vices ha v e been deplo yed in all kinds of application elds, including smart cities, inte lligent transportation syst ems, healthcare, and industria l automation [ 1 ]–[ 3 ]. The y are v ery dif ferent in their hardw are resources, communication protocols, data formats, and semantic. While this di v ersity allo ws for e xible and customized IoT deplo yments, it also poses enormous challenges in realizing seamless interoperability between de vices and services [ 4 ]–[ 6 ]. One of the k e y issues that hinder scalability and decision making in real-time is semantic interoperability , which refers to IoT systems’ capabilit y to understand and reuse unambiguously data collected from di v erse sources [ 7 ], [8]. Semantic interoperability attempts to guarantee that shared data has syntactic compatibility as well as semantics for all in v olv ed entities within the system [ 9 ], [ 10 ]. Ontology-based semantic models utilizing J ournal homepage: http://ijr es.iaescor e .com Evaluation Warning : The document was created with Spire.PDF for Python.
820 ❒ ISSN: 2089-4864 resource description frame w ork (RDF) and web ontology language (O Wl), pro vide rich e xpressi v eness and ha v e been lar gely used to combat such a challenge. Ne v ertheless, the majority of current solutions for semantic interoperability tak e as a premise static en vironments, in which de vice types are pre-dened and the ontologies are frozen [ 10 ], [ 11 ]. Assuming as such is not practical for modern IoT ecosystems, gi v en that there is a dynamic introduction of ne w de vices, data attrib utes, and services occurring [ 12 ]. In addition, most of t he e xisting semantic interoperability frame w orks use cloud-centric architecture where centralised cloud se rv er is responsible to do the semantic annotation and reasoning [ 13 ], [ 14 ]. While the cloud platforms of fer a lot of a v ailable computing resources, the y produce service latencies, netw ork o v erheads and ener gy consumption which are not suitable for light-latenc y-sensiti v e and real-time IoT deplo yments [15], [16]. F og computing has recently raised as a ne w paradigm to reply t hese chall enges by shifting cloud po wer closer to the data sources [ 17 ], [ 18 ]. F og computing, by dis trib uting computation and storage capacities to the netw ork edge, allo ws for lo w-latenc y processing and minimizes traf c to the cloud. Ho we v er , despite these merits, the state-of-the-art fog-assisted s emantic interoperability solutions still lack a simple and ef fecti v e w ay to manage dynamic adaptations in semantics [ 19 ], [ 20 ]. In most cases, fog nodes to only do partial processing and ontology handling is centralized or static, which leads to lack of scalable and adapti v e in heterogeneous IoT . Although much research progress has been achie v ed for the semantic interoperability of heterogeneous IoT systems, relying on tw o mainstream approaches—ontology-based and fog-assisted methods—core unre- solv ed limitations still persist: static ontologies require manual adaptation to support ne wly added de vices ; cloud-centric schemes suf fer from the problems of high latenc y , high o v erhead, and high ener gy consumption; and the ontology e v olution of emer ging fog-assisted approaches still has k e y a ws, remaining either static or o v erly reliant on cloud-side resources. T o address the limi tations of e xisting research, this paper proposes the dynamic semantic fog (DSF) frame w ork, which performs semantic processing directly at the fog layer to achie v e real-time semantic interop- erability and inte grates four core functions into a unied fog-based architecture, setting it apart f rom e xisting similar solutions. The no v elty of this w ork can be summarized as follo ws: − This paper proposes a semantic frame w ork for delay-sensiti v e IoT systems, which mo v es the full semantic processing w orko w—co v ering RDF generation and ontology management—from cloud serv ers to fog nodes, and can signicantly reduce service latenc y and netw ork o v erhead. − Compared with traditional static ontology systems, the dynamic ontology enhancement mechanism proposed in this paper can automatically inte grate ne w elements during operation, and requires no human interv ention throughout the entire process. − The DSF proposed in this paper inte grates four core modules: w orkload of oading, semantic represen- tation, RDF graph construction, and ontology e v olution, to achie v e scalable and self-e v olving semantic interoperability . − As v eried through e xperiments, the ne w service mechanism proposed in this paper deli v ers a 50% reduction in service delay compared to tradit ional cloud-based semantic interoperability solutions, while also impro vi ng ener gy ef cienc y and reducing netw ork utilization. The remainder of this paper is or g anized as follo ws. Section 2 re vie ws e xisting w ork on semant ic interoperability and fog-assisted IoT frame w orks. Section 3 sho ws system model and research problem of this w ork. Section 4 presents the proposed fog-based adapti v e semantic mechanism and describes its architectural components in detail. Section 5 discusses the e xperimental setup, e v aluation methodology , the performance results and comparati v e analysis. Finally , section 6 concludes the paper and outlines directions for future research. 2. RELA TED W ORK Interoperability is a well kno wn issue of IoT systems because of the heterogeneity present in de vices, communication protocols, data formats and application domains. In response to this challenge, se v eral researches ha v e e xplored interoperability under the terms de vice, netw ork, syntactic, platform, and semantic interoperability . Of these dimensions, semantic interoperability stands out as the most important one since it not only allo ws data e xchange b ut also f acilitates a mutual understanding of the semantics of data among heterogeneous IoT artif acts. The primary ef f orts for semantic interoperability in IoT are based on ontology-based methods that represent domain kno wledge using semantic technologies (such as RDF and O WL) [ 20 ]–[ 22 ]. These methods enable an uniform and machine-readable representation of IoT data which enables semantic reasoning and Int J Recongurable & Embedded Syst, V ol. 15, No. 3, No v ember 2026: 819–836 Evaluation Warning : The document was created with Spire.PDF for Python.
Int J Recongurable & Embedded Syst ISSN: 2089-4864 ❒ 821 inter -domain data inte gration. Ho we v er , the maj ority of ontology-based approaches consider a static en vironment in which the de vice types are pre dened and constant ontological structures are used [ 23 ]–[ 25 ]. The y are thus not easily amenable to dynamic IoT scenarios where ne w de vices, data attrib utes and services are constantly added, calling for cumbersome ontology update and reconguration [26], [27]. In order to cope with scalability and processing issues of IoT de vices, a number of w orks ha v e been proposed which use cloud-based semantic interoperability fra me w orks [ 28 ]. In the prior art systems, IoT data is sent to centralized cloud serv ers for both semantic annotati on and reasoning services as well as interoperability [ 29 ]–[ 30 ]. Although cloud-based systems pro vide plentiful computing capacity and gl o ba l kno wledge retention, the y come at the cost of serious constraints for real-time IoT applications [ 31 ], [ 32 ]. In particular , the ra w data is transmitted to the cloud continuously whic h incurs higher service delay , e xcessi v e netw ork traf c and more ener gy consumption and therefore is not viable for applications with lo w latenc y requir ement lik e smart transportation, smart healthcare auditory IoT , and industrial IoT . A more recent paradigm, fog computing, aims at o v ercoming some of these dra wbacks and of f ers a platform between the IoT de vices and the cloud [ 26 ], [ 32 ]. F og-aided semantic interoperability frame w orks also push some of the semantic processing to w ards data sources by deplo ying semantic services at fog nodes [ 33 ], [ 34 ]. The current fog-based solutions sho w better performance in latenc y reduction and bandwidth utili zation than cloud-alone based approach. Ho we v er , man y of these solutions are still b uilt on static ontologies or partial semantic reasoning at the fog layer , with intensi v e reasoning and ontology e v olution is cloud-centric. Their payof f with full dynamic semantic interoperation is therefore v ery constrained [35]–[37]. Moreo v er , some research use s semantic netw orks or h ybrid semantic approaches to model IoT kno wl- edge. Although the y are easy for human visualization and hierarchical kno wledge representation, semantic netw orks do not ha v e formal semantics and reasoning support as ontology-based methods [ 38 ]–[ 40 ]. This limitation therefore limits the applicability of DCRAPs in lar ge-scale and heterogeneous IoT scenarios where consistent interpretation and e xtensibility are important [41], [42]. Building on the rele v ant discussions in the preceding te xt, this study identies three core research g aps in the eld of IoT semantic processing: t he lack of mechanisms to dynamically inte grate ne w IoT de vices at runtime, e xcessi v e reliance on cloud processing that triggers increases in latenc y , netw ork o v erhead and ener gy consumption, and the f ailure to le v erage fog computing resources to support adapti v e semantic reasoning. There remain unaddressed research g aps in the heterogeneous IoT domain. There is an ur gent need for a fog-based semantic frame w ork equipped with the capabilities of local semantic processing, dynamic ontology e xpansion, and runtime semantic adaptation. This paper proposes a fog-based adapti v e semantic mechanism deplo yed at the fog layer , which inte grates four core modules including w orkload of oading, RDF generation, and semantic representation. Its core goal is to achie v e scalable, ener gy-ef ci ent r eal-time semantic interoperability for heterogeneous IoT systems. T able 1 summarizes the dif ferences between representati v e semantic interoperability approaches and the proposed DSF frame w ork. T able 1. Comparison of e xisting semantic interoperability frame w orks and the proposed DSF Frame w ork F og-based RDF at fog Dynamic ontology Runtime de vice inte gration Ontology-based methods × × × × Cloud-based semantic frame w orks × × × P artial F og semantic web frame w orks ✓ P artial × P artial Dyno-IoT [23] × × ✓ P artial Pr oposed DSF ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ 3. SYSTEM MODEL AND PR OBLEM DEFINITION This section presents the system model under study and formulates the problem of dynamic semantic interoperability in heterogeneous IoT . The proposed model sets the assumptions, architectural background and design considerations to which the fog-based adapti v e semantic mechanism refers. 3.1. System model The system model used in this paper is presented as a series of logical steps that indicate ho w disparate IoT data are generated, processed and semantically interpreted within the en visioned IoT –fog–cloud model, as sho wn in Figure 1. Heter o g eneous internet of things de vice inter oper ability using fo g-based ... (De vamekalai Na gasundar am) Evaluation Warning : The document was created with Spire.PDF for Python.
822 ❒ ISSN: 2089-4864 − Heterogeneous IoT data generation: thousands of not similar IoT de vices, such as temperature sensors and actuators, are scattered in the tar get en vironment (e.g., smart city use cases). These de vices produce continuous streams of data that emplo y v arious formats, names, units and schemas. − Data transmission to fog nodes: the IoT de vices send their data to t he nearest fog node o v er their def ault communication infrastructure. The basic netw orking interoperation is presumed to already e xist that permits de vices to communicate without conicts in a protocol-le v el conte xt. − F og node reception and resource a v ailabili ty: each fog node has limited computational and storage capacity , serving as middle processing tier between IoT de vices and cloud. F og nodes are constantly tracking their resource utilization and service queue lengths, in terms of both CPU usage, a v ailable memory , and task queues. − Local data processing at the fog tab: when recei ving the data, fog nodes locally process (i.e., pack etize, transform, lter , and e xamine) them. This process operates as a lter to normalise and v alidate ra w data which is of di v erse qualitati v e character prior to semantic processing. − Semantic encoding and ontology interaction: transformed data into RDF-based semantic representations and link ed with the local ontology . In case the incoming data cannot be entirely mapped into a v ailable ontology concept, the dynamic enrichment process will be initiated to dynamically update semantic model. − Selecti v e cloud interaction: only semantically digested, annotated, or non-time-sensiti v e data are transmitted to the cloud tier for archi v al or w orldwide analytics. Latenc y-sensiti v e semantic interoperability tasks are k ept at the fog layer for real-time responsi v eness. − Continuous system e v olution: with the ne w de vices and types of data, the system can update its ontologies and semantic mappings in runtime completely automatic which allo ws to pro vide a scalable and dynamic semantic interoperability without requiring manual reconguration of all de vices. Figure 1. Ov erall system model of the proposed fog-based adapti v e semantic interoperability mechanism The proposed architecture f acili tates agile semantic interoperability by partitioning the processing responsibilities across IoT , fog, and cloud layers in an hierarchical f ashion emphasizing lo w latenc y , scalability , and recongurability in heterogeneous IoT platforms. 3.2. Pr oblem denition Although it is being widely applied in IoT systems lar ge scale semantic technologies, current solutions to semantic interoperability ha v e some weaknesses particularly when considering real-time and lar ge and Int J Recongurable & Embedded Syst, V ol. 15, No. 3, No v ember 2026: 819–836 Evaluation Warning : The document was created with Spire.PDF for Python.
Int J Recongurable & Embedded Syst ISSN: 2089-4864 ❒ 823 heterogeneous scenarios. These problems may be formulated as follo ws: − High service delay: the e xplanation is that cloud-based semantic interoperability solutions implies sending data to remote serv ers for sem antic-related processing, with a consequent high latenc y inadequate for real-time IoT applications. − Excessi v e netw ork usage: when ra w or minimally processed IoT data are sent to the cloud, high bandwidth usage and netw ork o v erload can result, allo wing for deplo yment scenarios featuring man y de vices. − High ener gy consumption: frequent long range wireless communication and central semantic computation lead to high ener gy consumption, which is not sustainable for IoT systems. − No dynamic semantic adaptability: other approaches use x ed ontologi es for which manual changes are required as ne w de vices and data types emer ge, making the model unt for e v olving IoT ecosystems with dynamic contents. Ag ainst this background, the problem being considered in this study can be formulated as follo ws: ho w to realize dynamic semantic interoperability in heterogeneous IoT systems with the requirement of ef cient delay , ef fecti v e lessening of netw ork o v erhead and po wer consumption as well as adapti v e inte gration of ne w de vices and semantics simultaneously? T o this end, the proposed method utilises fog computing to push do wn semantic processing into data sources and introduces an adapti v e ontology enrichment capability that enables a dynamic e v olution of the semantic model. This fusion all o w performance ef fecti v e, scalable, and real-time semantic interoperability in Heterogeneous IoT systems. 4. PR OPOSED FOG-B ASED AD APTIVE SEMANTIC MECHANISM In this section, we introduce our proposed fog-based adapti v e semantic mechanism called the DSF for supporting runtime and dynamic interoperability among heterogeneous IoT de vices t o alle viate service delay , netw ork utilization cost and ener gy consumption by of oading ontology processing from resource-constrained de vices to their neighboring fog nodes. The DSF model in v olv es: i) w orkload shifting in fog layers, ii) data getting in appropriate formats and semanti c representation, iii) creation of RDF graph database, and i v) e xible ontology e xtension for the automatic inte gration of ne w de vices or data sources. 4.1. Ov erall ar chitectur e The fog-based adapt i v e semantic mechanism is al so composed of three layers (IoT layer , fog layer , and cloud layer) to dri v e dynamic implementation of semantic interoperability in IoT h ybrid en vironments, as sho wn in Figure 2. This design is based on the f act that semantic processing is placed in the fog layer to eliminate such shortcomings of cloud-centric architect ures as a trick y o v erhead associated with high response time and e xcessi v e netw ork usage and ener gy consumption in real-time IoT applications. − IoT layer: heterogeneous de vices s uch as sensors, actuators and smart objects produce data in v arious formats (e.g., JSON, XML, and CSV), b ut also semantic represe ntations. W e assume that these de vices ha v e already established basic netw orking interoperability , and t he y mainly concentrate on sensing data and transmitting the data with less local processing resulting from resource limitations. − The fog layer: is the heart of the presented mechanism. F og nodes are located near the IoT de vices and ha v e moderate computing po wer and storage. This layer in v olv es semantic processing modules: w orkload of oading, data fetching and interpretation, generation of the RDF representation and adapti v e ontology enrichment. By performing these tasks locally , the fog layer enables lo w-latenc y semantic inference, reduces traf c to cloud services and allo ws for easy inclusion of ne w de vices or data modalities into the semantic model in a dynamic w ay . − Cloud layer: the cloud layer is an auxiliary component in char ge of data storage, historical analysis and global systems management. On-demand non-time-sensiti v e tasks or compressed semantic summaries can then be sent to the cloud. Ho we v er , the architecture is designed to be independent of cloud as much as possible for a real-time semantic interoperation to pre v ent potential performance bottleneck. The o v erall layered architecture ensures that the semantic int eroperability is dynamically and ef c iently realized in an intelligence dispersed manner o v er IoT–fog–cloud continuum. The fog-dri v en approach supports dynamic scalability , enhances the responsi v eness for real-time services and yields a persistent solution to cope with semantic heterogeneity in lar ge-scale IoT systems. Heter o g eneous internet of things de vice inter oper ability using fo g-based ... (De vamekalai Na gasundar am) Evaluation Warning : The document was created with Spire.PDF for Python.
824 ❒ ISSN: 2089-4864 Figure 2. Three-layer IoT -fog-cloud architecture of the proposed fog-based adapti v e semantic mechanism [ 26 ] 4.2. Node w orkload ofoading module The fog node w orkload of oading module is a k e y b uilding block of the proposed fog-based adapti v e semantic mechanism, in char ge of e x ecuting semantic processing tasks so that real-time requirements are met and resource utilization is optimized, as sho wn in Figure 3. Because it is computationally intensi v e in ontological reasoning and RDF generation, to mak e all semantic logic operations occurring at the cloud side will result in service delay and o v erhead. T o o v ercome this challenge, the proposed system prefers to perform fog-side processing for latenc y-sensiti v e tasks and can dynamically upload unnecessary data to cloud when possible. Figure 3. Design of the fog node w orkload of oading module for adapti v e semantic processing The of oading module w orks in a round-robin f ashion w atches the resource status for fog nodes and cate gorizes incoming semantic w orkloads, depending on their ur genc y and computational needs. Operations, such as data parsing and ltering, R DF formation and ontology updat e are considered of high priority and the y are performed locally at the fog le v el for immediate semantic interpretation. Ho we v er , tasks that are demandingly computationally hea vy or non-real-time ones (e.g., lar ge-scale historical reasoning and long-term analytics) can be pushed to the cloud layer in order not to o v erload resource within a fog. The fog node w orkload of oading module comprises: − W orkload discriminator: recognizes dif ferent semantic processing tasks and assigns them a real-time require- ment and computation comple xity based on their nature. − Resource monitor: monitors fog node resourc es (CPU usage, memory a v ailability , and task queue length) at e v ery instant of time. − Of oading decision engine: decides whether a task is best e x ecuted locally or of oaded to the cloud by considering a v ailable resources and quality of service constraints. − Ex ecution scheduler: the e x ecution scheduler or g ani zes to run accepted tasks ef ciently and within the deadline. By introducing intelligent task placement and adapti v e of oading, this module can greatly decreas e the Int J Recongurable & Embedded Syst, V ol. 15, No. 3, No v ember 2026: 819–836 Evaluation Warning : The document was created with Spire.PDF for Python.
Int J Recongurable & Embedded Syst ISSN: 2089-4864 ❒ 825 service delay and netw ork traf c-consuming meanwhile k eeping high semantic processing accurac y . Addition- ally , the of oading strate gy from fog-based systems i mpro v es its scalability by a v oiding an y cloud bottleneck and additionally f acilitates the simple addition of ne w IoT de vices and semantic w orkloads to the system as it gro ws. 4.3. Data pr ocur ement and r epr esentation The data procurement and representation is in char ge of collecting data from the heterogeneous IoT streams, which is then put into homogeneous semantically mea ningful form to be used for follo wing steps including RDF generation and ontology enrichment, as sho wn in Figure 4. Ne w da ta may be of dif f erent syntax, format, measurement units and le v el of detail according to the lar ge num b e r of IoT pro viders and type of de vices. This layer allo ws for ra w de vice stream information to be normalized, v a lidated and ltere d before it is processed semantically on the fog, minimising redundant computation and netw ork traf c to w ards cloud. Figure 4. Design of the data procurement and representation module for heterogeneous IoT data processing This module, as depicted throughout the paper , consists of three consecuti v e stages: data parsing and transformation, data ltration, and data inspection. The combi nation of all these steps allo ws a highly ef fecti v e processing of heterogeneous data in the sense that semantics is preserv ed. − Data parser and t ransformation: the data parser detects the syntactic structures of input records (i.e., JSON, XML, or CSV), and prunes irrele v ant elds. The transformation f actor subsequently describes these attrib utes in a normalized internal representation of the name con v e ntions, data types, and measuring units. This stage gi v es an homogeneous structure of the data, so that is easier to perform semantic mapping and RDF generation. − Data ltration: the reduction stage lters out redundant, incomplete, and irrele v ant data records to reduce the processing o v erhead and netw ork ut ilisation. Filtering rules could check for duplicate remo v al, v alue-based thresholds and/or application-specic attrib ute pruning. Through early dropping of unnecessary information, the proposed scheme can ef ciently support real-time IoT applications with lo w latenc y . − Data inspection: the data re vie w process checks normalized records for consistenc y and completeness before semantic encoding. It tests for the presenc e of required elements, v alidates range, and forms structure. This ensures that i ncorrect or inconsistent data do not propag ate into the semantic layer a nd ultimately impro v es the reliability of ontology enrichment and reasoning operations. As a result, the data procurement and representation module is mainly responsible to act as an interf ace between ra w poorly-structure d IoT data forms and the semantic interoperability space by sharing clean, normalised and sem antically meaningful data to pass for RDF generation and ontology processing on fog layer . 4.4. Resour ce description framew ork generation and semantic r epr esentation Con v erts IoT data into machine underst andable semantic format, RDF . RDF is a standard and e x- tensible data model that can achie v e semantic i nteroperability by formatting information in the triples of subject–predicate–object, as sho wn in Figure 5. Such a representation entails that heterogeneous IoT de vices and services communicate with shared meaning, re g ardless of natural metadata formats or manuf acturer . In this module, after normalization and v alidation of the data processed in the pre vious module, the fog node starts semantic encoding by capturing conte xtual meta data and mapping de vice observ ations to concepts within the ontology . Performing RDF generation in the fog layer can bring do wn semantic proces sing time and reduce ra w data transmission to the cloud. The procedure to deri v e the RDF in v olv es a number of stages. − Metadata e xtraction: the e xtracted metadata contained, including de vice IDs, timestamps, location informa- tion, follo wed by measurement units and conte xtual tags. Heter o g eneous internet of things de vice inter oper ability using fo g-based ... (De vamekalai Na gasundar am) Evaluation Warning : The document was created with Spire.PDF for Python.
826 ❒ ISSN: 2089-4864 − Metadata annotation: it refers to relating of e xtracted metadata with ontology classes and properties by means of predened v ocab ularies and semantic rules. This action pro vides uniform interpretation of data in di v erse sources. − RDF-triples construction: for each v alidated data observ ation, we encode i t into an RDF triples structure, linking the entities of de vices, their observ ed v alues, and conte xt attrib utes in a graph form. The produced RDF graph creates a homogeneous semantic layer for supporting semantic querying, reasoning and interoperability servi ces. Using a unied semantic representation for IoT data, the proposed mid- dle w are supports coherent inte gration of ne w de vices and data types without an y need of manual reconguration. In addition, the RDF based semanti c representa tion enables scalabi lity and e xtensibility as ne w semantic relations can be added dynamically by ontology enrichment. This creates a common semantic understanding of things across IoT–fog–cloud continuum and this formulation forms the base for dynamic semantic interoperability in our system. Figure 5. Softw are architecture of the RDF generation and semantic representation module at the fog layer 4.5. Adapti v e ontology enrichment The adapt i v e ontology enrichment is the crux of the proposed fog-based adapti v e semantic mechanism, allo wing for dynamic semantic interoperability in heterogeneous IoT en vironments. In contrast to static semantic approaches based on a priori and x ed ontologies, this module permits the ontology to nati v ely gro w at runtime by assimilating ne w de vices, attrib utes and relationships as the y appear , as sho wn in Figure 6. By performing the ontology enrichment in fog, proposed approach enables real-time adaptabilit y with no latenc y and o v erhead requirements of cloud-based ontology management. The enrichment process is initial ised when the incoming IoT data cannot be completely related with e xisting ontology classes or properties. In such cases, the fog node autonomously process data structure and semantics, update the ontology appropriately , and distrib utes such ne w kno wledge in order to potentially ha v e it reused later on. This capacity allo ws for the inte gration of ne w de vices and data types without manual ef fort. The enrichment is acti v ated whene v er there are incoming IoT messages that cannot be correctly annotated with an e xisting ontology class or property . In this situation, the fog node processes on its o wn the structure and meaning of the data it recei v es, updating its ontology accordingly , and sa ving ne w kno wledge to reuse in later occasions. This ability allo ws for the automatic inclusion of ne w or unkno wn de vices and data types with minimal human interv ention. − Attrib ute mapping: attrib ute mapping matches incoming data elds to ontology attrib utes. Kno wn at trib utes are straightforw ardly mapped to kno wn terms while the unkno wn ones are analyzed in the light of conte xt and string simi larity for ndi ng appropriate sem antic representations. When v alidated, ne w attrib utes mapping is re gistered to ha v e dra wers interpret future streams reliably . − Primary subject identication: this stage determines the main semant ic subject of arri ving data, for e xample a particular sensor , de vice or monitored object. Accurate subject identication guarantees that the ne wly Int J Recongurable & Embedded Syst, V ol. 15, No. 3, No v ember 2026: 819–836 Evaluation Warning : The document was created with Spire.PDF for Python.
Int J Recongurable & Embedded Syst ISSN: 2089-4864 ❒ 827 generated RDF triples are connected to the right ontology instances so as not to disturb semantic coherence throughout the kno wledge graph (KG). − Ontology class assessment and identi cation: for ne w de vice types or application domains, it is e xamined whether an appropriate ontological class already e xists for data pro vided. Whe n no appropriate class is retrie v ed, we create a ne w class and insert it in the ontol o gy by creating subclass relationships. Appropriate features and constraints are then assigned to the ne w class gi v en observ ed data attrib utes. − Mapping representation and class v erication: the v eried attrib ute and class mappings are formally articu- lated as ontology-grounded statements. The v erication step ensuring the consistenc y and correctness of ne wly added classes, properties with respect to the ontology constraints such as domain/range restrictions. − Ontology enrichment and update: nally , the ontology is e xtended with the ne wly v alidated classes, properties and relations. This information w ould allo w the system to understand semantically subsequent data coming from an y ne w inserted de vice automatically . Such an adapti v e enrichment procedure allo ws to be scalable, v endor independent and e v olv e the IoT ecosystem, seamlessly . Figure 6. Process o w of the adapti v e ontology enrichment module enabling dynamic semantic interoperability at the fog layer In this re g ard, the proposed mechanism can achie v e real-time semantic interoperability in a true dynamic manner through its autonomous ontology e v olution at fog layer which is a mandatory requirement for critical and lar ge-scale deplo yments of IoT . Heter o g eneous internet of things de vice inter oper ability using fo g-based ... (De vamekalai Na gasundar am) Evaluation Warning : The document was created with Spire.PDF for Python.
828 ❒ ISSN: 2089-4864 5. RESUL TS AND PERFORMANCE AN AL YSIS In this section, we introduce the e xperimental results and performance analysis on fog-based adapti v e semantic mechanism. The e v aluation aims at judging whether the performance concerning the semantic interoperability performs an y better when it comes to implementing that in fog layer instead of re gular cloud- based semantic solutions. Performance is objecti v ely e v aluated through three metrics – service delay , ener gy consumption and, the netw ork usage. Such metrics are particularly important for real-time and/or massi v e-scale IoT applications that focus on demands of lo w latenc y , resource usage ef cienc y , and scalability . 5.1. Experimental setup The ef f ecti v eness of the proposed fog-based adapti v e semantic mechanism w as tested with a simulation- dri v en e xperimental platform to w ork under e v aluation in relation with enabling dynamic IoT en vironments for hetere geneous sementic interoperability . The e xperiments were performed based on the iF ogSim simulator , a popular toolkit to simulate and analyze fog and edge computing en vironments, as sho wn in Figure 7. A smart city traf c management scenario w as chosen as an instance of a real and data intensi v e w orkload in the IoT , including de vices with heterogeneity , real-time data streams, and latenc y sensiti v e a pp l ications. F og nodes were located near to IoT de vices and process semantic tasks, whereas the cloud layer w as utilized for non-real-time analytics as well as long-term storage. Figure 7. DSF implementation simulation topology F or a f air and replicable e v aluation, the simulation parameters, hardw are settings, and softw are en vironment were preserv ed during all e xperiments. The performance of the proposed mechanism w as assessed in terms of service delay , netw ork utilization, and ener gy usage. These st atistics sho w the benet of ha ving semantic processing being done in the fog as opposed to a cloud-centric method. The full hardw are and softw are specications of the e xperimental platform are sho wn in T able 2. T able 2. Hardw are and softw are specication of the e xperimental setup Component Specication Simulation tool iF ogSim Programming language Ja v a IoT application scenario Smart city traf c management F og node CPU Multi-core processor (GHz range) F og node memory Congured for semantic processing w orkloads Operating system Linux-based en vironment Data formats JSON, XML, and CSV Ev aluation metrics Service delay , netw ork usage, and ener gy consumption 5.2. Ser vice delay analysis Service delay is ho w long IoT data, from the time data are generated to a de vice until a sema ntic response being issued, is processed end-to-end. This measure consists of communication latenc y , semantic processing delay , and decision-making time, it has amen in v olv ed into i mportant aspect for real-time IoT applications (i.e. intelligent transport management systems). Int J Recongurable & Embedded Syst, V ol. 15, No. 3, No v ember 2026: 819–836 Evaluation Warning : The document was created with Spire.PDF for Python.